summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-09-19selftests/bpf: Clean up fmod_ret in bench_rename test scriptYipeng Zou1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 83a89c4b6ae93481d3f618aba6a29d89208d26ed ] Running the bench_rename test script, the following error occurs: # ./benchs/run_bench_rename.sh base : 0.819 ± 0.012M/s kprobe : 0.538 ± 0.009M/s kretprobe : 0.503 ± 0.004M/s rawtp : 0.779 ± 0.020M/s fentry : 0.726 ± 0.007M/s fexit : 0.691 ± 0.007M/s benchmark 'rename-fmodret' not found The bench_rename_fmodret has been removed in commit b000def2e052 ("selftests: Remove fmod_ret from test_overhead"), thus remove it from the runners in the test script. Fixes: b000def2e052 ("selftests: Remove fmod_ret from test_overhead") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230814030727.3010390-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-19selftests/bpf: fix static assert compilation issue for test_cls_*.cAlan Maguire1-0/+9
[ Upstream commit 416c6d01244ecbf0abfdb898fd091b50ef951b48 ] commit bdeeed3498c7 ("libbpf: fix offsetof() and container_of() to work with CO-RE") ...was backported to stable trees such as 5.15. The problem is that with older LLVM/clang (14/15) - which is often used for older kernels - we see compilation failures in BPF selftests now: In file included from progs/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.c:2: progs/test_cls_redirect.c:90:2: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression sizeof(flow_ports_t) != ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ progs/test_cls_redirect.c:91:3: note: cast that performs the conversions of a reinterpret_cast is not allowed in a constant expression offsetofend(struct bpf_sock_tuple, ipv4.dport) - ^ progs/test_cls_redirect.c:32:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend' (offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER))) ^ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:86:33: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof' ^ In file included from progs/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.c:2: progs/test_cls_redirect.c:95:2: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression sizeof(flow_ports_t) != ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ progs/test_cls_redirect.c:96:3: note: cast that performs the conversions of a reinterpret_cast is not allowed in a constant expression offsetofend(struct bpf_sock_tuple, ipv6.dport) - ^ progs/test_cls_redirect.c:32:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend' (offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER))) ^ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:86:33: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof' ^ 2 errors generated. make: *** [Makefile:594: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.bpf.o] Error 1 The problem is the new offsetof() does not play nice with static asserts. Given that the context is a static assert (and CO-RE relocation is not needed at compile time), offsetof() usage can be replaced by restoring the original offsetof() definition as __builtin_offsetof(). Fixes: bdeeed3498c7 ("libbpf: fix offsetof() and container_of() to work with CO-RE") Reported-by: Colm Harrington <colm.harrington@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Tested-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802073906.3197480-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Fix sk_assign on s390xIlya Leoshkevich3-6/+33
[ Upstream commit 7ce878ca81bca7811e669db4c394b86780e0dbe4 ] sk_assign is failing on an s390x machine running Debian "bookworm" for 2 reasons: legacy server_map definition and uninitialized addrlen in recvfrom() call. Fix by adding a new-style server_map definition and dropping addrlen (recvfrom() allows NULL values for src_addr and addrlen). Since the test should support tc built without libbpf, build the prog twice: with the old-style definition and with the new-style definition, then select the right one at runtime. This could be done at compile time too, but this would not be cross-compilation friendly. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230129190501.1624747-2-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for ↵Yonghong Song1-1/+1
fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code [ Upstream commit 63d78b7e8ca2d0eb8c687a355fa19d01b6fcc723 ] With latest llvm17, selftest fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code has the following verification failure: 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) 0: (bf) r7 = r1 ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R7_w=ctx(off=0,imm=0) 1: (b4) w6 = 0 ; R6_w=0 ; memset(&tuple.ipv4.saddr, 0, sizeof(tuple.ipv4.saddr)); ... ; return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0; 179: (bf) r1 = r7 ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R7=ctx(off=0,imm=0) 180: (85) call pc+147 Func#3 is global and valid. Skipping. 