summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Remove flaky test_btf_id testYonghong Song1-5/+0
commit 56925f389e152dcb8d093435d43b78a310539c23 upstream. With previous patch, one of subtests in test_btf_id becomes flaky and may fail. The following is a failing example: Error: #26 btf Error: #26/174 btf/BTF ID Error: #26/174 btf/BTF ID btf_raw_create:PASS:check 0 nsec btf_raw_create:PASS:check 0 nsec test_btf_id:PASS:check 0 nsec ... test_btf_id:PASS:check 0 nsec test_btf_id:FAIL:check BTF lingersdo_test_get_info:FAIL:check failed: -1 The test tries to prove a btf_id not available after the map is closed. But btf_id is freed only after workqueue and a rcu grace period, compared to previous case just after a rcu grade period. Depending on system workload, workqueue could take quite some time to execute function bpf_map_free_deferred() which may cause the test failure. Instead of adding arbitrary delays, let us remove the logic to check btf_id availability after map is closed. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214203820.1469402-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: fix compiler warnings in RELEASE=1 modeAndrii Nakryiko2-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 62d9a969f4a95219c757831e9ad66cd4dd9edee5 ] When compiling BPF selftests with RELEASE=1, we get two new warnings, which are treated as errors. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212225343.1723081-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-05bpf: Fix a few selftest failures due to llvm18 changeYonghong Song1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit b16904fd9f01b580db357ef2b1cc9e86d89576c2 ] With latest upstream llvm18, the following test cases failed: $ ./test_progs -j #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #77 fentry_fexit:FAIL #78/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #78 fentry_test:FAIL #82/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #82 fexit_test:FAIL #112/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #112/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL [...] #112 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL #356/17 test_global_funcs/global_func17:FAIL #356 test_global_funcs:FAIL Further analysis shows llvm upstream patch [1] is responsible for the above failures. For example, for function bpf_fentry_test7() in net/bpf/test_run.c, without [1], the asm code is: 0000000000000400 <bpf_fentry_test7>: 400: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 404: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x409 <bpf_fentry_test7+0x9> 409: 48 89 f8 movq %rdi, %rax 40c: c3 retq 40d: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax) ... and with [1], the asm code is: 0000000000005d20 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1>: 5d20: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x5d25 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1+0x5> 5d25: c3 retq ... and <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1> is called instead of <bpf_fentry_test7> and this caused test failures for #13/#77 etc. except #356. For test case #356/17, with [1] (progs/test_global_func17.c)), the main prog looks like: 0000000000000000 <global_func17>: 0: b4 00 00 00 2a 00 00 00 w0 = 0x2a 1: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit ... which passed verification while the test itself expects a verification failure. Let us add 'barrier_var' style asm code in both places to prevent function specialization which caused selftests failure. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72903 Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231127050342.1945270-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Fix issues in setup_classid_environment()Yafang Shao1-4/+14
[ Upstream commit 4849775587844e44d215289c425bcd70f315efe7 ] If the net_cls subsystem is already mounted, attempting to mount it again in setup_classid_environment() will result in a failure with the error code EBUSY. Despite this, tmpfs will have been successfully mounted at /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls. Consequently, the /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls directory will be empty, causing subsequent setup operations to fail. Here's an error log excerpt illustrating the issue when net_cls has already been mounted at /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls prior to running setup_classid_environment(): - Before that change $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=cgroup_v1v2 test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:client_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup-v2-only 0 nsec (cgroup_helpers.c:248: errno: No such file or directory) Opening Cgroup Procs: /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls/cgroup.procs (cgroup_helpers.c:540: errno: No such file or directory) Opening cgroup classid: /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls/cgroup-test-work-dir/net_cls.classid run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec (cgroup_helpers.c:248: errno: No such file or directory) Opening Cgroup Procs: /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls/cgroup-test-work-dir/cgroup.procs run_test:FAIL:join_classid unexpected error: 1 (errno 2) test_cgroup_v1v2:FAIL:cgroup-v1v2 unexpected error: -1 (errno 2) (cgroup_helpers.c:248: errno: No such file or directory) Opening Cgroup Procs: /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls/cgroup.procs #44 cgroup_v1v2:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED - After that change $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=cgroup_v1v2 #44 cgroup_v1v2:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111090034.4248-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Fix pyperf180 compilation failure with clang18Yonghong Song1-0/+22
