| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[BUG]
The following script would allow invalid mount options to be specified
(although such invalid options would just be ignored):
# mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
# mount $dev $mnt1 <<< Successful mount expected
# mount $dev $mnt2 -o junk <<< Failed mount expected
# echo $?
0
[CAUSE]
For the 2nd mount, since the fs is already mounted, we won't go through
open_ctree() thus no btrfs_parse_options(), but only through
btrfs_parse_subvol_options().
However we do not treat unrecognized options from valid but irrelevant
options, thus those invalid options would just be ignored by
btrfs_parse_subvol_options().
[FIX]
Add the handling for Opt_err to handle invalid options and error out,
while still ignore other valid options inside btrfs_parse_subvol_options().
Reported-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Jens reported the following warnings from -Wmaybe-uninitialized recent
Linus' branch.
In file included from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71,
from ./include/linux/compiler.h:246,
from ./include/linux/export.h:5,
from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17,
from fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:6:
In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl_space_info’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2999:6,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4616:10:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘space_args’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘kasan_check_write’
129 | kasan_check_write(to, n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2981:39: note: ‘space_args’ declared here
2981 | struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args space_args;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
inlined from ‘_btrfs_ioctl_send’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4343:9,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4658:10:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘args32’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘kasan_check_write’
129 | kasan_check_write(to, n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4341:49: note: ‘args32’ declared here
4341 | struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args_32 args32;
| ^~~~~~
This was due to his config options and having KASAN turned on,
which adds some extra checks around copy_from_user(), which then
triggered the -Wmaybe-uninitialized checker for these cases.
Fix the warnings by initializing the different structs we're copying
into.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Jens reported a compiler warning when using
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y that looks like this
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘btrfs_log_prealloc_extents’:
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4828:23: warning: ‘start_slot’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
4828 | ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4829 | start_slot, ins_nr, 1, 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4725:13: note: ‘start_slot’ was declared here
4725 | int start_slot;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
The compiler is incorrect, as we only use this code when ins_len > 0,
and when ins_len > 0 we have start_slot properly initialized. However
we generally find the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings valuable, so
initialize start_slot to get rid of the warning.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Jens reported a compiler error when using CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
that looks like this
In function ‘gather_device_info’,
inlined from ‘btrfs_create_chunk’ at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5507:8:
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5245:48: warning: ‘dev_offset’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
5245 | devices_info[ndevs].dev_offset = dev_offset;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_create_chunk’:
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5196:13: note: ‘dev_offset’ was declared here
5196 | u64 dev_offset;
This occurs because find_free_dev_extent is responsible for setting
dev_offset, however if we get an -ENOMEM at the top of the function
we'll return without setting the value.
This isn't actually a problem because we will see the -ENOMEM in
gather_device_info() and return and not use the uninitialized value,
however we also just don't want the compiler warning so rework the code
slightly in find_free_dev_extent() to make sure it's always setting
*start and *len to avoid the compiler warning.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit f98b6215d7d1 ("btrfs: extent_io: do extra check for extent buffer
read write functions") changed how we handle invalid extent buffer range
for read_extent_buffer().
Previously if the range is invalid we just set the destination to zero,
but after the patch we do nothing and error out.
This can lead to smatch static checker errors like:
fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:186 print_uuid_item() error: uninitialized symbol 'subvol_id'.
fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c:338 check_eb_bitmap() error: uninitialized symbol 'has'.
fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c:353 check_eb_bitmap() error: uninitialized symbol 'has'.
fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:203 btrfs_uuid_tree_remove() error: uninitialized symbol 'read_subid'.
fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:353 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate() error: uninitialized symbol 'subid_le'.
fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:72 btrfs_uuid_tree_lookup() error: uninitialized symbol 'data'.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:7415 btrfs_dev_stats_value() error: uninitialized symbol 'val'.
Fix those warnings by reverting back to the old memset() behavior.
