summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-05-05btrfs: zoned: move non-changing condition check out of the loopNaohiro Aota1-6/+6
btrfs_zone_activate() checks if block_group->alloc_offset == block_group->zone_capacity every time it iterates the loop. But, it is not depending on the index. Move out the check and do it only once. Fixes: f9a912a3c45f ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-05btrfs: force v2 space cache usage for subpage mountQu Wenruo1-0/+11
[BUG] For a 4K sector sized btrfs with v1 cache enabled and only mounted on systems with 4K page size, if it's mounted on subpage (64K page size) systems, it can cause the following warning on v1 space cache: BTRFS error (device dm-1): csum mismatch on free space cache BTRFS warning (device dm-1): failed to load free space cache for block group 84082688, rebuilding it now Although not a big deal, as kernel can rebuild it without problem, such warning will bother end users, especially if they want to switch the same btrfs seamlessly between different page sized systems. [CAUSE] V1 free space cache is still using fixed PAGE_SIZE for various bitmap, like BITS_PER_BITMAP. Such hard-coded PAGE_SIZE usage will cause various mismatch, from v1 cache size to checksum. Thus kernel will always reject v1 cache with a different PAGE_SIZE with csum mismatch. [FIX] Although we should fix v1 cache, it's already going to be marked deprecated soon. And we have v2 cache based on metadata (which is already fully subpage compatible), and it has almost everything superior than v1 cache. So just force subpage mount to use v2 cache on mount. Reported-by: Matt Corallo <blnxfsl@bluematt.me> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/61aa27d1-30fc-c1a9-f0f4-9df544395ec3@bluematt.me/ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-27btrfs: skip compression property for anything other than files and dirsFilipe Manana3-0/+47
The compression property only has effect on regular files and directories (so that it's propagated to files and subdirectories created inside a directory). For any other inode type (symlink, fifo, device, socket), it's pointless to set the compression property because it does nothing and ends up unnecessarily wasting leaf space due to the pointless xattr (75 or 76 bytes, depending on the compression value). Symlinks in particular are very common (for example, I have almost 10k symlinks under /etc, /usr and /var alone) and therefore it's worth to avoid wasting leaf space with the compression xattr. For example, the compression property can end up on a symlink or character device implicitly, through inheritance from a parent directory $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ btrfs property set /mnt/testdir compression lzo $ ln -s yadayada /mnt/testdir/lnk $ mknod /mnt/testdir/dev c 0 0 Or explicitly like this: $ ln -s yadayda /mnt/lnk $ setfattr -h -n btrfs.compression -v lzo /mnt/lnk So skip the compression property on inodes that are neither a regular file nor a directory. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-27btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to update inode when setting xattrFilipe Manana1-2/+4
We are doing a BUG_ON() if we fail to update an inode after setting (or clearing) a xattr, but there's really no reason to not instead simply abort the transaction and return the error to the caller. This should be a rare error because we have previously reserved enough metadata space to update the inode and the delayed inode should have already been setup, so an -ENOSPC or -ENOMEM, which are the possible errors, are very unlikely to happen. So replace the BUG_ON()s with a transaction abort. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-27btrfs: always log symlinks in full modeFilipe Manana1-1/+13
On Linux, empty symlinks are invalid, and attempting to create one with the system call symlink(2) results in an -ENOENT error and this is explicitly documented in the man page. If we rename a symlink that was created in the current transaction and its parent directory was logged before, we actually end up logging the symlink without logging its content, which is stored in an inline extent. That means that after a power failure we can end up with an empty symlink, having no content and an i_size of 0 bytes. It can be easily reproduced like this: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ sync # Create a file inside the directory and fsync the directory. $ touch /mnt/testdir/foo $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir # Create a symlink inside the directory and then rename the symlink. $ ln -s /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar $ mv /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/baz # Now fsync again the directory, this persist the log tree. $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ stat -c %s /mnt/testdir/baz 0 $ readlink /mnt/testdir/baz $ Fix this by always logging symlinks in full mode (LOG_INODE_ALL), so that their content is also logged. A test case for fstests will follow. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-27btrfs: do not allow compression on nodatacow filesChung-Chiang Cheng3-7/+14
Compression and nodatacow are mutually exclusive. A similar issue was fixed by commit f37c563bab429 ("btrfs: add missing check for nocow and compression inode flags"). Besides ioctl, there is another way to enable/disable/reset compression directly via xattr. The following steps will result in a invalid combination. $ touch bar $ chattr +C bar $ lsattr bar ---------------C-- bar $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v zstd bar $ lsattr bar --------c------C-- bar To align with the logic in check_fsflags, nocompress will also be unacceptable after this patch, to prevent mix any compression-related options with nodatacow. $ touch bar $ chattr +C bar $ lsattr bar ---------------C-- bar $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v zstd bar setfattr: bar: Invalid argument $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v no bar setfattr: bar: Invalid argument When both compression and nodatacow are enabled, then btrfs_run_delalloc_range prefers nodatacow and no compression happens. Reported-by: Jayce Lin <jaycelin@synology.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10.x: e6f9d6964802: btrfs: export a helper for compression hard check CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10.x Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-27btrfs: export a helper for compression hard checkChung-Chiang Cheng2-13/+13
