summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/radix-tree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-10-05mm: filemap: don't plant shadow entries without radix tree nodeJohannes Weiner1-11/+3
When the underflow checks were added to workingset_node_shadow_dec(), they triggered immediately: kernel BUG at ./include/linux/swap.h:276! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: isofs usb_storage fuse xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 tun nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 soundcore wmi acpi_als pinctrl_sunrisepoint kfifo_buf tpm_tis industrialio acpi_pad pinctrl_intel tpm_tis_core tpm nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc dm_crypt CPU: 0 PID: 20929 Comm: blkid Not tainted 4.8.0-rc8-00087-gbe67d60ba944 #1 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/Z170-K, BIOS 1803 05/06/2016 task: ffff8faa93ecd940 task.stack: ffff8faa7f478000 RIP: page_cache_tree_insert+0xf1/0x100 Call Trace: __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x12e/0x270 add_to_page_cache_lru+0x4e/0xe0 mpage_readpages+0x112/0x1d0 blkdev_readpages+0x1d/0x20 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1ad/0x290 force_page_cache_readahead+0xaa/0x100 page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3f/0x50 generic_file_read_iter+0x5af/0x740 blkdev_read_iter+0x35/0x40 __vfs_read+0xe1/0x130 vfs_read+0x96/0x130 SyS_read+0x55/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x8f Code: 03 00 48 8b 5d d8 65 48 33 1c 25 28 00 00 00 44 89 e8 75 19 48 83 c4 18 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f 0b 41 bd ef ff ff ff eb d7 <0f> 0b e8 88 68 ef ff 0f 1f 84 00 RIP page_cache_tree_insert+0xf1/0x100 This is a long-standing bug in the way shadow entries are accounted in the radix tree nodes. The shrinker needs to know when radix tree nodes contain only shadow entries, no pages, so node->count is split in half to count shadows in the upper bits and pages in the lower bits. Unfortunately, the radix tree implementation doesn't know of this and assumes all entries are in node->count. When there is a shadow entry directly in root->rnode and the tree is later extended, the radix tree implementation will copy that entry into the new node and and bump its node->count, i.e. increases the page count bits. Once the shadow gets removed and we subtract from the upper counter, node->count underflows and triggers the warning. Afterwards, without node->count reaching 0 again, the radix tree node is leaked. Limit shadow entries to when we have actual radix tree nodes and can count them properly. That means we lose the ability to detect refaults from files that had only the first page faulted in at eviction time. Fixes: 449dd6984d0e ("mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-25radix tree: fix sibling entry handling in radix_tree_descend()Linus Torvalds1-4/+4
The fixes to the radix tree test suite show that the multi-order case is broken. The basic reason is that the radix tree code uses tagged pointers with the "internal" bit in the low bits, and calculating the pointer indices was supposed to mask off those bits. But gcc will notice that we then use the index to re-create the pointer, and will avoid doing the arithmetic and use the tagged pointer directly. This cleans the code up, using the existing is_sibling_entry() helper to validate the sibling pointer range (instead of open-coding it), and using entry_to_node() to mask off the low tag bit from the pointer. And once you do that, you might as well just use the now cleaned-up pointer directly. [ Side note: the multi-order code isn't actually ever used in the kernel right now, and the only reason I didn't just delete all that code is that Kirill Shutemov piped up and said: "Well, my ext4-with-huge-pages patchset[1] uses multi-order entries. It also converts shmem-with-huge-pages and hugetlb to them. I'm okay with converting it to other mechanism, but I need something. (I looked into Konstantin's RFC patchset[2]. It looks okay, but I don't feel myself qualified to review it as I don't know much about radix-tree internals.)" [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160915115523.29737-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/147230727479.9957.1087787722571077339.stgit@zurg ] Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-03radix-tree: account nodes to memcg only if explicitly requestedVladimir Davydov1-4/+10
Radix trees may be used not only for storing page cache pages, so unconditionally accounting radix tree nodes to the current memory cgroup is bad: if a radix tree node is used for storing data shared among different cgroups we risk pinning dead memory cgroups forever. So let's only account radix tree nodes if it was explicitly requested by passing __GFP_ACCOUNT to INIT_RADIX_TREE. Currently, we only want to account page cache entries, so mark mapping->page_tree so. Fixes: 58e698af4c63 ("radix-tree: account radix_tree_node to memory cgroup") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470057188-7864-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.6+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27radix-tree: implement radix_tree_maybe_preload_order()Kirill A. Shutemov1-5/+79