[ Upstream commit 100888fb6d8a185866b1520031ee7e3182b173de ] With latest clang18 (main branch of llvm-project repo), when building bpf selftests, [~/work/bpf-next (master)]$ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf LLVM=1 -j The following compilation error happens: fatal error: error in backend: Branch target out of insn range ... Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: clang -g -Wall -Werror -D__TARGET_ARCH_x86 -mlittle-endian -I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include -I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf -I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/include/uapi -I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/usr/include -idirafter /home/yhs/work/llvm-project/llvm/build.18/install/lib/clang/18/include -idirafter /usr/local/include -idirafter /usr/include -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -DENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS -O2 --target=bpf -c progs/pyperf180.c -mcpu=v3 -o /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/pyperf180.bpf.o 1. <eof> parser at end of file 2. Code generation ... The compilation failure only happens to cpu=v2 and cpu=v3. cpu=v4 is okay since cpu=v4 supports 32-bit branch target offset. The above failure is due to upstream llvm patch [1] where some inlining behavior are changed in clang18. To workaround the issue, previously all 180 loop iterations are fully unrolled. The bpf macro __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ (implemented in clang18 recently) is used to avoid unrolling changes if cpu=v4. If __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is not available and the compiler is clang18, the unrollng amount is unconditionally reduced. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a2e77cf9e11dbf56b5720c607313a566eebb16e Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: satisfy compiler by having explicit return in btf testAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit f4c7e887324f5776eef6e6e47a90e0ac8058a7a8 ] Some compilers complain about get_pprint_mapv_size() not returning value in some code paths. Fix with explicit return. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: fix RELEASE=1 build for tc_optsAndrii Nakryiko1-5/+1
[ Upstream commit 2b62aa59d02ed281fa4fc218df3ca91b773e1e62 ] Compiler complains about malloc(). We also don't need to dynamically allocate anything, so make the life easier by using statically sized buffer. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: check if max number of bpf_loop iterations is trackedEduard Zingerman1-0/+75
commit 57e2a52deeb12ab84c15c6d0fb93638b5b94001b upstream. Check that even if bpf_loop() callback simulation does not converge to a specific state, verification could proceed via "brute force" simulation of maximal number of callback calls. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-12-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterationsEduard Zingerman1-10/+25
commit bb124da69c47dd98d69361ec13244ece50bec63e upstream. In some cases verifier can't infer convergence of the bpf_loop() iteration. E.g. for the following program: static int cb(__u32 idx, struct num_context* ctx) { ctx->i++; return 0; } SEC("?raw_tp") int prog(void *_) { struct num_context ctx = { .i = 0 }; __u8 choice_arr[2] = { 0, 1 }; bpf_loop(2, cb, &ctx, 0); return choice_arr[ctx.i]; } Each 'cb' simulation would eventually return to 'prog' and reach 'return choice_arr[ctx.i]' statement. At which point ctx.i would be marked precise, thus forcing verifier to track multitude of separate states with {.i=0}, {.i=1}, ... at bpf_loop() callback entry. This commit allows "brute force" handling for such cases by limiting number of callback body simulations using 'umax' value of the first bpf_loop() parameter. For this, extend bpf_func_state with 'callback_depth' field. Increment this field when callback visiting state is pushed to states traversal stack. For frame #N it's 'callback_depth' field counts how many times callback with frame depth N+1 had been executed. Use bpf_func_state specifically to allow independent tracking of callback depths when multiple nested bpf_loop() calls are present. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-11-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: test widening for iterating callbacksEduard Zingerman1-0/+20
commit 9f3330aa644d6d979eb064c46e85c62d4b4eac75 upstream. A test case to verify that imprecise scalars widening is applied to callback entering state, when callback call is simulated repeatedly. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-10-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: tests for iterating callbacksEduard Zingerman2-0/+149
commit 958465e217dbf5fc6677d42d8827fb3073d86afd upstream. A set of test cases to check behavior of callback handling logic, check if verifier catches the following situations: - program not safe on second callback iteration; - program not safe on zero callback iterations; - infinite loop inside a callback. Verify that callback logic works for bpf_loop, bpf_for_each_map_elem, bpf_user_ringbuf_drain, bpf_find_vma. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-8-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of timesEduard Zingerman2-14/+58