By this we keep the static checker happy and would still make a lot of
noise when such invalid ranges are passed in.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: f98b6215d7d1 ("btrfs: extent_io: do extra check for extent buffer read write functions")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
A user reported some issues with smaller file systems that get very
full. While investigating this issue I noticed that df wasn't showing
100% full, despite having 0 chunk space and having < 1MiB of available
metadata space.
This turns out to be an overflow issue, we're doing:
total_available_metadata_space - SZ_4M < global_block_rsv_size
to determine if there's not enough space to make metadata allocations,
which overflows if total_available_metadata_space is < 4M. Fix this by
checking to see if our available space is greater than the 4M threshold.
This makes df properly report 100% usage on the file system.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When running a delayed extent operation, if we don't find the extent item
in the extent tree we just return -EIO without any logged message. This
indicates some bug or possibly a memory or fs corruption, so the return
value should not be -EIO but -EUCLEAN instead, and since it's not expected
to ever happen, print an informative error message so that if it happens
we have some idea of what went wrong, where to look at.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At __btrfs_inc_extent_ref() we are doing a BUG_ON() if we are dealing with
a tree block reference that has a reference count that is different from 1,
but we have already dealt with this case at run_delayed_tree_ref(), making
it useless. So remove the BUG_ON().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When running a delayed tree reference, if we find a ref count different
from 1, we return -EIO. This isn't an IO error, as it indicates either a
bug in the delayed refs code or a memory corruption, so change the error
code from -EIO to -EUCLEAN. Also tag the branch as 'unlikely' as this is
not expected to ever happen, and change the error message to print the
tree block's bytenr without the parenthesis (and there was a missing space
between the 'block' word and the opening parenthesis), for consistency as
that's the style we used everywhere else.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When starting a transaction, with a non-zero number of items, we reserve
metadata space for that number of items and for delayed refs by doing a
call to btrfs_block_rsv_add(), with the transaction block reserve passed
as the block reserve argument. This reserves metadata space and adds it
to the transaction block reserve. Later we migrate the space we reserved
for delayed references from the transaction block reserve into the delayed
refs block reserve, by calling btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv().
btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv() decrements the number of bytes to
migrate from the source block reserve, and this however may result in an
underflow in case the space added to the transaction block reserve ended
up being used by another task that has not reserved enough space for its
own use - examples are tasks doing reflinks or hole punching because they
end up calling btrfs_replace_file_extents() -> btrfs_drop_extents() and
may need to modify/COW a variable number of leaves/paths, so they keep
trying to use space from the transaction block reserve when they need to
COW an extent buffer, and may end up trying to use more space then they
have reserved (1 unit/path only for removing file extent items).
This can be avoided by simply reserving space first without adding it to
the transaction block reserve, then add the space for delayed refs to the
delayed refs block reserve and finally add the remaining reserved space
to the transaction block reserve. This also makes the code a bit shorter
and simpler. So just do that.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we have two (or more) tasks attempting to refill the delayed refs block
reserve we can end up with the delayed block reserve being over reserved,
that is, with a reserved space greater than its size. If this happens, we
are holding to more reserved space than necessary for a while.
The race happens like this:
1) The delayed refs block reserve has a size of 8M and a reserved space of
6M for example;
2) Task A calls btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill();
3) Task B also calls btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill();
4) Task A sees there's a 2M difference between the size and the reserved
space of the delayed refs rsv, so it will reserve 2M of space by
calling btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes();
5) Task B also sees that 2M difference, and like task A, it reserves
another 2M of metadata space;
6) Both task A and task B increase the reserved space of block reserve
by 2M, by calling btrfs_block_rsv_add_bytes(), so the block reserve
ends up with a size of 8M and a reserved space of 10M;
7) The extra, over reserved space will eventually be freed by some task
calling btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release() -> btrfs_block_rsv_release()
-> block_rsv_release_bytes(), as there we will detect the over reserve
and release that space.