The new helper is similar to radix_tree_maybe_preload(), but tries to preload number of nodes required to insert (1 << order) continuous naturally-aligned elements. This is required to push huge pages into pagecache. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466021202-61880-24-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: make radix_tree_descend() more usefulMatthew Wilcox1-52/+26
Now that the shift amount is stored in the node, radix_tree_descend() can calculate offset itself from index, which removes several lines of code from each of the tree walkers. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: introduce radix_tree_replace_clear_tags()Matthew Wilcox1-29/+47
In addition to replacing the entry, we also clear all associated tags. This is really a one-off special for page_cache_tree_delete() which had far too much detailed knowledge about how the radix tree works. For efficiency, factor node_tag_clear() out of radix_tree_tag_clear() It can be used by radix_tree_delete_item() as well as radix_tree_replace_clear_tags(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: tidy up __radix_tree_create()Matthew Wilcox1-25/+23
1. Rename the existing variable 'slot' to 'child'. 2. Introduce a new variable called 'slot' which is the address of the slot we're dealing with. This lets us simplify the tree insertion, and removes the recalculation of 'slot' at the end of the function. 3. Using 'slot' in the sibling pointer insertion part makes the code more readable. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: tidy up range_tag_if_taggedMatthew Wilcox1-22/+17
Convert radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged to name the nodes parent, node and child instead of node & slot. Use parent->offset instead of playing games with 'upindex'. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: tidy up next_chunkMatthew Wilcox1-34/+19
Convert radix_tree_next_chunk to use 'child' instead of 'slot' as the name of the child node. Also use node_maxindex() where it makes sense. The 'rnode' variable was unnecessary; it doesn't overlap in usage with 'node', so we can just use 'node' the whole way through the function. Improve the testcase to start the walk from every index in the carefully constructed tree, and to accept any index within the range covered by the entry. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: change naming conventions in radix_tree_shrinkMatthew Wilcox1-15/+15
Use the more standard 'node' and 'child' instead of 'to_free' and 'slot'. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rename radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr()Matthew Wilcox1-24/+24
As with indirect_to_ptr(), ptr_to_indirect() and RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR, change radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr() to radix_tree_is_internal_node(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rename indirect_to_ptr() to entry_to_node()Matthew Wilcox1-27/+21
Mirrors the earlier commit introducing node_to_entry(). Also change the type returned to be a struct radix_tree_node pointer. That lets us simplify a couple of places in the radix tree shrink & extend paths where we could convert an entry into a pointer, modify the node, then convert the pointer back into an entry. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rename ptr_to_indirect() to node_to_entry()Matthew Wilcox1-11/+10
ptr_to_indirect() was a bad name. What it really means is "Convert this pointer to a node into an entry suitable for storing in the radix tree". So node_to_entry() seemed like a better name. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rename INDIRECT_PTR to INTERNAL_NODEMatthew Wilcox1-1/+1
The name RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR doesn't really match the meaning. RADIX_TREE_INTERNAL_NODE is a better name. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: remove root->heightMatthew Wilcox1-75/+31
The only remaining references to root->height were in extend and shrink, where it was updated. Now we can remove it entirely. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: remove a use of root->height from delete_nodeMatthew Wilcox1-6/+8
If radix_tree_shrink returns whether it managed to shrink, then __radix_tree_delete_node doesn't ned to query the tree to find out whether it did any work or not. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: replace node->height with node->shiftMatthew Wilcox1-14/+16
node->shift represents the shift necessary for looking in the slots array at this level. It is equal to the old (node->height - 1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: split node->path into offset and heightMatthew Wilcox1-21/+17
Neither piece of information we're storing in node->path can be larger than 64, so store each in its own unsigned char instead of shifting and masking to store them both in an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: miscellaneous fixesMatthew Wilcox1-34/+36
