summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/if_frad.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-01-29annotate the rest of drivers/net/wanAl Viro1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
2006-04-26Don't include linux/config.h from anywhere else in include/David Woodhouse1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-01-09[PATCH] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1Jan Blunck1-6/+6
Since version 4.1 the gcc is warning about ignored attributes. This patch is using the equivalent attribute on the struct instead of on each of the structure or union members. GCC Manual: "Specifying Attributes of Types packed This attribute, attached to struct or union type definition, specifies that each member of the structure or union is placed to minimize the memory required. When attached to an enum definition, it indicates that the smallest integral type should be used. Specifying this attribute for struct and union types is equivalent to specifying the packed attribute on each of the structure or union members." Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-30[NET]: Fix sparse warningsArnaldo Carvalho de Melo1-2/+4
Of this type, mostly: CHECK net/ipv6/netfilter.c net/ipv6/netfilter.c:96:12: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_init' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv6/netfilter.c:101:6: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_fini' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-04-17Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds1-0/+200
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!