summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-30selftests/bpf: check that modifier resolves after pointerLorenz Bauer1-0/+28
[ Upstream commit dfdd608c3b365f0fd49d7e13911ebcde06b9865b ] Add a regression test that ensures that a VAR pointing at a modifier which follows a PTR (or STRUCT or ARRAY) is resolved correctly by the datasec validator. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306112138.155352-3-lmb@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-17Revert "bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMES"Martin KaFai Lau1-4/+3
commit 181127fb76e62d06ab17a75fd610129688612343 upstream. This reverts commit 6c20822fada1b8adb77fa450d03a0d449686a4a9. build bot failed on arch with different cache line size: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/50c35055-afa9-d01e-9a05-ea5351280e4f@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-17bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMESAlexander Lobakin1-3/+4
[ Upstream commit 6c20822fada1b8adb77fa450d03a0d449686a4a9 ] &xdp_buff and &xdp_frame are bound in a way that xdp_buff->data_hard_start == xdp_frame It's always the case and e.g. xdp_convert_buff_to_frame() relies on this. IOW, the following: for (u32 i = 0; i < 0xdead; i++) { xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(&xdp); xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp); } shouldn't ever modify @xdpf's contents or the pointer itself. However, "live packet" code wrongly treats &xdp_frame as part of its context placed *before* the data_hard_start. With such flow, data_hard_start is sizeof(*xdpf) off to the right and no longer points to the XDP frame. Instead of replacing `sizeof(ctx)` with `offsetof(ctx, xdpf)` in several places and praying that there are no more miscalcs left somewhere in the code, unionize ::frm with ::data in a flex array, so that both starts pointing to the actual data_hard_start and the XDP frame actually starts being a part of it, i.e. a part of the headroom, not the context. A nice side effect is that the maximum frame size for this mode gets increased by 40 bytes, as xdp_buff::frame_sz includes everything from data_hard_start (-> includes xdpf already) to the end of XDP/skb shared info. Also update %MAX_PKT_SIZE accordingly in the selftests code. Leave it hardcoded for 64 bit && 4k pages, it can be made more flexible later on. Minor: align `&head->data` with how `head->frm` is assigned for consistency. Minor #2: rename 'frm' to 'frame' in &xdp_page_head while at it for clarity. (was found while testing XDP traffic generator on ice, which calls xdp_convert_frame_to_buff() for each XDP frame) Fixes: b530e9e1063e ("bpf: Add "live packet" mode for XDP in BPF_PROG_RUN") Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230215185440.4126672-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_do_redirect on s390xIlya Leoshkevich1-0/+4
[ Upstream commit 06c1865b0b0c7820ea53af2394dd7aff31100295 ] s390x cache line size is 256 bytes, so skb_shared_info must be aligned on a much larger boundary than for x86. This makes the maximum packet size smaller. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128000650.1516334-11-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 6c20822fada1 ("bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMES") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Fix map_kptr test.Alexei Starovoitov1-5/+7
[ Upstream commit 62d101d5f422cde39b269f7eb4cbbe2f1e26f9d4 ] The compiler is optimizing out majority of unref_ptr read/writes, so the test wasn't testing much. For example, one could delete '__kptr' tag from 'struct prog_test_ref_kfunc __kptr *unref_ptr;' and the test would still "pass". Convert it to volatile stores. Confirmed by comparing bpf asm before/after. Fixes: 2cbc469a6fc3 ("selftests/bpf: Add C tests for kptr") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230214235051.22938-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Fix out-of-srctree buildIlya Leoshkevich1-2/+0
[ Upstream commit 0b0757244754ea1d0721195c824770f5576e119e ] Building BPF selftests out of srctree fails with: make: *** No rule to make target '/linux-build//ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop. The culprit is the rule that defines convenient shorthands like "make test_progs", which builds $(OUTPUT)/test_progs. These shorthands make sense only for binaries that are built though; scripts that live in the source tree do not end up in $(OUTPUT). Therefore drop $(TEST_PROGS) and $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) from the rule. The issue exists for a while, but it became a problem only after commit d68ae4982cb7 ("selftests/bpf: Install all required files to run selftests"), which added dependencies on these scripts. Fixes: 03dcb78460c2 ("selftests/bpf: Add simple per-test targets to Makefile") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230208231211.283606-1-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Initialize tc in xdp_synproxyIlya Leoshkevich1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit 354bb4a0e0b6be8f55bacbe7f08c94b4741f5658 ] xdp_synproxy/xdp fails in CI with: Error: bpf_tc_hook_create: File exists The XDP version of the test should not be calling bpf_tc_hook_create(); the reason it's happening anyway is that if we don't specify --tc on the command line, tc variable remains uninitialized. Fixes: 784d5dc0efc2 ("selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers in TC mode") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reported-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202235335.3403781-1-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Fix vmtest static compilation errorDaniel T. Lee1-2/+3
