summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-01-20bpf: Fix signed_{sub,add32}_overflows type handlingDaniel Borkmann1-3/+3
Fix incorrect signed_{sub,add32}_overflows() input types (and a related buggy comment). It looks like this might have slipped in via copy/paste issue, also given prior to 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") the signature of signed_sub_overflows() had s64 a and s64 b as its input args whereas now they are truncated to s32. Thus restore proper types. Also, the case of signed_add32_overflows() is not consistent to signed_sub32_overflows(). Both have s32 as inputs, therefore align the former. Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Reported-by: De4dCr0w <sa516203@mail.ustc.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-01-15bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructionsBrendan Jackman1-0/+6
This adds instructions for atomic[64]_[fetch_]and atomic[64]_[fetch_]or atomic[64]_[fetch_]xor All these operations are isomorphic enough to implement with the same verifier, interpreter, and x86 JIT code, hence being a single commit. The main interesting thing here is that x86 doesn't directly support the fetch_ version these operations, so we need to generate a CMPXCHG loop in the JIT. This requires the use of two temporary registers, IIUC it's safe to use BPF_REG_AX and x86's AUX_REG for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-10-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-15bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchgBrendan Jackman1-2/+17
This adds two atomic opcodes, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. XCHG without the BPF_FETCH flag would naturally encode atomic_set. This is not supported because it would be of limited value to userspace (it doesn't imply any barriers). CMPXCHG without BPF_FETCH woulud be an atomic compare-and-write. We don't have such an operation in the kernel so it isn't provided to BPF either. There are two significant design decisions made for the CMPXCHG instruction: - To solve the issue that this operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be R0. x86 has similar design (and A64 doesn't have this problem). A potential alternative might be to encode the other operand's register number in the immediate field. - The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the old value, while the C11 userspace APIs return a boolean indicating the comparison result. Which should BPF do? A64 returns the old value. x86 returns the old value in the hard-coded register (and also sets a flag). That means return-old-value is easier to JIT, so that's what we use. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-8-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-15bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instructionBrendan Jackman1-9/+24
The BPF_FETCH field can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC instructions, in order to have the previous value of the atomically-modified memory location loaded into the src register after an atomic op is carried out. Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-7-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-15bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier codeBrendan Jackman1-7/+6
I can't find a reason why this code is in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64; since I'll be modifying it in a subsequent commit, tidy it up. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-6-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-15bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .immBrendan Jackman1-10/+14
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-14bpf: Support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spillingGilad Reti1-0/+2
Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper. The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc. Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it") Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113053810.13518-1-gilad.reti@gmail.com
2021-01-13bpf: Support BPF ksym variables in kernel modulesAndrii Nakryiko1-28/+126
Add support for directly accessing kernel module variables from BPF programs using special ldimm64 instructions. This functionality builds upon vmlinux ksym support, but extends ldimm64 with src_reg=BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID to allow specifying kernel module BTF's FD in insn[1].imm field. During BPF program load time, verifier will resolve FD to BTF object and will take reference on BTF object itself and, for module BTFs, corresponding module as well, to make sure it won't be unloaded from under running BPF program. The mechanism used is similar to how bpf_prog keeps track of used bpf_maps. One interesting change is also in how per-CPU variable is determined. The logic is to find .data..percpu data section in provided BTF, but both vmlinux and module each have their own .data..percpu entries in BTF. So for module's case, the search for DATASEC record needs to look at only module's added BTF types. This is implemented with custom search function. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-6-andrii@kernel.org
2021-01-12bpf: Fix a verifier message for alloc size helper argBrendan Jackman1-1/+1
The error message here is misleading, the argument will be rejected unless it is a known constant. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112123913.2016804-1-jackmanb@google.com
2020-12-15Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski1-1/+2