commit ab5cfac139ab8576fb54630d4cca23c3e690ee90 upstream. Prior to this patch callbacks were handled as regular function calls, execution of callback body was modeled exactly once. This patch updates callbacks handling logic as follows: - introduces a function push_callback_call() that schedules callback body verification in env->head stack; - updates prepare_func_exit() to reschedule callback body verification upon BPF_EXIT; - as calls to bpf_*_iter_next(), calls to callback invoking functions are marked as checkpoints; - is_state_visited() is updated to stop callback based iteration when some identical parent state is found. Paths with callback function invoked zero times are now verified first, which leads to necessity to modify some selftests: - the following negative tests required adding release/unlock/drop calls to avoid previously masked unrelated error reports: - cb_refs.c:underflow_prog - exceptions_fail.c:reject_rbtree_add_throw - exceptions_fail.c:reject_with_cp_reference - the following precision tracking selftests needed change in expected log trace: - verifier_subprog_precision.c:callback_result_precise (note: r0 precision is no longer propagated inside callback and I think this is a correct behavior) - verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback - verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback Reported-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+vRuzPChFNXmouzGG+wsy=6eMcfr1mFG0F3g7rbg-sedGKW3w@mail.gmail.com/ Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-7-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: track string payload offset as scalar in strobemetaEduard Zingerman1-30/+48
commit 87eb0152bcc102ecbda866978f4e54db5a3be1ef upstream. This change prepares strobemeta for update in callbacks verification logic. To allow bpf_loop() verification converge when multiple callback iterations are considered: - track offset inside strobemeta_payload->payload directly as scalar value; - at each iteration make sure that remaining strobemeta_payload->payload capacity is sufficient for execution of read_{map,str}_var functions; - make sure that offset is tracked as unbound scalar between iterations, otherwise verifier won't be able infer that bpf_loop callback reaches identical states. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: track tcp payload offset as scalar in xdp_synproxyEduard Zingerman1-32/+52
commit 977bc146d4eb7070118d8a974919b33bb52732b4 upstream. This change prepares syncookie_{tc,xdp} for update in callbakcs verification logic. To allow bpf_loop() verification converge when multiple callback itreations are considered: - track offset inside TCP payload explicitly, not as a part of the pointer; - make sure that offset does not exceed MAX_PACKET_OFF enforced by verifier; - make sure that offset is tracked as unbound scalar between iterations, otherwise verifier won't be able infer that bpf_loop callback reaches identical states. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: test if state loops are detected in a tricky caseEduard Zingerman1-0/+177
commit 64870feebecb7130291a55caf0ce839a87405a70 upstream. A convoluted test case for iterators convergence logic that demonstrates that states with branch count equal to 0 might still be a part of not completely explored loop. E.g. consider the following state diagram: initial Here state 'succ' was processed first, | it was eventually tracked to produce a V state identical to 'hdr'. .---------> hdr All branches from 'succ' had been explored | | and thus 'succ' has its .branches == 0. | V | .------... Suppose states 'cur' and 'succ' correspond | | | to the same instruction + callsites. | V V In such case it is necessary to check | ... ... whether 'succ' and 'cur' are identical. | | | If 'succ' and 'cur' are a part of the same loop | V V they have to be compared exactly. | succ <- cur | | | V | ... | | '----' Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-7-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: tests with delayed read/precision makrs in loop bodyEduard Zingerman1-0/+518
commit 389ede06c2974b2f878a7ebff6b0f4f707f9db74 upstream. These test cases try to hide read and precision marks from loop convergence logic: marks would only be assigned on subsequent loop iterations or after exploring states pushed to env->head stack first. Without verifier fix to use exact states comparison logic for iterators convergence these tests (except 'triple_continue') would be errorneously marked as safe. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-26selftests/bpf: Add assert for user stacks in test_task_stackJordan Rome2-0/+7