inode_can_compress will be used outside of inode.c to check the availability of setting compression flag by xattr. This patch moves this function as an internal helper and renames it to btrfs_inode_can_compress. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-21btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data relocationNaohiro Aota3-2/+4
Currently, we use btrfs_inode_{lock,unlock}() to grant an exclusive writeback of the relocation data inode in btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_{lock,unlock}(). However, that can cause a deadlock in the following path. Thread A takes btrfs_inode_lock() and waits for metadata reservation by e.g, waiting for writeback: prealloc_file_extent_cluster() - btrfs_inode_lock(&inode->vfs_inode, 0); - btrfs_prealloc_file_range() ... - btrfs_replace_file_extents() - btrfs_start_transaction ... - btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() Thread B (e.g, doing a writeback work) needs to wait for the inode lock to continue writeback process: do_writepages - btrfs_writepages - extent_writpages - btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_lock(BTRFS_I(inode)); - btrfs_inode_lock() The deadlock is caused by relying on the vfs_inode's lock. By using it, we introduced unnecessary exclusion of writeback and btrfs_prealloc_file_range(). Also, the lock at this point is useless as we don't have any dirty pages in the inode yet. Introduce fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock and use it for the exclusive writeback. Fixes: 35156d852762 ("btrfs: zoned: only allow one process to add pages to a relocation inode") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16.x: 869f4cdc73f9: btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16.x CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-21btrfs: fix assertion failure during scrub due to block group reallocationFilipe Manana2-2/+31
During a scrub, or device replace, we can race with block group removal and allocation and trigger the following assertion failure: [7526.385524] assertion failed: cache->start == chunk_offset, in fs/btrfs/scrub.c:3817 [7526.387351] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [7526.387373] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3599! [7526.388001] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [7526.388970] CPU: 2 PID: 1158150 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-btrfs-next-114 #4 [7526.390279] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [7526.392430] RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs] [7526.393520] Code: f3 48 c7 c7 20 (...) [7526.396926] RSP: 0018:ffffb9154176bc40 EFLAGS: 00010246 [7526.397690] RAX: 0000000000000048 RBX: ffffa0db8a910000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [7526.398732] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff9d7239a2 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [7526.399766] RBP: ffffa0db8a911e10 R08: ffffffffa71a3ca0 R09: 0000000000000001 [7526.400793] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0db4b170800 [7526.401839] R13: 00000003494b0000 R14: ffffa0db7c55b488 R15: ffffa0db8b19a000 [7526.402874] FS: 00007f6c99c40640(0000) GS:ffffa0de6d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [7526.404038] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [7526.405040] CR2: 00007f31b0882160 CR3: 000000014b38c004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [7526.406112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [7526.407148] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [7526.408169] Call Trace: [7526.408529] <TASK> [7526.408839] scrub_enumerate_chunks.cold+0x11/0x79 [btrfs] [7526.409690] ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xb0/0xb0 [7526.410276] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x226/0x620 [btrfs] [7526.410995] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [7526.411592] btrfs_ioctl+0x1ab5/0x36d0 [btrfs] [7526.412278] ? __fget_files+0xc9/0x1b0 [7526.412825] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [7526.413459] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0 [7526.414022] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [7526.414601] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [7526.415150] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [7526.415675] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [7526.416408] RIP: 0033:0x7f6c99d34397 [7526.416931] Code: 3c 1c e8 1c ff (...) [7526.419641] RSP: 002b:00007f6c99c3fca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [7526.420735] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005624e1e007b0 RCX: 00007f6c99d34397 [7526.421779] RDX: 00005624e1e007b0 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003 [7526.422820] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f6c99c40640 R09: 0000000000000000 [7526.423906] R10: 00007f6c99c40640 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff746755de [7526.424924] R13: 00007fff746755df R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f6c99c40640 [7526.425950] </TASK> That assertion is relatively new, introduced with commit d04fbe19aefd2 ("btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk()"). The block group we get at scrub_enumerate_chunks() can actually have a start address that is smaller then the chunk offset we extracted from a device extent item we got from the commit root of the device tree. This is very rare, but it can happen due to a race with block group removal and allocation. For example, the following steps show how this can happen: 1) We are at transaction T, and we have