summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86/system_64.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-10-23x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro1-22/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-07-22x86: consolidate header guardsVegard Nossum1-3/+3
This patch is the result of an automatic script that consolidates the format of all the headers in include/asm-x86/. The format: 1. No leading underscore. Names with leading underscores are reserved. 2. Pathname components are separated by two underscores. So we can distinguish between mm_types.h and mm/types.h. 3. Everything except letters and numbers are turned into single underscores. Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
2008-01-30x86: move switch_to macro to system.hGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-43/+0
This patch moves the switch_to() macro to system.h As those macros are fundamentally different between i386 and x86_64, they are enclosed around an ifdef. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: unify smp parts of system.hGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-25/+0
The memory barrier parts of system.h are not very different between i386 and x86_64, the main difference being the availability of instructions, which we handle with the use of ifdefs. They are consolidated in system.h file, and then removed from the arch-specific headers. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: remove unused macroGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-2/+0
Mr. Grep says warn_if_not_ulong() is not used anymore anywhere in the code. So, we remove it. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: unify paravirt parts of system.hGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-73/+12
This patch moves the i386 control registers manipulation functions, wbinvd, and clts functions to system.h. They are essentially the same as in x86_64. With this, system.h paravirt comes for free in x86_64. [ mingo@elte.hu: reintroduced the cr8 bits - needed for resume images ] Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: unify load_segment macroGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-20/+0
This patch unifies the load_segment() macro, making them equal in both x86_64 and i386 architectures. The common version goes to system.h, and the old are deleted. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: put together equal pieces of system.hGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-12/+0
This patch puts together pieces of system_{32,64}.h that looks like the same. It's the first step towards integration of this file. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: use generic register name in the thread and tss structuresH. Peter Anvin1-1/+1
This changes size-specific register names (eip/rip, esp/rsp, etc.) to generic names in the thread and tss structures. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-12-18x86: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCHJan Beulich1-0/+7
The patch introducing this left out 64-bit x86 despite it also having extra entries. this solves Xen guest troubles. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-17x86: remove STR() macrosGlauber de Oliveira Costa1-3/+0
This patch removes the __STR() and STR() macros from x86_64 header files. They seem to be legacy, and has no more users. Even if there were users, they should use __stringify() instead. In fact, there were one third place in which this macro was defined (ia32_binfmt.c), and used just below. In this file, usage was properly converted to __stringify() [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-17x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvdH. Peter Anvin1-0/+5
Create an inline function for clflush(), with the proper arguments, and use it instead of hard-coding the instruction. This also removes one instance of hard-coded wbinvd, based on a patch by Bauder de Oliveira Costa. [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-17x86: mark read_crX() asm code as volatileKirill Korotaev1-4/+4
Some gcc versions (I checked at least 4.1.1 from RHEL5 & 4.1.2 from gentoo) can generate incorrect code with read_crX()/write_crX() functions mix up, due to cached results of read_crX(). The small app for x8664 below compiled with -O2 demonstrates this (i686 does the same thing):
2007-10-13x86: optimise barriersNick Piggin1-2/+2
According to latest memory ordering specification documents from Intel and AMD, both manufacturers are committed to in-order loads from cacheable memory for the x86 architecture. Hence, smp_rmb() may be a simple barrier. Also according to those documents, and according to existing practice in Linux (eg. spin_unlock doesn't enforce ordering), stores to cacheable memory are visible in program order too. Special string stores are safe -- their constituent stores may be out of order, but they must complete in order WRT surrounding stores. Nontemporal stores to WB memory can go out of order, and so they should be fenced explicitly to make them appear in-order WRT other stores. Hence, smp_wmb() may be a simple barrier. http://developer.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/318147.pdf http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24593.pdf In userspace microbenchmarks on a core2 system, fence instructions range anywhere from around 15 cycles to 50, which may not be totally insignificant in performance critical paths (code size will go down too). However the primary motivation for this is to have the canonical barrier implementation for x86 architecture. smp_rmb on buggy pentium pros remains a locked op, which is apparently required. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-13x86: fix IO write barrierNick Piggin1-5/+1
wmb() on x86 must always include a barrier, because stores can go out of order in many cases when dealing with devices (eg. WC memory). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner1-0/+180
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>