| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
There are some spelling mistakes in some ksft messages. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220207092235.240284-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
This program has only one file so most functions can be static.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220202150902.19563-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Add some coverage of event generation to mixer-test. Rather than doing a
separate set of writes designed to trigger events we add a step to the
existing write_and_verify() which checks to see if the value we read back
from non-volatile controls matches the value before writing and that an
event is or isn't generated as appropriate. The "tests" for events then
simply check that no spurious or missing events were detected. This avoids
needing further logic to generate appropriate values for each control type
and maximises coverage.
When checking for events we use a timeout of 0. This relies on the kernel
generating any event prior to returning to userspace when setting a control.
That is currently the case and it is difficult to see it changing, if it
does the test will need to be updated. Using a delay of 0 means that we
don't slow things down unduly when checking for no event or when events
fail to be generated.
We don't check behaviour for volatile controls since we can't tell what
the behaviour is supposed to be for any given control.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220202150902.19563-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Attempt to write various invalid values for control types we know about and
check that something sensible happens. The ABI isn't quite as clearly
defined as one might like, rather than generating an error when an invalid
value is written many devices will silently rewrite the value into one that
is valid for the control. The exact value chosen is not predictable so in
the case the write succeeds we just check that the value we read back is
one that is valid for the control.
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220125162824.3816659-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Enumerations should return a value between 0 and items-1, check that this
is the case.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217130213.3893415-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
To simplify the code a bit and allow future reuse factor the checks that
values we read are valid out of test_ctl_get_value() into a separate
function which can be reused later. As part of this extend the test to
check all the values for the control, not just the first one.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217130213.3893415-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
As mentined by Takashi Sakamoto, the system-wide alsa-lib configuration
may override the standard device declarations. This patch use the private
alsa-lib configuration to set the predictable environment.
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211208095209.1772296-1-perex@perex.cz
[Restructure version test to keep the preprocessor happy -- broonie]
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210185410.740009-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
The volatile attribute of control element means that the hardware can
voluntarily change the state of control element independent of any
operation by software. ALSA control core necessarily sends notification
to userspace subscribers for any change from userspace application, while
it doesn't for the hardware's voluntary change.
This commit adds optimization for the attribute. Even if read value is
different from written value, the test reports success as long as the
target control element has the attribute. On the other hand, the
difference is itself reported for developers' convenience.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Ya7TAHdMe9i41bsC@workstation
[Fix comment style as suggested by Shuah -- broonie]
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210185410.740009-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Add a basic test for the mixer control interface. For every control on
every sound card in the system it checks that it can read and write the
default value where the control supports that and for writeable controls
attempts to write all valid values, restoring the default values after
each test to minimise disruption for users.
There are quite a few areas for improvement - currently no coverage of the
generation of notifications, several of the control types don't have any
coverage for the values and we don't have any testing of error handling
when we attempt to write out of range values - but this provides some basic
coverage.
This is added as a kselftest since unlike other ALSA test programs it does
not require either physical setup of the device or interactive monitoring
by users and kselftest is one of the test suites that is frequently run by
people doing general automated testing so should increase coverage. It is
written in terms of alsa-lib since tinyalsa is not generally packaged for
distributions which makes things harder for general users interested in
kselftest as a whole but it will be a barrier to people with Android.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210185410.740009-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