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-14 1) Expose bpf_sk_storage_*() helpers to iterator programs, from Florent Revest. 2) Add AF_XDP selftests based on veth devs to BPF selftests, from Weqaar Janjua. 3) Support for finding BTF based kernel attach targets through libbpf's bpf_program__set_attach_target() API, from Andrii Nakryiko. 4) Permit pointers on stack for helper calls in the verifier, from Yonghong Song. 5) Fix overflows in hash map elem size after rlimit removal, from Eric Dumazet. 6) Get rid of direct invocation of llc in BPF selftests, from Andrew Delgadillo. 7) Fix xsk_recvmsg() to reorder socket state check before access, from Björn Töpel. 8) Add new libbpf API helper to retrieve ring buffer epoll fd, from Brendan Jackman. 9) Batch of minor BPF selftest improvements all over the place, from Florian Lehner, KP Singh, Jiri Olsa and various others. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (31 commits) selftests/bpf: Add a test for ptr_to_map_value on stack for helper access bpf: Permits pointers on stack for helper calls libbpf: Expose libbpf ring_buffer epoll_fd selftests/bpf: Add set_attach_target() API selftest for module target libbpf: Support modules in bpf_program__set_attach_target() API selftests/bpf: Silence ima_setup.sh when not running in verbose mode. selftests/bpf: Drop the need for LLVM's llc selftests/bpf: fix bpf_testmod.ko recompilation logic samples/bpf: Fix possible hang in xdpsock with multiple threads selftests/bpf: Make selftest compilation work on clang 11 selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - adding xdpxceiver to .gitignore selftests/bpf: Drop tcp-{client,server}.py from Makefile selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Bi-directional Sockets - SKB, DRV selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Socket Teardown - SKB, DRV selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - DRV POLL, NOPOLL selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - SKB POLL, NOPOLL selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests framework bpf: Only provide bpf_sock_from_file with CONFIG_NET bpf: Return -ENOTSUPP when attaching to non-kernel BTF xsk: Validate socket state in xsk_recvmsg, prior touching socket members ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201214214316.20642-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-12-14bpf: Permits pointers on stack for helper callsYonghong Song1-1/+2
Currently, when checking stack memory accessed by helper calls, for spills, only PTR_TO_BTF_ID and SCALAR_VALUE are allowed. Song discovered an issue where the below bpf program int dump_task(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx) { struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq; static char[] info = "abc"; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info); return 0; } may cause a verifier failure. The verifier output looks like: ; struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq; 1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info); 2: (18) r2 = 0xffff9054400f6000 4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r2 5: (bf) r4 = r10 ; 6: (07) r4 += -8 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info); 7: (18) r2 = 0xffff9054400fe000 9: (b4) w3 = 4 10: (b4) w5 = 8 11: (85) call bpf_seq_printf#126 R1_w=ptr_seq_file(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=4,imm=0) R3_w=inv4 R4_w=fp-8 R5_w=inv8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=map_value last_idx 11 first_idx 0 regs=8 stack=0 before 10: (b4) w5 = 8 regs=8 stack=0 before 9: (b4) w3 = 4 invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8 Basically, the verifier complains the map_value pointer at "fp-8" location. To fix the issue, if env->allow_ptr_leaks is true, let us also permit pointers on the stack to be accessible by the helper. Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201210013349.943719-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-12-12Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-5/+5
xdp_return_frame_bulk() needs to pass a xdp_buff to __xdp_return(). strlcpy got converted to strscpy but here it makes no functional difference, so just keep the right code. Conflicts: net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-12-11bpf: Fix propagation of 32-bit signed bounds from 64-bit bounds.Alexei Starovoitov1-5/+5
The 64-bit signed bounds should not affect 32-bit signed bounds unless the verifier knows that upper 32-bits are either all 1s or all 0s. For example the register with smin_value==1 doesn't mean that s32_min_value is also equal to 1, since smax_value could be larger than 32-bit subregister can hold. The verifier refines the smax/s32_max return value from certain helpers in do_refine_retval_range(). Teach the verifier to recognize that smin/s32_min value is also bounded. When both smin and smax bounds fit into 32-bit subregister the verifier can propagate those bounds. Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Reported-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-12-04Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski1-114/+142
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-03 The main changes are: 1) Support BTF in kernel modules, from Andrii. 2) Introduce preferred busy-polling, from Björn. 3) bpf_ima_inode_hash() and bpf_bprm_opts_set() helpers, from KP Singh. 4) Memcg-based memory accounting for bpf objects, from Roman. 5) Allow bpf_{s,g}etsockopt from cgroup bind{4,6} hooks, from Stanislav. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (118 commits) selftests/bpf: Fix invalid use of strncat in test_sockmap libbpf: Use memcpy instead of strncpy to please GCC selftests/bpf: Add fentry/fexit/fmod_ret selftest for kernel module selftests/bpf: Add tp_btf CO-RE reloc test for modules libbpf: Support attachment of BPF tracing programs to kernel modules libbpf: Factor out low-level BPF program loading helper bpf: Allow to specify kernel module BTFs when attaching BPF programs bpf: Remove hard-coded btf_vmlinux assumption from BPF verifier selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs selftest relying on kernel module BTF selftests/bpf: Add support for marking sub-tests as skipped selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing libbpf: Add kernel module BTF support for CO-RE relocations libbpf: Refactor CO-RE relocs to not assume a single BTF object libbpf: Add internal helper to load BTF data by FD bpf: Keep module's btf_data_size intact after load bpf: Fix bpf_put_raw_tracepoint()'s use of __module_address() selftests/bpf: Add Userspace tests for TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP bpf: Adds support for setting window clamp samples/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "recieving" -> "receiving" bpf: Fix cold build of test_progs-no_alu32 ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204021936.85653-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-12-04bpf: Remove hard-coded btf_vmlinux assumption from BPF verifierAndrii Nakryiko1-30/+47
Remove a permeating assumption thoughout BPF verifier of vmlinux BTF. Instead, wherever BTF type IDs are involved, also track the instance of struct btf that goes along with the type ID. This allows to gradually add support for kernel module BTFs and using/tracking module types across BPF helper calls and registers. This patch also renames btf_id() function to btf_obj_id() to minimize naming clash with using btf_id to denote BTF *type* ID, rather than BTF *object*'s ID. Also, altough btf_vmlinux can't get destructed and thus doesn't need refcounting, module BTFs need that, so apply BTF refcounting universally when BPF program is using BTF-powered attachment (tp_btf, fentry/fexit, etc). This makes for simpler clean up code. Now that BTF type ID is not enough to uniquely identify a BTF type, extend BPF trampoline key to include BTF object ID. To differentiate that from target program BPF ID, set 31st bit of type ID. BTF type IDs (at least currently) are not allowed to take full 32 bits, so there is no danger of confusing that bit with a valid BTF type ID. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201203204634.1325171-10-andrii@kernel.org
2020-11-25bpf: Refactor check_cfg to use a structured loop.Wedson Almeida Filho1-84/+95
The current implementation uses a number of gotos to implement a loop and different paths within the loop, which makes the code less readable than it would be with an explicit while-loop. This patch also replaces a chain of if/if-elses keyed on the same expression with a switch statement. No change in behaviour is intended. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201121015509.3594191-1-wedsonaf@google.com
2020-11-20Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-3/+15
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-11-14bpf: Relax return code check for subprogramsDmitrii Banshchikov1-2/+13
Currently verifier enforces return code checks for subprograms in the same manner as it does for program entry points. This prevents returning arbitrary scalar values from subprograms. Scalar type of returned values is checked by btf_prepare_func_args() and hence it should be safe to allow only scalars for now. Relax return code checks for subprograms and allow any correct scalar values. Fixes: 51c39bb1d5d10 (bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification) Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201113171756.90594-1-me@ubique.spb.ru
2020-11-13bpf: Augment the set of sleepable LSM hooksKP Singh1-15/+1
Update the set of sleepable hooks with the ones that do not trigger a warning with might_fault() when exercised with the correct kernel config options enabled, i.e. DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y LOCKDEP=y PROVE_LOCKING=y This means that a sleepable LSM eBPF program can be attached to these LSM hooks. A new helper method bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook is added and the set is maintained locally in bpf_lsm.c Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201113005930.541956-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
2020-11-13bpf: Support for pointers beyond pkt_end.Alexei Starovoitov1-22/+107
This patch adds the verifier support to recognize inlined branch conditions. The LLVM knows that the branch evaluates to the same value, but the verifier couldn't track it. Hence causing valid programs to be rejected. The potential LLVM workaround: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87428 can have undesired side effects, since LLVM doesn't know that skb->data/data_end are being compared. LLVM has to introduce extra boolean variable and use inline_asm trick to force easier for the verifier assembly. Instead teach the verifier to recognize that r1 = skb->data; r1 += 10; r2 = skb->data_end; if (r1 > r2) { here r1 points beyond packet_end and subsequent if (r1 > r2) // always evaluates to "true". } Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201111031213.25109-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2020-11-11bpf: Fix unsigned 'datasec_id' compared with zero in check_pseudo_btf_idKaixu Xia1-1/+2
The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code. This fixes the following coccicheck warning: ./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0 Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1605071026-25906-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com
2020-11-06bpf: Implement get_current_task_btf and RET_PTR_TO_BTF_IDKP Singh1-2/+5
The currently available bpf_get_current_task returns an unsigned integer which can be used along with BPF_CORE_READ to read data from the task_struct but still cannot be used as an input argument to a helper that accepts an ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID of type task_struct. In order to implement this helper a new return type, RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, is added. This is similar to RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL but does not require checking the nullness of returned pointer. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-6-kpsingh@chromium.org
