diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-07-07 04:38:31 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-07-07 04:38:31 +0300 |
commit | c136b84393d4e340e1b53fc7f737dd5827b19ee5 (patch) | |
tree | 985a1bdfafe7ec5ce2d3c738f601cad3998d8ce9 /arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | |
parent | e0f25a3f2d052e36ff67a9b4db835c3e27e950d8 (diff) | |
parent | 1372324b328cd5dabaef5e345e37ad48c63df2a9 (diff) | |
download | linux-c136b84393d4e340e1b53fc7f737dd5827b19ee5.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
Pull KVM updates from Paolo Bonzini:
"PPC:
- Better machine check handling for HV KVM
- Ability to support guests with threads=2, 4 or 8 on POWER9
- Fix for a race that could cause delayed recognition of signals
- Fix for a bug where POWER9 guests could sleep with interrupts pending.
ARM:
- VCPU request overhaul
- allow timer and PMU to have their interrupt number selected from userspace
- workaround for Cavium erratum 30115
- handling of memory poisonning
- the usual crop of fixes and cleanups
s390:
- initial machine check forwarding
- migration support for the CMMA page hinting information
- cleanups and fixes
x86:
- nested VMX bugfixes and improvements
- more reliable NMI window detection on AMD
- APIC timer optimizations
Generic:
- VCPU request overhaul + documentation of common code patterns
- kvm_stat improvements"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (124 commits)
Update my email address
kvm: vmx: allow host to access guest MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS
x86: kvm: mmu: use ept a/d in vmcs02 iff used in vmcs12
kvm: x86: mmu: allow A/D bits to be disabled in an mmu
x86: kvm: mmu: make spte mmio mask more explicit
x86: kvm: mmu: dead code thanks to access tracking
KVM: PPC: Book3S: Fix typo in XICS-on-XIVE state saving code
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Close race with testing for signals on guest entry
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
KVM: x86: remove ignored type attribute
KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic timer injection delay
KVM: lapic: reorganize restart_apic_timer
KVM: lapic: reorganize start_hv_timer
kvm: nVMX: Check memory operand to INVVPID
KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the nested guest
KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the guest
tools/kvm_stat: add new interactive command 'b'
tools/kvm_stat: add new command line switch '-i'
tools/kvm_stat: fix error on interactive command 'g'
KVM: SVM: suppress unnecessary NMI singlestep on GIF=0 and nested exit
...
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 511 |
1 files changed, 399 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c index 773b35d16a0b..0b436df746fc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ #include <linux/of.h> #include <asm/reg.h> +#include <asm/ppc-opcode.h> +#include <asm/disassemble.h> #include <asm/cputable.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> @@ -645,6 +647,7 @@ static void kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long stolen; unsigned long core_stolen; u64 now; + unsigned long flags; dt = vcpu->arch.dtl_ptr; vpa = vcpu->arch.vpa.pinned_addr; @@ -652,10 +655,10 @@ static void kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, core_stolen = vcore_stolen_time(vc, now); stolen = core_stolen - vcpu->arch.stolen_logged; vcpu->arch.stolen_logged = core_stolen; - spin_lock_irq(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock, flags); stolen += vcpu->arch.busy_stolen; vcpu->arch.busy_stolen = 0; - spin_unlock_irq(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vcpu->arch.tbacct_lock, flags); if (!dt || !vpa) return; memset(dt, 0, sizeof(struct dtl_entry)); @@ -675,6 +678,26 @@ static void kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vcpu->arch.dtl.dirty = true; } +/* See if there is a doorbell interrupt pending for a vcpu */ +static bool kvmppc_doorbell_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int thr; + struct kvmppc_vcore *vc; + + if (vcpu->arch.doorbell_request) + return true; + /* + * Ensure that the read of vcore->dpdes comes after the read + * of vcpu->doorbell_request. This barrier matches the + * lwsync in book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S just before the + * fast_guest_return label. + */ + smp_rmb(); + vc = vcpu->arch.vcore; + thr = vcpu->vcpu_id - vc->first_vcpuid; + return !!