Typos, whitespace, grammar, line length, using the correct types, etc. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: add copyright statementsMatthew Wilcox1-0/+2
The multiorder support is a sufficiently large feature to be worth adding copyrigt lines for. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix radix_tree_dump() for multi-order entriesRoss Zwisler1-19/+29
- Print which indices are covered by every leaf entry - Print sibling entries - Print the node pointer instead of the slot entry - Build by default in userspace, and make it accessible to the test-suite Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged() for multiorder entriesMatthew Wilcox1-43/+33
I had previously decided that tagging a single multiorder entry would count as tagging 2^order entries for the purposes of 'nr_to_tag'. I now believe that decision to be a mistake, and it should count as a single entry. That's more likely to be what callers expect. When walking back up the tree from a newly-tagged entry, the current code assumed we were starting from the lowest level of the tree; if we have a multiorder entry with an order at least RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT in size then we need to shift the index by 'shift' before we start walking back up the tree, or we will end up not setting tags on higher entries, and then mistakenly thinking that entries below a certain point in the tree are not tagged. If the first index we examine is a sibling entry of a tagged multiorder entry, we were not tagging it. We need to examine the canonical entry, and the easiest way to do that is to use radix_tree_descend(). We then have to skip over sibling slots when looking for the next entry in the tree or we will end up walking back to the canonical entry. Add several tests for radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_locate_itemMatthew Wilcox1-44/+43
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_locate_item(). Modify the locate tests to test multiorder entries too. [hughd@google.com: radix_tree_locate_item() is often returning the wrong index] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1605012108490.1166@eggly.anvils Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix radix_tree_create for sibling entriesMatthew Wilcox1-2/+2
If the radix tree user attempted to insert a colliding entry with an existing multiorder entry, then radix_tree_create() could encounter a sibling entry when walking down the tree to look for a slot. Use radix_tree_descend() to fix the problem, and add a test-case to make sure the problem doesn't come back in future. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_tag_getRoss Zwisler1-26/+18
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_get() Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_tag_clearRoss Zwisler1-24/+20
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_clear() Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_tag_setRoss Zwisler1-20/+17
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_set() Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: add support for multi-order iteratingRoss Zwisler1-28/+38
This enables the macros radix_tree_for_each_slot() and friends to be used with multi-order entries. The way that this works is that we treat all entries in a given slots[] array as a single chunk. If the index given to radix_tree_next_chunk() happens to point us to a sibling entry, we will back up iter->index so that it points to the canonical entry, and that will be the place where we start our iteration. As we're processing a chunk in radix_tree_next_slot(), we process canonical entries, skip over sibling entries, and restart the chunk lookup if we find a non-sibling indirect pointer. This drops back to the radix_tree_next_chunk() code, which will re-walk the tree and look for another chunk. This allows us to properly handle multi-order entries mixed with other entries that are at various heights in the radix tree. Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix multiorder BUG_ON in radix_tree_insertMatthew Wilcox1-4/+10
These BUG_ON tests are to ensure that all the tags are clear when inserting a new entry. If we insert a multiorder entry, we'll end up looking at the tags for a different node, and so the BUG_ON can end up triggering spuriously. Also, we now have three tags, not two, so check all three are clear, and check all the root tags with a single call to BUG_ON since the bits are stored contiguously. Include a test-case to ensure this problem does not reoccur. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: rewrite __radix_tree_lookupMatthew Wilcox1-32/+16
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite __radix_tree_lookup() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix several shrinking bugs with multiorder entriesMatthew Wilcox1-11/+12