So fix this by checking if we still need to add space to the delayed refs
block reserve after reserving the metadata space, and if we don't, just
release that space immediately.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When opening a directory (opendir(3)) or rewinding it (rewinddir(3)), we
are not holding the directory's inode locked, and this can result in later
attempting to add two entries to the directory with the same index number,
resulting in a transaction abort, with -EEXIST (-17), when inserting the
second delayed dir index. This results in a trace like the following:
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: BTRFS error (device dm-3): err add delayed dir index item(name: cockroach-stderr.log) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 5, inode id: 4539217, errno: -17)
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1504!
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 7159 Comm: cockroach Not tainted 6.4.15-200.fc38.x86_64 #1
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Hardware name: ASUS ESC500 G3/P9D WS, BIOS 2402 06/27/2018
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RIP: 0010:btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Code: eb dd 48 (...)
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RSP: 0000:ffffa9980e0fbb28 EFLAGS: 00010282
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b10b8f4a3c0 RCX: 0000000000000000
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b177ec21540 RDI: ffff8b177ec21540
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RBP: ffff8b110cf80888 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa9980e0fb938
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff86146508 R12: 0000000000000014
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: R13: ffff8b1131ae5b40 R14: ffff8b10b8f4a418 R15: 00000000ffffffef
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: FS: 00007fb14a7fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff8b177ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CR2: 000000c00143d000 CR3: 00000001b3b4e002 CR4: 00000000001706f0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Call Trace:
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: <TASK>
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? die+0x36/0x90
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? do_trap+0xda/0x100
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x200/0x280
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: btrfs_add_link+0xab/0x4f0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? ktime_get_real_ts64+0x47/0xe0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: btrfs_create_new_inode+0x7cd/0xa80
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: btrfs_symlink+0x190/0x4d0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? schedule+0x5e/0xd0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? __d_lookup+0x7e/0xc0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: vfs_symlink+0x148/0x1e0
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: do_symlinkat+0x130/0x140
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: __x64_sys_symlinkat+0x3d/0x50
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2b/0x40
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
The race leading to the problem happens like this:
1) Directory inode X is loaded into memory, its ->index_cnt field is
initialized to (u64)-1 (at btrfs_alloc_inode());
2) Task A is adding a new file to directory X, holding its vfs inode lock,
and calls btrfs_set_inode_index() to get an index number for the entry.
Because the inode's index_cnt field is set to (u64)-1 it calls
btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count() which fails because no dir index
entries were added yet to the delayed inode and then it calls
btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). This functions finds the last dir index
key and then sets index_cnt to that index value + 1. It found that the
last index key has an offset of 100. However before it assigns a value
of 101 to index_cnt...
3) Task B calls opendir(3), ending up at btrfs_opendir(), where the VFS
lock for inode X is not taken, so it calls btrfs_get_dir_last_index()
and sees index_cnt still with a value of (u64)-1. Because of that it
calls btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count() which fails since no dir
index entries were added to the delayed inode yet, and then it also
calls btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). This also finds that the last
index key has an offset of 100, and before it assigns the value 101
to the index_cnt field of inode X...
4) Task A assigns a value of 101 to index_cnt. And then the code flow
goes to btrfs_set_inode_index() where it increments index_cnt from
101 to 102. Task A then creates a delayed dir index entry with a
sequence number of 101 and adds it to the delayed inode;
5) Task B assigns 101 to the index_cnt field of inode X;
6) At some later point when someone tries to add a new entry to the
directory, btrfs_set_inode_index() will return 101 again and shortly
after an attempt to add another delayed dir index key with index
number 101 will fail with -EEXIST resulting in a transaction abort.
Fix this by locking the inode at btrfs_get_dir_last_index(), which is only
only used when opening a directory or attempting to lseek on it.
