From 88dc4384958759510db248bf9158434ac783d407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:36:18 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: remove redundant 'policy' field from user_policy Its always same as policy->policy, and there is no need to keep another copy of it. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 3033952391fe..a80bd68bbd74 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -671,11 +671,7 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return -EINVAL; ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); - if (ret) - return ret; - - policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; - return count; + return ret ? ret : count; } /** @@ -1322,9 +1318,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) goto out_exit_policy; } - if (new_policy) - policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; - up_write(&policy->rwsem); kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD); @@ -2302,7 +2295,6 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min; new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max; - new_policy.policy = policy->user_policy.policy; /* * BIOS might change freq behind our back -- cgit v1.2.3