diff options
author | Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> | 2019-04-30 01:46:19 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-05-01 18:47:54 +0300 |
commit | 6b94b1c88b660a786fdb1c22d8a0d3529fe40f8c (patch) | |
tree | 94f9dd344ea2aa1a5dbee85f2746614b186403c0 | |
parent | 794200d66273cbfa32cab2dbcd59a5db6b57a5d1 (diff) | |
download | linux-6b94b1c88b660a786fdb1c22d8a0d3529fe40f8c.tar.xz |
tcp: refactor to consolidate TFO passive open code
Use a helper to consolidate two identical code block for passive TFO.
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 52 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 3a40584cb473..706a99ec73f6 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -5989,6 +5989,27 @@ reset_and_undo: return 1; } +static void tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(struct sock *sk) +{ + tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, false); + inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0; + + /* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV or TCP_FIN_WAIT_1, + * we no longer need req so release it. + */ + reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk, false); + + /* Re-arm the timer because data may have been sent out. + * This is similar to the regular data transmission case + * when new data has just been ack'ed. + * + * (TFO) - we could try to be more aggressive and + * retransmitting any data sooner based on when they + * are sent out. + */ + tcp_rearm_rto(sk); +} + /* * This function implements the receiving procedure of RFC 793 for * all states except ESTABLISHED and TIME_WAIT. @@ -6085,22 +6106,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (!tp->srtt_us) tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, req); - /* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV, we no longer need req - * so release it. - */ if (req) { - tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, false); - inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0; - reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false); - /* Re-arm the timer because data may have been sent out. - * This is similar to the regular data transmission case - * when new data has just been ack'ed. - * - * (TFO) - we could try to be more aggressive and - * retransmitting any data sooner based on when they - * are sent out. - */ - tcp_rearm_rto(sk); + tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(sk); } else { tcp_try_undo_spurious_syn(sk); tp->retrans_stamp = 0; @@ -6138,18 +6145,9 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) case TCP_FIN_WAIT1: { int tmo; - /* If we enter the TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state and we are a - * Fast Open socket and this is the first acceptable - * ACK we have received, this would have acknowledged - * our SYNACK so stop the SYNACK timer. - */ - if (req) { - tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, false); - inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0; - /* We no longer need the request sock. */ - reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false); - tcp_rearm_rto(sk); - } + if (req) + tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(sk); + if (tp->snd_una != tp->write_seq) break; |