the following blocks groups, sorted by their logical start address: [ bg A, start address A, length 1G (data) ] [ bg B, start address B, length 1G (data) ] (...) [ bg W, start address W, length 1G (data) ] --> logical address space hole of 256M, there used to be a 256M metadata block group here [ bg Y, start address Y, length 256M (metadata) ] --> Y matches W's end offset + 256M Block group Y is the block group with the highest logical address in the whole filesystem; 2) Block group Y is deleted and its extent mapping is removed by the call to remove_extent_mapping() made from btrfs_remove_block_group(). So after this point, the last element of the mapping red black tree, its rightmost node, is the mapping for block group W; 3) While still at transaction T, a new data block group is allocated, with a length of 1G. When creating the block group we do a call to find_next_chunk(), which returns the logical start address for the new block group. This calls returns X, which corresponds to the end offset of the last block group, the rightmost node in the mapping red black tree (fs_info->mapping_tree), plus one. So we get a new block group that starts at logical address X and with a length of 1G. It spans over the whole logical range of the old block group Y, that was previously removed in the same transaction. However the device extent allocated to block group X is not the same device extent that was used by block group Y, and it also does not overlap that extent, which must be always the case because we allocate extents by searching through the commit root of the device tree (otherwise it could corrupt a filesystem after a power failure or an unclean shutdown in general), so the extent allocator is behaving as expected; 4) We have a task running scrub, currently at scrub_enumerate_chunks(). There it searches for device extent items in the device tree, using its commit root. It finds a device extent item that was used by block group Y, and it extracts the value Y from that item into the local variable 'chunk_offset', using btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_offset(); It then calls btrfs_lookup_block_group() to find block group for the logical address Y - since there's currently no block group that starts at that logical address, it returns block group X, because its range contains Y. This results in triggering the assertion: ASSERT(cache->start == chunk_offset); right before calling scrub_chunk(), as cache->start is X and chunk_offset is Y. This is more likely to happen of filesystems not larger than 50G, because for these filesystems we use a 256M size for metadata block groups and a 1G size for data block groups, while for filesystems larger than 50G, we use a 1G size for both data and metadata block groups (except for zoned filesystems). It could also happen on any filesystem size due to the fact that system block groups are always smaller (32M) than both data and metadata block groups, but these are not frequently deleted, so much less likely to trigger the race. So make scrub skip any block group with a start offset that is less than the value we expect, as that means it's a new block group that was created in the current transaction. It's pointless to continue and try to scrub its extents, because scrub searches for extents using the commit root, so it won't find any. For a device replace, skip it as well for the same reasons, and we don't need to worry about the possibility of extents of the new block group not being to the new device, because we have the write duplication setup done through btrfs_map_block(). Fixes: d04fbe19aefd ("btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-19btrfs: fix direct I/O writes for split bios on zoned devicesChristoph Hellwig1-2/+3
When a bio is split in btrfs_submit_direct, dip->file_offset contains the file offset for the first bio. But this means the start value used in btrfs_end_dio_bio to record the write location for zone devices is incorrect for subsequent bios. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-19btrfs: fix direct I/O read repair for split biosChristoph Hellwig3-8/+9
When a bio is split in btrfs_submit_direct, dip->file_offset contains the file offset for the first bio. But this means the start value used in btrfs_check_read_dio_bio is incorrect for subsequent bios. Add a file_offset field to struct btrfs_bio to pass along the correct offset. Given that check_data_csum only uses start of an error message this means problems with this miscalculation will only show up when I/O fails or checksums mismatch. The logic was removed in f4f39fc5dc30 ("btrfs: remove btrfs_bio::logical member") but we need it due to the bio splitting. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-19btrfs: fix and document the zoned device choice in alloc_new_bioChristoph Hellwig1-15/+28
Zone Append bios only need a valid block device in struct bio, but not the device in the btrfs_bio. Use the information from btrfs_zoned_get_device to set up bi_bdev and fix zoned writes on multi-device file system with non-homogeneous capabilities and remove the pointless btrfs_bio.device assignment. Add big fat comments explaining what is going on here. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-19btrfs: fix leaked plug after failure syncing log on zoned filesystemsFilipe Manana1-0/+1
On a zoned filesystem, if we fail to allocate the root node for the log root tree while syncing the log, we end up returning without finishing the IO plug we started before, resulting in leaking resources as we have started writeback for extent buffers of a log tree before. That allocation failure, which typically is either -ENOMEM or -ENOSPC, is not fatal and the fsync can safely fallback to a full transaction commit. So release the IO plug if we fail to allocate the extent buffer for the root of the log root tree when syncing the log on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: 3ddebf27fcd3a9 ("btrfs: zoned: reorder log node allocation on zoned filesystem") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: fix btrfs_submit_compressed_write cgroup attributionDennis Zhou1-0/+8