2020-11-06bpf: Implement task local storageKP Singh1-0/+10
Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets and inodes add local storage for task_struct. The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the task_struct. i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning task with a callback to the bpf_task_storage_free from the task_free LSM hook. The BPF LSM allocates an __rcu pointer to the bpf_local_storage in the security blob which are now stackable and can co-exist with other LSMs. The userspace map operations can be done by using a pid fd as a key passed to the lookup, update and delete operations. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-3-kpsingh@chromium.org
2020-11-06bpf: Allow LSM programs to use bpf spin locksKP Singh1-5/+15
Usage of spin locks was not allowed for tracing programs due to insufficient preemption checks. The verifier does not currently prevent LSM programs from using spin locks, but the helpers are not exposed via bpf_lsm_func_proto. Based on the discussion in [1], non-sleepable LSM programs should be able to use bpf_spin_{lock, unlock}. Sleepable LSM programs can be preempted which means that allowng spin locks will need more work (disabling preemption and the verifier ensuring that no sleepable helpers are called when a spin lock is held). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201103153132.2717326-1-kpsingh@chromium.org/T/#md601a053229287659071600d3483523f752cd2fb Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
2020-10-20bpf: Enforce id generation for all may-be-null register typeMartin KaFai Lau1-6/+5
The commit af7ec1383361 ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper") introduces RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL and the commit eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") introduces RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. Note that for RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL, the reg0->type could become PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL which is not covered by BPF_PROBE_MEM. The BPF_REG_0 will then hold a _OR_NULL pointer type. This _OR_NULL pointer type requires the bpf program to explicitly do a NULL check first. After NULL check, the verifier will mark all registers having the same reg->id as safe to use. However, the reg->id is not set for those new _OR_NULL return types. One of the ways that may be wrong is, checking NULL for one btf_id typed pointer will end up validating all other btf_id typed pointers because all of them have id == 0. The later tests will exercise this path. To fix it and also avoid similar issue in the future, this patch moves the id generation logic out of each individual RET type test in check_helper_call(). Instead, it does one reg_type_may_be_null() test and then do the id generation if needed. This patch also adds a WARN_ON_ONCE in mark_ptr_or_null_reg() to catch future breakage. The _OR_NULL pointer usage in the bpf_iter_reg.ctx_arg_info is fine because it just happens that the existing id generation after check_ctx_access() has covered it. It is also using the reg_type_may_be_null() to decide if id generation is needed or not. Fixes: af7ec1383361 ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper") Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019194212.1050855-1-kafai@fb.com
2020-10-15bpf: Fix register equivalence tracking.Alexei Starovoitov1-13/+25
The 64-bit JEQ/JNE handling in reg_set_min_max() was clearing reg->id in either true or false branch. In the case 'if (reg->id)' check was done on the other branch the counter part register would have reg->id == 0 when called into find_equal_scalars(). In such case the helper would incorrectly identify other registers with id == 0 as equivalent and propagate the state incorrectly. Fix it by preserving ID across reg_set_min_max(). In other words any kind of comparison operator on the scalar register should preserve its ID to recognize: r1 = r2 if (r1 == 20) { #1 here both r1 and r2 == 20 } else if (r2 < 20) { #2 here both r1 and r2 < 20 } The patch is addressing #1 case. The #2 was working correctly already. Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201014175608.1416-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2020-10-13Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski1-19/+251
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-10-12 The main changes are: 1) The BPF verifier improvements to track register allocation pattern, from Alexei and Yonghong. 2) libbpf relocation support for different size load/store, from Andrii. 3) bpf_redirect_peer() helper and support for inner map array with different max_entries, from Daniel. 4) BPF support for per-cpu variables, form Hao. 5) sockmap improvements, from John. ==================== Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-10-11bpf: Allow for map-in-map with dynamic inner array map entriesDaniel Borkmann1-2/+4