Reported-by: ken <ken@bllue.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE6xmH+Lp=Q=E61bU+v9eWX8gYfLvu6jLYxjxjFpo3zHVPR0EQ@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+d13490c82ad5353c779d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
Fixes: 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When opening a directory we find what's the index of its last entry and
then store it in the directory's file handle private data (struct
btrfs_file_private::last_index), so that in the case new directory entries
are added to a directory after an opendir(3) call we don't end up in an
infinite loop (see commit 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory
reads")) when calling readdir(3).
However once rewinddir(3) is called, POSIX states [1] that any new
directory entries added after the previous opendir(3) call, must be
returned by subsequent calls to readdir(3):
"The rewinddir() function shall reset the position of the directory
stream to which dirp refers to the beginning of the directory.
It shall also cause the directory stream to refer to the current
state of the corresponding directory, as a call to opendir() would
have done."
We currently don't refresh the last_index field of the struct
btrfs_file_private associated to the directory, so after a rewinddir(3)
we are not returning any new entries added after the opendir(3) call.
Fix this by finding the current last index of the directory when llseek
is called against the directory.
This can be reproduced by the following C program provided by Ian Johnson:
#include <dirent.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
DIR *dir = opendir("test");
FILE *file;
file = fopen("test/1", "w");
fwrite("1", 1, 1, file);
fclose(file);
file = fopen("test/2", "w");
fwrite("2", 1, 1, file);
fclose(file);
rewinddir(dir);
struct dirent *entry;
while ((entry = readdir(dir))) {
printf("%s\n", entry->d_name);
}
closedir(dir);
return 0;
}
Reported-by: Ian Johnson <ian@ianjohnson.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YR1P0S.NGASEG570GJ8@ianjohnson.dev/
Fixes: 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When opening a directory for reading it, we set the last index where we
stop iteration to the value in struct btrfs_inode::index_cnt. That value
does not match the index of the most recently added directory entry but
it's instead the index number that will be assigned the next directory
entry.
This means that if after the call to opendir(3) new directory entries are
added, a readdir(3) call will return the first new directory entry. This
is fine because POSIX says the following [1]:
"If a file is removed from or added to the directory after the most
recent call to opendir() or rewinddir(), whether a subsequent call to
readdir() returns an entry for that file is unspecified."
For example for the test script from commit 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix
infinite directory reads"), where we have 2000 files in a directory, ext4
doesn't return any new directory entry after opendir(3), while xfs returns
the first 13 new directory entries added after the opendir(3) call.
If we move to a shorter example with an empty directory when opendir(3) is
called, and 2 files added to the directory after the opendir(3) call, then
readdir(3) on btrfs will return the first file, ext4 and xfs return the 2
files (but in a different order). A test program for this, reported by
Ian Johnson, is the following:
#include <dirent.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
DIR *dir = opendir("test");
FILE *file;
file = fopen("test/1", "w");
fwrite("1", 1, 1, file);
fclose(file);
file = fopen("test/2", "w");
fwrite("2", 1, 1, file);
fclose(file);
struct dirent *entry;
while ((entry = readdir(dir))) {
printf("%s\n", entry->d_name);
}
closedir(dir);
return 0;
}
To make this less odd, change the behaviour to never return new entries
that were added after the opendir(3) call. This is done by setting the
last_index field of the struct btrfs_file_private attached to the
directory's file handle with a value matching btrfs_inode::index_cnt
minus 1, since that value always matches the index of the next new
directory entry and not the index of the most recently added entry.
[1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904875/functions/readdir_r.html
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YR1P0S.NGASEG570GJ8@ianjohnson.dev/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have been consistently seeing hangs with generic/648 in our subpage
GitHub CI setup. This is a classic deadlock, we are calling
btrfs_read_folio() on a folio, which requires holding the folio lock on
the folio, and then finding a ordered extent that overlaps that range
and calling btrfs_start_ordered_extent(), which then tries to write out
the dirty page, which requires taking the folio lock and then we
deadlock.