[ Upstream commit 2514a31241e1e9067d379e0fbdb60e4bc2bf4659 ] As stated in README.rst, in order to resolve errors with linker errors, 'LDLIBS=-static' should be used. Most problems will be solved by this option, but in the case of urandom_read, this won't fix the problem. So the Makefile is currently implemented to strip the 'static' option when compiling the urandom_read. However, stripping this static option isn't configured properly on $(LDLIBS) correctly, which is now causing errors on static compilation. # LDLIBS=-static ./vmtest.sh ld.lld: error: attempted static link of dynamic object liburandom_read.so clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) make: *** [Makefile:190: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/urandom_read] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... This commit fixes this problem by configuring the strip with $(LDLIBS). Fixes: 68084a136420 ("selftests/bpf: Fix building bpf selftests statically") Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230125100440.21734-1-danieltimlee@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10bpf: Fix partial dynptr stack slot reads/writesKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-3/+3
[ Upstream commit ef8fc7a07c0e161841779d6fe3f6acd5a05c547c ] Currently, while reads are disallowed for dynptr stack slots, writes are not. Reads don't work from both direct access and helpers, while writes do work in both cases, but have the effect of overwriting the slot_type. While this is fine, handling for a few edge cases is missing. Firstly, a user can overwrite the stack slots of dynptr partially. Consider the following layout: spi: [d][d][?] 2 1 0 First slot is at spi 2, second at spi 1. Now, do a write of 1 to 8 bytes for spi 1. This will essentially either write STACK_MISC for all slot_types or STACK_MISC and STACK_ZERO (in case of size < BPF_REG_SIZE partial write of zeroes). The end result is that slot is scrubbed. Now, the layout is: spi: [d][m][?] 2 1 0 Suppose if user initializes spi = 1 as dynptr. We get: spi: [d][d][d] 2 1 0 But this time, both spi 2 and spi 1 have first_slot = true. Now, when passing spi 2 to dynptr helper, it will consider it as initialized as it does not check whether second slot has first_slot == false. And spi 1 should already work as normal. This effectively replaced size + offset of first dynptr, hence allowing invalid OOB reads and writes. Make a few changes to protect against this: When writing to PTR_TO_STACK using BPF insns, when we touch spi of a STACK_DYNPTR type, mark both first and second slot (regardless of which slot we touch) as STACK_INVALID. Reads are already prevented. Second, prevent writing to stack memory from helpers if the range may contain any STACK_DYNPTR slots. Reads are already prevented. For helpers, we cannot allow it to destroy dynptrs from the writes as depending on arguments, helper may take uninit_mem and dynptr both at the same time. This would mean that helper may write to uninit_mem before it reads the dynptr, which would be bad. PTR_TO_MEM: [?????dd] Depending on the code inside the helper, it may end up overwriting the dynptr contents first and then read those as the dynptr argument. Verifier would only simulate destruction when it does byte by byte access simulation in check_helper_call for meta.access_size, and fail to catch this case, as it happens after argument checks. The same would need to be done for any other non-trivial objects created on the stack in the future, such as bpf_list_head on stack, or bpf_rb_root on stack. A common misunderstanding in the current code is that MEM_UNINIT means writes, but note that writes may also be performed even without MEM_UNINIT in case of helpers, in that case the code after handling meta && meta->raw_mode will complain when it sees STACK_DYNPTR. So that invalid read case also covers writes to potential STACK_DYNPTR slots. The only loophole was in case of meta->raw_mode which simulated writes through instructions which could overwrite them. A future series sequenced after this will focus on the clean up of helper access checks and bugs around that. Fixes: 97e03f521050 ("bpf: Add verifier support for dynptrs") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121002241.2113993-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10bpf: Fix missing var_off check for ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTRKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-3/+3