commit 727a92d62fd6a382b4c5972008e45667e707b0e4 upstream. This is a follow up to: commit b8e3a87a627b ("bpf: Add crosstask check to __bpf_get_stack"). This test ensures that the task iterator only gets a single user stack (for the current task). Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231112023010.144675-1-linux@jordanrome.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-26selftests/bpf: Relax time_tai test for equal timestamps in tai_forwardYiFei Zhu1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit e1ba7f64b192f083b4423644be03bb9e3dc8ae84 ] We're observing test flakiness on an arm64 platform which might not have timestamps as precise as x86. The test log looks like: test_time_tai:PASS:tai_open 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:test_run 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts1 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts2 0 nsec test_time_tai:FAIL:tai_forward unexpected tai_forward: actual 1702348135471494160 <= expected 1702348135471494160 test_time_tai:PASS:tai_gettime 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts1 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts2 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts1 0 nsec test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts2 0 nsec #199 time_tai:FAIL This patch changes ASSERT_GT to ASSERT_GE in the tai_forward assertion so that equal timestamps are permitted. Fixes: 64e15820b987 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF-helper test for CLOCK_TAI access") Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231212182911.3784108-1-zhuyifei@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-26bpf: Fix accesses to uninit stack slotsAndrei Matei7-32/+65
[ Upstream commit 6b4a64bafd107e521c01eec3453ce94a3fb38529 ] Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places: - in check_stack_slot_within_bounds() - in check_stack_range_initialized() This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it can't run unprivileged for other reasons. This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime because a too small stack had been allocated for it. Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access() was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used instead. This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size. check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue. A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv. Fixes: 01f810ace9ed3 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access") Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-26selftests/bpf: Fix erroneous bitmask operationJeroen van Ingen Schenau1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit b6a3451e0847d5d70fb5fa2b2a80ab9f80bf2c7b ] xdp_synproxy_kern.c is a BPF program that generates SYN cookies on allowed TCP ports and sends SYNACKs to clients, accelerating synproxy iptables module. Fix the bitmask operation when checking the status of an existing conntrack entry within tcp_lookup() function. Do not AND with the bit position number, but with the bitmask value to check whether the entry found has the IPS_CONFIRMED flag set. Fixes: fb5cd0ce70d4 ("selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers") Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Ingen Schenau <jeroen.vaningenschenau@novoserve.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Minh Le Hoang <minh.lehoang@novoserve.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xdp-newbies/CAAi1gX7owA+Tcxq-titC-h-KPM7Ri-6ZhTNMhrnPq5gmYYwKow@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231130120353.3084-1-jeroen.vaningenschenau@novoserve.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-20selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification schemeEduard Zingerman1-5/+8
[ Upstream commit f40bfd1679446b22d321e64a1fa98b7d07d2be08 ] This is a preparatory change. A follow-up patch "bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times" changes logic for callbacks handling. While previously callbacks were verified as a single function call, new scheme takes into account that callbacks could be executed unknown number of times. This has dire implications for bpf_loop_bench: SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") int benchmark(void *ctx) { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); } return 0; } W/o callbacks change verifier sees it as a 1000 calls to empty_callback(). However, with callbacks change things become exponential: - i=0: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=0 (a); - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... - i=999: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=999; - state (a) is popped from stack; - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... Avoid this issue by rewriting outer loop as bpf_loop(). Unfortunately, this adds a function call to a loop at runtime, which negatively affects performance: throughput latency before: 149.919 ± 0.168 M ops/s, 6.670 ns/op after : 137.040 ± 0.187 M ops/s, 7.297 ns/op Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-20cred: get rid of CONFIG_DEBUG_CREDENTIALSJens Axboe1-1/+0
commit ae1914174a63a558113e80d24ccac2773f9f7b2b upstream. This code is rarely (never?) enabled by distros, and it hasn't caught anything in decades. Let's kill off this legacy debug code. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-11-28bpf: fix control-flow graph checking in privileged modeAndrii Nakryiko2-6/+9
