From 49598e04b5a1c3679cbee0dda8c2a0461e9bb320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jun Piao Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:17:49 -0500 Subject: ext4: use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' We could use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' to make code more elegant. Signed-off-by: Jun Piao Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ext4/block_validity.c') diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c index bee888e0e2db..913061c0de1b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c @@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) int ret; if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY)) { - if (EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks.rb_node) + if (sbi->system_blks.rb_node) ext4_release_system_zone(sb); return 0; } - if (EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks.rb_node) + if (sbi->system_blks.rb_node) return 0; for (i=0; i < ngroups; i++) { @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) } if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG)) - debug_print_tree(EXT4_SB(sb)); + debug_print_tree(sbi); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3