Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Add RISC-V variants of the ftrace-direct* samples.
Tested-by: Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@yadro.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130121531.1178502-5-bjorn@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
When cross-building the arm64 kernel with allmodconfig using GCC 9.4,
the following error occurs on multiple files under samples/ftrace/:
/tmp/ccPC1ODs.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccPC1ODs.s:8: Error: selected processor does not support `bti c'
Fix this issue by replacing `bti c` with `hint 34`, which is compatible
for the older compiler.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230820111509.1470826-1-gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Fixes: 8c3526fb86060cb5 ("arm64: ftrace: Add direct call trampoline samples support")
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
The ftrace samples need per-architecture trampoline implementations
to save and restore argument registers around the calls to
my_direct_func* and to restore polluted registers (eg: x30).
These samples also include <asm/asm-offsets.h> which, on arm64, is not
necessary and redefines previously defined macros (resulting in
warnings) so these includes are guarded by !CONFIG_ARM64.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230427140700.625241-3-revest@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
The ftrace-direct-too sample traces the handle_mm_fault function whose
signature changed since the introduction of the sample. Since:
commit bce617edecad ("mm: do page fault accounting in handle_mm_fault")
handle_mm_fault now has 4 arguments. Therefore, the sample trampoline
should save 4 argument registers.
s390 saves all argument registers already so it does not need a change
but x86_64 needs an extra push and pop.
This also evolves the signature of the tracing function to make it
mirror the signature of the traced function.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230427140700.625241-2-revest@chromium.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: bce617edecad ("mm: do page fault accounting in handle_mm_fault")
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson
Pull LoongArch updates from Huacai Chen:
- Better backtraces for humanization
- Relay BCE exceptions to userland as SIGSEGV
- Provide kernel fpu functions
- Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove)
- Optimize checksum and crc32(c) calculation
- Add ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE selection
- Add function error injection support
- Add ftrace with direct call support
- Add basic perf tools support
* tag 'loongarch-6.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson: (24 commits)
tools/perf: Add basic support for LoongArch
LoongArch: ftrace: Add direct call trampoline samples support
LoongArch: ftrace: Add direct call support
LoongArch: ftrace: Implement ftrace_find_callable_addr() to simplify code
LoongArch: ftrace: Fix build error if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS is not set
LoongArch: ftrace: Abstract DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS accesses
LoongArch: Add support for function error injection
LoongArch: Add ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE selection
LoongArch: crypto: Add crc32 and crc32c hw acceleration
LoongArch: Add checksum optimization for 64-bit system
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove)
LoongArch: Provide kernel fpu functions
LoongArch: Relay BCE exceptions to userland as SIGSEGV with si_code=SEGV_BNDERR
LoongArch: Tweak the BADV and CPUCFG.PRID lines in show_regs()
LoongArch: Humanize the ESTAT line when showing registers
LoongArch: Humanize the ECFG line when showing registers
LoongArch: Humanize the EUEN line when showing registers
LoongArch: Humanize the PRMD line when showing registers
LoongArch: Humanize the CRMD line when showing registers
LoongArch: Fix format of CSR lines during show_regs()
...
|
|
The ftrace samples need per-architecture trampoline implementations to
save and restore argument registers around the calls to my_direct_func*
and to restore polluted registers (e.g: ra).
Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
Now that the original _ftrace_direct APIs are gone, the "_multi"
suffixes only add confusion.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230321140424.345218-5-revest@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
The _multi API requires that users keep their own ops but can enforce
that an op is only associated to one direct call.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230321140424.345218-3-revest@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
When other architectures without the nospec functionality write their
direct-call functions of samples/ftrace/*.c, the including of
asm/nospec-branch.h must be taken care to fix the no header file found
error in building process.
This commit (ee3e2469b346 "x86/ftrace: Make it call depth tracking aware")
file-globally includes asm/nospec-branch.h providing CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT
for only x86 direct-call functions.
It seems better to move the including to `#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64`.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230130085954.647845-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Since ftrace has trampolines, don't use thunks for the __fentry__ site
but instead require that every function called from there includes
accounting. This very much includes all the direct-call functions.
