diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-09-21 01:25:33 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-09-21 01:25:33 +0300 |
commit | 3d491679b880006d2469ad14f73c2debb2a522bd (patch) | |
tree | c28cc001fea96b7cbaf993ed89bd639d28eca3ea | |
parent | 5674d81c21d47e12c2def2df7360ef2dbca108e6 (diff) | |
parent | e6b1a44eccfcab5e5e280be376f65478c3b2c7a2 (diff) | |
download | linux-3d491679b880006d2469ad14f73c2debb2a522bd.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'locking_urgent_for_v5.9_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Borislav Petkov:
"Two fixes from the locking/urgent pile:
- Fix lockdep's detection of "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions (Peter
Zijlstra)
- Make percpu-rwsem operations on the semaphore's ->read_count
IRQ-safe because it can be used in an IRQ context (Hou Tao)"
* tag 'locking_urgent_for_v5.9_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
locking/percpu-rwsem: Use this_cpu_{inc,dec}() for read_count
locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 4 |
4 files changed, 37 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h index 5e033fe1ff4e..5fda40f97fe9 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) * anything we did within this RCU-sched read-size critical section. */ if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss))) - __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); else __percpu_down_read(sem, false); /* Unconditional memory barrier */ /* @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) * Same as in percpu_down_read(). */ if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss))) - __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); else ret = __percpu_down_read(sem, true); /* Unconditional memory barrier */ preempt_enable(); @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) * Same as in percpu_down_read(). */ if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss))) { - __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); } else { /* * slowpath; reader will only ever wake a single blocked @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) * aggregate zero, as that is the only time it matters) they * will also see our critical section. */ - __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer); } preempt_enable(); diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 54b74fabf40c..2facbbd146ec 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -3969,13 +3969,18 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { - unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1; + unsigned int old_mask, new_mask, ret = 1; if (new_bit >= LOCK_USAGE_STATES) { DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1); return 0; } + if (new_bit == LOCK_USED && this->read) + new_bit = LOCK_USED_READ; + + new_mask = 1 << new_bit; + /* * If already set then do not dirty the cacheline, * nor do any checks: @@ -3988,13 +3993,22 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, /* * Make sure we didn't race: */ - if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask)) { - graph_unlock(); - return 1; - } + if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask)) + goto unlock; + old_mask = hlock_class(this)->usage_mask; hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask; + /* + * Save one usage_traces[] entry and map both LOCK_USED and + * LOCK_USED_READ onto the same entry. + */ + if (new_bit == LOCK_USED || new_bit == LOCK_USED_READ) { + if (old_mask & (LOCKF_USED | LOCKF_USED_READ)) + goto unlock; + new_bit = LOCK_USED; + } + if (!(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces[new_bit] = save_trace())) return 0; @@ -4008,6 +4022,7 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, return 0; } +unlock: graph_unlock(); /* @@ -4942,12 +4957,20 @@ static void verify_lock_unused(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock { #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING struct lock_class *class = look_up_lock_class(lock, subclass); + unsigned long mask = LOCKF_USED; /* if it doesn't have a class (yet), it certainly hasn't been used yet */ if (!class) return; - if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED)) + /* + * READ locks only conflict with USED, such that if we only ever use + * READ locks, there is no deadlock possible -- RCU. + */ + if (!hlock->read) + mask |= LOCKF_USED_READ; + + if (!(class->usage_mask & mask)) return; hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes; diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h index baca699b94e9..b0be1560ed17 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum lock_usage_bit { #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE LOCK_USED, + LOCK_USED_READ, LOCK_USAGE_STATES }; @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ enum { #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE __LOCKF(USED) + __LOCKF(USED_READ) }; #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) LOCKF_ENABLED_##__STATE | diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c index 8bbafe3e5203..70a32a576f3f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem); static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) { - __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); /* * Due to having preemption disabled the decrement happens on @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) if (likely(!atomic_read_acquire(&sem->block))) return true; - __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); + this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); /* Prod writer to re-evaluate readers_active_check() */ rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer); |