summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>2005-04-17 02:20:36 +0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>2005-04-17 02:20:36 +0400
commit1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 (patch)
tree0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d /arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c
downloadlinux-1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2.tar.xz
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c172
1 files changed, 172 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c b/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..aa989c2246da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/signal.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
+
+#include <asm/asm.h>
+#include <asm/bootinfo.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
+#include <asm/inst.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/branch.h>
+#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+
+#include <asm/fpu_emulator.h>
+
+#include "ieee754.h"
+#include "dsemul.h"
+
+/* Strap kernel emulator for full MIPS IV emulation */
+
+#ifdef __mips
+#undef __mips
+#endif
+#define __mips 4
+
+extern struct mips_fpu_emulator_private fpuemuprivate;
+
+
+/*
+ * Emulate the arbritrary instruction ir at xcp->cp0_epc. Required when
+ * we have to emulate the instruction in a COP1 branch delay slot. Do
+ * not change cp0_epc due to the instruction
+ *
+ * According to the spec:
+ * 1) it shouldnt be a branch :-)
+ * 2) it can be a COP instruction :-(
+ * 3) if we are tring to run a protected memory space we must take
+ * special care on memory access instructions :-(
+ */
+
+/*
+ * "Trampoline" return routine to catch exception following
+ * execution of delay-slot instruction execution.
+ */
+
+struct emuframe {
+ mips_instruction emul;
+ mips_instruction badinst;
+ mips_instruction cookie;
+ gpreg_t epc;
+};
+
+int mips_dsemul(struct pt_regs *regs, mips_instruction ir, gpreg_t cpc)
+{
+ extern asmlinkage void handle_dsemulret(void);
+ mips_instruction *dsemul_insns;
+ struct emuframe *fr;
+ int err;
+
+ if (ir == 0) { /* a nop is easy */
+ regs->cp0_epc = cpc;
+ regs->cp0_cause &= ~CAUSEF_BD;
+ return 0;
+ }
+#ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE
+ printk("dsemul %lx %lx\n", regs->cp0_epc, cpc);
+
+#endif
+
+ /*
+ * The strategy is to push the instruction onto the user stack
+ * and put a trap after it which we can catch and jump to
+ * the required address any alternative apart from full
+ * instruction emulation!!.
+ *
+ * Algorithmics used a system call instruction, and
+ * borrowed that vector. MIPS/Linux version is a bit
+ * more heavyweight in the interests of portability and
+ * multiprocessor support. For Linux we generate a
+ * an unaligned access and force an address error exception.
+ *
+ * For embedded systems (stand-alone) we prefer to use a
+ * non-existing CP1 instruction. This prevents us from emulating
+ * branches, but gives us a cleaner interface to the exception
+ * handler (single entry point).
+ */
+
+ /* Ensure that the two instructions are in the same cache line */
+ dsemul_insns = (mips_instruction *) REG_TO_VA ((regs->regs[29] - sizeof(struct emuframe)) & ~0x7);
+ fr = (struct emuframe *) dsemul_insns;
+
+ /* Verify that the stack pointer is not competely insane */
+ if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe))))
+ return SIGBUS;
+
+ err = __put_user(ir, &fr->emul);
+ err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BADINST, &fr->badinst);
+ err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BD_COOKIE, &fr->cookie);
+ err |= __put_user(cpc, &fr->epc);
+
+ if (unlikely(err)) {
+ fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++;
+ return SIGBUS;
+ }
+
+ regs->cp0_epc = VA_TO_REG & fr->emul;
+
+ flush_cache_sigtramp((unsigned long)&fr->badinst);
+
+ return SIGILL; /* force out of emulation loop */
+}
+
+int do_dsemulret(struct pt_regs *xcp)
+{
+ struct emuframe *fr;
+ gpreg_t epc;
+ u32 insn, cookie;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ fr = (struct emuframe *) (xcp->cp0_epc - sizeof(mips_instruction));
+
+ /*
+ * If we can't even access the area, something is very wrong, but we'll
+ * leave that to the default handling
+ */
+ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe)))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Do some sanity checking on the stackframe:
+ *
+ * - Is the instruction pointed to by the EPC an BADINST?
+ * - Is the following memory word the BD_COOKIE?
+ */
+ err = __get_user(insn, &fr->badinst);
+ err |= __get_user(cookie, &fr->cookie);
+
+ if (unlikely(err || (insn != BADINST) || (cookie != BD_COOKIE))) {
+ fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, we are satisfied that it's a BD emulation trap. Yes,
+ * a user might have deliberately put two malformed and useless
+ * instructions in a row in his program, in which case he's in for a
+ * nasty surprise - the next instruction will be treated as a
+ * continuation address! Alas, this seems to be the only way that we
+ * can handle signals, recursion, and longjmps() in the context of
+ * emulating the branch delay instruction.
+ */
+
+#ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE
+ printk("dsemulret\n");
+#endif
+ if (__get_user(epc, &fr->epc)) { /* Saved EPC */
+ /* This is not a good situation to be in */
+ force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Set EPC to return to post-branch instruction */
+ xcp->cp0_epc = epc;
+
+ return 1;
+}