[ Upstream commit 79168a669d8125453c8a271115f1ffd4294e61f6 ] Currently, the dynptr function is not checking the variable offset part of PTR_TO_STACK that it needs to check. The fixed offset is considered when computing the stack pointer index, but if the variable offset was not a constant (such that it could not be accumulated in reg->off), we will end up a discrepency where runtime pointer does not point to the actual stack slot we mark as STACK_DYNPTR. It is impossible to precisely track dynptr state when variable offset is not constant, hence, just like bpf_timer, kptr, bpf_spin_lock, etc. simply reject the case where reg->var_off is not constant. Then, consider both reg->off and reg->var_off.value when computing the stack pointer index. A new helper dynptr_get_spi is introduced to hide over these details since the dynptr needs to be located in multiple places outside the process_dynptr_func checks, hence once we know it's a PTR_TO_STACK, we need to enforce these checks in all places. Note that it is disallowed for unprivileged users to have a non-constant var_off, so this problem should only be possible to trigger from programs having CAP_PERFMON. However, its effects can vary. Without the fix, it is possible to replace the contents of the dynptr arbitrarily by making verifier mark different stack slots than actual location and then doing writes to the actual stack address of dynptr at runtime. Fixes: 97e03f521050 ("bpf: Add verifier support for dynptrs") Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121002241.2113993-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=mTiezhu Yang1-3/+8
[ Upstream commit 92afc5329a5b23d876b215b783d200352d5aaea6 ] If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed. $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC' bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC); ^ progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST' bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST); ^ 2 errors generated. Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c, in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf: Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n"). Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1674028604-7113-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/xsk: print correct error codes when exitingMagnus Karlsson1-9/+9
[ Upstream commit 085dcccfb7d3dc52ed708fc588587f319541bc83 ] Print the correct error codes when exiting the test suite due to some terminal error. Some of these had a switched sign and some of them printed zero instead of errno. Fixes: facb7cb2e909 ("selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - SKB POLL, NOPOLL") Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230111093526.11682-5-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-10selftests/xsk: print correct payload for packet dumpMagnus Karlsson1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 2d0b2ae2871ae6d42a9f0a4280e0fb5bff8d38b8 ] Print the correct payload when the packet dump option is selected. The network to host conversion was forgotten and the payload was erronously declared to be an int instead of an unsigned int. Fixes: facb7cb2e909 ("selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - SKB POLL, NOPOLL") Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230111093526.11682-2-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-01-25selftests/bpf: Cover listener cloning with progs attached to sockmapJakub Sitnicki1-2/+28
Today we test if a child socket is cloned properly from a listening socket inside a sockmap only when there are no BPF programs attached to the map. A bug has been reported [1] for the case when sockmap has a verdict program attached. So cover this case as well to prevent regressions. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v2-4-1e0ee7ac2f90@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-01-25selftests/bpf: Pass BPF skeleton to sockmap_listen ops testsJakub Sitnicki1-18/+37
Following patch extends the sockmap ops tests to cover the scenario when a sockmap with attached programs holds listening sockets. Pass the BPF skeleton to sockmap ops test so that the can access and attach the BPF programs. Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v2-3-1e0ee7ac2f90@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-01-20selftests/bpf: Verify copy_register_state() preserves parent/live fieldsEduard Zingerman1-0/+36
A testcase to check that verifier.c:copy_register_state() preserves register parentage chain and livness information. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230106142214.1040390-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-29selftests/bpf: add a test for iter/task_vma for short-lived processesKui-Feng Lee1-0/+73
When a task iterator traverses vma(s), it is possible task->mm might become invalid in the middle of traversal and this may cause kernel misbehave (e.g., crash) This test case creates iterators repeatedly and forks short-lived processes in the background to detect this bug. The test will last for 3 seconds to get the chance to trigger the issue. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221216221855.4122288-3-kuifeng@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-29selftests/bpf: Temporarily disable part of btf_dump:var_data test.Alexei Starovoitov1-1/+1
Commit 7443b296e699 ("x86/percpu: Move cpu_number next to current_task") moved global per_cpu variable 'cpu_number' into pcpu_hot structure. Therefore this part of var_data test is no longer valid. Disable it until better solution is found. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-24selftests/bpf: Add host-tools to gitignoreStanislav Fomichev1-0/+1
Shows up when cross-compiling: HOST_SCRATCH_DIR := $(OUTPUT)/host-tools vs SCRATCH_DIR := $(OUTPUT)/tools HOST_SCRATCH_DIR := $(SCRATCH_DIR) Reported-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221222213958.2302320-1-sdf@google.com
2022-12-23selftests/bpf: check null propagation only neither reg is PTR_TO_BTF_IDHao Sun2-0/+51
