From 3a4fa0a25da81600ea0bcd75692ae8ca6050d165 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:10:43 +0200 Subject: Fix misspellings of "system", "controller", "interrupt" and "necessary". Fix the various misspellings of "system", controller", "interrupt" and "[un]necessary". Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- sound/mips/au1x00.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'sound/mips/au1x00.c') diff --git a/sound/mips/au1x00.c b/sound/mips/au1x00.c index 8a61a1191861..24460a558bf7 100644 --- a/sound/mips/au1x00.c +++ b/sound/mips/au1x00.c @@ -498,8 +498,8 @@ snd_au1000_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg) int i; spin_lock(&au1000->ac97_lock); -/* would rather use the interupt than this polling but it works and I can't -get the interupt driven case to work efficiently */ +/* would rather use the interrupt than this polling but it works and I can't +get the interrupt driven case to work efficiently */ for (i = 0; i < 0x5000; i++) if (!(au1000->ac97_ioport->status & AC97C_CP)) break; @@ -535,8 +535,8 @@ snd_au1000_ac97_write(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg, unsigned short int i; spin_lock(&au1000->ac97_lock); -/* would rather use the interupt than this polling but it works and I can't -get the interupt driven case to work efficiently */ +/* would rather use the interrupt than this polling but it works and I can't +get the interrupt driven case to work efficiently */ for (i = 0; i < 0x5000; i++) if (!(au1000->ac97_ioport->status & AC97C_CP)) break; -- cgit v1.2.3