diff options
author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2023-07-29 04:35:31 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2023-08-31 21:08:16 +0300 |
commit | e18c5429e0c4bf7b550211245dcbfc61e71a7e6f (patch) | |
tree | 62657b61e455e13008fd67d0f7e88057dfffc697 /arch/x86 | |
parent | 7b574863e71833b5a4907245c1d95e76d507b984 (diff) | |
download | linux-e18c5429e0c4bf7b550211245dcbfc61e71a7e6f.tar.xz |
KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking
When adding/removing gfns to/from write-tracking, assert that mmu_lock
is held for write, and that either slots_lock or kvm->srcu is held.
mmu_lock must be held for write to protect gfn_write_track's refcount,
and SRCU or slots_lock must be held to protect the memslot itself.
Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729013535.1070024-26-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c index dd6765bc385e..2c6b912072b7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ */ #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt +#include <linux/lockdep.h> #include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <linux/rculist.h> @@ -77,9 +78,6 @@ static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that * page will be intercepted. * - * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu - * or kvm->slots_lock. - * * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in. * @slot: the @gfn belongs to. * @gfn: the guest page. @@ -87,6 +85,11 @@ static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn) { + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); + + lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&kvm->slots_lock) || + srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->srcu)); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))) return; @@ -107,9 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn); * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception * of corresponding access on that page. * - * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu - * or kvm->slots_lock. - * * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in. * @slot: the @gfn belongs to. * @gfn: the guest page. @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn); void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn) { + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); + + lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&kvm->slots_lock) || + srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->srcu)); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))) return; |