From 1ef55be16ed69538f89e0a6508be5e62fdc9851c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:48:12 -0700
Subject: x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe()

We use __read_cr4() vs __read_cr4_safe() inconsistently.  On
CR4-less CPUs, all CR4 bits are effectively clear, so we can make
the code simpler and more robust by making __read_cr4() always fix
up faults on 32-bit kernels.

This may fix some bugs on old 486-like CPUs, but I don't have any
easy way to test that.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: david@saggiorato.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ea647033d357d9ce2ad2bbde5a631045f5052fb6.1475178370.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'arch/x86/power')

diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index b12c26e2e309..53cace2ec0e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	ctxt->cr0 = read_cr0();
 	ctxt->cr2 = read_cr2();
 	ctxt->cr3 = read_cr3();
-	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4_safe();
+	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4();
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	ctxt->cr8 = read_cr8();
 #endif
-- 
cgit v1.2.3