From 475f230c6072fb2186f48b23943afcd0ee3a8343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Teigland Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:08:21 -0500 Subject: dlm: fix unlock balance warnings The in_recovery rw_semaphore has always been acquired and released by different threads by design. To work around the "BUG: bad unlock balance detected!" messages, adjust things so the dlm_recoverd thread always does both down_write and up_write. Signed-off-by: David Teigland --- fs/dlm/lockspace.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/dlm/lockspace.c') diff --git a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c index 952557d00ccd..2e99fb0c9737 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c @@ -582,8 +582,6 @@ static int new_lockspace(const char *name, const char *cluster, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ls->ls_root_list); init_rwsem(&ls->ls_root_sem); - down_write(&ls->ls_in_recovery); - spin_lock(&lslist_lock); ls->ls_create_count = 1; list_add(&ls->ls_list, &lslist); @@ -597,13 +595,24 @@ static int new_lockspace(const char *name, const char *cluster, } } - /* needs to find ls in lslist */ + init_waitqueue_head(&ls->ls_recover_lock_wait); + + /* + * Once started, dlm_recoverd first looks for ls in lslist, then + * initializes ls_in_recovery as locked in "down" mode. We need + * to wait for the wakeup from dlm_recoverd because in_recovery + * has to start out in down mode. + */ + error = dlm_recoverd_start(ls); if (error) { log_error(ls, "can't start dlm_recoverd %d", error); goto out_callback; } + wait_event(ls->ls_recover_lock_wait, + test_bit(LSFL_RECOVER_LOCK, &ls->ls_flags)); + ls->ls_kobj.kset = dlm_kset; error = kobject_init_and_add(&ls->ls_kobj, &dlm_ktype, NULL, "%s", ls->ls_name); -- cgit v1.2.3