[ Upstream commit 10e14e9652bf9e8104151bfd9200433083deae3d ] When BPF program is verified in privileged mode, BPF verifier allows bounded loops. This means that from CFG point of view there are definitely some back-edges. Original commit adjusted check_cfg() logic to not detect back-edges in control flow graph if they are resulting from conditional jumps, which the idea that subsequent full BPF verification process will determine whether such loops are bounded or not, and either accept or reject the BPF program. At least that's my reading of the intent. Unfortunately, the implementation of this idea doesn't work correctly in all possible situations. Conditional jump might not result in immediate back-edge, but just a few unconditional instructions later we can arrive at back-edge. In such situations check_cfg() would reject BPF program even in privileged mode, despite it might be bounded loop. Next patch adds one simple program demonstrating such scenario. To keep things simple, instead of trying to detect back edges in privileged mode, just assume every back edge is valid and let subsequent BPF verification prove or reject bounded loops. Note a few test changes. For unknown reason, we have a few tests that are specified to detect a back-edge in a privileged mode, but looking at their code it seems like the right outcome is passing check_cfg() and letting subsequent verification to make a decision about bounded or not bounded looping. Bounded recursion case is also interesting. The example should pass, as recursion is limited to just a few levels and so we never reach maximum number of nested frames and never exhaust maximum stack depth. But the way that max stack depth logic works today it falsely detects this as exceeding max nested frame count. This patch series doesn't attempt to fix this orthogonal problem, so we just adjust expected verifier failure. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110061412.2995786-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-28bpf: handle ldimm64 properly in check_cfg()Andrii Nakryiko1-4/+4
[ Upstream commit 3feb263bb516ee7e1da0acd22b15afbb9a7daa19 ] ldimm64 instructions are 16-byte long, and so have to be handled appropriately in check_cfg(), just like the rest of BPF verifier does. This has implications in three places: - when determining next instruction for non-jump instructions; - when determining next instruction for callback address ldimm64 instructions (in visit_func_call_insn()); - when checking for unreachable instructions, where second half of ldimm64 is expected to be unreachable; We take this also as an opportunity to report jump into the middle of ldimm64. And adjust few test_verifier tests accordingly. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Fixes: 475fb78fbf48 ("bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks)") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110002638.4168352-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20selftests/bpf: Make linked_list failure test more robustKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-9/+5
[ Upstream commit da1055b673f3baac2249571c9882ce767a0aa746 ] The linked list failure test 'pop_front_off' and 'pop_back_off' currently rely on matching exact instruction and register values. The purpose of the test is to ensure the offset is correctly incremented for the returned pointers from list pop helpers, which can then be used with container_of to obtain the real object. Hence, somehow obtaining the information that the offset is 48 will work for us. Make the test more robust by relying on verifier error string of bpf_spin_lock and remove dependence on fragile instruction index or register number, which can be affected by different clang versions used to build the selftests. Fixes: 300f19dcdb99 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF linked list API tests") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231020144839.2734006-1-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20selftests/bpf: Define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME for riscvBjörn Töpel1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit b55b775f03166b8da60af80ef33da8bf83ca96c1 ] Add missing sys_nanosleep name for RISC-V, which is used by some tests (e.g. attach_probe). Fixes: 08d0ce30e0e4 ("riscv: Implement syscall wrappers") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004110905.49024-4-bjorn@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20selftests/bpf: Define SYS_PREFIX for riscvBjörn Töpel1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit 0f2692ee4324679df6c80ccbb75660564009d187 ] SYS_PREFIX was missing for a RISC-V, which made a couple of kprobe tests fail. Add missing SYS_PREFIX for RISC-V. Fixes: 08d0ce30e0e4 ("riscv: Implement syscall wrappers") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004110905.49024-3-bjorn@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20selftests/bpf: Skip module_fentry_shadow test when bpf_testmod is not availableArtem Savkov1-0/+5
[ Upstream commit 971f7c32147f2d0953a815a109b22b8ed45949d4 ] This test relies on bpf_testmod, so skip it if the module is not available. Fixes: aa3d65de4b900 ("bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914124928.340701-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20selftests/bpf: Correct map_fd to data_fd in tailcallsLeon Hwang1-16/+16
[ Upstream commit 96daa9874211d5497aa70fa409b67afc29f0cb86 ] Get and check data_fd. It should not check map_fd again. Meanwhile, correct some 'return' to 'goto out'. Thank the suggestion from Maciej in "bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop"[0] discussions. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e496aef8-1f80-0f8e-dcdd-25a8c300319a@gmail.com/T/#m7d3b601066ba66400d436b7e7579b2df4a101033 Fixes: 79d49ba048ec ("bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases") Fixes: 3b0379111197 ("selftests/bpf: Add tailcall_bpf2bpf tests") Fixes: 5e0b0a4c52d3 ("selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack") Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906154256.95461-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10selftests/bpf: Add testcase for async callback return value failureDavid Vernet2-2/+51