181: R0_w=scalar() 181: (bc) w6 = w0 ; R0_w=scalar() R6_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 182: (05) goto pc-129 ; } 54: (bc) w0 = w6 ; R0_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 55: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has value (0x0; 0xffffffff) should have been in (0x0; 0x1) processed 281 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 26 peak_states 26 mark_read 13 -- END PROG LOAD LOG -- libbpf: prog 'connect_v4_prog': failed to load: -22 The corresponding source code: __attribute__ ((noinline)) int do_bind(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) { struct sockaddr_in sa = {}; sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_port = bpf_htons(0); sa.sin_addr.s_addr = bpf_htonl(SRC_REWRITE_IP4); if (bpf_bind(ctx, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa)) != 0) return 0; return 1; } ... SEC("cgroup/connect4") int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) { ... return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0; } Insn 180 is a call to 'do_bind'. The call's return value is also the return value for the program. Since do_bind() returns 0/1, so it is legitimate for compiler to optimize 'return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0' to 'return do_bind(ctx)'. However, such optimization breaks verifier as the return value of 'do_bind()' is marked as any scalar which violates the requirement of prog return value 0/1. There are two ways to fix this problem, (1) changing 'return 1' in do_bind() to e.g. 'return 10' so the compiler has to do 'do_bind(ctx) ? 1 :0', or (2) suggested by Andrii, marking do_bind() with __weak attribute so the compiler cannot make any assumption on do_bind() return value. This patch adopted adding __weak approach which is simpler and more resistant to potential compiler optimizations. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230310012410.2920570-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robustAndrii Nakryiko1-13/+23
[ Upstream commit 4f999b767769b76378c3616c624afd6f4bb0d99f ] test_align selftest relies on BPF verifier log emitting register states for specific instructions in expected format. Unfortunately, BPF verifier precision backtracking log interferes with such expectations. And instruction on which precision propagation happens sometimes don't output full expected register states. This does indeed look like something to be improved in BPF verifier, but is beyond the scope of this patch set. So to make test_align a bit more robust, inject few dummy R4 = R5 instructions which capture desired state of R5 and won't have precision tracking logs on them. This fixes tests until we can improve BPF verifier output in the presence of precision tracking. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: ecdf985d7615 ("bpf: track immediate values written to stack by BPF_ST instruction") Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-27selftests/bpf: Add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spillGilad Reti2-1/+41
commit 4237e9f4a96228ccc8a7abe5e4b30834323cd353 upstream. Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it. The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc. Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113053810.13518-2-gilad.reti@gmail.com Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-27bpf: Remove extra lock_sock for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVEStanislav Fomichev6-3/+52
[ Upstream commit 9cacf81f8161111db25f98e78a7a0e32ae142b3f ] Add custom implementation of getsockopt hook for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE. We skip generic hooks for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE and have a custom call in do_tcp_getsockopt using the on-stack data. This removes 3% overhead for locking/unlocking the socket. Without this patch: 3.38% 0.07% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt | --3.30%--__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt | --0.81%--__kmalloc With the patch applied: 0.52% 0.12% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern Note, exporting uapi/tcp.h requires removing netinet/tcp.h from test_progs.h because those headers have confliciting definitions. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210115163501.805133-2-sdf@google.com Stable-dep-of: 2598619e012c ("sctp: add bpf_bypass_getsockopt proto callback") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-06-28bpf: track immediate values written to stack by BPF_ST instructionEduard Zingerman1-46/+64
[ Upstream commit ecdf985d7615356b78241fdb159c091830ed0380 ] For aligned stack writes using BPF_ST instruction track stored values in a same way BPF_STX is handled, e.g. make sure that the following commands produce similar verifier knowledge: fp[-8] = 42; r1 = 42; fp[-8] = r1; This covers two cases: - non-null values written to stack are stored as spill of fake registers; - null values written to stack are stored as STACK_ZERO marks. Previously both cases above used STACK_MISC marks instead. Some verifier test cases relied on the old logic to obtain STACK_MISC marks for some stack values. These test cases are updated in the same commit to avoid failures during bisect. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230214232030.1502829-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 713274f1f2c8 ("bpf: Fix verifier id tracking of scalars on spill") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-17selftests/bpf: Wait for receive in cg_storage_multi testYiFei Zhu1-2/+6