The hang happens because we're writing to range [1271750656, 1271767040),
page index [77621, 77622], and page 77621 is !Uptodate. It is also Dirty,
so we call btrfs_read_folio() for 77621 and which does
btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range() for that range, and we find an ordered
extent which is [1271644160, 1271746560), page index [77615, 77621].
The page indexes overlap, but the actual bytes don't overlap. We're
holding the page lock for 77621, then call
btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range() which tries to flush the dirty
page, and tries to lock 77621 again and then we deadlock.
The byte ranges do not overlap, but with subpage support if we clear
uptodate on any portion of the page we mark the entire thing as not
uptodate.
We have been clearing page uptodate on write errors, but no other file
system does this, and is in fact incorrect. This doesn't hurt us in the
!subpage case because we can't end up with overlapped ranges that don't
also overlap on the page.
Fix this by not clearing uptodate when we have a write error. The only
thing we should be doing in this case is setting the mapping error and
carrying on. This makes it so we would no longer call
btrfs_read_folio() on the page as it's uptodate and eliminates the
deadlock.
With this patch we're now able to make it through a full fstests run on
our subpage blocksize VMs.
Note for stable backports: this probably goes beyond 6.1 but the code
has been cleaned up and clearing the uptodate bit must be verified on
each version independently.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This was noticed by Miklos that file_remove_privs might call into
notify_change(), which requires to hold an exclusive lock. The problem
exists in FUSE and btrfs. We can fix it without any additional helpers
from VFS, in case the privileges would need to be dropped, change the
lock type to be exclusive and redo the loop.
Fixes: e9adabb9712e ("btrfs: use shared lock for direct writes within EOF")
CC: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Remove a number of hidden calls to compound_head() by using a folio
throughout. Also follow core kernel coding style by adding the folio to
the page cache immediately after allocation instead of doing the read
first, then adding it to the page cache. This ordering makes subsequent
readers block waiting for the first reader instead of duplicating the
work only to throw it away when they find out they lost the race.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The wiki has been archived and is not updated anymore. Remove or replace
the links in files that contain it (MAINTAINERS, Kconfig, docs).
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When removing a delayed item, or releasing which will remove it as well,
we will modify one of the delayed node's rbtrees and item counter if the
delayed item is in one of the rbtrees. This require having the delayed
node's mutex locked, otherwise we will race with other tasks modifying
the rbtrees and the counter.
This is motivated by a previous version of another patch actually calling
btrfs_release_delayed_item() after unlocking the delayed node's mutex and
against a delayed item that is in a rbtree.
So assert at __btrfs_remove_delayed_item() that the delayed node's mutex
is locked.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item
into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we
have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is
fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before
calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending
snapshots in the transaction commit path).
So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.
This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because
it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow
we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we fail to add a delayed dir index item because there's already another
item with the same index number, we print an error message (and then BUG).
However that message isn't very helpful to debug anything because we don't
know what's the index number and what are the values of index counters in
the inode and its delayed inode (index_cnt fields of struct btrfs_inode
and struct btrfs_delayed_node).
So update the error message to include the index number and counters.
We actually had a recent case where this issue was hit by a syzbot report
(see the link below).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
After commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap"), the DEBUG section of btree_dirty_folio() would
no longer compile.
[CAUSE]
If DEBUG is defined, we would do extra checks for btree_dirty_folio(),
mostly to make sure the range we marked dirty has an extent buffer and
that extent buffer is dirty.
For subpage, we need to iterate through all the extent buffers covered
by that page range, and make sure they all matches the criteria.
However commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap") changes how we store the bitmap, we pack all the
16 bits bitmaps into a larger bitmap, which would save some space.
This means we no longer have btrfs_subpage::dirty_bitmap, instead the
dirty bitmap is starting at btrfs_subpage_info::dirty_offset, and has a
length of btrfs_subpage_info::bitmap_nr_bits.
[FIX]
Although I'm not sure if it still makes sense to maintain such code, at
least let it compile.
