From 6f1982fedd59856bcc42a9b521be4c3ffd2f60a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 04:42:36 +0200 Subject: sched/isolation: Handle the nohz_full= parameter We want to centralize the isolation management, done by the housekeeping subsystem. Therefore we need to handle the nohz_full= parameter from there. Since nohz_full= so far has involved unbound timers, watchdog, RCU and tilegx NAPI isolation, we keep that default behaviour. nohz_full= will be deprecated in the future. We want to control the isolation features from the isolcpus= parameter. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Chris Metcalf Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Wanpeng Li Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509072159-31808-10-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/tick.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'include/linux/tick.h') diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h index 68afc09aa8ac..e2a163a9f96c 100644 --- a/include/linux/tick.h +++ b/include/linux/tick.h @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal, extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu); extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void); +extern void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask); #else static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; } static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; } @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal, static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { } static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void) { } +static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { } #endif static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void) -- cgit v1.2.3