(vc->dpdes & (1 << thr)); +} + static bool kvmppc_power8_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (vcpu->arch.vcore->arch_compat >= PVR_ARCH_207) @@ -926,6 +949,101 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_debug_inst(struct kvm_run *run, } } +static void do_nothing(void *x) +{ +} + +static unsigned long kvmppc_read_dpdes(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int thr, cpu, pcpu, nthreads; + struct kvm_vcpu *v; + unsigned long dpdes; + + nthreads = vcpu->kvm->arch.emul_smt_mode; + dpdes = 0; + cpu = vcpu->vcpu_id & ~(nthreads - 1); + for (thr = 0; thr < nthreads; ++thr, ++cpu) { + v = kvmppc_find_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, cpu); + if (!v) + continue; + /* + * If the vcpu is currently running on a physical cpu thread, + * interrupt it in order to pull it out of the guest briefly, + * which will update its vcore->dpdes value. + */ + pcpu = READ_ONCE(v->cpu); + if (pcpu >= 0) + smp_call_function_single(pcpu, do_nothing, NULL, 1); + if (kvmppc_doorbell_pending(v)) + dpdes |= 1 << thr; + } + return dpdes; +} + +/* + * On POWER9, emulate doorbell-related instructions in order to + * give the guest the illusion of running on a multi-threaded core. + * The instructions emulated are msgsndp, msgclrp, mfspr TIR, + * and mfspr DPDES. + */ +static int kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + u32 inst, rb, thr; + unsigned long arg; + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; + struct kvm_vcpu *tvcpu; + + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) + return EMULATE_FAIL; + if (kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &inst) != EMULATE_DONE) + return RESUME_GUEST; + if (get_op(inst) != 31) + return EMULATE_FAIL; + rb = get_rb(inst); + thr = vcpu->vcpu_id & (kvm->arch.emul_smt_mode - 1); + switch (get_xop(inst)) { + case OP_31_XOP_MSGSNDP: + arg = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rb); + if (((arg >> 27) & 0xf) != PPC_DBELL_SERVER) + break; + arg &= 0x3f; + if (arg >= kvm->arch.emul_smt_mode) + break; + tvcpu = kvmppc_find_vcpu(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id - thr + arg); + if (!tvcpu) + break; + if (!tvcpu->arch.doorbell_request) { + tvcpu->arch.doorbell_request = 1; + kvmppc_fast_vcpu_kick_hv(tvcpu); + } + break; + case OP_31_XOP_MSGCLRP: + arg = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rb); + if (((arg >> 27) & 0xf) != PPC_DBELL_SERVER) + break; + vcpu->arch.vcore->dpdes = 0; + vcpu->arch.doorbell_request = 0; + break; + case OP_31_XOP_MFSPR: + switch (get_sprn(inst)) { + case SPRN_TIR: + arg = thr; + break; + case SPRN_DPDES: + arg = kvmppc_read_dpdes(vcpu); + break; + default: + return EMULATE_FAIL; + } + kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, get_rt(inst), arg); + break; + default: + return EMULATE_FAIL; + } + kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4); + return RESUME_GUEST; +} + static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct task_struct *tsk) { @@ -971,15 +1089,20 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, r = RESUME_GUEST; break; case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK: - /* - * Deliver a machine check interrupt to the guest. - * We have to do this, even if the host has handled the - * machine check, because machine checks use SRR0/1 and - * the interrupt might have trashed guest state in them. - */ - kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu, - BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK); - r = RESUME_GUEST; + /* Exit to guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI as exit reason */ + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_NMI; + run->hw.hardware_exit_reason = vcpu->arch.trap; + /* Clear out the old NMI status from run->flags */ + run->flags &= ~KVM_RUN_PPC_NMI_DISP_MASK; + /* Now set the NMI status */ + if (vcpu->arch.mce_evt.disposition == MCE_DISPOSITION_RECOVERED) + run->flags |= KVM_RUN_PPC_NMI_DISP_FULLY_RECOV; + else + run->flags |= KVM_RUN_PPC_NMI_DISP_NOT_RECOV; + + r = RESUME_HOST; + /* Print the MCE event to host console. */ + machine_check_print_event_info(&vcpu->arch.mce_evt, false); break; case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM: { @@ -1048,12 +1171,19 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, break; /* * This occurs if the guest (kernel or userspace), does something that - * is prohibited by HFSCR. We just generate a program interrupt to - * the guest. + * is prohibited by HFSCR. + * On POWER9, this could be a doorbell instruction that we need + * to emulate. + * Otherwise, we just generate a program interrupt to the guest. */ case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_FAC_UNAVAIL: - kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL); - r = RESUME_GUEST; + r = EMULATE_FAIL; + if ((vcpu->arch.hfscr >> 56) == FSCR_MSGP_LG) + r = kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr(vcpu); + if (r == EMULATE_FAIL) { + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL); + r = RESUME_GUEST; + } break; case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_HV_RM_HARD: r = RESUME_PASSTHROUGH; @@ -1143,6 +1273,12 @@ static void kvmppc_set_lpcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 new_lpcr, mask = LPCR_DPFD | LPCR_ILE | LPCR_TC; if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)) mask |= LPCR_AIL; + /* + * On POWER9, allow userspace to enable large decrementer for the + * guest, whether or not the host has it enabled. + */ + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) + mask |= LPCR_LD; /* Broken 32-bit version of LPCR must not clear top bits */ if (preserve_top32) @@ -1611,7 +1747,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_vcore *kvmppc_vcore_create(struct kvm *kvm, int core) init_swait_queue_head(&vcore->wq); vcore->preempt_tb = TB_NIL; vcore->lpcr = kvm->arch.lpcr; - vcore->first_vcpuid = core * threads_per_vcore(); + vcore->first_vcpuid = core * kvm->arch.smt_mode; vcore->kvm = kvm; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcore->preempt_list); @@ -1770,14 +1906,10 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - int err = -EINVAL; + int err; int core; struct kvmppc_vcore *vcore; - core = id / threads_per_vcore(); - if (core >= KVM_MAX_VCORES) - goto out; - err = -ENOMEM; vcpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(kvm_vcpu_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!vcpu) @@ -1808,6 +1940,20 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm *kvm, vcpu->arch.busy_preempt = TB_NIL; vcpu->arch.intr_msr = MSR_SF | MSR_ME; + /* + * Set the default HFSCR for the guest from the host value. + * This value is only used on POWER9. + * On POWER9 DD1, TM doesn't work, so we make sure to + * prevent the guest from using it. + * On POWER9, we want to virtualize the doorbell facility, so we + * turn off the HFSCR bit, which causes those instructions to trap. + */ + vcpu->arch.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR); + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM)) + vcpu->arch.hfscr &= ~HFSCR_TM; + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) + vcpu->arch.hfscr &= ~HFSCR_MSGP; + kvmppc_mmu_book3s_hv_init(vcpu); vcpu->arch.state = KVMPPC_VCPU_NOTREADY; @@ -1815,11 +1961,17 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *kvmppc_core_vcpu_create_hv(struct kvm *kvm, init_waitqueue_head(&vcpu->arch.cpu_run); mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); - vcore = kvm->arch.vcores[core]; - if (!vcore) { - vcore = kvmppc_vcore_create(kvm, core); - kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; - kvm->arch.online_vcores++; + vcore = NULL; + err = -EINVAL; + core = id / kvm->arch.smt_mode; + if (core < KVM_MAX_VCORES) { + vcore = kvm->arch.vcores[core]; + if (!vcore) { + err = -ENOMEM; + vcore = kvmppc_vcore_create(kvm, core); + kvm->arch.vcores[core] = vcore; + kvm->arch.online_vcores++; + } } mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); @@ -1847,6 +1999,43 @@ out: return ERR_PTR(err); } +static int kvmhv_set_smt_mode(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long smt_mode, + unsigned long flags) +{ + int