[ Upstream commit 5af607a861d43ffff830fc1890033e579ec44799 ] In some cases the loopback latency might be large enough, causing the assertion on invocations to be run before ingress prog getting executed. The assertion would fail and the test would flake. This can be reliably reproduced by arbitrarily increasing the loopback latency (thanks to [1]): tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 20kbps ceil 20kbps tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 netem delay 100ms Fix this by waiting on the receive end, instead of instantly returning to the assert. The call to read() will wait for the default SO_RCVTIMEO timeout of 3 seconds provided by start_server(). [1] https://gist.github.com/kstevens715/4598301 Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9c5c8b7e-1d89-a3af-5400-14fde81f4429@linux.dev/ Fixes: 3573f384014f ("selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress") Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405193354.1956209-1-zhuyifei@google.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-04-05libbpf: Fix btf_dump's packed struct determinationAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+19
[ Upstream commit 4fb877aaa179dcdb1676d55216482febaada457e ] Fix bug in btf_dump's logic of determining if a given struct type is packed or not. The notion of "natural alignment" is not needed and is even harmful in this case, so drop it altogether. The biggest difference in btf_is_struct_packed() compared to its original implementation is that we don't really use btf__align_of() to determine overall alignment of a struct type (because it could be 1 for both packed and non-packed struct, depending on specifci field definitions), and just use field's actual alignment to calculate whether any field is requiring packing or struct's size overall necessitates packing. Add two simple test cases that demonstrate the difference this change would make. Fixes: ea2ce1ba99aa ("libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logic") Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215183605.4149488-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-04-05selftests/bpf: Add few corner cases to test padding handling of btf_dumpAndrii Nakryiko2-1/+164
[ Upstream commit b148c8b9b926e257a59c8eb2cd6fa3adfd443254 ] Add few hand-crafted cases and few randomized cases found using script from [0] that tests btf_dump's padding logic. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/85f83c333f5355c8ac026f835b18d15060725fcb.camel@ericsson.com/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-7-andrii@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: 4fb877aaa179 ("libbpf: Fix btf_dump's packed struct determination") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-04-05libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logicAndrii Nakryiko2-19/+41
[ Upstream commit ea2ce1ba99aa6a60c8d8a706e3abadf3de372163 ] Turns out that btf_dump API doesn't handle a bunch of tricky corner cases, as reported by Per, and further discovered using his testing Python script ([0]). This patch revamps btf_dump's padding logic significantly, making it more correct and also avoiding unnecessary explicit padding, where compiler would pad naturally. This overall topic turned out to be very tricky and subtle, there are lots of subtle corner cases. The comments in the code tries to give some clues, but comments themselves are supposed to be paired with good understanding of C alignment and padding rules. Plus some experimentation to figure out subtle things like whether `long :0;` means that struct is now forced to be long-aligned (no, it's not, turns out). Anyways, Per's script, while not completely correct in some known situations, doesn't show any obvious cases where this logic breaks, so this is a nice improvement over the previous state of this logic. Some selftests had to be adjusted to accommodate better use of natural alignment rules, eliminating some unnecessary padding, or changing it to `type: 0;` alignment markers. Note also that for when we are in between bitfields, we emit explicit bit size, while otherwise we use `: 0`, this feels much more natural in practice. Next patch will add few more test cases, found through randomized Per's script. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/85f83c333f5355c8ac026f835b18d15060725fcb.camel@ericsson.com/ Reported-by: Per Sundström XP <per.xp.sundstrom@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-6-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-04-05selftests/bpf: Test btf dump for struct with padding only fieldsEduard Zingerman1-0/+9
[ Upstream commit d503f1176b14f722a40ea5110312614982f9a80b ] Structures with zero regular fields but some padding constitute a special case in btf_dump.c:btf_dump_emit_struct_def with regards to newline before closing '}'. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221001104425.415768-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Stable-dep-of: ea2ce1ba99aa ("libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logic") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-04-05selftests/bpf: check that modifier resolves after pointerLorenz Bauer1-0/+28
[ Upstream commit dfdd608c3b365f0fd49d7e13911ebcde06b9865b ] Add a regression test that ensures that a VAR pointing at a modifier which follows a PTR (or STRUCT or ARRAY) is resolved correctly by the datasec validator. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306112138.155352-3-lmb@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11selftests/bpf: Fix out-of-srctree buildIlya Leoshkevich1-2/+0