Verify that nullness information is not porpagated in the branches of register to register JEQ and JNE operations if one of them is PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Implement this in C level so we can use CO-RE. Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222024414.29539-2-sunhao.th@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2022-12-22selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skb_adjust_room on CHECKSUM_PARTIALMartin KaFai Lau4-0/+160
When the bpf_skb_adjust_room() shrinks the skb such that its csum_start is invalid, the skb->ip_summed should be reset from CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to CHECKSUM_NONE. The commit 54c3f1a81421 ("bpf: pull before calling skb_postpull_rcsum()") fixed it. This patch adds a test to ensure the skb->ip_summed changed from CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to CHECKSUM_NONE after bpf_skb_adjust_room(). Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221221185653.1589961-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
2022-12-15selftests/bpf: Add a test for using a cpumap from an freplace-to-XDP programToke Høiland-Jørgensen2-0/+72
This adds a simple test for inserting an XDP program into a cpumap that is "owned" by an XDP program that was loaded as PROG_TYPE_EXT (as libxdp does). Prior to the kernel fix this would fail because the map type ownership would be set to PROG_TYPE_EXT instead of being resolved to PROG_TYPE_XDP. v5: - Fix a few nits from Andrii, add his ACK v4: - Use skeletons for selftest v3: - Update comment to better explain the cause - Add Yonghong's ACK Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221214230254.790066-2-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2022-12-14selftests/bpf: Select CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTIONSong Liu1-0/+1
BPF selftests require CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION to work. However, CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION is no longer 'y' by default after recent changes. As a result, we are seeing errors like the following from BPF CI: bpf_testmod_test_read() is not modifiable __x64_sys_setdomainname is not sleepable __x64_sys_getpgid is not sleepable Fix this by explicitly selecting CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION in the selftest config. Fixes: a4412fdd49dc ("error-injection: Add prompt for function error injection") Reported-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221213220500.3427947-1-song@kernel.org
2022-12-14selftests/bpf: Fix a selftest compilation error with CONFIG_SMP=nYonghong Song2-5/+5
Kernel test robot reported bpf selftest build failure when CONFIG_SMP is not set. The error message looks below: >> progs/rcu_read_lock.c:256:34: error: no member named 'last_wakee' in 'struct task_struct' last_wakee = task->real_parent->last_wakee; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 1 error generated. When CONFIG_SMP is not set, the field 'last_wakee' is not available in struct 'task_struct'. Hence the above compilation failure. To fix the issue, let us choose another field 'group_leader' which is available regardless of CONFIG_SMP set or not. Fixes: fe147956fca4 ("bpf/selftests: Add selftests for new task kfuncs") Fixes: 48671232fcb8 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rcu_read_lock()") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221213012224.379581-1-yhs@fb.com
2022-12-11selftests/bpf: test case for relaxed prunning of active_lock.idEduard Zingerman1-0/+75
Check that verifier.c:states_equal() uses check_ids() to match consistent active_lock/map_value configurations. This allows to prune states with active spin locks even if numerical values of active_lock ids do not match across compared states. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-8-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-11selftests/bpf: Add pruning test case for bpf_spin_lockKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+39
Test that when reg->id is not same for the same register of type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE between current and old explored state, we currently return false from regsafe and continue exploring. Without the fix in prior commit, the test case fails. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-7-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-11selftests/bpf: verify states_equal() maintains idmap across all framesEduard Zingerman1-0/+82
A test case that would erroneously pass verification if verifier.c:states_equal() maintains separate register ID mappings for call frames. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-11selftests/bpf: test cases for regsafe() bug skipping check_id()Eduard Zingerman2-0/+103
Under certain conditions it was possible for verifier.c:regsafe() to skip check_id() call. This commit adds negative test cases previously errorneously accepted as safe. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-09selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callbackKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-8/+45
The original support for bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callbacks simply short-circuited checks for the dynptr state, allowing users to pass PTR_TO_DYNPTR (now CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) to helpers that initialize a dynptr. This bug would have also surfaced with other dynptr helpers in the future that changed dynptr view or modified it in some way. Include test cases for all cases, i.e. both bpf_dynptr_from_mem and bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr, and ensure verifier rejects both of them. Without the fix, both of these programs load and pass verification. While at it, remove sys_nanosleep target from failure cases' SEC definition, as there is no such tracepoint. Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207204141.308952-8-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-09bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_offKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-2/+2
