From 6944e6d8a6d4c1e654de1da112da8fef1b30e623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cheng-Yang Chou Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 03:57:57 +0800 Subject: sched_ext/selftests: Fix format specifier and buffer length in file_write_long() Use %ld (not %lu) for signed long, and pass the actual string length returned by sprintf() to write_text() instead of sizeof(buf). Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yang Chou Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/util.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/util.c index e47769c91918..2111329ed289 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/util.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/util.c @@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ int file_write_long(const char *path, long val) char buf[64]; int ret; - ret = sprintf(buf, "%lu", val); + ret = sprintf(buf, "%ld", val); if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (write_text(path, buf, sizeof(buf)) <= 0) + if (write_text(path, buf, ret) <= 0) return -1; return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3 From cf534a09fb621b0aa875613e3cd88aee336e16d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kai Huang Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 09:51:58 +1300 Subject: KVM: selftests: Increase 'maxnode' for guest_memfd tests Increase 'maxnode' when using 'get_mempolicy' syscall in guest_memfd mmap and NUMA policy tests to fix a failure on one Intel GNR platform. On a CXL-capable platform, the memory affinity of CXL memory regions may not be covered by the SRAT. Since each CXL memory region is enumerated via a CFMWS table, at early boot the kernel parses all CFMWS tables to detect all CXL memory regions and assigns a 'faked' NUMA node for each of them, starting from the highest NUMA node ID enumerated via the SRAT. This increases the 'nr_node_ids'. E.g., on the aforementioned Intel GNR platform which has 4 NUMA nodes and 18 CFMWS tables, it increases to 22. This results in the 'get_mempolicy' syscall failure on that platform, because currently 'maxnode' is hard-coded to 8 but the 'get_mempolicy' syscall requires the 'maxnode' to be not smaller than the 'nr_node_ids'. Increase the 'maxnode' to the number of bits of 'nodemask', which is 'unsigned long', to fix this. This may not cover all systems. Perhaps a better way is to always set the 'nodemask' and 'maxnode' based on the actual maximum NUMA node ID on the system, but for now just do the simple way. Reported-by: Yi Lai Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221014 Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bug-221014-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org%2F Signed-off-by: Kai Huang Reviewed-by: Yuan Yao Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302205158.178058-1-kai.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c index 618c937f3c90..cc329b57ce2e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void test_mbind(int fd, size_t total_size) { const unsigned long nodemask_0 = 1; /* nid: 0 */ unsigned long nodemask = 0; - unsigned long maxnode = 8; + unsigned long maxnode = BITS_PER_TYPE(nodemask); int policy; char *mem; int ret; -- cgit v1.2.3 From c52b534f26574ddf2f67cf07992ae2c25e8932c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:43:57 +0100 Subject: selftests: kvm: extract common functionality out of smm_test.c Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/smm.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/smm_test.c | 27 ++----------------------- 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/smm.h (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/smm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/smm.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..19337c34f13e --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/smm.h @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +#ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_SMM_H +#define SELFTEST_KVM_SMM_H + +#include "kvm_util.h" + +#define SMRAM_SIZE 65536 +#define SMRAM_MEMSLOT ((1 << 16) | 1) +#define SMRAM_PAGES (SMRAM_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) + +void setup_smram(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + uint64_t smram_gpa, + const void *smi_handler, size_t handler_size); + +void inject_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); + +#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_SMM_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c index fab18e9be66c..23a44941e283 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "kvm_util.h" #include "pmu.h" #include "processor.h" +#include "smm.h" #include "svm_util.h" #include "sev.h" #include "vmx.h" @@ -1444,3 +1445,28 @@ bool kvm_arch_has_default_irqchip(void) { return true; } + +void setup_smram(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + uint64_t smram_gpa, + const void *smi_handler, size_t handler_size) +{ + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, smram_gpa, + SMRAM_MEMSLOT, SMRAM_PAGES, 0); + TEST_ASSERT(vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, SMRAM_PAGES, smram_gpa, + SMRAM_MEMSLOT) == smram_gpa, + "Could not allocate guest physical addresses for SMRAM"); + + memset(addr_gpa2hva(vm, smram_gpa), 0x0, SMRAM_SIZE); + memcpy(addr_gpa2hva(vm, smram_gpa) + 0x8000, smi_handler, handler_size); + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_SMBASE, smram_gpa); +} + +void inject_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_events events; + + vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events); + events.smi.pending = 1; + events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM; + vcpu_events_set(vcpu, &events); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/smm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/smm_test.c index 55c88d664a94..ade8412bf94a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/smm_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/smm_test.c @@ -14,13 +14,11 @@ #include "test_util.h" #include "kvm_util.h" +#include "smm.h" #include "vmx.h" #include "svm_util.h" -#define SMRAM_SIZE 65536 -#define SMRAM_MEMSLOT ((1 << 16) | 1) -#define SMRAM_PAGES (SMRAM_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) #define SMRAM_GPA 0x1000000 #define SMRAM_STAGE 0xfe @@ -113,18 +111,6 @@ static void guest_code(void *arg) sync_with_host(DONE); } -void inject_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - struct kvm_vcpu_events events; - - vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events); - - events.smi.pending = 1; - events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM; - - vcpu_events_set(vcpu, &events); -} - int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { vm_vaddr_t nested_gva = 0; @@ -140,16 +126,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) /* Create VM */ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); - vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, SMRAM_GPA, - SMRAM_MEMSLOT, SMRAM_PAGES, 0); - TEST_ASSERT(vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, SMRAM_PAGES, SMRAM_GPA, SMRAM_MEMSLOT) - == SMRAM_GPA, "could not allocate guest physical addresses?"); - - memset(addr_gpa2hva(vm, SMRAM_GPA), 0x0, SMRAM_SIZE); - memcpy(addr_gpa2hva(vm, SMRAM_GPA) + 0x8000, smi_handler, - sizeof(smi_handler)); - - vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_SMBASE, SMRAM_GPA); + setup_smram(vm, vcpu, SMRAM_GPA, smi_handler, sizeof(smi_handler)); if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE)) { if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SVM)) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3e745694b032b405ff1ced74a8b3b95cdd00a385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:44:40 +0100 Subject: selftests: kvm: add a test that VMX validates controls on RSM Add a test checking that invalid eVMCS contents are validated after an RSM instruction is emulated. The failure mode is simply that the RSM succeeds, because KVM virtualizes NMIs anyway while running L2; the two pin-based execution controls used by the test are entirely handled by KVM and not by the processor. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 + .../selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm index fdec90e85467..dc68371f76a3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/cpuid_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/cr4_cpuid_sync_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/dirty_log_page_splitting_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/feature_msrs_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/exit_on_emulation_failure_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/fastops_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/fix_hypercall_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..af7c90103396 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2026, Red Hat, Inc. + * + * Test that vmx_leave_smm() validates vmcs12 controls before re-entering + * nested guest mode on RSM. + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "test_util.h" +#include "kvm_util.h" +#include "smm.h" +#include "hyperv.h" +#include "vmx.h" + +#define SMRAM_GPA 0x1000000 +#define SMRAM_STAGE 0xfe + +#define SYNC_PORT 0xe + +#define STR(x) #x +#define XSTR(s) STR(s) + +/* + * SMI handler: runs in real-address mode. + * Reports SMRAM_STAGE via port IO, then does RSM. + */ +static uint8_t smi_handler[] = { + 0xb0, SMRAM_STAGE, /* mov $SMRAM_STAGE, %al */ + 0xe4, SYNC_PORT, /* in $SYNC_PORT, %al */ + 0x0f, 0xaa, /* rsm */ +}; + +static inline void sync_with_host(uint64_t phase) +{ + asm volatile("in $" XSTR(SYNC_PORT) ", %%al \n" + : "+a" (phase)); +} + +static void l2_guest_code(void) +{ + sync_with_host(1); + + /* After SMI+RSM with invalid controls, we should not reach here. */ + vmcall(); +} + +static void guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages, + struct hyperv_test_pages *hv_pages) +{ +#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64 + unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]; + + /* Set up Hyper-V enlightenments and eVMCS */ + wrmsr(HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HYPERV_LINUX_OS_ID); + enable_vp_assist(hv_pages->vp_assist_gpa, hv_pages->vp_assist); + evmcs_enable(); + + GUEST_ASSERT(prepare_for_vmx_operation(vmx_pages)); + GUEST_ASSERT(load_evmcs(hv_pages)); + prepare_vmcs(vmx_pages, l2_guest_code, + &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]); + + GUEST_ASSERT(!vmlaunch()); + + /* L2 exits via vmcall if test fails */ + sync_with_host(2); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva = 0, hv_pages_gva = 0; + struct hyperv_test_pages *hv; + struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_regs regs; + int stage_reported; + + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX)); + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE)); + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS)); + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_SMM)); + + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); + + setup_smram(vm, vcpu, SMRAM_GPA, smi_handler, sizeof(smi_handler)); + + vcpu_set_hv_cpuid(vcpu); + vcpu_enable_evmcs(vcpu); + vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &vmx_pages_gva); + hv = vcpu_alloc_hyperv_test_pages(vm, &hv_pages_gva); + vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 2, vmx_pages_gva, hv_pages_gva); + + vcpu_run(vcpu); + + /* L2 is running and syncs with host. */ + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); + vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s); + stage_reported = regs.rax & 0xff; + TEST_ASSERT(stage_reported == 1, + "Expected stage 1, got %d", stage_reported); + + /* Inject SMI while L2 is running. */ + inject_smi(vcpu); + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); + vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s); + stage_reported = regs.rax & 0xff; + TEST_ASSERT(stage_reported == SMRAM_STAGE, + "Expected SMM handler stage %#x, got %#x", + SMRAM_STAGE, stage_reported); + + /* + * Guest is now paused in the SMI handler, about to execute RSM. + * Hack the eVMCS page to set-up invalid pin-based execution + * control (PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS without PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING). + */ + evmcs = hv->enlightened_vmcs_hva; + evmcs->pin_based_vm_exec_control |= PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS; + evmcs->hv_clean_fields = 0; + + /* + * Trigger copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12() via KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE, + * copying the invalid pin_based_vm_exec_control into cached_vmcs12. + */ + union { + struct kvm_nested_state state; + char state_[16384]; + } nested_state_buf; + + memset(&nested_state_buf, 0, sizeof(nested_state_buf)); + nested_state_buf.state.size = sizeof(nested_state_buf); + vcpu_nested_state_get(vcpu, &nested_state_buf.state); + + /* + * Resume the guest. The SMI handler executes RSM, which calls + * vmx_leave_smm(). nested_vmx_check_controls() should detect + * VIRTUAL_NMIS without NMI_EXITING and cause a triple fault. + */ + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN); + + kvm_vm_free(vm); + return 0; +} -- cgit v1.2.3 From 146c9ab38b48004b40735b6c1e1c2b5adf6436f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sayali Patil Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:52:01 +0530 Subject: powerpc/selftests/copyloops: extend selftest to exercise __copy_tofrom_user_power7_vmx The new PowerPC VMX fast path (__copy_tofrom_user_power7_vmx) is not exercised by existing copyloops selftests. This patch updates the selftest to exercise the VMX variant, ensuring the VMX copy path is validated. Changes include: - COPY_LOOP=test___copy_tofrom_user_power7_vmx with -D VMX_TEST is used in existing selftest build targets. - Inclusion of ../utils.c to provide get_auxv_entry() for hardware feature detection. - At runtime, the test skips execution if Altivec is not available. - Copy sizes above VMX_COPY_THRESHOLD are used to ensure the VMX path is taken. This enables validation of the VMX fast path without affecting systems that do not support Altivec. Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260304122201.153049-2-sayalip@linux.ibm.com --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/.gitignore | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/Makefile | 11 ++++++++--- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/stubs.S | 8 -------- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/validate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/.gitignore index 7283e8b07b75..80d4270a71ac 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/.gitignore @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ copyuser_64_t0 copyuser_64_t1 copyuser_64_t2 -copyuser_p7_t0 -copyuser_p7_t1 +copyuser_p7 +copyuser_p7_vmx memcpy_64_t0 memcpy_64_t1 memcpy_64_t2 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/Makefile index 42940f92d832..0c8efb0bddeb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 TEST_GEN_PROGS := copyuser_64_t0 copyuser_64_t1 copyuser_64_t2 \ - copyuser_p7_t0 copyuser_p7_t1 \ + copyuser_p7 copyuser_p7_vmx \ memcpy_64_t0 memcpy_64_t1 memcpy_64_t2 \ memcpy_p7_t0 memcpy_p7_t1 copy_mc_64 \ copyuser_64_exc_t0 copyuser_64_exc_t1 copyuser_64_exc_t2 \ @@ -28,10 +28,15 @@ $(OUTPUT)/copyuser_64_t%: copyuser_64.S $(EXTRA_SOURCES) -D SELFTEST_CASE=$(subst copyuser_64_t,,$(notdir $@)) \ -o $@ $^ -$(OUTPUT)/copyuser_p7_t%: copyuser_power7.S $(EXTRA_SOURCES) +$(OUTPUT)/copyuser_p7: copyuser_power7.S $(EXTRA_SOURCES) $(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) \ -D COPY_LOOP=test___copy_tofrom_user_power7 \ - -D SELFTEST_CASE=$(subst copyuser_p7_t,,$(notdir $@)) \ + -o $@ $^ + +$(OUTPUT)/copyuser_p7_vmx: copyuser_power7.S $(EXTRA_SOURCES) ../utils.c + $(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) \ + -D COPY_LOOP=test___copy_tofrom_user_power7_vmx \ + -D VMX_TEST \ -o $@ $^ # Strictly speaking, we only need the memcpy_64 test cases for big-endian diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/stubs.S b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/stubs.S index ec8bcf2bf1c2..3a9cb8c9a3ee 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/stubs.S +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/stubs.S @@ -1,13 +1,5 @@ #include -FUNC_START(enter_vmx_usercopy) - li r3,1 - blr - -FUNC_START(exit_vmx_usercopy) - li r3,0 - blr - FUNC_START(enter_vmx_ops) li r3,1 blr diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/validate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/validate.c index 0f6873618552..fb822534fbe9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/validate.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/validate.c @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ #define BUFLEN (MAX_LEN+MAX_OFFSET+2*MIN_REDZONE) #define POISON 0xa5 +#ifdef VMX_TEST +#define VMX_COPY_THRESHOLD 3328 +#endif + unsigned long COPY_LOOP(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long size); static void do_one(char *src, char *dst, unsigned long src_off, @@ -81,8 +85,12 @@ int test_copy_loop(void) /* Fill with sequential bytes */ for (i = 0; i < BUFLEN; i++) fill[i] = i & 0xff; - +#ifdef VMX_TEST + /* Force sizes above kernel VMX threshold (3328) */ + for (len = VMX_COPY_THRESHOLD + 1; len < MAX_LEN; len++) { +#else for (len = 1; len < MAX_LEN; len++) { +#endif for (src_off = 0; src_off < MAX_OFFSET; src_off++) { for (dst_off = 0; dst_off < MAX_OFFSET; dst_off++) { do_one(src, dst, src_off, dst_off, len, @@ -96,5 +104,10 @@ int test_copy_loop(void) int main(void) { +#ifdef VMX_TEST + /* Skip if Altivec not present */ + SKIP_IF_MSG(!have_hwcap(PPC_FEATURE_HAS_ALTIVEC), "ALTIVEC not supported"); +#endif + return test_harness(test_copy_loop, str(COPY_LOOP)); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From d2ea4ff1ce50787a98a3900b3fb1636f3620b7cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:18:41 -0700 Subject: KVM: selftests: Verify SEV+ guests can read and write EFER, CR0, CR4, and CR8 Add "do no harm" testing of EFER, CR0, CR4, and CR8 for SEV+ guests to verify that the guest can read and write the registers, without hitting e.g. a #VC on SEV-ES guests due to KVM incorrectly trying to intercept a register. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Message-ID: <20260310211841.2552361-3-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h index 4ebae4269e68..469a22122157 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h @@ -557,6 +557,11 @@ static inline uint64_t get_cr0(void) return cr0; } +static inline void set_cr0(uint64_t val) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%cr0" : : "r" (val) : "memory"); +} + static inline uint64_t get_cr3(void) { uint64_t cr3; @@ -566,6 +571,11 @@ static inline uint64_t get_cr3(void) return cr3; } +static inline void set_cr3(uint64_t val) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%cr3" : : "r" (val) : "memory"); +} + static inline uint64_t get_cr4(void) { uint64_t cr4; @@ -580,6 +590,19 @@ static inline void set_cr4(uint64_t val) __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%cr4" : : "r" (val) : "memory"); } +static inline uint64_t get_cr8(void) +{ + uint64_t cr8; + + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %%cr8, %[cr8]" : [cr8]"=r"(cr8)); + return cr8; +} + +static inline void set_cr8(uint64_t val) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%cr8" : : "r" (val) : "memory"); +} + static inline void set_idt(const struct desc_ptr *idt_desc) { __asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0"::"m"(*idt_desc)); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c index 86ad1c7d068f..8bd37a476f15 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c @@ -13,6 +13,30 @@ #include "linux/psp-sev.h" #include "sev.h" +static void guest_sev_test_msr(uint32_t msr) +{ + uint64_t val = rdmsr(msr); + + wrmsr(msr, val); + GUEST_ASSERT(val == rdmsr(msr)); +} + +#define guest_sev_test_reg(reg) \ +do { \ + uint64_t val = get_##reg(); \ + \ + set_##reg(val); \ + GUEST_ASSERT(val == get_##reg()); \ +} while (0) + +static void guest_sev_test_regs(void) +{ + guest_sev_test_msr(MSR_EFER); + guest_sev_test_reg(cr0); + guest_sev_test_reg(cr3); + guest_sev_test_reg(cr4); + guest_sev_test_reg(cr8); +} #define XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX (XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE | XFEATURE_MASK_YMM) @@ -24,6 +48,8 @@ static void guest_snp_code(void) GUEST_ASSERT(sev_msr & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED); GUEST_ASSERT(sev_msr & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED); + guest_sev_test_regs(); + wrmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB, GHCB_MSR_TERM_REQ); vmgexit(); } @@ -34,6 +60,8 @@ static void guest_sev_es_code(void) GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV) & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED); GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV) & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED); + guest_sev_test_regs(); + /* * TODO: Add GHCB and ucall support for SEV-ES guests. For now, simply * force "termination" to signal "done" via the GHCB MSR protocol. @@ -47,6 +75,8 @@ static void guest_sev_code(void) GUEST_ASSERT(this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV)); GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV) & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED); + guest_sev_test_regs(); + GUEST_DONE(); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5d4c6c132ea9a967d48890dd03e6a786c060e968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Tissoires Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:40:24 +0100 Subject: selftests/hid: fix compilation when bpf_wq and hid_device are not exported MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This can happen in situations when CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT is set to no, or some complex situations where struct bpf_wq is not exported. So do the usual dance of hiding them before including vmlinux.h, and then redefining them and make use of CO-RE to have the correct offsets. Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603111558.KLCIxsZB-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: fe8d561db3e8 ("selftests/hid: add wq test for hid_bpf_input_report()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Jiri Kosina Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires --- tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h index 80ab60905865..cdca912f3afd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h @@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ #define __HID_BPF_HELPERS_H /* "undefine" structs and enums in vmlinux.h, because we "override" them below */ +#define bpf_wq bpf_wq___not_used #define hid_bpf_ctx hid_bpf_ctx___not_used #define hid_bpf_ops hid_bpf_ops___not_used +#define hid_device hid_device___not_used #define hid_report_type hid_report_type___not_used #define hid_class_request hid_class_request___not_used #define hid_bpf_attach_flags hid_bpf_attach_flags___not_used @@ -27,8 +29,10 @@ #include "vmlinux.h" +#undef bpf_wq #undef hid_bpf_ctx #undef hid_bpf_ops +#undef hid_device #undef hid_report_type #undef hid_class_request #undef hid_bpf_attach_flags @@ -55,6 +59,14 @@ enum hid_report_type { HID_REPORT_TYPES, }; +struct hid_device { + unsigned int id; +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); + +struct bpf_wq { + __u64 __opaque[2]; +}; + struct hid_bpf_ctx { struct hid_device *hid; __u32 allocated_size; -- cgit v1.2.3