summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-02-05iommu sg: kill __clear_bit_string and find_next_zero_stringFUJITA Tomonori1-16/+0
This kills unused __clear_bit_string and find_next_zero_string (they were used by only gart and calgary IOMMUs). Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-01-30x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.hJeremy Fitzhardinge1-297/+0
This unifies the set/clear/test bit functions of asm/bitops.h. I have not attempted to merge the bit-finding functions, since they rely on the machine word size and can't be easily restructured to work generically without a lot of #ifdefs. In particular, the 64-bit code can assume the presence of conditional move instructions, whereas 32-bit needs to be more careful. The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will pick the appropriate instruction forms depending on the architecture and the context. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-26x86 bitops: fix code style issuesRandy Dunlap1-26/+26
Coding style cleanups: - change __inline__ to inline; - drop space in "* addr" parameters; - drop space between func. name and '(' The "volatile" keywords are correct according to email from one Linus Torvalds. [Several other arches need some of this also.] Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-26bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macroRandy Dunlap1-2/+5
Use duplicated inline functions for test_and_set_bit_lock() on x86 instead of #define macros, thus avoiding a bad example. This allows kernel-doc to run cleanly instead of terminating with an error: Error(linux-2.6.24-rc1//include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h:188): cannot understand prototype: 'test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit ' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-24x86: lock bitopsNick Piggin1-1/+41
I missed an obvious one! x86 CPUs are defined not to reorder stores past earlier loads, so there is no hardware memory barrier required to implement a release-consistent store (all stores are, by definition). So ditch the generic lock bitops, and implement optimised versions for x86, which removes the mfence from __clear_bit_unlock (which is already a useful primitive for SLUB). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-19forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusionJiri Slaby1-0/+4
forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion Because of compile errors that may occur after bit changes if asm/bitops.h is included directly without e.g. linux/kernel.h which includes linux/bitops.h, forbid direct inclusion of asm/bitops.h. Thanks to Adrian Bunk. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-19bitops: introduce lock opsNick Piggin1-0/+1
Introduce test_and_set_bit_lock / clear_bit_unlock bitops with lock semantics. Convert all architectures to use the generic implementation. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> Cc: Richard Curnow <rc@rc0.org.uk> Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Cc: Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-17x86: Eliminate result signage problem in asm-x86_64/bitops.hChuck Lever1-1/+1
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like this: boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit() you get an unsigned long result if "boolean" is true, and a signed long result if "boolean" is false. In file included from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:15, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/gfp.h:4, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/slab.h:14, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/percpu.h:5, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/rcupdate.h:41, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/dcache.h:10, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:275, from /home/cel/src/linux/fs/nfs/sysctl.c:9: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__first_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:229: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__next_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:235: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__first_unset_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:253: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner1-0/+427
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>