summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>2021-06-14 15:09:07 +0300
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2021-06-16 17:09:11 +0300
commitb112fb913b5b5705db22efa90ec60f42518934af (patch)
tree78ce3f3f8d13289e02ee7fc9782ae210abb361c0 /arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
parentd81090ed44c0d15abf2b07663d5f0b9e5ba51525 (diff)
downloadlinux-b112fb913b5b5705db22efa90ec60f42518934af.tar.xz
powerpc: make stack walking KASAN-safe
Make our stack-walking code KASAN-safe by using __no_sanitize_address. Generic code, arm64, s390 and x86 all make accesses unchecked for similar sorts of reasons: when unwinding a stack, we might touch memory that KASAN has marked as being out-of-bounds. In ppc64 KASAN development, I hit this sometimes when checking for an exception frame - because we're checking an arbitrary offset into the stack frame. See commit 20955746320e ("s390/kasan: avoid false positives during stack unwind"), commit bcaf669b4bdb ("arm64: disable kasan when accessing frame->fp in unwind_frame"), commit 91e08ab0c851 ("x86/dumpstack: Prevent KASAN false positive warnings") and commit 6e22c8366416 ("tracing, kasan: Silence Kasan warning in check_stack of stack_tracer"). Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210614120907.1952321-1-dja@axtens.net
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 1deb1bf331dd..1961e6d5e33b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
#include <asm/paca.h>
-void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
- struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
+void __no_sanitize_address arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
+ struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long sp;
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
*
* If the task is not 'current', the caller *must* ensure the task is inactive.
*/
-int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
- void *cookie, struct task_struct *task)
+int __no_sanitize_address arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
+ void *cookie, struct task_struct *task)
{
unsigned long sp;
unsigned long newsp;