Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Leave a hint to folks which file to edit instead.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Expect reStructuredText input and have kernel-doc produce
reStructuredText output with the new --rst option. Also add --docbook
option for completeness. If no option is given, default to
reStructuredText if the input file has ".rst" extension, DocBook
otherwise.
Directives for reStructuredText use .. ! instead of just !, to make them
reStructuredText comments.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Cleaner code. Also fixes a bug when F or P directives didn't in fact
have space.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Helps follow-up work. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Improves clarity. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Improves clarity. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
|
|
When using '!Ffile function' in a docbook template, and the function no
longer exists, you get a "no structured comments found" error from the
kernel-doc processing script. It's useful to know which functions it was
looking for, so print them out in this case. Also do the same for '!Pfile
doc-section'
The same error also happens when using '!Efile' when some exported
functions aren't documented (in the same file.) There's a very large
number of such functions though, so don't print the message in this case
-- right now it would give ~850 messages.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The placement of the opening brace "{" after 'if' statements in
scripts/docproc.c is inconsistent. Most are placed on the same line as the 'if'
statement itself as per CodingStyle, but a few are not. This patch cleans up
the inconsistency. We save a few source lines and the file then uses the same
style throughout, which is nice.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
|
Move docproc from scripts/basic to scripts so it is only built for *doc
targets instead of every time the kernel is built.
|