This restores the logic from commit 46bcff2bfc5e ("btrfs: fix compressed write bio blkcg attribution") which added cgroup attribution to btrfs writeback. It also adds back the REQ_CGROUP_PUNT flag for these ios. Fixes: 91507240482e ("btrfs: determine stripe boundary at bio allocation time in btrfs_submit_compressed_write") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: fix root ref counts in error handling in btrfs_get_root_refJia-Ju Bai1-2/+3
In btrfs_get_root_ref(), when btrfs_insert_fs_root() fails, btrfs_put_root() can happen for two reasons: - the root already exists in the tree, in that case it returns the reference obtained in btrfs_lookup_fs_root() - another error so the cleanup is done in the fail label Calling btrfs_put_root() unconditionally would lead to double decrement of the root reference possibly freeing it in the second case. Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn> Fixes: bc44d7c4b2b1 ("btrfs: push btrfs_grab_fs_root into btrfs_get_fs_root") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: zoned: activate block group only for extent allocationNaohiro Aota3-9/+21
In btrfs_make_block_group(), we activate the allocated block group, expecting that the block group is soon used for allocation. However, the chunk allocation from flush_space() context broke the assumption. There can be a large time gap between the chunk allocation time and the extent allocation time from the chunk. Activating the empty block groups pre-allocated from flush_space() context can exhaust the active zone counter of a device. Once we use all the active zone counts for empty pre-allocated block groups, we cannot activate new block group for the other things: metadata, tree-log, or data relocation block group. That failure results in a fake -ENOSPC. This patch introduces CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT to distinguish the chunk allocation from find_free_extent(). Now, the new block group is activated only in that context. Fixes: eb66a010d518 ("btrfs: zoned: activate new block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: return allocated block group from do_chunk_alloc()Naohiro Aota1-3/+13
Return the allocated block group from do_chunk_alloc(). This is a preparation patch for the next patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: mark resumed async balance as writingNaohiro Aota1-0/+2
When btrfs balance is interrupted with umount, the background balance resumes on the next mount. There is a potential deadlock with FS freezing here like as described in commit 26559780b953 ("btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writing"). Mark the process as sb_writing to avoid it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: remove support of balance v1 ioctlNikolay Borisov1-2/+0
It was scheduled for removal in kernel v5.18 commit 6c405b24097c ("btrfs: deprecate BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE ioctl") thus its time has come. Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: release correct delalloc amount in direct IO write pathNaohiro Aota1-3/+3
Running generic/406 causes the following WARNING in btrfs_destroy_inode() which tells there are outstanding extents left. In btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(), we reserve a temporary outstanding extents with btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata() (or indirectly from btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(()). We then release the outstanding extents with btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(). However, the "len" can be modified in the COW case, which releases fewer outstanding extents than expected. Fix it by calling btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() for the original length. To reproduce the warning, the filesystem should be 1 GiB. It's triggering a short-write, due to not being able to allocate a large extent and instead allocating a smaller one. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 757 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8848 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e6/0x210 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor lzo_compress lzo_decompress raid6_pq zstd zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash zram zsmalloc CPU: 0 PID: 757 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS d55cb5a 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e6/0x210 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000327bda8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100548b78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000026900 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff888100548b78 RBP: ffff888100548940 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88810b48aba8 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff8881004eb240 R12: ffff88810b48a800 R13: ffff88810b48ec08 R14: ffff88810b48ed00 R15: ffff888100490c68 FS: 00007f8549ea0b80(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f854a09e733 CR3: 000000010a2e9003 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> destroy_inode+0x33/0x70 dispose_list+0x43/0x60 evict_inodes+0x161/0x1b0 generic_shutdown_super+0x2d/0x110 kill_anon_super+0xf/0x20 btrfs_kill_super+0xd/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x27/0x90 cleanup_mnt+0x12c/0x180 task_work_run+0x54/0x80 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x152/0x160 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f854a000fb7 Fixes: f0bfa76a11e9 ("btrfs: fix ENOSPC failure when attempting direct IO write into NOCOW range") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: remove unused variable in btrfs_{start,write}_dirty_block_groups()Nathan Chancellor1-4/+0
