summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com>2012-07-20 20:01:23 +0400
committerWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>2013-05-30 19:02:18 +0400
commit82f667046ec895552caf2f7a4c6841c530bfc215 (patch)
treea9ebf45fc7606fd6c8b8c7d5bce643a6527de454 /arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
parent4756dcbfd37819a8359d3c69a22be2ee41666d0f (diff)
downloadlinux-82f667046ec895552caf2f7a4c6841c530bfc215.tar.xz
ARM: mm: use physical addresses in highmem sanity checks
This patch modifies the highmem sanity checking code to use physical addresses instead. This change eliminates the wrap-around problems associated with the original virtual address based checks, and this simplifies the code a bit. The one constraint imposed here is that low physical memory must be mapped in a monotonically increasing fashion if there are multiple banks of memory, i.e., x < y must => pa(x) < pa(y). Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Tested-by: Subash Patel <subash.rp@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mm/mmu.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mm/mmu.c22
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index b7ce65a82371..fc6ff1a9db50 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0;
void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
{
int i, j, highmem = 0;
+ phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) {
struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j];
@@ -997,8 +998,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
highmem = 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
- if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET)
+ if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit)
highmem = 1;
bank->highmem = highmem;
@@ -1007,8 +1007,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping
* the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later.
*/
- if (!highmem && __va(bank->start) < vmalloc_min &&
- bank->size > vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start)) {
+ if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit &&
+ bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) {
if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, "
"ignoring high memory\n");
@@ -1017,12 +1017,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
(meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank));
meminfo.nr_banks++;
i++;
- bank[1].size -= vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
- bank[1].start = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
+ bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
+ bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit;
bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1;
j++;
}
- bank->size = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
+ bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
}
#else
bank->highmem = highmem;
@@ -1042,8 +1042,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Check whether this memory bank would entirely overlap
* the vmalloc area.
*/
- if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) {
+ if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Ignoring RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx "
"(vmalloc region overlap).\n",
(unsigned long long)bank->start,
@@ -1055,9 +1054,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap
* the vmalloc area.
*/
- if (__va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) <= __va(bank->start)) {
- unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
+ if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit)
+ unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx "
"to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n",
(unsigned long long)bank->start,