Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm

Pull KVM fixes from Paolo Bonzini:
 "ARM:

   - Plug race between enabling MTE and creating vcpus

   - Fix off-by-one bug when checking whether an address range is RAM

  x86:

   - Fixes for the new MMU, especially a memory leak on hosts with <39
     physical address bits

   - Remove bogus EFER.NX checks on 32-bit non-PAE hosts

   - WAITPKG fix"

* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm:
  KVM: x86/mmu: Protect marking SPs unsync when using TDP MMU with spinlock
  KVM: x86/mmu: Don't step down in the TDP iterator when zapping all SPTEs
  KVM: x86/mmu: Don't leak non-leaf SPTEs when zapping all SPTEs
  KVM: nVMX: Use vmx_need_pf_intercept() when deciding if L0 wants a #PF
  kvm: vmx: Sync all matching EPTPs when injecting nested EPT fault
  KVM: x86: remove dead initialization
  KVM: x86: Allow guest to set EFER.NX=1 on non-PAE 32-bit kernels
  KVM: VMX: Use current VMCS to query WAITPKG support for MSR emulation
  KVM: arm64: Fix race when enabling KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE
  KVM: arm64: Fix off-by-one in range_is_memory

2 files changed, 9 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index e9a2b8f27792..0ca72f5cda41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -94,10 +94,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 		kvm->arch.return_nisv_io_abort_to_user = true;
 		break;
 	case KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE:
-		if (!system_supports_mte() || kvm->created_vcpus)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		r = 0;
-		kvm->arch.mte_enabled = true;
+		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+		if (!system_supports_mte() || kvm->created_vcpus) {
+			r = -EINVAL;
+		} else {
+			r = 0;
+			kvm->arch.mte_enabled = true;
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 		break;
 	default:
 		r = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
index d938ce95d3bd..a6ce991b1467 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static bool range_is_memory(u64 start, u64 end)
 {
 	struct kvm_mem_range r1, r2;
 
-	if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end, &r2))
+	if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end - 1, &r2))
 		return false;
 	if (r1.start != r2.start)
 		return false;