A previous commit updated the verifier to print an accurate failure message for when someone specifies a nonzero return value from an async callback. This adds a testcase for validating that the verifier emits the correct message in such a case. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231009161414.235829-2-void@manifault.com
2023-10-07selftests/bpf: Make seen_tc* variable tests more robustDaniel Borkmann3-60/+46
Martin reported that on his local dev machine the test_tc_chain_mixed() fails as "test_tc_chain_mixed:FAIL:seen_tc5 unexpected seen_tc5: actual 1 != expected 0" and others occasionally, too. However, when running in a more isolated setup (qemu in particular), it works fine for him. The reason is that there is a small race-window where seen_tc* could turn into true for various test cases when there is background traffic, e.g. after the asserts they often get reset. In such case when subsequent detach takes place, unrelated background traffic could have already flipped the bool to true beforehand. Add a small helper tc_skel_reset_all_seen() to reset all bools before we do the ping test. At this point, everything is set up as expected and therefore no race can occur. All tc_{opts,links} tests continue to pass after this change. Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-7-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-10-07selftests/bpf: Test query on empty mprog and pass revision into attachDaniel Borkmann1-0/+59
Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does succeed. ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz [ 1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns [ 1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK #269 tc_opts_query_attach:OK <--- (new test) #270 tc_opts_replace:OK #271 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-6-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-10-07selftests/bpf: Adapt assert_mprog_count to always expect 0 countDaniel Borkmann3-11/+8
Simplify __assert_mprog_count() to remove the -ENOENT corner case as the bpf_prog_query() now returns 0 when no bpf_mprog is attached. This also allows to convert a few test cases from using raw __assert_mprog_count() over to plain assert_mprog_count() helper. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-5-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-10-07selftests/bpf: Test bpf_mprog query API via libbpf and raw syscallDaniel Borkmann1-0/+167
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with the program array without clearing passed structs in between. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz [ 1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns [ 1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK <--- (new test) #269 tc_opts_replace:OK #270 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-09-30selftest/bpf: Add various selftests for program limitsDaniel Borkmann1-0/+84
Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs being attached: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz [ 1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns [ 1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK <--- (new test) #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_replace:OK #269 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230929204121.20305-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
2023-09-29bpf, sockmap: Add tests for MSG_F_PEEKJohn Fastabend1-0/+51
Test that we can read with MSG_F_PEEK and then still get correct number of available bytes through FIONREAD. The recv() (without PEEK) then returns the bytes as expected. The recv() always worked though because it was just the available byte reporting that was broke before latest fixes. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230926035300.135096-4-john.fastabend@gmail.com
2023-09-19selftests/bpf: Check bpf_cubic_acked() is called via struct_opsSong Liu2-0/+5
Test bpf_tcp_ca (in test_progs) checks multiple tcp_congestion_ops. However, there isn't a test that verifies functions in the tcp_congestion_ops is actually called. Add a check to verify that bpf_cubic_acked is actually called during the test. Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919060258.3237176-3-song@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-13selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi_test/attach_override testJiri Olsa2-9/+3
We need to deny the attach_override test for arm64, denying the whole kprobe_multi_test suite. Also making attach_override static. Fixes: 7182e56411b9 ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi override test") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230913114711.499829-1-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-09-12selftests/bpf: fix unpriv_disabled check in test_verifierArtem Savkov1-1/+1
Commit 1d56ade032a49 changed the function get_unpriv_disabled() to return its results as a bool instead of updating a global variable, but test_verifier was not updated to keep in line with these changes. Thus unpriv_disabled is always false in test_verifier and unprivileged tests are not properly skipped on systems with unprivileged bpf disabled. Fixes: 1d56ade032a49 ("selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912120631.213139-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-12selftests/bpf: ensure all CI arches set CONFIG_BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE=yAndrii Nakryiko2-1/+1