Setting the indirect bit on the user data entry used to be unambiguous because the tree walking code knew not to expect internal nodes in the last level of the tree. Multiorder entries can appear at any level of the tree, and a leaf with the indirect bit set is indistinguishable from a pointer to a node. Introduce a special entry (RADIX_TREE_RETRY) which is neither a valid user entry, nor a valid pointer to a node. The radix_tree_deref_retry() function continues to work the same way, but tree walking code can distinguish it from a pointer to a node. Also fix the condition for setting slot->parent to NULL; it does not matter what height the tree is, it only matters whether slot is an indirect pointer. Move this code above the comment which is referring to the assignment to root->rnode. Also fix the condition for preventing the tree from shrinking to a single entry if it's a multiorder entry. Add a test-case to the test suite that checks that the tree goes back down to its original height after an item is inserted & deleted from a higher index in the tree. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix extending the tree for multi-order entries at offset 0Matthew Wilcox1-11/+17
The current code will insert entries at each level, as if we're going to add a new entry at the bottom level, so we then get an -EEXIST when we try to insert the entry into the tree. The best way to fix this is to not check 'order' when inserting into an empty tree. We still need to 'extend' the tree to the height necessary for the maximum index corresponding to this entry, so pass that value to radix_tree_extend() rather than the index we're asked to create, or we won't create a tree that's deep enough. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: introduce radix_tree_load_root()Matthew Wilcox1-0/+23
All the tree walking functions start with some variant of this code; centralise it in one place so we're not chasing subtly different bugs everywhere. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: remove restriction on multi-order entriesMatthew Wilcox1-2/+0
Now that sibling pointers are handled explicitly, there is no purpose served by restricting the order to be >= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix deleting a multi-order entry through an aliasMatthew Wilcox1-1/+1
If we deleted an entry through an index which looked up a sibling pointer, we'd end up zeroing out the wrong slots in the node. Use get_slot_offset() to find the right slot. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: fix sibling entry insertionMatthew Wilcox1-2/+2
The subtraction was the wrong way round, leading to undefined behaviour (shift by an amount larger than the size of the type). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21radix-tree: add missing sibling entry functionalityMatthew Wilcox1-0/+40
The code I previously added to enable multiorder radix tree entries was untested and therefore buggy. This commit adds the support functions that Ross and I decided were necessary over a four-week period of iterating various designs. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21raxix-tree: introduce CONFIG_RADIX_TREE_MULTIORDERMatthew Wilcox1-8/+18
I've been receiving increasingly concerned notes from 0day about how much my recent changes have been bloating the radix tree. Make it happier by only including multiorder support if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES is set. This is an independent Kconfig option, so other radix tree users can also set it if they have a need. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-18radix_tree: add radix_tree_dumpMatthew Wilcox1-0/+35
This is debug code which is #if 0 out. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-18radix_tree: add support for multi-order entriesMatthew Wilcox1-26/+83
With huge pages, it is convenient to have the radix tree be able to return an entry that covers multiple indices. Previous attempts to deal with the problem have involved inserting N duplicate entries, which is a waste of memory and leads to problems trying to handle aliased tags, or probing the tree multiple times to find alternative entries which might cover the requested index. This approach inserts one canonical entry into the tree for a given range of indices, and may also insert other entries in order to ensure that lookups find the canonical entry. This solution only tolerates inserting powers of two that are greater than the fanout of the tree. If we wish to expand the radix tree's abilities to support large-ish pages that is less than the fanout at the penultimate level of the tree, then we would need to add one more step in lookup to ensure that any sibling nodes in the final level of the tree are dereferenced and we return the canonical entry that they reference. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-18radix_tree: loop based on shift count, not heightMatthew Wilcox1-3/+3
When we introduce entries that can cover multiple indices, we will need to stop in __radix_tree_create based on the shift, not the height. Split out for ease of bisect. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-18radix_tree: tag all internal tree nodes as indirect pointersMatthew Wilcox1-6/+18