Recent work in f4d05259213f ("bpf: Add map_meta_equal map ops") and 134fede4eecf ("bpf: Relax max_entries check for most of the inner map types") added support for dynamic inner max elements for most map-in-map types. Exceptions were maps like array or prog array where the map_gen_lookup() callback uses the maps' max_entries field as a constant when emitting instructions. We recently implemented Maglev consistent hashing into Cilium's load balancer which uses map-in-map with an outer map being hash and inner being array holding the Maglev backend table for each service. This has been designed this way in order to reduce overall memory consumption given the outer hash map allows to avoid preallocating a large, flat memory area for all services. Also, the number of service mappings is not always known a-priori. The use case for dynamic inner array map entries is to further reduce memory overhead, for example, some services might just have a small number of back ends while others could have a large number. Right now the Maglev backend table for small and large number of backends would need to have the same inner array map entries which adds a lot of unneeded overhead. Dynamic inner array map entries can be realized by avoiding the inlined code generation for their lookup. The lookup will still be efficient since it will be calling into array_map_lookup_elem() directly and thus avoiding retpoline. The patch adds a BPF_F_INNER_MAP flag to map creation which therefore skips inline code generation and relaxes array_map_meta_equal() check to ignore both maps' max_entries. This also still allows to have faster lookups for map-in-map when BPF_F_INNER_MAP is not specified and hence dynamic max_entries not needed. Example code generation where inner map is dynamic sized array: # bpftool p d x i 125 int handle__sys_enter(void * ctx): ; int handle__sys_enter(void *ctx) 0: (b4) w1 = 0 ; int key = 0; 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1 2: (bf) r2 = r10 ; 3: (07) r2 += -4 ; inner_map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_arr_dyn, &key); 4: (18) r1 = map[id:468] 6: (07) r1 += 272 7: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) 8: (35) if r0 >= 0x3 goto pc+5 9: (67) r0 <<= 3 10: (0f) r0 += r1 11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) 12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 13: (05) goto pc+1 14: (b7) r0 = 0 15: (b4) w6 = -1 ; if (!inner_map) 16: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+6 17: (bf) r2 = r10 ; 18: (07) r2 += -4 ; val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(inner_map, &key); 19: (bf) r1 = r0 | No inlining but instead 20: (85) call array_map_lookup_elem#149280 | call to array_map_lookup_elem() ; return val ? *val : -1; | for inner array lookup. 21: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 ; return val ? *val : -1; 22: (61) r6 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0) ; } 23: (bc) w0 = w6 24: (95) exit Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201010234006.7075-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
2020-10-09bpf: Track spill/fill of bounded scalars.Yonghong Song1-1/+15
Under register pressure the llvm may spill registers with bounds into the stack. The verifier has to track them through spill/fill otherwise many kinds of bound errors will be seen. The spill/fill of induction variables was already happening. This patch extends this logic from tracking spill/fill of a constant into any bounded register. There is no need to track spill/fill of unbounded, since no new information will be retrieved from the stack during register fill. Though extra stack difference could cause state pruning to be less effective, no adverse affects were seen from this patch on selftests and on cilium programs. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2020-10-09bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.Alexei Starovoitov1-0/+50
The llvm register allocator may use two different registers representing the same virtual register. In such case the following pattern can be observed: 1047: (bf) r9 = r6 1048: (a5) if r6 < 0x1000 goto pc+1 1050: ... 1051: (a5) if r9 < 0x2 goto pc+66 1052: ... 1053: (bf) r2 = r9 /* r2 needs to have upper and lower bounds */ This is normal behavior of greedy register allocator. The slides 137+ explain why regalloc introduces such register copy: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/slides/Yatsina-LLVM%20Greedy%20Register%20Allocator.pdf There is no way to tell llvm 'not to do this'. Hence the verifier has to recognize such patterns. In order to track this information without backtracking allocate ID for scalars in a similar way as it's done for find_good_pkt_pointers(). When the verifier encounters r9 = r6 assignment it will assign the same ID to both registers. Later if either register range is narrowed via conditional jump propagate the register state into the other register. Clear register ID in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() for any alu instruction. The register ID is ignored for scalars in regsafe() and doesn't affect state pruning. mark_reg_unknown() clears the ID. It's used to process call, endian and other instructions. Hence ID is explicitly cleared only in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and in 32-bit mov. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2020-10-09Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-4/+4
Small conflict around locking in rxrpc_process_event() - channel_lock moved to bundle in next, while state lock needs _bh() from net. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-10-08bpf: Fix scalar32_min_max_or bounds trackingDaniel Borkmann1-4/+4