Clang's version of -Wunused-but-set-variable recently gained support for unary operations, which reveals two unused variables: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2949:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int num_started = 0; ^ fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3116:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int num_started = 0; ^ 2 errors generated. These variables appear to be unused from their introduction, so just remove them to silence the warnings. Fixes: c9dc4c657850 ("Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout") Fixes: 1bbc621ef284 ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1614 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: zoned: remove redundant condition in btrfs_run_delalloc_rangeHaowen Bai1-2/+1
The logic !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. so we can make code clear. Note: though it's preferred to be in the more human readable form, there have been repeated reports and patches as the expression is detected by tools so apply it to reduce the load. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: prevent subvol with swapfile from being deletedKaiwen Hu1-0/+22
A subvolume with an active swapfile must not be deleted otherwise it would not be possible to deactivate it. After the subvolume is deleted, we cannot swapoff the swapfile in this deleted subvolume because the path is unreachable. The swapfile is still active and holding references, the filesystem cannot be unmounted. The test looks like this: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null mount $dev $mnt btrfs sub create $mnt/subvol touch $mnt/subvol/swapfile chmod 600 $mnt/subvol/swapfile chattr +C $mnt/subvol/swapfile dd if=/dev/zero of=$mnt/subvol/swapfile bs=1K count=4096 mkswap $mnt/subvol/swapfile swapon $mnt/subvol/swapfile btrfs sub delete $mnt/subvol swapoff $mnt/subvol/swapfile # failed: No such file or directory swapoff --all unmount $mnt # target is busy. To prevent above issue, we simply check that whether the subvolume contains any active swapfile, and stop the deleting process. This behavior is like snapshot ioctl dealing with a swapfile. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Kaiwen Hu <kevinhu@synology.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: do not warn for free space inode in cow_file_rangeJosef Bacik1-1/+0
This is a long time leftover from when I originally added the free space inode, the point was to catch cases where we weren't honoring the NOCOW flag. However there exists a race with relocation, if we allocate our free space inode in a block group that is about to be relocated, we could trigger the COW path before the relocation has the opportunity to find the extents and delete the free space cache. In production where we have auto-relocation enabled we're seeing this WARN_ON_ONCE() around 5k times in a 2 week period, so not super common but enough that it's at the top of our metrics. We're properly handling the error here, and with us phasing out v1 space cache anyway just drop the WARN_ON_ONCE. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: avoid defragging extents whose next extents are not targetsQu Wenruo1-6/+14
[BUG] There is a report that autodefrag is defragging single sector, which is completely waste of IO, and no help for defragging: btrfs-cleaner-808 defrag_one_locked_range: root=256 ino=651122 start=0 len=4096 [CAUSE] In defrag_collect_targets(), we check if the current range (A) can be merged with next one (B). If mergeable, we will add range A into target for defrag. However there is a catch for autodefrag, when checking mergeability against range B, we intentionally pass 0 as @newer_than, hoping to get a higher chance to merge with the next extent. But in the next iteration, range B will looked up by defrag_lookup_extent(), with non-zero @newer_than. And if range B is not really newer, it will rejected directly, causing only range A being defragged, while we expect to defrag both range A and B. [FIX] Since the root cause is the difference in check condition of defrag_check_next_extent() and defrag_collect_targets(), we fix it by: 1. Pass @newer_than to defrag_check_next_extent() 2. Pass @extent_thresh to defrag_check_next_extent() This makes the check between defrag_collect_targets() and defrag_check_next_extent() more consistent. While there is still some minor difference, the remaining checks are focus on runtime flags like writeback/delalloc, which are mostly transient and safe to be checked only in defrag_collect_targets(). Link: https://github.com/btrfs/linux/issues/423#issuecomment-1066981856 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: fix fallocate to use file_modified to update permissions consistentlyDarrick J. Wong1-2/+11
Since the initial introduction of (posix) fallocate back at the turn of the century, it has been possible to use this syscall to change the user-visible contents of files. This can happen by extending the file size during a preallocation, or through any of the newer modes (punch, zero range). Because the call can be used to change file contents, we should treat it like we do any other modification to a file -- update the mtime, and drop set[ug]id privileges/capabilities. The VFS function file_modified() does all this for us if pass it a locked inode, so let's make fallocate drop permissions correctly. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transactionQu Wenruo1-37/+28
[BUG] There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices. This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely. BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22 BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed [CAUSE] During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are updated in two different transactions: btrfs_rm_device() |- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device) | |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction() | | Now we got transaction X | | | |- btrfs_del_item() | | Now device item is removed from chunk tree | | | |- btrfs_commit_transaction() | Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched, | but device item removed from chunk tree. | (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect) | |- cur_devices->num_devices--; |- cur_devices->total_devices--; |- btrfs_set_super_num_devices() All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will only be written back to disk in next transaction. So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then we got the super num mismatch. [FIX] Instead of starting and committing a transaction inside btrfs_rm_dev_item(), start a transaction in side btrfs_rm_device() and pass it to btrfs_rm_dev_item(). And only commit the transaction after everything is done. Reported-by: Luca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: fix qgroup reserve overflow the qgroup limitEthan Lien1-1/+1