While check_func_arg_reg_off is the place which performs generic checks needed by various candidates of reg->type, there is some handling for special cases, like ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, OBJ_RELEASE, and ARG_PTR_TO_RINGBUF_MEM. This commit aims to streamline these special cases and instead leave other things up to argument type specific code to handle. The function will be restrictive by default, and cover all possible cases when OBJ_RELEASE is set, without having to update the function again (and missing to do that being a bug). This is done primarily for two reasons: associating back reg->type to its argument leaves room for the list getting out of sync when a new reg->type is supported by an arg_type. The other case is ARG_PTR_TO_RINGBUF_MEM. The problem there is something we already handle, whenever a release argument is expected, it should be passed as the pointer that was received from the acquire function. Hence zero fixed and variable offset. There is nothing special about ARG_PTR_TO_RINGBUF_MEM, where technically its target register type PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RINGBUF can already be passed with non-zero offset to other helper functions, which makes sense. Hence, lift the arg_type_is_release check for reg->off and cover all possible register types, instead of duplicating the same kind of check twice for current OBJ_RELEASE arg_types (alloc_mem and ptr_to_btf_id). For the release argument, arg_type_is_dynptr is the special case, where we go to actual object being freed through the dynptr, so the offset of the pointer still needs to allow fixed and variable offset and process_dynptr_func will verify them later for the release argument case as well. This is not specific to ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR though, we will need to make this exception for any future object on the stack that needs to be released. In this sense, PTR_TO_STACK as a candidate for object on stack argument is a special case for release offset checks, and they need to be done by the helper releasing the object on stack. Since the check has been lifted above all register type checks, remove the duplicated check that is being done for PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207204141.308952-5-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-09bpf: Rework process_dynptr_funcKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-2/+2
Recently, user ringbuf support introduced a PTR_TO_DYNPTR register type for use in callback state, because in case of user ringbuf helpers, there is no dynptr on the stack that is passed into the callback. To reflect such a state, a special register type was created. However, some checks have been bypassed incorrectly during the addition of this feature. First, for arg_type with MEM_UNINIT flag which initialize a dynptr, they must be rejected for such register type. Secondly, in the future, there are plans to add dynptr helpers that operate on the dynptr itself and may change its offset and other properties. In all of these cases, PTR_TO_DYNPTR shouldn't be allowed to be passed to such helpers, however the current code simply returns 0. The rejection for helpers that release the dynptr is already handled. For fixing this, we take a step back and rework existing code in a way that will allow fitting in all classes of helpers and have a coherent model for dealing with the variety of use cases in which dynptr is used. First, for ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, it can either be set alone or together with a DYNPTR_TYPE_* constant that denotes the only type it accepts. Next, helpers which initialize a dynptr use MEM_UNINIT to indicate this fact. To make the distinction clear, use MEM_RDONLY flag to indicate that the helper only operates on the memory pointed to by the dynptr, not the dynptr itself. In C parlance, it would be equivalent to taking the dynptr as a point to const argument. When either of these flags are not present, the helper is allowed to mutate both the dynptr itself and also the memory it points to. Currently, the read only status of the memory is not tracked in the dynptr, but it would be trivial to add this support inside dynptr state of the register. With these changes and renaming PTR_TO_DYNPTR to CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to better reflect its usage, it can no longer be passed to helpers that initialize a dynptr, i.e. bpf_dynptr_from_mem, bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr. A note to reviewers is that in code that does mark_stack_slots_dynptr, and unmark_stack_slots_dynptr, we implicitly rely on the fact that PTR_TO_STACK reg is the only case that can reach that code path, as one cannot pass CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to helpers that don't set MEM_RDONLY. In both cases such helpers won't be setting that flag. The next patch will add a couple of selftest cases to make sure this doesn't break. Fixes: 205715673844 ("bpf: Add bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() helper") Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207204141.308952-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-09bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_funcKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-17/+2
ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is akin to ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER, ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR, where the underlying register type is subjected to more special checks to determine the type of object represented by the pointer and its state consistency. Move dynptr checks to their own 'process_dynptr_func' function so that is consistent and in-line with existing code. This also makes it easier to reuse this code for kfunc handling. Then, reuse this consolidated function in kfunc dynptr handling too. Note that for kfuncs, the arg_type constraint of DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL has been lifted. Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207204141.308952-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-09selftests/bpf: Bring test_offload.py back to lifeStanislav Fomichev1-3/+5
Bpftool has new extra libbpf_det_bind probing map we need to exclude. Also skip trying to load netdevsim modules if it's already loaded (builtin). v2: - drop iproute2->bpftool changes (Toke) Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221206232739.2504890-1-sdf@google.com
2022-12-08selftests/bpf: convert dynptr_fail and map_kptr_fail subtests to generic testerAndrii Nakryiko5-155/+64
Convert big chunks of dynptr and map_kptr subtests to use generic verification_tester. They are switched from using manually maintained tables of test cases, specifying program name and expected error verifier message, to btf_decl_tag-based annotations directly on corresponding BPF programs: __failure to specify that BPF program is expected to fail verification, and __msg() to specify expected log message. Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207201648.2990661-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-08selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program tester-loaderAndrii Nakryiko4-1/+272
It's become a common pattern to have a collection of small BPF programs in one BPF object file, each representing one test case. On user-space side of such tests we maintain a table of program names and expected failure or success, along with optional expected verifier log message. This works, but each set of tests reimplement this mundane code over and over again, which is a waste of time for anyone trying to add a new set of tests. Furthermore, it's quite error prone as it's way too easy to miss some entries in these manually maintained test tables (as evidences by dynptr_fail tests, in which ringbuf_release_uninit_dynptr subtest was accidentally missed; this is fixed in next patch). So this patch implements generic test_loader, which accepts skeleton name and handles the rest of details: opens and loads BPF object file, making sure each program is tested in isolation. Optionally each test case can specify expected BPF verifier log message. In case of failure, tester makes sure to report verifier log, but it also reports verifier log in verbose mode unconditionally. Now, the interesting deviation from existing custom implementations is the use of btf_decl_tag attribute to specify expected-to-fail vs expected-to-succeed markers and, optionally, expected log message directly next to BPF program source code, eliminating the need to manually create and update table of tests. We define few macros wrapping btf_decl_tag with a convention that all values of btf_decl_tag start with "comment:" prefix, and then utilizing a very simple "just_some_text_tag" or "some_key_name=<value>" pattern to define things like expected success/failure, expected verifier message, extra verifier log level (if necessary). This approach is demonstrated by next patch in which two existing sets of failure tests are converted. Tester supports both expected-to-fail and expected-to-succeed programs, though this patch set didn't convert any existing expected-to-succeed programs yet, as existing tests couple BPF program loading with their further execution through attach or test_prog_run. One way to allow testing scenarios like this would be ability to specify custom callback, executed for each successfully loaded BPF program. This is left for follow up patches, after some more analysis of existing test cases. This test_loader is, hopefully, a start of a test_verifier-like runner, but integrated into test_progs infrastructure. It will allow much better "user experience" of defining low-level verification tests that can take advantage of all the libbpf-provided nicety features on BPF side: global variables, declarative maps, etc. All while having a choice of defining it in C or as BPF assembly (through __attribute__((naked)) functions and using embedded asm), depending on what makes most sense in each particular case. This will be explored in follow up patches as well. Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207201648.2990661-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-07bpf: Don't use rcu_users to refcount in task kfuncsDavid Vernet2-2/+12