Turns out CONFIG_BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE=y is only enabled in x86-64 CI, but is not set on aarch64, causing CI failures ([0]). Move CONFIG_BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE=y to arch-agnostic CI config. [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/6122324047/job/16618390535 Fixes: 7182e56411b9 ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi override test") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912055928.1704269-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-12selftests/bpf: Offloaded prog after non-offloaded should not cause BUGEduard Zingerman1-0/+61
Check what happens if non-offloaded dev bound BPF program is followed by offloaded dev bound program. Test case adapated from syzbot report [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000d97f3c060479c4f8@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912005539.2248244-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-09-11selftests/bpf: Update bpf_clone_redirect expected return codeStanislav Fomichev1-2/+10
Commit 151e887d8ff9 ("veth: Fixing transmit return status for dropped packets") started propagating proper NET_XMIT_DROP error to the caller which means it's now possible to get positive error code when calling bpf_clone_redirect() in this particular test. Update the test to reflect that. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230911194731.286342-2-sdf@google.com
2023-09-11selftests/bpf: Test all valid alloc sizes for bpf mem allocatorHou Tao2-0/+173
Add a test to test all possible and valid allocation size for bpf memory allocator. For each possible allocation size, the test uses the following two steps to test the alloc and free path: 1) allocate N (N > high_watermark) objects to trigger the refill executed in irq_work. 2) free N objects to trigger the freeing executed in irq_work. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-09-09selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi override testJiri Olsa2-0/+50
Adding test that tries to attach program with bpf_override_return helper to function not within error injection list. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230907200652.926951-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-09-08Merge tag 'net-6.6-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds8-3/+184
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net Pull networking updates from Jakub Kicinski: "Including fixes from netfilter and bpf. Current release - regressions: - eth: stmmac: fix failure to probe without MAC interface specified Current release - new code bugs: - docs: netlink: fix missing classic_netlink doc reference Previous releases - regressions: - deal with integer overflows in kmalloc_reserve() - use sk_forward_alloc_get() in sk_get_meminfo() - bpf_sk_storage: fix the missing uncharge in sk_omem_alloc - fib: avoid warn splat in flow dissector after packet mangling - skb_segment: call zero copy functions before using skbuff frags - eth: sfc: check for zero length in EF10 RX prefix Previous releases - always broken: - af_unix: fix msg_controllen test in scm_pidfd_recv() for MSG_CMSG_COMPAT - xsk: fix xsk_build_skb() dereferencing possible ERR_PTR() - netfilter: - nft_exthdr: fix non-linear header modification - xt_u32, xt_sctp: validate user space input - nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write - nfnetlink_osf: avoid OOB read - one more fix for the garbage collection work from last release - igmp: limit igmpv3_newpack() packet size to IP_MAX_MTU - bpf, sockmap: fix preempt_rt splat when using raw_spin_lock_t - handshake: fix null-deref in handshake_nl_done_doit() - ip: ignore dst hint for multipath routes to ensure packets are hashed across the nexthops - phy: micrel: - correct bit assignments for cable test errata - disable EEE according to the KSZ9477 errata Misc: - docs/bpf: document compile-once-run-everywhere (CO-RE) relocations - Revert "net: macsec: preserve ingress frame ordering", it appears to have been developed against an older kernel, problem doesn't exist upstream" * tag 'net-6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (95 commits) net: enetc: distinguish error from valid pointers in enetc_fixup_clear_rss_rfs() Revert "net: team: do not use dynamic lockdep key" net: hns3: remove GSO partial feature bit net: hns3: fix the port information display when sfp is absent net: hns3: fix invalid mutex between tc qdisc and dcb ets command issue net: hns3: fix debugfs concurrency issue between kfree buffer and read net: hns3: fix byte order conversion issue in hclge_dbg_fd_tcam_read() net: hns3: Support query tx timeout threshold by debugfs net: hns3: fix tx timeout issue net: phy: Provide Module 4 KSZ9477 errata (DS80000754C) netfilter: nf_tables: Unbreak audit log reset netfilter: ipset: add the missing IP_SET_HASH_WITH_NET0 macro for ip_set_hash_netportnet.c netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip sync GC for new elements in this transaction netfilter: nf_tables: uapi: Describe NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID netfilter: nfnetlink_osf: avoid OOB read netfilter: nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write selftests/bpf: Check bpf_sk_storage has uncharged sk_omem_alloc bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix the missing uncharge in sk_omem_alloc bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix invalid wait context lockdep report s390/bpf: Pass through tail call counter in trampolines ...
