[PATCH] mm: kill check_user_page_readable

check_user_page_readable is a problematic variant of follow_page.  It's used
only by oprofile's i386 and arm backtrace code, at interrupt time, to
establish whether a userspace stackframe is currently readable.

This is problematic, because we want to push the page_table_lock down inside
follow_page, and later split it; whereas oprofile is doing a spin_trylock on
it (in the i386 case, forgotten in the arm case), and needs that to pin
perhaps two pages spanned by the stackframe (which might be covered by
different locks when we split).

I think oprofile is going about this in the wrong way: it doesn't need to know
the area is readable (neither i386 nor arm uses read protection of user
pages), it doesn't need to pin the memory, it should simply
__copy_from_user_inatomic, and see if that succeeds or not.  Sorry, but I've
not got around to devising the sparse __user annotations for this.

Then we can eliminate check_user_page_readable, and return to a single
follow_page without the __follow_page variants.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 37 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/oprofile/backtrace.c b/arch/arm/oprofile/backtrace.c
index df35c452a8bf..7c22c12618cc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/oprofile/backtrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/oprofile/backtrace.c
@@ -49,42 +49,22 @@ static struct frame_tail* kernel_backtrace(struct frame_tail *tail)
 
 static struct frame_tail* user_backtrace(struct frame_tail *tail)
 {
-	struct frame_tail buftail;
+	struct frame_tail buftail[2];
 
-	/* hardware pte might not be valid due to dirty/accessed bit emulation
-	 * so we use copy_from_user and benefit from exception fixups */
-	if (copy_from_user(&buftail, tail, sizeof(struct frame_tail)))
+	/* Also check accessibility of one struct frame_tail beyond */
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, tail, sizeof(buftail)))
+		return NULL;
+	if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(buftail, tail, sizeof(buftail)))
 		return NULL;
 
-	oprofile_add_trace(buftail.lr);
+	oprofile_add_trace(buftail[0].lr);
 
 	/* frame pointers should strictly progress back up the stack
 	 * (towards higher addresses) */
-	if (tail >= buftail.fp)
+	if (tail >= buftail[0].fp)
 		return NULL;
 
-	return buftail.fp-1;
-}
-
-/* Compare two addresses and see if they're on the same page */
-#define CMP_ADDR_EQUAL(x,y,offset) ((((unsigned long) x) >> PAGE_SHIFT) \
-	== ((((unsigned long) y) + offset) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
-
-/* check that the page(s) containing the frame tail are present */
-static int pages_present(struct frame_tail *tail)
-{
-	struct mm_struct * mm = current->mm;
-
-	if (!check_user_page_readable(mm, (unsigned long)tail))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (CMP_ADDR_EQUAL(tail, tail, 8))
-		return 1;
-
-	if (!check_user_page_readable(mm, ((unsigned long)tail) + 8))
-		return 0;
-
-	return 1;
+	return buftail[0].fp-1;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -118,7 +98,6 @@ static int valid_kernel_stack(struct frame_tail *tail, struct pt_regs *regs)
 void arm_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
 {
 	struct frame_tail *tail;
-	unsigned long last_address = 0;
 
 	tail = ((struct frame_tail *) regs->ARM_fp) - 1;
 
@@ -132,13 +111,6 @@ void arm_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	while (depth-- && tail && !((unsigned long) tail & 3)) {
-		if ((!CMP_ADDR_EQUAL(last_address, tail, 0)
-			|| !CMP_ADDR_EQUAL(last_address, tail, 8))
-				&& !pages_present(tail))
-			return;
-		last_address = (unsigned long) tail;
+	while (depth-- && tail && !((unsigned long) tail & 3))
 		tail = user_backtrace(tail);
-	}
 }
-