From a15ac665b9e9c90b1557499f2a46c1e89d29154a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:35:11 +0100
Subject: vfio-mdev: Wire in a request handler for mdev parent
While performing some destructive tests with vfio-ccw, where the
paths to a device are forcible removed and thus the device itself
is unreachable, it is rather easy to end up in an endless loop in
vfio_del_group_dev() due to the lack of a request callback for the
associated device.
In this example, one MDEV (77c) is used by a guest, while another
(77b) is not. The symptom is that the iommu is detached from the
mdev for 77b, but not 77c, until that guest is shutdown:
[ 238.794867] vfio_ccw 0.0.077b: MDEV: Unregistering
[ 238.794996] vfio_mdev 11f2d2bc-4083-431d-a023-eff72715c4f0: Removing from iommu group 2
[ 238.795001] vfio_mdev 11f2d2bc-4083-431d-a023-eff72715c4f0: MDEV: detaching iommu
[ 238.795036] vfio_ccw 0.0.077c: MDEV: Unregistering
...silence...
Let's wire in the request call back to the mdev device, so that a
device being physically removed from the host can be (gracefully?)
handled by the parent device at the time the device is removed.
Add a message when registering the device if a driver doesn't
provide this callback, so a clue is given that this same loop
may be encountered in a similar situation, and a message when
this occurs instead of the awkward silence noted above.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 4 ++++
drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
(limited to 'drivers/vfio')
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
index b558d4cfd082..6de97d25a3f8 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
@@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ int mdev_register_device(struct device *dev, const struct mdev_parent_ops *ops)
if (!dev)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Not mandatory, but its absence could be a problem */
+ if (!ops->request)
+ dev_info(dev, "Driver cannot be asked to release device\n");
+
mutex_lock(&parent_list_lock);
/* Check for duplicate */
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
index 30964a4e0a28..b52eea128549 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
@@ -98,6 +98,18 @@ static int vfio_mdev_mmap(void *device_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
return parent->ops->mmap(mdev, vma);
}
+static void vfio_mdev_request(void *device_data, unsigned int count)
+{
+ struct mdev_device *mdev = device_data;
+ struct mdev_parent *parent = mdev->parent;
+
+ if (parent->ops->request)
+ parent->ops->request(mdev, count);
+ else if (count == 0)
+ dev_notice(mdev_dev(mdev),
+ "No mdev vendor driver request callback support, blocked until released by user\n");
+}
+
static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_mdev_dev_ops = {
.name = "vfio-mdev",
.open = vfio_mdev_open,
@@ -106,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_mdev_dev_ops = {
.read = vfio_mdev_read,
.write = vfio_mdev_write,
.mmap = vfio_mdev_mmap,
+ .request = vfio_mdev_request,
};
static int vfio_mdev_probe(struct device *dev)
--
cgit v1.2.3