Simon reported an issue with the current scalar32_min_max_or() implementation. That is, compared to the other 32 bit subreg tracking functions, the code in scalar32_min_max_or() stands out that it's using the 64 bit registers instead of 32 bit ones. This leads to bounds tracking issues, for example: [...] 8: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 9: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 9: (b7) r0 = 1 10: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 10: (18) r2 = 0x600000002 12: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 12: (ad) if r1 < r2 goto pc+1 R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 13: (95) exit 14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x7ffffffff)) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 14: (25) if r1 > 0x0 goto pc+1 R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 15: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 15: (95) exit 16: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 16: (47) r1 |= 0 17: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=32212254719,var_off=(0x1; 0x700000000),s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm [...] The bound tests on the map value force the upper unsigned bound to be 25769803777 in 64 bit (0b11000000000000000000000000000000001) and then lower one to be 1. By using OR they are truncated and thus result in the range [1,1] for the 32 bit reg tracker. This is incorrect given the only thing we know is that the value must be positive and thus 2147483647 (0b1111111111111111111111111111111) at max for the subregs. Fix it by using the {u,s}32_{min,max}_value vars instead. This also makes sense, for example, for the case where we update dst_reg->s32_{min,max}_value in the else branch we need to use the newly computed dst_reg->u32_{min,max}_value as we know that these are positive. Previously, in the else branch the 64 bit values of umin_value=1 and umax_value=32212254719 were used and latter got truncated to be 1 as upper bound there. After the fix the subreg range is now correct: [...] 8: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 9: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 9: (b7) r0 = 1 10: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 10: (18) r2 = 0x600000002 12: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 12: (ad) if r1 < r2 goto pc+1 R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 13: (95) exit 14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x7ffffffff)) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 14: (25) if r1 > 0x0 goto pc+1 R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 15: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 15: (95) exit 16: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm 16: (47) r1 |= 0 17: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=32212254719,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm [...] Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Reported-by: Simon Scannell <scannell.smn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-10-07kernel/bpf/verifier: Fix build when NET is not enabledRandy Dunlap1-0/+4
Fix build errors in kernel/bpf/verifier.c when CONFIG_NET is not enabled. ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3995:13: error: ‘btf_sock_ids’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘bpf_sock_ops’? .btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON], ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3995:26: error: ‘BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON’? .btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON], Fixes: 1df8f55a37bd ("bpf: Enable bpf_skc_to_* sock casting helper to networking prog type") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201007021613.13646-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2020-10-05bpf, verifier: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
Replace /* fallthrough */ comments with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough [1]. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201002234217.GA12280@embeddedor
2020-10-03bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()Hao Luo1-3/+8
Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr() to help access percpu var on this cpu. This helper always returns a valid pointer, therefore no need to check returned value for NULL. Also note that all programs run with preemption disabled, which means that the returned pointer is stable during all the execution of the program. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-6-haoluo@google.com
2020-10-03bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()Hao Luo1-3/+61
Add bpf_per_cpu_ptr() to help bpf programs access percpu vars. bpf_per_cpu_ptr() has the same semantic as per_cpu_ptr() in the kernel except that it may return NULL. This happens when the cpu parameter is out of range. So the caller must check the returned value. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-5-haoluo@google.com
2020-10-03bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_idHao Luo1-13/+112
Pseudo_btf_id is a type of ld_imm insn that associates a btf_id to a ksym so that further dereferences on the ksym can use the BTF info to validate accesses. Internally, when seeing a pseudo_btf_id ld insn, the verifier reads the btf_id stored in the insn[0]'s imm field and marks the dst_reg as PTR_TO_BTF_ID. The btf_id points to a VAR_KIND, which is encoded in btf_vminux by pahole. If the VAR is not of a struct type, the dst reg will be marked as PTR_TO_MEM instead of PTR_TO_BTF_ID and the mem_size is resolved to the size of the VAR's type. >From the VAR btf_id, the verifier can also read the address of the ksym's corresponding kernel var from kallsyms and use that to fill dst_reg. Therefore, the proper functionality of pseudo_btf_id depends on (1) kallsyms and (2) the encoding of kernel global VARs in pahole, which should be available since pahole v1.18. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-2-haoluo@google.com
2020-09-29bpf: Support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach pointsToke Høiland-Jørgensen1-0/+10
This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was supplied at program load time. The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to co-exist simultaneously. The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of those, there is no API support for doing so. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355169.48470.17165680973640685368.stgit@toke.dk
2020-09-29bpf: Move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attachToke Høiland-Jørgensen1-4/+7