[ Upstream commit 0b0757244754ea1d0721195c824770f5576e119e ] Building BPF selftests out of srctree fails with: make: *** No rule to make target '/linux-build//ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop. The culprit is the rule that defines convenient shorthands like "make test_progs", which builds $(OUTPUT)/test_progs. These shorthands make sense only for binaries that are built though; scripts that live in the source tree do not end up in $(OUTPUT). Therefore drop $(TEST_PROGS) and $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) from the rule. The issue exists for a while, but it became a problem only after commit d68ae4982cb7 ("selftests/bpf: Install all required files to run selftests"), which added dependencies on these scripts. Fixes: 03dcb78460c2 ("selftests/bpf: Add simple per-test targets to Makefile") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230208231211.283606-1-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-22selftests/bpf: Verify copy_register_state() preserves parent/live fieldsEduard Zingerman1-0/+36
[ Upstream commit b9fa9bc839291020b362ab5392e5f18ba79657ac ] A testcase to check that verifier.c:copy_register_state() preserves register parentage chain and livness information. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230106142214.1040390-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-02-01Revert "selftests/bpf: check null propagation only neither reg is PTR_TO_BTF_ID"Sasha Levin2-51/+0
This reverts commit 3093027183f2846365a76b2fb1e1309f1960084a. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-01-24selftests/bpf: check null propagation only neither reg is PTR_TO_BTF_IDHao Sun2-0/+51
[ Upstream commit cedebd74cf3883f0384af9ec26b4e6f8f1964dd4 ] Verify that nullness information is not porpagated in the branches of register to register JEQ and JNE operations if one of them is PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Implement this in C level so we can use CO-RE. Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222024414.29539-2-sunhao.th@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-12-02selftests/bpf: Add verifier test for release_reference()Youlin Li1-0/+36
[ Upstream commit 475244f5e06beeda7b557d9dde46a5f439bf3379 ] Add a test case to ensure that released pointer registers will not be leaked into the map. Before fix: ./test_verifier 984 984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 67 usec stack depth 4 processed 23 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 2 peak_states 2 mark_read 1 984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED After fix: ./test_verifier 984 984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK 984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Youlin Li <liulin063@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103093440.3161-2-liulin063@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-08-21selftests/bpf: fix a test for snprintf() overflowDan Carpenter1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit c5d22f4cfe8dfb93f1db0a1e7e2e7ebc41395d98 ] The snprintf() function returns the number of bytes which *would* have been copied if there were space. In other words, it can be > sizeof(pin_path). Fixes: c0fa1b6c3efc ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YtZ+aD/tZMkgOUw+@kili Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-08-11selftests/bpf: Check dst_port only on the client socketJakub Sitnicki1-0/+4
commit 2d2202ba858c112b03f84d546e260c61425831a1 upstream. cgroup_skb/egress programs which sock_fields test installs process packets flying in both directions, from the client to the server, and in reverse direction. Recently added dst_port check relies on the fact that destination port (remote peer port) of the socket which sends the packet is known ahead of time. This holds true only for the client socket, which connects to the known server port. Filter out any traffic that is not egressing from the client socket in the BPF program that tests reading the dst_port. Fixes: 8f50f16ff39d ("selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads") Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220317113920.1068535-3-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-08-11selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loadsJakub Sitnicki3-22/+160
commit 8f50f16ff39dd4e2d43d1548ca66925652f8aff7 upstream. Add coverage to the verifier tests and tests for reading bpf_sock fields to ensure that 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit loads from dst_port field are allowed only at intended offsets and produce expected values. While 16-bit and 8-bit access to dst_port field is straight-forward, 32-bit wide loads need be allowed and produce a zero-padded 16-bit value for backward compatibility. Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-3-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [OP: backport to 5.10: adjusted context in sock_fields.c] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-08-03selftests: bpf: Don't run sk_lookup in verifier testsLorenz Bauer2-2/+3
commit b4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb upstream. sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here doesn't reduce coverage. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-06-09selftests/bpf: fix btf_dump/btf_dump due to recent clang changeYonghong Song1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 4050764cbaa25760aab40857f723393c07898474 ] Latest llvm-project upstream had a change of behavior related to qualifiers on function return type ([1]). This caused selftests btf_dump/btf_dump failure. The following example shows what changed. $ cat t.c typedef const char * const (* const (* const fn_ptr_arr2_t[5])())(char * (*)(int)); struct t { int a; fn_ptr_arr2_t l; }; int foo(struct t *arg) { return arg->a; } Compiled with latest upstream llvm15, $ clang -O2 -g -target bpf -S -emit-llvm t.c The related generated debuginfo IR looks like: !16 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "fn_ptr_arr2_t", file: !1, line: 1, baseType: !17) !17 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_array_type, baseType: !18, size: 320, elements: !32) !18 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !19) !19 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !20, size: 64) !20 = !DISubroutineType(types: !21) !21 = !