This patch would let us test the bits one by one through the bitmaps.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current
transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for. This means we
expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the
ordered extent. However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean
it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the
"ASSERT(trans)" check. This is obviously incorrect, and the code
properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist. Fix
this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
delayed items
When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then
we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the
delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example,
btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent
buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the
delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the
delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported
by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline]
lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781
up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625
btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline]
btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239
search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376
btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline]
btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline]
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153
flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078
process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600
worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751
kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
__mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
__do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
__se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257:
#0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline]
#0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287
#1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
__mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
__do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
__se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8
</TASK>
------------[ cut here ]------------
Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the
error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items().
Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Internally I got a report of very long stalls on normal operations like
creating a new file when auto relocation was running. The reporter used
the 'bpf offcputime' tracer to show that we would get stuck in
start_transaction for 5 to 30 seconds, and were always being woken up by
the transaction commit.
Using my timing-everything script, which times how long a function takes
and what percentage of that total time is taken up by its children, I
saw several traces like this
1083 took 32812902424 ns
29929002926 ns 91.2110% wait_for_commit_duration
25568 ns 7.7920e-05% commit_fs_roots_duration
1007751 ns 0.00307% commit_cowonly_roots_duration
446855602 ns 1.36182% btrfs_run_delayed_refs_duration
271980 ns 0.00082% btrfs_run_delayed_items_duration
2008 ns 6.1195e-06% btrfs_apply_pending_changes_duration
9656 ns 2.9427e-05% switch_commit_roots_duration
1598 ns 4.8700e-06% btrfs_commit_device_sizes_duration
4314 ns 1.3147e-05% btrfs_free_log_root_tree_duration
Here I was only tracing functions that happen where we are between
START_COMMIT and UNBLOCKED in order to see what would be keeping us
blocked for so long. The wait_for_commit() we do is where we wait for a
previous transaction that hasn't completed it's commit. This can
include all of the unpin work and other cleanups, which tends to be the
longest part of our transaction commit.
There is no reason we should be blocking new things from entering the
transaction at this point, it just adds to random latency spikes for no
reason.
Fix this by adding a PREP stage. This allows us to properly deal with
multiple committers coming in at the same time, we retain the behavior
that the winner waits on the previous transaction and the losers all
wait for this transaction commit to occur. Nothing else is blocked
during the PREP stage, and then once the wait is complete we switch to
COMMIT_START and all of the same behavior as before is maintained.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
During the ino lookup ioctl we can end up calling btrfs_iget() to get an
inode reference while we are holding on a root's btree. If btrfs_iget()
needs to lookup the inode from the root's btree, because it's not
currently loaded in memory, then it will need to lock another or the
same path in the same root btree. This may result in a deadlock and
trigger the following lockdep splat:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor277/5012 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802df41710 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
btrfs_search_slot+0x13a4/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2302
btrfs_init_root_free_objectid+0x148/0x320 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4955
btrfs_init_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1128 [inline]
btrfs_get_root_ref+0x5ae/0xae0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1338
btrfs_get_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1390 [inline]
open_ctree+0x29c8/0x3030 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3494
btrfs_fill_super+0x1c7/0x2f0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1154
btrfs_mount_root+0x7e0/0x910 fs/btrfs/super.c:1519
legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1112 [inline]
vfs_kern_mount+0xbc/0x150 fs/namespace.c:1142
btrfs_mount+0x39f/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1579
legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0 fs/namespace.c:3335
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d9/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3861
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(btrfs-tree-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
rlock(btrfs-tree-01);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor277/5012:
#0: ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5012 Comm: syz-executor277 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f0bec94ea39
Fix this simply by releasing the path before calling btrfs_iget() as at
point we don't need the path anymore.