We use extent_changeset->bytes_changed in qgroup_reserve_data() to record how many bytes we set for EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED state. Currently the bytes_changed is set as "unsigned int", and it will overflow if we try to fallocate a range larger than 4GiB. The result is we reserve less bytes and eventually break the qgroup limit. Unlike regular buffered/direct write, which we use one changeset for each ordered extent, which can never be larger than 256M. For fallocate, we use one changeset for the whole range, thus it no longer respects the 256M per extent limit, and caused the problem. The following example test script reproduces the problem: $ cat qgroup-overflow.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT # Set qgroup limit to 2GiB. btrfs quota enable $MNT btrfs qgroup limit 2G $MNT # Try to fallocate a 3GiB file. This should fail. echo echo "Try to fallocate a 3GiB file..." fallocate -l 3G $MNT/3G.file # Try to fallocate a 5GiB file. echo echo "Try to fallocate a 5GiB file..." fallocate -l 5G $MNT/5G.file # See we break the qgroup limit. echo sync btrfs qgroup show -r $MNT umount $MNT When running the test: $ ./qgroup-overflow.sh (...) Try to fallocate a 3GiB file... fallocate: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded Try to fallocate a 5GiB file... qgroupid         rfer         excl     max_rfer --------         ----         ----     -------- 0/5           5.00GiB      5.00GiB      2.00GiB Since we have no control of how bytes_changed is used, it's better to set it to u64. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: zoned: remove left over ASSERT checking for single profileJohannes Thumshirn1-4/+0
With commit dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups") we started allowing DUP on metadata block groups, so the ASSERT()s in btrfs_can_activate_zone() and btrfs_zoned_get_device() are no longer valid and in fact even harmful. Fixes: dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-24btrfs: zoned: traverse devices under chunk_mutex in btrfs_can_activate_zoneJohannes Thumshirn1-4/+5
btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already held, which will lead to a deadlock: insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex `-> insert_dev_extent() `-> btrfs_insert_empty_item() `-> btrfs_insert_empty_items() `-> btrfs_search_slot() `-> btrfs_cow_block() `-> __btrfs_cow_block() `-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block() `-> btrfs_reserve_extent() `-> find_free_extent() `-> find_free_extent_update_loop() `-> can_allocate_chunk() `-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse the list of active devices. We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the chunk_mutex. btrfs_create_chunk() lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex); gather_device_info list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list) Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in the context of the chunk alloc. [15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted [15.167487] -------------------------------------------- [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] but task is already holding lock: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] other info that might help us debug this: [15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [15.167733] [15.171834] CPU0 [15.171834] ---- [15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [15.171834] [15.171834] *** DEADLOCK *** [15.171834] [15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [15.171834] [15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146: [15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs] [15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs] [15.179641] [15.179641] stack backtrace: [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 [15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014 [15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] [15.179641] Call Trace: [15.179641] <TASK> [15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 [15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2 [15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40 [15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs] [15.187601] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs] [15.187601] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130 [15.187601] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs] [15.187601] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs] [15.192037] flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs] [15.192037] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [15.192037] ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs] [15.192037] ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0 [15.192037] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs] [15.192037] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0 [15.192037] worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0 Fixes: a85f05e59bc1 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: zoned: put block group after final usageNikolay Borisov1-3/+4
It's counter-intuitive (and wrong) to put the block group _before_ the final usage in submit_eb_page. Fix it by re-ordering the call to btrfs_put_block_group after its final reference. Also fix a minor typo in 'implies' Fixes: be1a1d7a5d24 ("btrfs: zoned: finish fully written block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data in device_list_addDongliang Mu1-7/+6