{!22, null} !22 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !23, size: 64) !23 = !DISubroutineType(types: !24) !24 = !{!25, !28} !25 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !26, size: 64) !26 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !27) !27 = !DIBasicType(name: "char", size: 8, encoding: DW_ATE_signed_char) You can see two intermediate const qualifier to pointer are dropped in debuginfo IR. With llvm14, we have following debuginfo IR: !16 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "fn_ptr_arr2_t", file: !1, line: 1, baseType: !17) !17 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_array_type, baseType: !18, size: 320, elements: !34) !18 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !19) !19 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !20, size: 64) !20 = !DISubroutineType(types: !21) !21 = !{!22, null} !22 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !23) !23 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !24, size: 64) !24 = !DISubroutineType(types: !25) !25 = !{!26, !30} !26 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !27) !27 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !28, size: 64) !28 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_const_type, baseType: !29) !29 = !DIBasicType(name: "char", size: 8, encoding: DW_ATE_signed_char) All const qualifiers are preserved. To adapt the selftest to both old and new llvm, this patch removed the intermediate const qualifier in const-to-ptr types, to make the test succeed again. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919 Reported-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220523152044.3905809-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2.sh: Exit with proper codeHangbin Liu1-1/+4
[ Upstream commit ec80906b0fbd7be11e3e960813b977b1ffe5f8fe ] When test_lirc_mode2_user exec failed, the test report failed but still exit with 0. Fix it by exiting with an error code. Another issue is for the LIRCDEV checking. With bash -n, we need to quote the variable, or it will always be true. So if test_lirc_mode2_user was not run, just exit with skip code. Fixes: 6bdd533cee9a ("bpf: add selftest for lirc_mode2 type program") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321024149.157861-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08selftests/bpf: Fix error reporting from sock_fields programsJakub Sitnicki1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit a4c9fe0ed4a13e25e43fcd44d9f89bc19ba8fbb7 ] The helper macro that records an error in BPF programs that exercise sock fields access has been inadvertently broken by adaptation work that happened in commit b18c1f0aa477 ("bpf: selftest: Adapt sock_fields test to use skel and global variables"). BPF_NOEXIST flag cannot be used to update BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY. The operation always fails with -EEXIST, which in turn means the error never gets recorded, and the checks for errors always pass. Revert the change in update flags. Fixes: b18c1f0aa477 ("bpf: selftest: Adapt sock_fields test to use skel and global variables") Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220317113920.1068535-2-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08selftests/bpf: Make test_lwt_ip_encap more stable and fasterFelix Maurer1-1/+9
[ Upstream commit d23a8720327d33616f584d76c80824bfa4699be6 ] In test_lwt_ip_encap, the ingress IPv6 encap test failed from time to time. The failure occured when an IPv4 ping through the IPv6 GRE encapsulation did not receive a reply within the timeout. The IPv4 ping and the IPv6 ping in the test used different timeouts (1 sec for IPv4 and 6 sec for IPv6), probably taking into account that IPv6 might need longer to successfully complete. However, when IPv4 pings (with the short timeout) are encapsulated into the IPv6 tunnel, the delays of IPv6 apply. The actual reason for the long delays with IPv6 was that the IPv6 neighbor discovery sometimes did not complete in time. This was caused by the outgoing interface only having a tentative link local address, i.e., not having completed DAD for that lladdr. The ND was successfully retried after 1 sec but that was too late for the ping timeout. The IPv6 addresses for the test were already added with nodad. However, for the lladdrs, DAD was still performed. We now disable DAD in the test netns completely and just assume that the two lladdrs on each veth pair do not collide. This removes all the delays for IPv6 traffic in the test. Without the delays, we can now also reduce the delay of the IPv6 ping to 1 sec. This makes the whole test complete faster because we don't need to wait for the excessive timeout for each IPv6 ping that is supposed to fail. Fixes: 0fde56e4385b0 ("selftests: bpf: add test_lwt_ip_encap selftest") Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4987d549d48b4e316cd5b3936de69c8d4bc75a4f.1646305899.git.fmaurer@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-03-23Revert "selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_timer overwriting crash"Greg Kroah-Hartman2-86/+0
This reverts commit 4fb9be675be8360bede6fb8f0cad7948393fbef8 which is commit a7e75016a0753c24d6c995bc02501ae35368e333 upstream. It is reported to break the bpf self-tests. Reported-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com> Reported-by: Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com> Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209070324.1093182-3-memxor@gmail.com Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a0a7298ca5c64b3d0ecfcc8821c2de79186fa9f7.camel@nokia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/HE1PR0402MB3497CB13A12C4D15D20A1FCCF8139@HE1PR0402MB3497.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-03-16selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_timer overwriting crashKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-0/+86
[ Upstream commit a7e75016a0753c24d6c995bc02501ae35368e333 ] Add a test that validates that timer value is not overwritten when doing a copy_map_value call in the kernel. Without the prior fix, this test triggers a crash. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209070324.1093182-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-03-02selftests: bpf: Check bpf_msg_push_data return valueFelix Maurer1-8/+18
commit 61d06f01f9710b327a53492e5add9f972eb909b3 upstream. bpf_msg_push_data may return a non-zero value to indicate an error. The return value should be checked to prevent undetected errors. To indicate an error, the BPF programs now perform a different action than their intended one to make the userspace test program notice the error, i.e., the programs supposed to pass/redirect drop, the program supposed to drop passes. Fixes: 84fbfe026acaa ("bpf: test_sockmap add options to use msg_push_data") Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/89f767bb44005d6b4dd1f42038c438f76b3ebfad.1644601294.git.fmaurer@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-27selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_object leak in skb_ctx selftestAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 8c7a95520184b6677ca6075e12df9c208d57d088 ] skb_ctx selftest didn't close bpf_object implicitly allocated by bpf_prog_test_load() helper. Fix the problem by explicitly calling bpf_object__close() at the end of the test. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211107165521.9240-10-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-12-22bpf, selftests: Fix racing issue in btf_skc_cls_ingress testMartin KaFai Lau1-2/+14
[ Upstream commit c2fcbf81c332b42382a0c439bfe2414a241e4f5b ] The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress: test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0 bpf prog error at line 97 "error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0". The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had a chance to process the final ack. The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing everything. Fixes: 9a856cae2217 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-12-22bpf, selftests: Add test case trying to taint map value pointerDaniel Borkmann1-0/+23
commit b1a7288dedc6caf9023f2676b4f5ed34cf0d4029 upstream. Add a test case which tries to taint map value pointer arithmetic into a unknown scalar with subsequent export through the map. Before fix: # ./test_verifier 1186 #1186/u map access: trying to leak tained dst reg FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 24 usec stack depth 8 processed 15 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 #1186/p map access: trying to leak tained dst reg FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 8 usec stack depth 8 processed 15 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED After fix: # ./test_verifier 1186 #1186/u map access: trying to leak tained dst reg OK #1186/p map access: trying to leak tained dst reg OK Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-12-14bpf: Add selftests to cover packet access corner casesMaxim Mikityanskiy1-16/+584
commit b560b21f71eb4ef9dfc7c8ec1d0e4d7f9aa54b51 upstream. This commit adds BPF verifier selftests that cover all corner cases by packet boundary checks. Specifically, 8-byte packet reads are tested at the beginning of data and at the beginning of data_meta, using all kinds of boundary checks (all comparison operators: <, >, <=, >=; both permutations of operands: data + length compared to end, end compared to data + length). For each case there are three tests: 1. Length is just enough for an 8-byte read. Length is either 7 or 8, depending on the comparison. 2. Length is increased by 1 - should still pass the verifier. These cases are useful, because they failed before commit 2fa7d94afc1a ("bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markings"). 3. Length is decreased by 1 - should be rejected by the verifier. Some existing tests are just renamed to avoid duplication. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207081521.41923-1-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-12-14bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markingsMaxim Mikityanskiy1-16/+16