A series of prior patches added some kfuncs that allow struct task_struct * objects to be used as kptrs. These kfuncs leveraged the 'refcount_t rcu_users' field of the task for performing refcounting. This field was used instead of 'refcount_t usage', as we wanted to leverage the safety provided by RCU for ensuring a task's lifetime. A struct task_struct is refcounted by two different refcount_t fields: 1. p->usage: The "true" refcount field which task lifetime. The task is freed as soon as this refcount drops to 0. 2. p->rcu_users: An "RCU users" refcount field which is statically initialized to 2, and is co-located in a union with a struct rcu_head field (p->rcu). p->rcu_users essentially encapsulates a single p->usage refcount, and when p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU callback is scheduled on the struct rcu_head which decrements the p->usage refcount. Our logic was that by using p->rcu_users, we would be able to use RCU to safely issue refcount_inc_not_zero() a task's rcu_users field to determine if a task could still be acquired, or was exiting. Unfortunately, this does not work due to p->rcu_users and p->rcu sharing a union. When p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU callback is scheduled to drop a single p->usage refcount, and because the fields share a union, the refcount immediately becomes nonzero again after the callback is scheduled. If we were to split the fields out of the union, this wouldn't be a problem. Doing so should also be rather non-controversial, as there are a number of places in struct task_struct that have padding which we could use to avoid growing the structure by splitting up the fields. For now, so as to fix the kfuncs to be correct, this patch instead updates bpf_task_acquire() and bpf_task_release() to use the p->usage field for refcounting via the get_task_struct() and put_task_struct() functions. Because we can no longer rely on RCU, the change also guts the bpf_task_acquire_not_zero() and bpf_task_kptr_get() functions pending a resolution on the above problem. In addition, the task fixes the kfunc and rcu_read_lock selftests to expect this new behavior. Fixes: 90660309b0c7 ("bpf: Add kfuncs for storing struct task_struct * as a kptr") Fixes: fca1aa75518c ("bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly") Reported-by: Matus Jokay <matus.jokay@stuba.sk> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221206210538.597606-1-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-07selftests/bpf: Use CONFIG_TEST_BPF=m instead of CONFIG_TEST_BPF=yDaan De Meyer1-1/+1
CONFIG_TEST_BPF can only be a module, so let's indicate it as such in the selftests config. Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221205131618.1524337-4-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
2022-12-07selftests/bpf: Use "is not set" instead of "=n"Daan De Meyer1-1/+1
"=n" is not valid kconfig syntax. Use "is not set" instead to indicate the option should be disabled. Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221205131618.1524337-3-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
2022-12-07selftests/bpf: Install all required files to run selftestsDaan De Meyer1-2/+4
When installing the selftests using "make -C tools/testing/selftests install", we need to make sure all the required files to run the selftests are installed. Let's make sure this is the case. Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221205131618.1524337-2-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
2022-12-06selftests/bpf: Allow building bpf tests with CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=[m|n]Martin KaFai Lau1-4/+9
It is useful to use vmlinux.h in the xfrm_info test like other kfunc tests do. In particular, it is common for kfunc bpf prog that requires to use other core kernel structures in vmlinux.h Although vmlinux.h is preferred, it needs a ___local flavor of struct bpf_xfrm_info in order to build the bpf selftests when CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=[m|n]. Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com> Fixes: 90a3a05eb33f ("selftests/bpf: add xfrm_info tests") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221206193554.1059757-1-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-06selftests/bpf: add xfrm_info testsEyal Birger5-0/+403
Test the xfrm_info kfunc helpers. The test setup creates three name spaces - NS0, NS1, NS2. XFRM tunnels are setup between NS0 and the two other NSs. The kfunc helpers are used to steer traffic from NS0 to the other NSs based on a userspace populated bpf global variable and validate that the return traffic had arrived from the desired NS. Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203084659.1837829-5-eyal.birger@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2022-12-05selftests/bpf: Fix conflicts with built-in functions in bpf_iter_ksymJames Hilliard1-3/+3