Syzbot reported a possible use-after-free in printing information in device_list_add. Very similar with the bug fixed by commit 0697d9a61099 ("btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data for printing duplicate device"), but this time the use occurs in btrfs_info_in_rcu. Call Trace: kasan_report.cold+0x83/0xdf mm/kasan/report.c:459 btrfs_printk+0x395/0x425 fs/btrfs/super.c:244 device_list_add.cold+0xd7/0x2ed fs/btrfs/volumes.c:957 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x4c7/0x5c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1387 btrfs_control_ioctl+0x12a/0x2d0 fs/btrfs/super.c:2409 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fix this by modifying device->fs_info to NULL too. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+82650a4e0ed38f218363@syzkaller.appspotmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add lockdep_assert_held to need_preemptive_reclaimNiels Dossche1-0/+2
In a previous patch ("btrfs: extend locking to all space_info members accesses") the locking for the space_info members was extended in btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space because not all the member accesses that needed locks were actually locked (bytes_pinned et al). It was then suggested to also add a call to lockdep_assert_held to need_preemptive_reclaim. This function also works with space_info members. As of now, it has only two call sites which both hold the lock. Suggested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: verify the tranisd of the to-be-written dirty extent bufferQu Wenruo1-6/+20
[BUG] There is a bug report that a bitflip in the transid part of an extent buffer makes btrfs to reject certain tree blocks: BTRFS error (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on 1382301696 wanted 262166 found 22 [CAUSE] Note the failed transid check, hex(262166) = 0x40016, while hex(22) = 0x16. It's an obvious bitflip. Furthermore, the reporter also confirmed the bitflip is from the hardware, so it's a real hardware caused bitflip, and such problem can not be detected by the existing tree-checker framework. As tree-checker can only verify the content inside one tree block, while generation of a tree block can only be verified against its parent. So such problem remain undetected. [FIX] Although tree-checker can not verify it at write-time, we still have a quick (but not the most accurate) way to catch such obvious corruption. Function csum_one_extent_buffer() is called before we submit metadata write. Thus it means, all the extent buffer passed in should be dirty tree blocks, and should be newer than last committed transaction. Using that we can catch the above bitflip. Although it's not a perfect solution, as if the corrupted generation is higher than the correct value, we have no way to catch it at all. Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2dfcbc130c55cc6fd067b93752e90bd2b079baca.camel@scientia.org/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@sus,ree.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: unify the error handling of btrfs_read_buffer()Qu Wenruo1-6/+6
There is one oddball error handling of btrfs_read_buffer(): ret = btrfs_read_buffer(tmp, gen, parent_level - 1, &first_key); if (!ret) { *eb_ret = tmp; return 0; } free_extent_buffer(tmp); btrfs_release_path(p); return -EIO; While all other call sites check the error first. Unify the behavior. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: unify the error handling pattern for read_tree_block()Qu Wenruo5-27/+34
We had an error handling pattern for read_tree_block() like this: eb = read_tree_block(); if (IS_ERR(eb)) { /* * Handling error here * Normally ended up with return or goto out. */ } else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) { /* * Different error handling here * Normally also ended up with return or goto out; */ } This is fine, but if we want to add extra check for each read_tree_block(), the existing if-else-if is not that expandable and will take reader some seconds to figure out there is no extra branch. Here we change it to a more common way, without the extra else: eb = read_tree_block(); if (IS_ERR(eb)) { /* * Handling error here */ return eb or goto out; } if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) { /* * Different error handling here */ return eb or goto out; } This also removes some oddball call sites which uses some creative way to check error. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: factor out do_free_extent_accounting helperJosef Bacik1-22/+30
__btrfs_free_extent() does all of the hard work of updating the extent ref items, and then at the end if we dropped the extent completely it does the cleanup accounting work. We're going to only want to do that work for metadata with extent tree v2, so extract this bit into its own helper. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: remove last_ref from the extent freeing codeJosef Bacik1-23/+11
This is a remnant of the work I did for qgroups a long time ago to only run for a block when we had dropped the last ref. We haven't done that for years, but the code remains. Drop this remnant. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add a alloc_reserved_extent helperJosef Bacik1-32/+24
We duplicate this logic for both data and metadata, at this point we've already done our type specific extent root operations, this is just doing the accounting and removing the space from the free space tree. Extract this common logic out into a helper. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: remove BUG_ON(ret) in alloc_reserved_tree_blockJosef Bacik1-1/+2
Switch this to an ASSERT() and return the error in the normal case. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add and use helper for unlinking inode during log replayFilipe Manana1-48/+29
During log replay there is this pattern of running delayed items after every inode unlink. To avoid repeating this several times, move the logic into an helper function and use it instead of calling btrfs_unlink_inode() followed by btrfs_run_delayed_items(). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: extend locking to all space_info members accessesNiels Dossche1-1/+2
