summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>2013-08-14 22:09:11 +0400
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-08-14 23:12:43 +0400
commit034d1527adebd302115c87ef343497a889638275 (patch)
tree6a2ecc0b483f1e7480541e3908bd811bd9f2da8b /README
parenta77a8c23e4db9fb1f776147eda0d85117359c700 (diff)
downloadlinux-034d1527adebd302115c87ef343497a889638275.tar.xz
pl2303: improve the chip type detection/distinction
The driver currently knows about 3 different PL2303 chip types: The two legacy chip types type_0 and type_1 (PL2303H ?) and the HX type. The device distinction is currently completely based on the examination of the USB descriptors. During the last years, Prolific has introduced further PL2303 chips, such as the HXD (HX rev. D), TA (which replaced the X/HX chips), SA, RA, EA and TB variants. Unfortunately, all these new chips are currently detected as HX chips, because they are all using the same bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x40 value in the USB device descriptor. At this point it is not clear if these chips are really working with the driver, there are just some positive indicators (like device manufacturers claiming Linux support for these devices or commit 8d48fdf689 "correctly handle baudrates above 115200" which should only be necessary for newer devices, ...) For a complete support of all devices, we need to distinguish between them, because they differ in several functional aspects, such as the maximum supported baud rate (HXD, TB, EA: 12Mbps, HX, TA: 6Mbps, RA: 1Mbps, SA: 115.2kbps), handshaking line support, RS422/485 and GPIO ports support (currently not supported by the driver). And there might be further differences that we don't know yet. This patch improves the chip type detection by evaluating the bcdDevice value of the device descriptor. The values are taken from the datasheets and are safe to use because manufacturers can't change them: 3.00: X/HX, TA 4.00: HXD, EA, RA, SA 5.00: TB The rest of the device descriptors is completely identical, so no further distinction is possible this way. Anyway, Prolifics "checkChipVersion.exe"-tool is definitely able to distinguish for example between the X/HX and the TA chips, so there must be a possibility to improve the distinction further... Signed-off-by: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions