summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2021-04-23 21:13:42 +0300
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2021-04-24 00:05:27 +0300
commit0a342457b3bd36e6f9b558da3ff520dee35c5363 (patch)
treeb34cc7f56546e564f78a9d9322060406c919aaa4
parenta46349227cd832b33c12f74b85712ea67de3c6c4 (diff)
downloadlinux-0a342457b3bd36e6f9b558da3ff520dee35c5363.tar.xz
libbpf: Support extern resolution for BTF-defined maps in .maps section
Add extra logic to handle map externs (only BTF-defined maps are supported for linking). Re-use the map parsing logic used during bpf_object__open(). Map externs are currently restricted to always match complete map definition. So all the specified attributes will be compared (down to pining, map_flags, numa_node, etc). In the future this restriction might be relaxed with no backwards compatibility issues. If any attribute is mismatched between extern and actual map definition, linker will report an error, pointing out which one mismatches. The original intent was to allow for extern to specify attributes that matters (to user) to enforce. E.g., if you specify just key information and omit value, then any value fits. Similarly, it should have been possible to enforce map_flags, pinning, and any other possible map attribute. Unfortunately, that means that multiple externs can be only partially overlapping with each other, which means linker would need to combine their type definitions to end up with the most restrictive and fullest map definition. This requires an extra amount of BTF manipulation which at this time was deemed unnecessary and would require further extending generic BTF writer APIs. So that is left for future follow ups, if there will be demand for that. But the idea seems intresting and useful, so I want to document it here. Weak definitions are also supported, but are pretty strict as well, just like externs: all weak map definitions have to match exactly. In the follow up patches this most probably will be relaxed, with __weak map definitions being able to differ between each other (with non-weak definition always winning, of course). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210423181348.1801389-13-andrii@kernel.org
-rw-r--r--tools/lib/bpf/linker.c132
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index 23f49945dc7a..9de084b1c699 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -1471,6 +1471,134 @@ recur:
}
}
+static bool map_defs_match(const char *sym_name,
+ const struct btf *main_btf,
+ const struct btf_map_def *main_def,
+ const struct btf_map_def *main_inner_def,
+ const struct btf *extra_btf,
+ const struct btf_map_def *extra_def,
+ const struct btf_map_def *extra_inner_def)
+{
+ const char *reason;
+
+ if (main_def->map_type != extra_def->map_type) {
+ reason = "type";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+
+ /* check key type/size match */
+ if (main_def->key_size != extra_def->key_size) {
+ reason = "key_size";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if (!!main_def->key_type_id != !!extra_def->key_type_id) {
+ reason = "key type";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if ((main_def->parts & MAP_DEF_KEY_TYPE)
+ && !glob_sym_btf_matches(sym_name, true /*exact*/,
+ main_btf, main_def->key_type_id,
+ extra_btf, extra_def->key_type_id)) {
+ reason = "key type";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+
+ /* validate value type/size match */
+ if (main_def->value_size != extra_def->value_size) {
+ reason = "value_size";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if (!!main_def->value_type_id != !!extra_def->value_type_id) {
+ reason = "value type";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if ((main_def->parts & MAP_DEF_VALUE_TYPE)
+ && !glob_sym_btf_matches(sym_name, true /*exact*/,
+ main_btf, main_def->value_type_id,
+ extra_btf, extra_def->value_type_id)) {
+ reason = "key type";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+
+ if (main_def->max_entries != extra_def->max_entries) {
+ reason = "max_entries";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if (main_def->map_flags != extra_def->map_flags) {
+ reason = "map_flags";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if (main_def->numa_node != extra_def->numa_node) {
+ reason = "numa_node";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+ if (main_def->pinning != extra_def->pinning) {
+ reason = "pinning";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+
+ if ((main_def->parts & MAP_DEF_INNER_MAP) != (extra_def->parts & MAP_DEF_INNER_MAP)) {
+ reason = "inner map";
+ goto mismatch;
+ }
+
+ if (main_def->parts & MAP_DEF_INNER_MAP) {
+ char inner_map_name[128];
+
+ snprintf(inner_map_name, sizeof(inner_map_name), "%s.inner", sym_name);
+
+ return map_defs_match(inner_map_name,
+ main_btf, main_inner_def, NULL,
+ extra_btf, extra_inner_def, NULL);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+
+mismatch:
+ pr_warn("global '%s': map %s mismatch\n", sym_name, reason);
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool glob_map_defs_match(const char *sym_name,
+ struct bpf_linker *linker, struct glob_sym *glob_sym,
+ struct src_obj *obj, Elf64_Sym *sym, int btf_id)
+{
+ struct btf_map_def dst_def = {}, dst_inner_def = {};
+ struct btf_map_def src_def = {}, src_inner_def = {};
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+ int err;
+
+ t = btf__type_by_id(obj->btf, btf_id);
+ if (!btf_is_var(t)) {
+ pr_warn("global '%s': invalid map definition type [%d]\n", sym_name, btf_id);
+ return false;
+ }
+ t = skip_mods_and_typedefs(obj->btf, t->type, NULL);
+
+ err = parse_btf_map_def(sym_name, obj->btf, t, true /*strict*/, &src_def, &src_inner_def);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_warn("global '%s': invalid map definition\n", sym_name);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* re-parse existing map definition */
+ t = btf__type_by_id(linker->btf, glob_sym->btf_id);
+ t = skip_mods_and_typedefs(linker->btf, t->type, NULL);
+ err = parse_btf_map_def(sym_name, linker->btf, t, true /*strict*/, &dst_def, &dst_inner_def);
+ if (err) {
+ /* this should not happen, because we already validated it */
+ pr_warn("global '%s': invalid dst map definition\n", sym_name);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Currently extern map definition has to be complete and match
+ * concrete map definition exactly. This restriction might be lifted
+ * in the future.
+ */
+ return map_defs_match(sym_name, linker->btf, &dst_def, &dst_inner_def,
+ obj->btf, &src_def, &src_inner_def);
+}
+
static bool glob_syms_match(const char *sym_name,
struct bpf_linker *linker, struct glob_sym *glob_sym,
struct src_obj *obj, Elf64_Sym *sym, size_t sym_idx, int btf_id)
@@ -1492,6 +1620,10 @@ static bool glob_syms_match(const char *sym_name,
return false;
}
+ /* deal with .maps definitions specially */
+ if (glob_sym->sec_id && strcmp(linker->secs[glob_sym->sec_id].sec_name, MAPS_ELF_SEC) == 0)
+ return glob_map_defs_match(sym_name, linker, glob_sym, obj, sym, btf_id);
+
if (!glob_sym_btf_matches(sym_name, true /*exact*/,
linker->btf, glob_sym->btf_id, obj->btf, btf_id))
return false;