commit 2fa7d94afc1afbb4d702760c058dc2d7ed30f226 upstream. The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error, arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts from the verifier, for example (pseudocode): // 1. Passes the verifier: if (data + 8 > data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass): if (data + 7 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code starts failing in the verifier: // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1. if (data + 8 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however, they should be accepted. This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the one that should actually fail. Fixes: fb2a311a31d3 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns") Fixes: b37242c773b2 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftestAndrii Nakryiko1-13/+2
commit a20eac0af02810669e187cb623bc904908c423af upstream. Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries. While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests. Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests pass. Fixes: 0133c20480b1 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18bpf: Fix propagation of bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit and var_off.Alexei Starovoitov1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit b9979db8340154526d9ab38a1883d6f6ba9b6d47 ] Before this fix: 166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22 from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) After this fix: 166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22 from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1 and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg). Without the fix it would not pass the condition: if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value)) since umin_value == 0 at this point. Before commit 10bf4e83167c the umin was incorrectly ingored. The commit 10bf4e83167c fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off. Fixes: 10bf4e83167c ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18selftests/bpf: Fix fclose/pclose mismatch in test_progsAndrea Righi1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit f48ad69097fe79d1de13c4d8fef556d4c11c5e68 ] Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen(). Fixes: 81f77fd0deeb ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID") Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026143409.42666-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk_lookup testKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit c3fc706e94f5653def2783ffcd809a38676b7551 ] Similar to the fix in commit: e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot") We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size. The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking internal libbpf assumptions. Fixes: 0ab5539f8584 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18selftests: bpf: Convert sk_lookup ctx access tests to PROG_TEST_RUNLorenz Bauer2-36/+109
[ Upstream commit 509b2937bce90089fd2785db9f27951a3d850c34 ] Convert the selftests for sk_lookup narrow context access to use PROG_TEST_RUN instead of creating actual sockets. This ensures that ctx is populated correctly when using PROG_TEST_RUN. Assert concrete values since we now control remote_ip and remote_port. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-4-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regressionAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+11
[ Upstream commit 0133c20480b14820d43c37c0e9502da4bffcad3a ] After most recent nightly Clang update strobemeta selftests started failing with the following error (relevant portion of assembly included): 1624: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 1625: (bf) r1 = r0 1626: (18) r2 = 0xfffffffe 1628: (5f) r1 &= r2 1629: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+7 1630: (07) r9 += 104 1631: (6b) *(u16 *)(r9 +0) = r0 1632: (67) r0 <<= 32 1633: (77) r0 >>= 32 1634: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1635: (0f) r1 += r0 1636: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -456) = r1 1637: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -368) 1638: (c5) if r1 s< 0x1 goto pc+778 1639: (bf) r6 = r8 1640: (0f) r6 += r7 1641: (b4) w1 = 0 1642: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +108) = r1 1643: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r10 -352) 1644: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1645: (bf) r1 = r9 1646: (b4) w2 = 1 1647: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 R1 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access In the above code r0 and r1 are implicitly related. Clang knows that, but verifier isn't able to infer this relationship. Yonghong Song narrowed down this "regression" in code generation to a recent Clang optimization change ([0]), which for BPF target generates code pattern that BPF verifier can't handle and loses track of register boundaries. This patch works around the issue by adding an BPF assembly-based helper that helps to prove to the verifier that upper bound of the register is a given constant by controlling the exact share of generated BPF instruction sequence. This fixes the immediate issue for strobemeta selftest. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acabad9ff6bf13e00305d9d8621ee8eafc1f8b08 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029182907.166910-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpusJiri Olsa1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit d4121376ac7a9c81a696d7558789b2f29ef3574e ] The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-10-27selftests: bpf: fix backported ASSERT_FALSELorenz Bauer1-1/+1
