summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>2014-05-04 18:07:23 +0400
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2014-05-05 23:48:21 +0400
commit0254bc8205195c96b47abe33c67f8ccd2f2dad69 (patch)
treedb60ab06d01c7e08a73dea7da80dedd5a5a9d171
parent531d9014d5c870fdf493e626c4b4e448273cb616 (diff)
downloadlinux-0254bc8205195c96b47abe33c67f8ccd2f2dad69.tar.xz
net/mlx4_core: Fix slave id computation for single port VF
The code that deals with computing the slave id based on a given GID gave wrong results when the number of single port VFs wasn't the same for port 1 vs. port 2 and the relevant VF is single ported on port 2. As a result, incoming CM MADs were dispatched to the wrong VF. Fixed that and added documentation to clarify the computation steps. Fixes: 449fc48 ('net/mlx4: Adapt code for N-Port VF') Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c35
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
index cfcad26ed40f..b5b3549b0c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,9 @@ int mlx4_get_slave_from_roce_gid(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, u8 *gid,
}
if (found_ix >= 0) {
+ /* Calculate a slave_gid which is the slave number in the gid
+ * table and not a globally unique slave number.
+ */
if (found_ix < MLX4_ROCE_PF_GIDS)
slave_gid = 0;
else if (found_ix < MLX4_ROCE_PF_GIDS + (vf_gids % num_vfs) *
@@ -1118,41 +1121,43 @@ int mlx4_get_slave_from_roce_gid(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, u8 *gid,
((vf_gids % num_vfs) * ((vf_gids / num_vfs + 1)))) /
(vf_gids / num_vfs)) + vf_gids % num_vfs + 1;
+ /* Calculate the globally unique slave id */
if (slave_gid) {
struct mlx4_active_ports exclusive_ports;
struct mlx4_active_ports actv_ports;
struct mlx4_slaves_pport slaves_pport_actv;
unsigned max_port_p_one;
- int num_slaves_before = 1;
+ int num_vfs_before = 0;
+ int candidate_slave_gid;
+ /* Calculate how many VFs are on the previous port, if exists */
for (i = 1; i < port; i++) {
bitmap_zero(exclusive_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports);
- set_bit(i, exclusive_ports.ports);
+ set_bit(i - 1, exclusive_ports.ports);
slaves_pport_actv =
mlx4_phys_to_slaves_pport_actv(
dev, &exclusive_ports);
- num_slaves_before += bitmap_weight(
+ num_vfs_before += bitmap_weight(
slaves_pport_actv.slaves,
dev->num_vfs + 1);
}
- if (slave_gid < num_slaves_before) {
- bitmap_zero(exclusive_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports);
- set_bit(port - 1, exclusive_ports.ports);
- slaves_pport_actv =
- mlx4_phys_to_slaves_pport_actv(
- dev, &exclusive_ports);
- slave_gid += bitmap_weight(
- slaves_pport_actv.slaves,
- dev->num_vfs + 1) -
- num_slaves_before;
- }
- actv_ports = mlx4_get_active_ports(dev, slave_gid);
+ /* candidate_slave_gid isn't necessarily the correct slave, but
+ * it has the same number of ports and is assigned to the same
+ * ports as the real slave we're looking for. On dual port VF,
+ * slave_gid = [single port VFs on port <port>] +
+ * [offset of the current slave from the first dual port VF] +
+ * 1 (for the PF).
+ */
+ candidate_slave_gid = slave_gid + num_vfs_before;
+
+ actv_ports = mlx4_get_active_ports(dev, candidate_slave_gid);
max_port_p_one = find_first_bit(
actv_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports) +
bitmap_weight(actv_ports.ports,
dev->caps.num_ports) + 1;
+ /* Calculate the real slave number */
for (i = 1; i < max_port_p_one; i++) {
if (i == port)
continue;