Additionally, ftrace uses ROP tricks in two places:
- return_to_handler(), and
- ftrace_regs_caller() when pt_regs->orig_ax is set by a direct-call.
return_to_handler() already uses a retpoline to replace an
indirect-jump to defeat IBT, since this is a jump-type retpoline, make
sure there is no accounting done and ALTERNATIVE the RET into a ret.
ftrace_regs_caller() does much the same and gets the same treatment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220915111148.927545073@infradead.org
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308154318.523421433@infradead.org
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 core updates from Borislav Petkov:
- Get rid of all the .fixup sections because this generates
misleading/wrong stacktraces and confuse RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and
LIVEPATCH as the backtrace misses the function which is being fixed
up.
- Add Straight Line Speculation mitigation support which uses a new
compiler switch -mharden-sls= which sticks an INT3 after a RET or an
indirect branch in order to block speculation after them. Reportedly,
CPUs do speculate behind such insns.
- The usual set of cleanups and improvements
* tag 'x86_core_for_v5.17_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (32 commits)
x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions
objtool: Remove .fixup handling
x86: Remove .fixup section
x86/word-at-a-time: Remove .fixup usage
x86/usercopy: Remove .fixup usage
x86/usercopy_32: Simplify __copy_user_intel_nocache()
x86/sgx: Remove .fixup usage
x86/checksum_32: Remove .fixup usage
x86/vmx: Remove .fixup usage
x86/kvm: Remove .fixup usage
x86/segment: Remove .fixup usage
x86/fpu: Remove .fixup usage
x86/xen: Remove .fixup usage
x86/uaccess: Remove .fixup usage
x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage
x86/msr: Remove .fixup usage
x86/extable: Extend extable functionality
x86/entry_32: Remove .fixup usage
x86/entry_64: Remove .fixup usage
x86/copy_mc_64: Remove .fixup usage
...
|
|
There's another compilation fail (first here [1]) reported by kernel
test robot for W=1 clang build:
>> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c:7:6: warning: no previous
prototype for function 'my_direct_func1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void my_direct_func1(unsigned long ip)
Direct functions in ftrace direct sample modules need to have prototypes
defined. They are already global in order to be visible for the inline
assembly, so there's no problem.
The kernel test robot reported just error for ftrace-direct-multi-modify,
but I got same errors also for the rest of the modules touched by this patch.
[1] 67d4f6e3bf5d ftrace/samples: Add missing prototype for my_direct_func
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211219135317.212430-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: e1067a07cfbc ("ftrace/samples: Add module to test multi direct modify interface")
Fixes: ae0cc3b7e7f5 ("ftrace/samples: Add a sample module that implements modify_ftrace_direct()")
Fixes: 156473a0ff4f ("ftrace: Add another example of register_ftrace_direct() use case")
Fixes: b06457c83af6 ("ftrace: Add sample module that uses register_ftrace_direct()")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Replace all ret/retq instructions with ASM_RET in preparation of
making it more than a single instruction.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211204134907.964635458@infradead.org
|
|
Add s390 support for ftrace direct call samples, which also enables
ftrace direct call selftests within ftrace selftests.
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012133802.2460757-5-hca@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
my_tramp[12]? are declared as global functions in C, but they are not
marked global in the inline assembly definition. This mismatch confuses
Clang's Control-Flow Integrity checking. Fix the definitions by adding
.globl.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113183414.1446671-1-samitolvanen@google.com
Fixes: 9d907f1ae80b8 ("ftrace/samples: Add a sample module that implements modify_ftrace_direct()")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Enable objtool coverage for the sample ftrace modules by adding ELF
annotations to the asm trampoline functions.
samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x0: unreachable instruction
samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-modify.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x0: unreachable instruction
samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-too.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x0: unreachable instruction
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
|
|
Add another module sample that registers a direct trampoline to a function
via register_ftrace_direct(). Having another module that does this allows to
test the use case of multiple direct callers registered, as more than one
direct caller goes into another path, and is needed to perform proper
testing of the register_ftrace_direct() call.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|