summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>2011-02-21 08:54:41 +0300
committerLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2011-03-22 05:59:06 +0300
commit885b976fada5bc6595a9fd3e67e3cb1a3d11f50b (patch)
tree8b598bd3b265c0bbe8237e129410fdc80fe7847a /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c
parentdd9c1549edef02290edced639f67b54a25abbe0e (diff)
downloadlinux-885b976fada5bc6595a9fd3e67e3cb1a3d11f50b.tar.xz
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1, 2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow, reader 1 reader 2 1 2 3 4 -1 -1 where -1 signals there is no more record ID. Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any record even they are not cleared by anyone. This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple users. To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID available. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c42
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c
index 8209472b27a5..83930deec3c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-apei.c
@@ -106,24 +106,34 @@ int apei_write_mce(struct mce *m)
ssize_t apei_read_mce(struct mce *m, u64 *record_id)
{
struct cper_mce_record rcd;
- ssize_t len;
-
- len = erst_read_next(&rcd.hdr, sizeof(rcd));
- if (len <= 0)
- return len;
- /* Can not skip other records in storage via ERST unless clear them */
- else if (len != sizeof(rcd) ||
- uuid_le_cmp(rcd.hdr.creator_id, CPER_CREATOR_MCE)) {
- if (printk_ratelimit())
- pr_warning(
- "MCE-APEI: Can not skip the unknown record in ERST");
- return -EIO;
- }
-
+ int rc, pos;
+
+ rc = erst_get_record_id_begin(&pos);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+retry:
+ rc = erst_get_record_id_next(&pos, record_id);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+ /* no more record */
+ if (*record_id == APEI_ERST_INVALID_RECORD_ID)
+ goto out;
+ rc = erst_read(*record_id, &rcd.hdr, sizeof(rcd));
+ /* someone else has cleared the record, try next one */
+ if (rc == -ENOENT)
+ goto retry;
+ else if (rc < 0)
+ goto out;
+ /* try to skip other type records in storage */
+ else if (rc != sizeof(rcd) ||
+ uuid_le_cmp(rcd.hdr.creator_id, CPER_CREATOR_MCE))
+ goto retry;
memcpy(m, &rcd.mce, sizeof(*m));
- *record_id = rcd.hdr.record_id;
+ rc = sizeof(*m);
+out:
+ erst_get_record_id_end();
- return sizeof(*m);
+ return rc;
}
/* Check whether there is record in ERST */