Commit 183d9ebd449c ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner") causes builds of selftests/bpf to fail on 5.10.y since the branch doesn't have the ASSERT_FALSE macro yet. Replace ASSERT_FALSE with ASSERT_EQ. Fixes: 183d9ebd449c ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner") Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-06selftests, bpf: test_lwt_ip_encap: Really disable rp_filterJiri Benc1-5/+8
[ Upstream commit 79e2c306667542b8ee2d9a9d947eadc7039f0a3c ] It's not enough to set net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0, that does not override a greater rp_filter value on the individual interfaces. We also need to set net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0 before creating the interfaces. That way, they'll also get their own rp_filter value of zero. Fixes: 0fde56e4385b0 ("selftests: bpf: add test_lwt_ip_encap selftest") Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b1cdd9d469f09ea6e01e9c89a6071c79b7380f89.1632386362.git.jbenc@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-10-06selftests, bpf: Fix makefile dependencies on libbpfJiri Benc1-1/+2
[ Upstream commit d888eaac4fb1df30320bb1305a8f78efe86524c6 ] When building bpf selftest with make -j, I'm randomly getting build failures such as this one: In file included from progs/bpf_flow.c:19: [...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:11:10: fatal error: 'bpf_helper_defs.h' file not found #include "bpf_helper_defs.h" ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The file that fails the build varies between runs but it's always in the progs/ subdir. The reason is a missing make dependency on libbpf for the .o files in progs/. There was a dependency before commit 3ac2e20fba07e but that commit removed it to prevent unneeded rebuilds. However, that only works if libbpf has been built already; the 'wildcard' prerequisite does not trigger when there's no bpf_helper_defs.h generated yet. Keep the libbpf as an order-only prerequisite to satisfy both goals. It is always built before the progs/ objects but it does not trigger unnecessary rebuilds by itself. Fixes: 3ac2e20fba07e ("selftests/bpf: BPF object files should depend only on libbpf headers") Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ee84ab66436fba05a197f952af23c98d90eb6243.1632758415.git.jbenc@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-18selftests/bpf: Fix potential unreleased lockChengfeng Ye1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit 47bb27a20d6ea22cd092c1fc2bb4fcecac374838 ] This lock is not released if the program return at the patched branch. Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <cyeaa@connect.ust.hk> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210827074140.118671-1-cyeaa@connect.ust.hk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-18selftests/bpf: Enlarge select() timeout for test_mapsLi Zhijian1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ] 0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host. ------------------- # selftests: bpf: test_maps # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu' # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1 # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map # nr_cpus:8 ------------------- Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report. In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps', and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-18selftests/bpf: Fix flaky send_signal testYonghong Song1-0/+16
[ Upstream commit b16ac5bf732a5e23d164cf908ec7742d6a6120d3 ] libbpf CI has reported send_signal test is flaky although I am not able to reproduce it in my local environment. But I am able to reproduce with on-demand libbpf CI ([1]). Through code analysis, the following is possible reason. The failed subtest runs bpf program in softirq environment. Since bpf_send_signal() only sends to a fork of "test_progs" process. If the underlying current task is not "test_progs", bpf_send_signal() will not be triggered and the subtest will fail. To reduce the chances where the underlying process is not the intended one, this patch boosted scheduling priority to -20 (highest allowed by setpriority() call). And I did 10 runs with on-demand libbpf CI with this patch and I didn't observe any failures. [1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/workflows/ondemand.yml Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817190923.3186725-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-18selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_tx.c prog section nameJussi Maki2-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 95413846cca37f20000dd095cf6d91f8777129d7 ] The program type cannot be deduced from 'tx' which causes an invalid argument error when trying to load xdp_tx.o using the skeleton. Rename the section name to "xdp" so that libbpf can deduce the type. Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210731055738.16820-7-joamaki@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-15selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich1-5/+15
[ Upstream commit d164dd9a5c08c16a883b3de97d13948c7be7fa4d ] The "probed" part of test_core_autosize copies an integer using bpf_core_read() into an integer of a potentially different size. On big-endian machines a destination offset is required for this to produce a sensible result. Fixes: 888d83b961f6 ("selftests/bpf: Validate libbpf's auto-sizing of LD/ST/STX instructions") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812224814.187460-1-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2025-09-25 19:31:22 +0300