From a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:53:56 +0900 Subject: rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler Since the rethook::handler is an RCU-maganged pointer so that it will notice readers the rethook is stopped (unregistered) or not, it should be an __rcu pointer and use appropriate functions to be accessed. This will use appropriate memory barrier when accessing it. OTOH, rethook::data is never changed, so we don't need to check it in get_kretprobe(). NOTE: To avoid sparse warning, rethook::handler is defined by a raw function pointer type with __rcu instead of rethook_handler_t. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170126066201.398836.837498688669005979.stgit@devnote2/ Fixes: 54ecbe6f1ed5 ("rethook: Add a generic return hook") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241808.rv9ceuAh-lkp@intel.com/ Tested-by: JP Kobryn Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) --- include/linux/rethook.h | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/rethook.h') diff --git a/include/linux/rethook.h b/include/linux/rethook.h index ce69b2b7bc35..ba60962805f6 100644 --- a/include/linux/rethook.h +++ b/include/linux/rethook.h @@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ typedef void (*rethook_handler_t) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, */ struct rethook { void *data; - rethook_handler_t handler; + /* + * To avoid sparse warnings, this uses a raw function pointer with + * __rcu, instead of rethook_handler_t. But this must be same as + * rethook_handler_t. + */ + void (__rcu *handler) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, struct pt_regs *); struct objpool_head pool; struct rcu_head rcu; }; -- cgit v1.2.3