In preparation for allowing multiple attachments of freplace programs, move the references to the target program and trampoline into the bpf_tracing_link structure when that is created. To do this atomically, introduce a new mutex in prog->aux to protect writing to the two pointers to target prog and trampoline, and rename the members to make it clear that they are related. With this change, it is no longer possible to attach the same tracing program multiple times (detaching in-between), since the reference from the tracing program to the target disappears on the first attach. However, since the next patch will let the caller supply an attach target, that will also make it possible to attach to the same place multiple times. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355059.48470.2503076992210324984.stgit@toke.dk
2020-09-29bpf: Provide function to get vmlinux BTF informationAlan Maguire1-6/+12
It will be used later for BPF structure display support Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1601292670-1616-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
2020-09-29bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()Toke Høiland-Jørgensen1-86/+97
The check_attach_btf_id() function really does three things: 1. It performs a bunch of checks on the program to ensure that the attachment is valid. 2. It stores a bunch of state about the attachment being requested in the verifier environment and struct bpf_prog objects. 3. It allocates a trampoline for the attachment. This patch splits out (1.) and (3.) into separate functions which will perform the checks, but return the computed values instead of directly modifying the environment. This is done in preparation for reusing the checks when the actual attachment is happening, which will allow tracing programs to have multiple (compatible) attachments. This also fixes a bug where a bunch of checks were skipped if a trampoline already existed for the tracing target. Fixes: 6ba43b761c41 ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN") Fixes: 1e6c62a88215 ("bpf: Introduce sleepable BPF programs") Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-09-29bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointerToke Høiland-Jørgensen1-25/+25
In preparation for moving code around, change a bunch of references to env->log (and the verbose() logging helper) to use bpf_log() and a direct pointer to struct bpf_verifier_log. While we're touching the function signature, mark the 'prog' argument to bpf_check_type_match() as const. Also enhance the bpf_verifier_log_needed() check to handle NULL pointers for the log struct so we can re-use the code with logging disabled. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-09-29bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programsToke Høiland-Jørgensen1-0/+5
From the checks and commit messages for modify_return, it seems it was never the intention that it should be possible to attach a tracing program with expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN to another BPF program. However, check_attach_modify_return() will only look at the function name, so if the target function starts with "security_", the attach will be allowed even for bpf2bpf attachment. Fix this oversight by also blocking the modification if a target program is supplied. Fixes: 18644cec714a ("bpf: Fix use-after-free in fmod_ret check") Fixes: 6ba43b761c41 ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN") Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-09-29bpf: sockmap: Enable map_update_elem from bpf_iterLorenz Bauer1-1/+1
Allow passing a pointer to a BTF struct sock_common* when updating a sockmap or sockhash. Since BTF pointers can fault and therefore be NULL at runtime we need to add an additional !sk check to sock_map_update_elem. Since we may be passed a request or timewait socket we also need to check sk_fullsock. Doing this allows calling map_update_elem on sockmap from bpf_iter context, which uses BTF pointers. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200928090805.23343-2-lmb@cloudflare.com
2020-09-26bpf, verifier: Remove redundant var_off.value ops in scalar known reg casesJohn Fastabend1-4/+2
In BPF_AND and BPF_OR alu cases we have this pattern when the src and dst tnum is a constant. 1 dst_reg->var_off = tnum_[op](dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off) 2 scalar32_min_max_[op] 3 if (known) return 4 scalar_min_max_[op] 5 if (known) 6 __mark_reg_known(dst_reg, dst_reg->var_off.value [op] src_reg.var_off.value) The result is in 1 we calculate the var_off value and store it in the dst_reg. Then in 6 we duplicate this logic doing the op again on the value. The duplication comes from the the tnum_[op] handlers because they have already done the value calcuation. For example this is tnum_and(). struct tnum tnum_and(struct tnum a, struct tnum b) { u64 alpha, beta, v; alpha = a.value | a.mask; beta = b.value | b.mask; v = a.value & b.value; return TNUM(v, alpha & beta & ~v); } So lets remove the redundant op calculation. Its confusing for readers and unnecessary. Its also not harmful because those ops have the property, r1 & r1 = r1 and r1 | r1 = r1. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2020-09-25bpf: Enable bpf_skc_to_* sock casting helper to networking prog typeMartin KaFai Lau1-2/+32