Set the 'indirect_ptr' bit on all the pointers to internal nodes, not just on the root node. This enables the following patches to support multi-order entries in the radix tree. This patch is split out for ease of bisection. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-18radix-tree: account radix_tree_node to memory cgroupVladimir Davydov1-3/+13
Allocation of radix_tree_node objects can be easily triggered from userspace, so we should account them to memory cgroup. Besides, we need them accounted for making shadow node shrinker per memcg (see mm/workingset.c). A tricky thing about accounting radix_tree_node objects is that they are mostly allocated through radix_tree_preload(), so we can't just set SLAB_ACCOUNT for radix_tree_node_cachep - that would likely result in a lot of unrelated cgroups using objects from each other's caches. One way to overcome this would be making radix tree preloads per memcg, but that would probably look cumbersome and overcomplicated. Instead, we make radix_tree_node_alloc() first try to allocate from the cache with __GFP_ACCOUNT, no matter if the caller has preloaded or not, and only if it fails fall back on using per cpu preloads. This should make most allocations accounted. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-03radix-tree: fix race in gang lookupMatthew Wilcox1-2/+10
If the indirect_ptr bit is set on a slot, that indicates we need to redo the lookup. Introduce a new function radix_tree_iter_retry() which forces the loop to retry the lookup by setting 'slot' to NULL and turning the iterator back to point at the problematic entry. This is a pretty rare problem to hit at the moment; the lookup has to race with a grow of the radix tree from a height of 0. The consequences of hitting this race are that gang lookup could return a pointer to a radix_tree_node instead of a pointer to whatever the user had inserted in the tree. Fixes: cebbd29e1c2f ("radix-tree: rewrite gang lookup using iterator") Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-07mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to ↵Mel Gorman1-5/+5
sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-06-26radix-tree: replace preallocated node array with linked listKirill A. Shutemov1-11/+17
Currently we use per-cpu array to hold pointers to preallocated nodes. Let's replace it with linked list. On x86_64 it saves 256 bytes in per-cpu ELF section which may translate into freeing up 2MB of memory for NR_CPUS==8192. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, coding style] Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-05-19sched/preempt: Merge preempt_mask.h into preempt.hFrederic Weisbecker1-1/+1
preempt_mask.h defines all the preempt_count semantics and related symbols: preempt, softirq, hardirq, nmi, preempt active, need resched, etc... preempt.h defines the accessors and mutators of preempt_count. But there is a messy dependency game around those two header files: * preempt_mask.h includes preempt.h in order to access preempt_count() * preempt_mask.h defines all preempt_count semantic and symbols except PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED that is needed by asm/preempt.h Thus we need to define it from preempt.h, right before including asm/preempt.h, instead of defining it to preempt_mask.h with the other preempt_count symbols. Therefore the preempt_count semantics happen to be spread out. * We plan to introduce preempt_active_[enter,exit]() to consolidate preempt_schedule*() code. But we'll need to access both preempt_count mutators (preempt_count_add()) and preempt_count symbols (PREEMPT_ACTIVE, PREEMPT_OFFSET). The usual place to define preempt operations is in preempt.h but then we'll need symbols in preempt_mask.h which already includes preempt.h. So we end up with a ressource circle dependency. Lets merge preempt_mask.h into preempt.h to solve these dependency issues. This way we gather semantic symbols and operation definition of preempt_count in a single file. This is a dumb copy-paste merge. Further merge re-arrangments are performed in a subsequent patch to ease review. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431441711-29753-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-02-13lib/radix-tree.c: change to simpler includeRasmus Villemoes1-1/+1
The comment helpfully explains why hardirq.h is included, but since commit 2d4b84739f0a ("hardirq: Split preempt count mask definitions") in_interrupt() has been provided by preempt_mask.h. Use that instead, saving around 40 lines in the generated dependency file. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-07lib/radix-tree.c: update the kmemleak stack trace for radix tree allocationsCatalin Marinas1-0/+6
Since radix_tree_preload() stack trace is not always useful for debugging an actual radix tree memory leak, this patch updates the kmemleak allocation stack trace in the radix_tree_node_alloc() function. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-06-05lib/radix-tree.c: kernel-doc warning fixFabian Frederick1-1/+0
index has been removed from __radix_tree_delete_node in 449dd6984d0e47 ("mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check") Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>