bytes_pinned is always accessed under space_info->lock, except in btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space, however the other members are accessed under that lock. The reserved member of the rsv's are also partially accessed under a lock and partially not. Move all these accesses into the same lock to ensure consistency. This could potentially race and lead to a flush instead of a commit but it's not a big problem as it's only for preemptive flush. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <niels.dossche@ugent.be> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writingNaohiro Aota2-1/+10
There is a hung_task issue with running generic/068 on an SMR device. The hang occurs while a process is trying to thaw the filesystem. The process is trying to take sb->s_umount to thaw the FS. The lock is held by fsstress, which calls btrfs_sync_fs() and is waiting for an ordered extent to finish. However, as the FS is frozen, the ordered extents never finish. Having an ordered extent while the FS is frozen is the root cause of the hang. The ordered extent is initiated from btrfs_relocate_chunk() which is called from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(). This commit adds sb_*_write() around btrfs_relocate_chunk() call site. For the usual "btrfs balance" command, we already call it with mnt_want_file() in btrfs_ioctl_balance(). Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+ Link: https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/56 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14fs: allow cross-vfsmount reflink/dedupeJosef Bacik2-10/+1
Currently we disallow reflink and dedupe if the two files aren't on the same vfsmount. However we really only need to disallow it if they're not on the same super block. It is very common for btrfs to have a main subvolume that is mounted and then different subvolumes mounted at different locations. It's allowed to reflink between these volumes, but the vfsmount check disallows this. Instead fix dedupe to check for the same superblock, and simply remove the vfsmount check for reflink as it already does the superblock check. Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: remove the cross file system checks from remapJosef Bacik1-3/+1
The sb check is already done in do_clone_file_range, and the mnt check (which will hopefully go away in a subsequent patch) is done in ioctl_file_clone(). Remove the check in our code and put an ASSERT() to make sure it doesn't change underneath us. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info to btrfs_recover_relocationJosef Bacik3-5/+4
We don't need a root here, we just need the btrfs_fs_info, we can just get the specific roots we need from fs_info. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info for deleting snapshots and cleanerJosef Bacik3-7/+6
We're passing a root around here, but we only really need the fs_info, so fix up btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot() to take an fs_info instead, and then fix up all the callers appropriately. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add filesystems state details to error messagesSweet Tea Dorminy2-8/+62
When a filesystem goes read-only due to an error, multiple errors tend to be reported, some of which are knock-on failures. Logging fs_states, in btrfs_handle_fs_error() and btrfs_printk() helps distinguish the first error from subsequent messages which may only exist due to an error state. Under the new format, most initial errors will look like: `BTRFS: error (device loop0) in ...` while subsequent errors will begin with: `error (device loop0: state E) in ...` An initial transaction abort error will look like `error (device loop0: state A) in ...` and subsequent messages will contain `(device loop0: state EA) in ...` In addition to the error states we can also print other states that are temporary, like remounting, device replace, or indicate a global state that may affect functionality. Now implemented: E - filesystem error detected A - transaction aborted L - log tree errors M - remounting in progress R - device replace in progress C - data checksums not verified (mounted with ignoredatacsums) Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: deal with unexpected extent type during reflinkingFilipe Manana1-2/+4
Smatch complains about a possible dereference of a pointer that was not initialized: CC [M] fs/btrfs/reflink.o CHECK fs/btrfs/reflink.c fs/btrfs/reflink.c:533 btrfs_clone() error: potentially dereferencing uninitialized 'trans'. This is because we are not dealing with the case where the type of a file extent has an unexpected value (not regular, not prealloc and not inline), in which case the transaction handle pointer is not initialized. Such unexpected type should be impossible, except in case of some memory corruption caused either by bad hardware or some software bug causing something like a buffer overrun. So ASSERT that if the extent type is neither regular nor prealloc, then it must be inline. Bail out with -EUCLEAN and a warning in case it is not. This silences smatch. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: fix unexpected error path when reflinking an inline extentFilipe Manana1-2/+5
When reflinking an inline extent, we assert that its file offset is 0 and that its uncompressed length is not greater than the sector size. We then return an error if one of those conditions is not satisfied. However we use a return statement, which results in returning from btrfs_clone() without freeing the path and buffer that were allocated before, as well as not clearing the flag BTRFS_INODE_NO_DELALLOC_FLUSH for the destination inode. Fix that by jumping to the 'out' label instead, and also add a WARN_ON() for each condition so that in case assertions are disabled, we get to known which of the unexpected conditions triggered the error. Fixes: a61e1e0df9f321 ("Btrfs: simplify inline extent handling when doing reflinks") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>