2023-09-06selftests/bpf: Check bpf_sk_storage has uncharged sk_omem_allocMartin KaFai Lau3-0/+118
This patch checks the sk_omem_alloc has been uncharged by bpf_sk_storage during the __sk_destruct. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230901231129.578493-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
2023-09-01selftests/bpf: Fix a CI failure caused by vsock writeXu Kuohai2-0/+33
While commit 90f0074cd9f9 ("selftests/bpf: fix a CI failure caused by vsock sockmap test") fixes a receive failure of vsock sockmap test, there is still a write failure: Error: #211/79 sockmap_listen/sockmap VSOCK test_vsock_redir Error: #211/79 sockmap_listen/sockmap VSOCK test_vsock_redir ./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: egress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501 ./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: ingress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501 ./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: egress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501 The reason is that the vsock connection in the test is set to ESTABLISHED state by function virtio_transport_recv_pkt, which is executed in a workqueue thread, so when the user space test thread runs before the workqueue thread, this problem occurs. To fix it, before writing the connection, wait for it to be connected. Fixes: d61bd8c1fd02 ("selftests/bpf: add a test case for vsock sockmap") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230901031037.3314007-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
2023-08-31selftests/bpf: Include build flavors for install targetBjörn Töpel1-0/+12
When using the "install" or targets depending on install, e.g. "gen_tar", the BPF machine flavors weren't included. A command like: | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- O=/workspace/kbuild \ | HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \ | -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar would not include bpf/no_alu32, bpf/cpuv4, or bpf/bpf-gcc. Include the BPF machine flavors for "install" make target. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230831162954.111485-1-bjorn@kernel.org
2023-08-31selftests/bpf: Fix d_path testJiri Olsa1-1/+18
Recent commit [1] broke d_path test, because now filp_close is not called directly from sys_close, but eventually later when the file is finally released. As suggested by Hou Tao we don't need to re-hook the bpf program, but just instead we can use sys_close_range to trigger filp_close synchronously. [1] 021a160abf62 ("fs: use __fput_sync in close(2)") Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230831141103.359810-1-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-08-30selftests/bpf: Fix flaky cgroup_iter_sleepable subtestYonghong Song1-2/+3
Occasionally, with './test_progs -j' on my vm, I will hit the following failure: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:iter_create 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL:cgroup_id unexpected cgroup_id: actual 1 != expected 2812 #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Finally, I decided to do some investigation since the test is introduced by myself. It turns out the reason is due to cgroup_fd with value 0. In cgroup_iter, a cgroup_fd of value 0 means the root cgroup. /* from cgroup_iter.c */ if (fd) cgrp = cgroup_v1v2_get_from_fd(fd); else if (id) cgrp = cgroup_get_from_id(id); else /* walk the entire hierarchy by default. */ cgrp = cgroup_get_from_path("/"); That is why we got cgroup_id 1 instead of expected 2812. Why we got a cgroup_fd 0? Nobody should really touch 'stdin' (fd 0) in test_progs. I traced 'close' syscall with stack trace and found the root cause, which is a bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c. Basically, the code closed fd 0 although it should not. Fixing the bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c also resolved the above cgroup_iter_sleepable subtest failure. Fixes: 3b22f98e5a05 ("selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230827150551.1743497-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2026-05-13 09:01:42 +0300