There is a constant need to add more fields into the bpf_tcp_sock for the bpf programs running at tc, sock_ops...etc. A current workaround could be to use bpf_probe_read_kernel(). However, other than making another helper call for reading each field and missing CO-RE, it is also not as intuitive to use as directly reading "tp->lsndtime" for example. While already having perfmon cap to do bpf_probe_read_kernel(), it will be much easier if the bpf prog can directly read from the tcp_sock. This patch tries to do that by using the existing casting-helpers bpf_skc_to_*() whose func_proto returns a btf_id. For example, the func_proto of bpf_skc_to_tcp_sock returns the btf_id of the kernel "struct tcp_sock". These helpers are also added to is_ptr_cast_function(). It ensures the returning reg (BPF_REF_0) will also carries the ref_obj_id. That will keep the ref-tracking works properly. The bpf_skc_to_* helpers are made available to most of the bpf prog types in filter.c. The bpf_skc_to_* helpers will be limited by perfmon cap. This patch adds a ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON. The helper accepting this arg can accept a btf-id-ptr (PTR_TO_BTF_ID + &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON]) or a legacy-ctx-convert-skc-ptr (PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON). The bpf_skc_to_*() helpers are changed to take ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON such that they will accept pointer obtained from skb->sk. Instead of specifying both arg_type and arg_btf_id in the same func_proto which is how the current ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID does, the arg_btf_id of the new ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON is specified in the compatible_reg_types[] in verifier.c. The reason is the arg_btf_id is always the same. Discussion in this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200922070422.1917351-1-kafai@fb.com/ The ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_ part gives a clear expectation that the helper is expecting a PTR_TO_BTF_ID which could be NULL. This is the same behavior as the existing helper taking ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID. The _SOCK_COMMON part means the helper is also expecting the legacy SOCK_COMMON pointer. By excluding the _OR_NULL part, the bpf prog cannot call helper with a literal NULL which doesn't make sense in most cases. e.g. bpf_skc_to_tcp_sock(NULL) will be rejected. All PTR_TO_*_OR_NULL reg has to do a NULL check first before passing into the helper or else the bpf prog will be rejected. This behavior is nothing new and consistent with the current expectation during bpf-prog-load. [ ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON will be used to replace ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK* of other existing helpers later such that those existing helpers can take the PTR_TO_BTF_ID returned by the bpf_skc_to_*() helpers. The only special case is bpf_sk_lookup_assign() which can accept a literal NULL ptr. It has to be handled specially in another follow up patch if there is a need (e.g. by renaming ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL to ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL). ] [ When converting the older helpers that take ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK* in the later patch, if the kernel does not support BTF, ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON will behave like ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON because no reg->type could have PTR_TO_BTF_ID in this case. It is not a concern for the newer-btf-only helper like the bpf_skc_to_*() here though because these helpers must require BTF vmlinux to begin with. ] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200925000350.3855720-1-kafai@fb.com
2020-09-25bpf: Move the PTR_TO_BTF_ID check to check_reg_type()Martin KaFai Lau1-29/+31
check_reg_type() checks whether a reg can be used as an arg of a func_proto. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, the check is actually not completely done until the reg->btf_id is pointing to a kernel struct that is acceptable by the func_proto. Thus, this patch moves the btf_id check into check_reg_type(). "arg_type" and "arg_btf_id" are passed to check_reg_type() instead of "compatible". The compatible_reg_types[] usage is localized in check_reg_type() now. The "if (!btf_id) verbose(...); " is also removed since it won't happen. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200925000344.3854828-1-kafai@fb.com
2020-09-23Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller1-180/+360
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-09-23 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 95 non-merge commits during the last 22 day(s) which contain a total of 124 files changed, 4211 insertions(+), 2040 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Full multi function support in libbpf, from Andrii. 2) Refactoring of function argument checks, from Lorenz. 3) Make bpf_tail_call compatible with functions (subprograms), from Maciej. 4) Program metadata support, from YiFei. 5) bpf iterator optimizations, from Yonghong. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-23bpf: Explicitly size compatible_reg_typesLorenz Bauer1-2/+1
Arrays with designated initializers have an implicit length of the highest initialized value plus one. I used this to ensure that newly added entries in enum bpf_reg_type get a NULL entry in compatible_reg_types. This is difficult to understand since it requires knowledge of the peculiarities of designated initializers. Use __BPF_ARG_TYPE_MAX to size the array instead. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200923160156.80814-1-lmb@cloudflare.com
2020-09-22bpf: Use a table to drive helper arg type checksLorenz Bauer1-74/+109
The mapping between bpf_arg_type and bpf_reg_type is encoded in a big hairy if statement that is hard to follow. The debug output also leaves to be desired: if a reg_type doesn't match we only print one of the options, instead printing all the valid ones. Convert the if statement into a table which is then used to drive type checking. If none of the reg_types match we print all options, e.g.: R2 type=rdonly_buf expected=fp, pkt, pkt_meta, map_value Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200921121227.255763-12-lmb@cloudflare.com