summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>2008-04-28 08:54:56 +0400
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-05-06 01:56:18 +0400
commitcb4ad1ffc7c0d8ea7dc8cd8ba303d83551716d46 (patch)
tree79f6b1fe971a270e5e009d695d2bf998936197c8
parent712555ee4f873515612f89554ad1a3fda5fa887e (diff)
downloadlinux-cb4ad1ffc7c0d8ea7dc8cd8ba303d83551716d46.tar.xz
sched: fair-group: fix a Div0 error of the fair group scheduler
When I echoed 0 into the "cpu.shares" file, a Div0 error occured. We found it is caused by the following calling. sched_group_set_shares(tg, shares) set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares/nr_cpu_ids) __set_se_shares(se, shares) div64_64((1ULL<<32), shares) When the echoed value was less than the number of processores, the result of the sentence "shares/nr_cpu_ids" was 0, and then the system called div64() to divide the result, the Div0 error occured. It is unnecessary that the shares value is divided by nr_cpu_ids, I think. Because in the function __update_group_shares_cpu() and init_tg_cfs_entry(), the shares value isn't divided by nr_cpu_ids when setting shares of the sched entity. This patch fixes this bug. And echoing ULONG_MAX value into cpu.shares also causes Div0 error, so we set a macro MAX_SHARES to limit the max value of shares. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched.c17
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 561b3b39bdb8..f98f75f3c708 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -321,7 +321,13 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
# define INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD NICE_0_LOAD
#endif
+/*
+ * A weight of 0, 1 or ULONG_MAX can cause arithmetics problems.
+ * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
+ * limitation from this.)
+ */
#define MIN_SHARES 2
+#define MAX_SHARES (ULONG_MAX - 1)
static int init_task_group_load = INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
#endif
@@ -1804,6 +1810,8 @@ __update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, struct sched_domain *sd,
if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
shares = MIN_SHARES;
+ else if (shares > MAX_SHARES)
+ shares = MAX_SHARES;
__set_se_shares(tg->se[tcpu], shares);
}
@@ -8785,13 +8793,10 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
if (!tg->se[0])
return -EINVAL;
- /*
- * A weight of 0 or 1 can cause arithmetics problems.
- * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
- * limitation from this.)
- */
if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
shares = MIN_SHARES;
+ else if (shares > MAX_SHARES)
+ shares = MAX_SHARES;
mutex_lock(&shares_mutex);
if (tg->shares == shares)
@@ -8816,7 +8821,7 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
* force a rebalance
*/
cfs_rq_set_shares(tg->cfs_rq[i], 0);
- set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares/nr_cpu_ids);
+ set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares);
}
/*