err; + int esmt = 0; + + if (flags) + return -EINVAL; + if (smt_mode > MAX_SMT_THREADS || !is_power_of_2(smt_mode)) + return -EINVAL; + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) { + /* + * On POWER8 (or POWER7), the threading mode is "strict", + * so we pack smt_mode vcpus per vcore. + */ + if (smt_mode > threads_per_subcore) + return -EINVAL; + } else { + /* + * On POWER9, the threading mode is "loose", + * so each vcpu gets its own vcore. + */ + esmt = smt_mode; + smt_mode = 1; + } + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + err = -EBUSY; + if (!kvm->arch.online_vcores) { + kvm->arch.smt_mode = smt_mode; + kvm->arch.emul_smt_mode = esmt; + err = 0; + } + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + + return err; +} + static void unpin_vpa(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvmppc_vpa *vpa) { if (vpa->pinned_addr) @@ -1897,7 +2086,7 @@ static void kvmppc_end_cede(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } -extern void __kvmppc_vcore_entry(void); +extern int __kvmppc_vcore_entry(void); static void kvmppc_remove_runnable(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -1962,10 +2151,6 @@ static void kvmppc_release_hwthread(int cpu) tpaca->kvm_hstate.kvm_split_mode = NULL; } -static void do_nothing(void *x) -{ -} - static void radix_flush_cpu(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int i; @@ -1983,11 +2168,35 @@ static void radix_flush_cpu(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) smp_call_function_single(cpu + i, do_nothing, NULL, 1); } +static void kvmppc_prepare_radix_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pcpu) +{ + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; + + /* + * With radix, the guest can do TLB invalidations itself, + * and it could choose to use the local form (tlbiel) if + * it is invalidating a translation that has only ever been + * used on one vcpu. However, that doesn't mean it has + * only ever been used on one physical cpu, since vcpus + * can move around between pcpus. To cope with this, when + * a vcpu moves from one pcpu to another, we need to tell + * any vcpus running on the same core as this vcpu previously + * ran to flush the TLB. The TLB is shared between threads, + * so we use a single bit in .need_tlb_flush for all 4 threads. + */ + if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu != pcpu) { + if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu >= 0 && + cpu_first_thread_sibling(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu) != + cpu_first_thread_sibling(pcpu)) + radix_flush_cpu(kvm, vcpu->arch.prev_cpu, vcpu); + vcpu->arch.prev_cpu = pcpu; + } +} + static void kvmppc_start_thread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) { int cpu; struct paca_struct *tpaca; - struct kvmppc_vcore *mvc = vc->master_vcore; struct kvm *kvm = vc->kvm; cpu = vc->pcpu; @@ -1997,36 +2206,16 @@ static void kvmppc_start_thread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) vcpu->arch.timer_running = 0; } cpu += vcpu->arch.ptid; - vcpu->cpu = mvc->pcpu; + vcpu->cpu = vc->pcpu; vcpu->arch.thread_cpu = cpu; - - /* - * With radix, the guest can do TLB invalidations itself, - * and it could choose to use the local form (tlbiel) if - * it is invalidating a translation that has only ever been - * used on one vcpu. However, that doesn't mean it has - * only ever been used on one physical cpu, since vcpus - * can move around between pcpus. To cope with this, when - * a vcpu moves from one pcpu to another, we need to tell - * any vcpus running on the same core as this vcpu previously - * ran to flush the TLB. The TLB is shared between threads, - * so we use a single bit in .need_tlb_flush for all 4 threads. - */ - if (kvm_is_radix(kvm) && vcpu->arch.prev_cpu != cpu) { - if (vcpu->arch.prev_cpu >= 0 && - cpu_first_thread_sibling(vcpu->arch.prev_cpu) != - cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu)) - radix_flush_cpu(kvm, vcpu->arch.prev_cpu, vcpu); - vcpu->arch.prev_cpu = cpu; - } cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &kvm->arch.cpu_in_guest); } tpaca = &paca[cpu]; tpaca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu = vcpu; - tpaca->kvm_hstate.ptid = cpu - mvc->pcpu; + tpaca->kvm_hstate.ptid = cpu - vc->pcpu; /* Order stores to hstate.kvm_vcpu etc. before store to kvm_vcore */ smp_wmb(); - tpaca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcore = mvc; + tpaca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcore = vc; if (cpu != smp_processor_id()) kvmppc_ipi_thread(cpu); } @@ -2155,8 +2344,7 @@ struct core_info { int max_subcore_threads; int total_threads; int subcore_threads[MAX_SUBCORES]; - struct kvm *subcore_vm[MAX_SUBCORES]; - struct list_head vcs[MAX_SUBCORES]; + struct kvmppc_vcore *vc[MAX_SUBCORES]; }; /* @@ -2167,17 +2355,12 @@ static int subcore_thread_map[MAX_SUBCORES] = { 0, 4, 2, 6 }; static void init_core_info(struct core_info *cip, struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) { - int sub; - memset(cip, 0, sizeof(*cip)); cip->n_subcores = 1; cip->max_subcore_threads = vc->num_threads; cip->total_threads = vc->num_threads; cip->subcore_threads[0] = vc->num_threads; - cip->subcore_vm[0] = vc->kvm; - for (sub = 0; sub < MAX_SUBCORES; ++sub) - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cip->vcs[sub]); - list_add_tail(&vc->preempt_list, &cip->vcs[0]); + cip->vc[0] = vc; } static bool subcore_config_ok(int n_subcores, int n_threads) @@ -2197,9 +2380,8 @@ static bool subcore_config_ok(int n_subcores, int n_threads) return n_subcores * roundup_pow_of_two(n_threads) <= MAX_SMT_THREADS; } -static void init_master_vcore(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) +static void init_vcore_to_run(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) { - vc->master_vcore = vc; vc->entry_exit_map = 0; vc->in_guest = 0; vc->napping_threads = 0; @@ -2224,9 +2406,9 @@ static bool can_dynamic_split(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, struct core_info *cip) ++cip->n_subcores; cip->total_threads += vc->num_threads; cip->subcore_threads[sub] = vc->num_threads; - cip->subcore_vm[sub] = vc->kvm; - init_master_vcore(vc); - list_move_tail(&vc->preempt_list, &cip->vcs[sub]); + cip->vc[sub] = vc; + init_vcore_to_run(vc); + list_del_init(&vc->preempt_list); return true; } @@ -2294,6 +2476,18 @@ static void collect_piggybacks(struct core_info *cip, int target_threads) spin_unlock(&lp->lock); } +static bool recheck_signals(struct core_info *cip) +{ + int sub, i; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + for (sub = 0; sub < cip->n_subcores; ++sub) + for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, cip->vc[sub]) + if (signal_pending(vcpu->arch.run_task)) + return true; + return false; +} + static void post_guest_process(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, bool is_master) { int still_running = 0, i; @@ -2331,7 +2525,6 @@ static void post_guest_process(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, bool is_master) wake_up(&vcpu->arch.cpu_run); } } - list_del_init(&vc->preempt_list); if (!is_master) { if (still_running > 0) { kvmppc_vcore_preempt(vc); @@ -2393,6 +2586,21 @@ static inline int kvmppc_set_host_core(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } +static void set_irq_happened(int trap) +{ + switch (trap) { + case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL: + local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_EE; + break; + case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_DOORBELL: + local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_DBELL; + break; + case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_HMI: + local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HMI; + break; + } +} + /* * Run a set of guest threads on a physical core. * Called with vc->lock held. @@ -2403,7 +2611,7 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) int i; int srcu_idx; struct core_info core_info; - struct kvmppc_vcore *pvc, *vcnext; + struct kvmppc_vcore *pvc; struct kvm_split_mode split_info, *sip; int split, subcore_size, active; int sub; @@ -2412,6 +2620,7 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) int pcpu, thr; int target_threads; int controlled_threads; + int trap; /* * Remove from the list any threads that have a signal pending @@ -2426,7 +2635,7 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) /* * Initialize *vc. */ - init_master_vcore(vc); + init_vcore_to_run(vc); vc->preempt_tb = TB_NIL; /* @@ -2463,6 +2672,43 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) if (vc->num_threads < target_threads) collect_piggybacks(&core_info, target_threads); + /* + * On radix, arrange for TLB flushing if necessary. + * This has to be done before disabling interrupts since + * it uses smp_call_function(). + */ + pcpu = smp_processor_id(); + if (kvm_is_radix(vc->kvm)) { + for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) + for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, core_info.vc[sub]) + kvmppc_prepare_radix_vcpu(vcpu, pcpu); + } + + /* + * Hard-disable interrupts, and check resched flag and signals. + * If we need to reschedule or deliver a signal, clean up + * and return without going into the guest(s). + */ + local_irq_disable(); + hard_irq_disable(); + if (lazy_irq_pending() || need_resched() || + recheck_signals(&core_info)) { + local_irq_enable(); + vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE; + /* Unlock all except the primary vcore */ + for (sub = 1; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) { + pvc = core_info.vc[sub]; + /* Put back on to the preempted vcores list */ + kvmppc_vcore_preempt(pvc); + spin_unlock(&pvc->lock); + } + for (i = 0; i < controlled_threads; ++i) + kvmppc_release_hwthread(pcpu + i); + return; + } + + kvmppc_clear_host_core(pcpu); + /* Decide on micro-threading (split-core) mode */ subcore_size = threads_per_subcore; cmd_bit = stat_bit = 0; @@ -2486,13 +2732,10 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) split_info.ldbar = mfspr(SPRN_LDBAR); split_info.subcore_size = subcore_size; for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) - split_info.master_vcs[sub] = - list_first_entry(&core_info.vcs[sub], - struct kvmppc_vcore, preempt_list); + split_info.vc[sub] = core_info.vc[sub]; /* order writes to split_info before kvm_split_mode pointer */ smp_wmb(); } - pcpu = smp_processor_id(); for (thr = 0; thr < controlled_threads; ++thr) paca[pcpu + thr].kvm_hstate.kvm_split_mode = sip; @@ -2512,32 +2755,29 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) } } - kvmppc_clear_host_core(pcpu); - /* Start all the threads */ active = 0; for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) { thr = subcore_thread_map[sub]; thr0_done = false; active |= 1 << thr; - list_for_each_entry(pvc, &core_info.vcs[sub], preempt_list) { - pvc->pcpu = pcpu + thr; - for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, pvc) { - kvmppc_start_thread(vcpu, pvc); - kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(vcpu, pvc); - trace_kvm_guest_enter(vcpu); - if (!vcpu->arch.ptid) - thr0_done = true; - active |= 1 << (thr + vcpu->arch.ptid); - } - /* - * We need to start the first thread of each subcore - * even if it doesn't have a vcpu. - */ - if (pvc->master_vcore == pvc && !thr0_done) - kvmppc_start_thread(NULL, pvc); - thr += pvc->num_threads; + pvc = core_info.vc[sub]; + pvc->pcpu = pcpu + thr; + for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, pvc) { + kvmppc_start_thread(vcpu, pvc); + kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(vcpu, pvc); + trace_kvm_guest_enter(vcpu); + if (!vcpu->arch.ptid) + thr0_done = true; + active |= 1 << (thr + vcpu->arch.ptid); } + /* + * We need to start the first thread of each subcore + * even if it doesn't have a vcpu. + */ + if (!thr0_done) + kvmppc_start_thread(NULL, pvc); + thr += pvc->num_threads; } /* @@ -2564,17 +2804,27 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) trace_kvmppc_run_core(vc, 0); for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) - list_for_each_entry(pvc, &core_info.vcs[sub], preempt_list) - spin_unlock(&pvc->lock); + spin_unlock(&core_info.vc[sub]->lock); + + /* + * Interrupts will be enabled once we get into the guest, + * so tell lockdep that we're about to enable interrupts. + */ + trace_hardirqs_on(); guest_enter(); srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vc->kvm->srcu); - __kvmppc_vcore_entry(); + trap = __kvmppc_vcore_entry(); srcu_read_unlock(&vc->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx); + guest_exit(); + + trace_hardirqs_off(); + set_irq_happened(trap); + spin_lock(&vc->lock); /* prevent other vcpu threads from doing kvmppc_start_thread() now */ vc->vcore_state = VCORE_EXITING; @@ -2602,6 +2852,10 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) split_info.do_nap = 0; } + kvmppc_set_host_core(pcpu); + + local_irq_enable(); + /* Let secondaries go back to the offline loop */ for (i = 0; i < controlled_threads; ++i) { kvmppc_release_hwthread(pcpu + i); @@ -2610,18 +2864,15 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) cpumask_clear_cpu(pcpu + i, &vc->kvm->arch.cpu_in_guest); } - kvmppc_set_host_core(pcpu); - spin_unlock(&vc->lock); /* make sure updates to secondary vcpu structs are visible now */ smp_mb(); - guest_exit(); - for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) - list_for_each_entry_safe(pvc, vcnext, &core_info.vcs[sub], - preempt_list) - post_guest_process(pvc, pvc == vc); + for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) { + pvc = core_info.vc[sub]; + post_guest_process(pvc, pvc == vc); + } spin_lock(&vc->lock); preempt_enable(); @@ -2666,6 +2917,30 @@ static void shrink_halt_poll_ns(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) vc->halt_poll_ns /= halt_poll_ns_shrink; } +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XICS +static inline bool xive_interrupt_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + if (!xive_enabled()) + return false; + return vcpu->arch.xive_saved_state.pipr < + vcpu->arch.xive_saved_state.cppr; +} +#else +static inline bool xive_interrupt_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_XICS */ + +static bool kvmppc_vcpu_woken(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions || vcpu->arch.prodded || + kvmppc_doorbell_pending(vcpu) || xive_interrupt_pending(vcpu)) + return true; + + return false; +} + /* * Check to see if any of the runnable vcpus on the vcore have pending * exceptions or are no longer ceded @@ -2676,8 +2951,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcore_check_block(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc) int i; for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, vc) { - if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions || !vcpu->arch.ceded || - vcpu->arch.prodded) + if (!vcpu->arch.ceded || kvmppc_vcpu_woken(vcpu)) return 1; } @@ -2819,15 +3093,14 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ if (!signal_pending(current)) { if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_PIGGYBACK) { - struct kvmppc_vcore *mvc = vc->master_vcore; - if (spin_trylock(&mvc->lock)) { - if (mvc->vcore_state == VCORE_RUNNING && - !VCORE_IS_EXITING(mvc)) { + if (spin_trylock(&vc->lock)) { + if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_RUNNING && + !VCORE_IS_EXITING(vc)) { kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(vcpu, vc); kvmppc_start_thread(vcpu, vc); trace_kvm_guest_enter(vcpu); } - spin_unlock(&mvc->lock); + spin_unlock(&vc->lock); } } else if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_RUNNING && !VCORE_IS_EXITING(vc)) { @@ -2863,7 +3136,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) break; n_ceded = 0; for_each_runnable_thread(i, v, vc) { - if (!v->arch.pending_exceptions && !v->arch.prodded) + if (!kvmppc_vcpu_woken(v)) n_ceded += v->arch.ceded; else v->arch.ceded = 0; @@ -3519,6 +3792,19 @@ static int kvmppc_core_init_vm_hv(struct kvm *kvm) kvm_hv_vm_activated(); /* + * Initialize smt_mode depending on processor. + * POWER8 and earlier have to use "strict" threading, where + * all vCPUs in a vcore have to run on the same (sub)core, + * whereas on POWER9 the threads can each run a different + * guest. + */ + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) + kvm->arch.smt_mode = threads_per_subcore; + else + kvm->arch.smt_mode = 1; + kvm->arch.emul_smt_mode = 1; + + /* * Create a debugfs directory for the VM */ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "vm%d", current->pid); @@ -3947,6 +4233,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = { #endif .configure_mmu = kvmhv_configure_mmu, .get_rmmu_info = kvmhv_get_rmmu_info, + .set_smt_mode = kvmhv_set_smt_mode, }; static int kvm_init_subcore_bitmap(void) |