From 1fd02f6605b855b4af2883f29a2abc88bdf17857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lawall Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:56:54 +0200 Subject: powerpc: fix typos in comments Various spelling mistakes in comments. Detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220430185654.5855-1-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c index ab6d37d78c62..589a8f257120 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void icp_deliver_irq(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, * new guy. We cannot assume that the rejected interrupt is less * favored than the new one, and thus doesn't need to be delivered, * because by the time we exit icp_try_to_deliver() the target - * processor may well have alrady consumed & completed it, and thus + * processor may well have already consumed & completed it, and thus * the rejected interrupt might actually be already acceptable. */ if (icp_try_to_deliver(icp, new_irq, state->priority, &reject)) { -- cgit v1.2.3