diff options
author | Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> | 2021-09-03 01:00:26 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-03 19:58:17 +0300 |
commit | a7259df7670240ee03b0cfce8a3e5d3773911e24 (patch) | |
tree | 5ebc8853e9b52196d42fa397fc298bb1cacb9019 /arch/x86/mm | |
parent | 38b031dd4d03542d963eebe600d67ea34f47eb65 (diff) | |
download | linux-a7259df7670240ee03b0cfce8a3e5d3773911e24.tar.xz |
memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private
There are a lot of uses of memblock_find_in_range() along with
memblock_reserve() from the times memblock allocation APIs did not exist.
memblock_find_in_range() is the very core of memblock allocations, so any
future changes to its internal behaviour would mandate updates of all the
users outside memblock.
Replace the calls to memblock_find_in_range() with an equivalent calls to
memblock_phys_alloc() and memblock_phys_alloc_range() and make
memblock_find_in_range() private method of memblock.
This simplifies the callers, ensures that (unlikely) errors in
memblock_reserve() are handled and improves maintainability of
memblock_find_in_range().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210816122622.30279-1-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [arm64]
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shtuemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [ACPI]
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr> [riscv]
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/init.c | 23 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 5 |
3 files changed, 19 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c index 75ef19aa8903..23a14d82e783 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c @@ -127,14 +127,12 @@ __ref void *alloc_low_pages(unsigned int num) unsigned long ret = 0; if (min_pfn_mapped < max_pfn_mapped) { - ret = memblock_find_in_range( + ret = memblock_phys_alloc_range( + PAGE_SIZE * num, PAGE_SIZE, min_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT, - max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT, - PAGE_SIZE * num , PAGE_SIZE); + max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT); } - if (ret) - memblock_reserve(ret, PAGE_SIZE * num); - else if (can_use_brk_pgt) + if (!ret && can_use_brk_pgt) ret = __pa(extend_brk(PAGE_SIZE * num, PAGE_SIZE)); if (!ret) @@ -610,8 +608,17 @@ static void __init memory_map_top_down(unsigned long map_start, unsigned long addr; unsigned long mapped_ram_size = 0; - /* xen has big range in reserved near end of ram, skip it at first.*/ - addr = memblock_find_in_range(map_start, map_end, PMD_SIZE, PMD_SIZE); + /* + * Systems that have many reserved areas near top of the memory, + * e.g. QEMU with less than 1G RAM and EFI enabled, or Xen, will + * require lots of 4K mappings which may exhaust pgt_buf. + * Start with top-most PMD_SIZE range aligned at PMD_SIZE to ensure + * there is enough mapped memory that can be allocated from + * memblock. + */ + addr = memblock_phys_alloc_range(PMD_SIZE, PMD_SIZE, map_start, + map_end); + memblock_free(addr, PMD_SIZE); real_end = addr + PMD_SIZE; /* step_size need to be small so pgt_buf from BRK could cover it */ diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index e94da744386f..a1b5c71099e6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -376,15 +376,14 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void) cnt++; size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]); - phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped), - size, PAGE_SIZE); + phys = memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, 0, + PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped)); if (!phys) { pr_warn("Warning: can't allocate distance table!\n"); /* don't retry until explicitly reset */ numa_distance = (void *)1LU; return -ENOMEM; } - memblock_reserve(phys, size); numa_distance = __va(phys); numa_distance_cnt = cnt; diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c index 87d77cc52f86..737491b13728 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c @@ -447,13 +447,12 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt) if (numa_dist_cnt) { u64 phys; - phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped), - phys_size, PAGE_SIZE); + phys = memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_size, PAGE_SIZE, 0, + PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped)); if (!phys) { pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate copy of distance table, disabling emulation\n"); goto no_emu; } - memblock_reserve(phys, phys_size); phys_dist = __va(phys); for (i = 0; i < numa_dist_cnt; i++) |