From ac7e385f2bf1c39615cf58f7e58246fdd9da5bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Hogan Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:21:49 +0100 Subject: MIPS: MAAR: Fix address alignment The alignment of MIPS MAAR region addresses isn't quite right. - It rounds an already 64 KiB aligned start address up to the next 64 KiB boundary, e.g. 0x80000000 is rounded up to 0x80010000. - It assumes the end address is already on a 64 KiB boundary and doesn't round it down. Should that not be the case it will hit the second BUG_ON() in write_maar_pair(). Both cases are addressed by rounding up and down to 64 KiB boundaries in the more traditional way of adding 0xffff (for rounding up) and masking off the low 16 bits. Signed-off-by: James Hogan Cc: Paul Burton Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13858/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle --- arch/mips/mm/init.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/mips/mm/init.c') diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/init.c b/arch/mips/mm/init.c index a5509e7dcad2..2c3749d98f04 100644 --- a/arch/mips/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/mips/mm/init.c @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ unsigned __weak platform_maar_init(unsigned num_pairs) { struct maar_config cfg[BOOT_MEM_MAP_MAX]; unsigned i, num_configured, num_cfg = 0; - phys_addr_t skip; for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) { switch (boot_mem_map.map[i].type) { @@ -272,14 +271,14 @@ unsigned __weak platform_maar_init(unsigned num_pairs) continue; } - skip = 0x10000 - (boot_mem_map.map[i].addr & 0xffff); - + /* Round lower up */ cfg[num_cfg].lower = boot_mem_map.map[i].addr; - cfg[num_cfg].lower += skip; + cfg[num_cfg].lower = (cfg[num_cfg].lower + 0xffff) & ~0xffff; - cfg[num_cfg].upper = cfg[num_cfg].lower; - cfg[num_cfg].upper += boot_mem_map.map[i].size - 1; - cfg[num_cfg].upper -= skip; + /* Round upper down */ + cfg[num_cfg].upper = boot_mem_map.map[i].addr + + boot_mem_map.map[i].size; + cfg[num_cfg].upper = (cfg[num_cfg].upper & ~0xffff) - 1; cfg[num_cfg].attrs = MIPS_MAAR_S; num_cfg++; -- cgit v1.2.3