Reported-by: syzbot+bf66ad948981797d2f1d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000045fa140603c4a969@google.com/
Fixes: 23d0b79dfaed ("btrfs: Add unprivileged version of ino_lookup ioctl")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit 675dfe1223a6 ("btrfs: fix block group item corruption after
inserting new block group") fixed one race that resulted in not persisting
a block group's item when its "used" bytes field decreases to zero.
However there's another race that can happen in a much shorter time window
that results in the same problem. The following sequence of steps explains
how it can happen:
1) Task A creates a metadata block group X, its "used" and "commit_used"
fields are initialized to 0;
2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is
updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0;
3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block
group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with
a value of 32K and its "commit_used" field with a value of 0. However
that fails since the block group item was not yet inserted, so at
update_block_group_item(), the btrfs_search_slot() call returns 1, and
then we set 'ret' to -ENOENT. Before jumping to the label 'fail'...
4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its
transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting
the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a
"used" field having a value of 32K and setting "commit_used", in struct
btrfs_block_group, to the same value (32K);
5) Task B jumps to the 'fail' label and then resets the "commit_used"
field to 0. At btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), because -ENOENT was
returned from update_block_group_item(), we add the block group again
to the list of dirty block groups, so that we will try again in the
critical section of the transaction commit when calling
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups();
6) Later the two extents from block group X are freed, so its "used" field
becomes 0;
7) If no more extents are allocated from block group X before we get into
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), then when we call
update_block_group_item() again for block group X, we will not update
the block group item to reflect that it has 0 bytes used, because the
"used" and "commit_used" fields in struct btrfs_block_group have the
same value, a value of 0.
As a result after committing the transaction we have an empty block
group with its block group item having a 32K value for its "used" field.
This will trigger errors from fsck ("btrfs check" command) and after
mounting again the fs, the cleaner kthread will not automatically delete
the empty block group, since its "used" field is not 0. Possibly there
are other issues due to this inconsistency.
When this issue happens, the error reported by fsck is like this:
[1/7] checking root items
[2/7] checking extents
block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0
ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
(...)
So fix this by not resetting the "commit_used" field of a block group when
we don't find the block group item at update_block_group_item().
Fixes: 7248e0cebbef ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When doing a relocation, there is a chance that at the time of
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(), there is no checksum for the corresponding
region.
In this case, btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned()'s sum points to an invalid item
and so ordered_extent's logical is set to some invalid value. Then,
btrfs_lookup_block_group() in btrfs_zone_finish_endio() failed to find a
block group and will hit an assert or a null pointer dereference as
following.
This can be reprodcued by running btrfs/028 several times (e.g, 4 to 16
times) with a null_blk setup. The device's zone size and capacity is set to
32 MB and the storage size is set to 5 GB on my setup.
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f]
CPU: 6 PID: 3105720 Comm: kworker/u16:13 Tainted: G W 6.5.0-rc6-kts+ #1
Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 2.0 12/17/2015
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
Code: 41 54 49 89 fc 55 48 89 f5 53 e8 57 7d fc ff 48 8d b8 88 00 00 00 48 89 c3 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00
> 3c 02 00 0f 85 02 01 00 00 f6 83 88 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a8 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffff88833cf87b08 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088
RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102877b827
R10: ffff888143bdc13b R11: ffff888125b1cbc0 R12: ffff888143bdc000
R13: 0000000000007000 R14: ffff888125b1cba8 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88881e500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f3ed85223d5 CR3: 00000001519b4005 CR4: 00000000001706e0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0
? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x19/0x160 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x7b8/0x1de0 [btrfs]
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
? lock_release+0x47a/0x620
? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x59b/0x800 [btrfs]
? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x358/0x800 [btrfs]
? __smp_call_single_queue+0x124/0x350
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
btrfs_work_helper+0x19f/0xc60 [btrfs]
? __pfx_try_to_wake_up+0x10/0x10
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
process_one_work+0x8c1/0x1430
? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x52/0x60
worker_thread+0x100/0x12c0
? __kthread_parkme+0xc1/0x1f0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x2ea/0x3c0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
On the zoned mode, writing to pre-allocated region means data relocation
write. Such write always uses WRITE command so there is no need of splitting
and rewriting logical address. Thus, we can just skip the function for the
case.