Both tolower and toupper are built in c functions, we should not redefine them as this can result in a build error. Fixes the following errors: progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:10:20: error: conflicting types for built-in function 'tolower'; expected 'int(int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch] 10 | static inline char tolower(char c) | ^~~~~~~ progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:5:1: note: 'tolower' is declared in header '<ctype.h>' 4 | #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +++ |+#include <ctype.h> 5 | progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:17:20: error: conflicting types for built-in function 'toupper'; expected 'int(int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch] 17 | static inline char toupper(char c) | ^~~~~~~ progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:17:20: note: 'toupper' is declared in header '<ctype.h>' See background on this sort of issue: https://stackoverflow.com/a/20582607 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12213 (C99, 7.1.3p1) "All identifiers with external linkage in any of the following subclauses (including the future library directions) are always reserved for use as identifiers with external linkage." This is documented behavior in GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-std-2 Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203010847.2191265-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-05bpf: Add sleepable prog tests for cgrp local storageYonghong Song2-0/+174
Add three tests for cgrp local storage support for sleepable progs. Two tests can load and run properly, one for cgroup_iter, another for passing current->cgroups->dfl_cgrp to bpf_cgrp_storage_get() helper. One test has bpf_rcu_read_lock() and failed to load. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201050449.2785613-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-04bpf: Do not mark certain LSM hook arguments as trustedYonghong Song2-0/+12
Martin mentioned that the verifier cannot assume arguments from LSM hook sk_alloc_security being trusted since after the hook is called, the sk ref_count is set to 1. This will overwrite the ref_count changed by the bpf program and may cause ref_count underflow later on. I then further checked some other hooks. For example, for bpf_lsm_file_alloc() hook in fs/file_table.c, f->f_cred = get_cred(cred); error = security_file_alloc(f); if (unlikely(error)) { file_free_rcu(&f->f_rcuhead); return ERR_PTR(error); } atomic_long_set(&f->f_count, 1); The input parameter 'f' to security_file_alloc() cannot be trusted as well. Specifically, I investiaged bpf_map/bpf_prog/file/sk/task alloc/free lsm hooks. Except bpf_map_alloc and task_alloc, arguments for all other hooks should not be considered as trusted. This may not be a complete list, but it covers common usage for sk and task. Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203204954.2043348-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-04selftests/bpf: Fix rcu_read_lock test with new MEM_RCU semanticsYonghong Song1-10/+45
Add MEM_RCU pointer null checking for related tests. Also modified task_acquire test so it takes a rcu ptr 'ptr' where 'ptr = rcu_ptr->rcu_field'. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203184607.478314-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-03selftests/bpf: Add GCC compatible builtins to bpf_legacy.hJames Hilliard1-6/+13
The bpf_legacy.h header uses llvm specific load functions, add GCC compatible variants as well to fix tests using these functions under GCC. Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221201190939.3230513-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com
2022-12-02selftests/bpf: Validate multiple ref release_on_unlock logicDave Marchevsky1-1/+16
Modify list_push_pop_multiple to alloc and insert nodes 2-at-a-time. Without the previous patch's fix, this block of code: bpf_spin_lock(lock); bpf_list_push_front(head, &f[i]->node); bpf_list_push_front(head, &f[i + 1]->node); bpf_spin_unlock(lock); would fail check_reference_leak check as release_on_unlock logic would miss a ref that should've been released. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201183406.1203621-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-12-01selftests/bpf: Add ingress tests for txmsg with apply_bytesPengcheng Yang1-0/+18
Currently, the ingress redirect is not covered in "txmsg test apply". Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@wangsu.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1669718441-2654-5-git-send-email-yangpc@wangsu.com
2022-12-01bpf: Tighten ptr_to_btf_id checks.Alexei Starovoitov2-4/+5
The networking programs typically don't require CAP_PERFMON, but through kfuncs like bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() they can access memory through PTR_TO_BTF_ID. In such case enforce CAP_PERFMON. Also make sure that only GPL programs can access kernel data structures. All kfuncs require GPL already. Also remove allow_ptr_to_map_access. It's the same as allow_ptr_leaks and different name for the same check only causes confusion. Fixes: fd264ca02094 ("bpf: Add a kfunc to type cast from bpf uapi ctx to kernel ctx") Fixes: 50c6b8a9aea2 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu"") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221125220617.26846-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2022-12-01selftests/bpf: Add bench test to arm64 and s390x denylistDaniel Borkmann2-0/+2
BPF CI fails for arm64 and s390x each with the following result: [...] All error logs: serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:get_syms 0 nsec serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_kprobe_empty': failed to attach: Operation not supported serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:FAIL:bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 #92 kprobe_multi_bench_attach:FAIL [...] Add the test to the deny list. Fixes: 5b6c7e5c4434 ("selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>