Fixes: cbfce4c7fbde ("btrfs: optimize the logical to physical mapping for zoned writes")
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This reproduces the bug fixed by "btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in
btrfs_drop_extent_map_range", we were improperly calculating the range
for the split extent. Add a test that exercises this scenario and
validates that we get the correct resulting extent_maps in our tree.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This helper is different from the normal add_extent_mapping in that it
will stuff an em into a gap that exists between overlapping em's in the
tree. It appeared there was a bug so I wrote a self test to validate it
did the correct thing when it worked with two side by side ems.
Thankfully it is correct, but more testing is better.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While investigating weird problems with the extent_map I wrote a self
test testing the various edge cases of btrfs_drop_extent_map_range.
This can split in different ways and behaves different in each case, so
test the various edge cases to make sure everything is functioning
properly.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker()
Currently the scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker() only does reads to
rebuild the corrupted sectors, it doesn't do any writeback.
The design is mostly to put writeback into a more ordered manner, to
co-operate with dev-replace with zoned mode, which requires every write
to be submitted in their bytenr order.
However the writeback for repaired sectors into the original mirror
doesn't need such strong sync requirement, as it can only happen for
non-zoned devices.
This patch would move the writeback for repaired sectors into
scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(), which removes two calls sites for
repaired sectors writeback. (one from flush_scrub_stripes(), one from
scrub_raid56_parity_stripe())
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The workqueue fs_info->scrub_worker would go ordered workqueue if it's a
device replace operation.
However the scrub is relying on multiple workers to do data csum
verification, and we always submit several read requests in a row.
Thus there is no need to use ordered workqueue just for dev-replace.
We have extra synchronization (the main thread will always
submit-and-wait for dev-replace writes) to handle it for zoned devices.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[REGRESSION]
There are several regression reports about the scrub performance with
v6.4 kernel.
On a PCIe 3.0 device, the old v6.3 kernel can go 3GB/s scrub speed, but
v6.4 can only go 1GB/s, an obvious 66% performance drop.
[CAUSE]
Iostat shows a very different behavior between v6.3 and v6.4 kernel:
Device r/s rkB/s rrqm/s %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz %util
nvme0n1p3 9731.00 3425544.00 17237.00 63.92 2.18 352.02 21.18 100.00
nvme0n1p3 15578.00 993616.00 5.00 0.03 0.09 63.78 1.32 100.00
The upper one is v6.3 while the lower one is v6.4.
There are several obvious differences:
- Very few read merges
This turns out to be a behavior change that we no longer do bio
plug/unplug.
- Very low aqu-sz
This is due to the submit-and-wait behavior of flush_scrub_stripes(),
and extra extent/csum tree search.
Both behaviors are not that obvious on SATA SSDs, as SATA SSDs have NCQ
to merge the reads, while SATA SSDs can not handle high queue depth well
either.
[FIX]
For now this patch focuses on the read speed fix. Dev-replace replace
speed needs more work.
For the read part, we go two directions to fix the problems:
- Re-introduce blk plug/unplug to merge read requests
This is pretty simple, and the behavior is pretty easy to observe.
This would enlarge the average read request size to 512K.
- Introduce multi-group reads and no longer wait for each group
Instead of the old behavior, which submits 8 stripes and waits for
them, here we would enlarge the total number of stripes to 16 * 8.
Which is 8M per device, the same limit as the old scrub in-flight
bios size limit.
Now every time we fill a group (8 stripes), we submit them and
continue to next stripes.
Only when the full 16 * 8 stripes are all filled, we submit the
remaining ones (the last group), and wait for all groups to finish.
Then submit the repair writes and dev-replace writes.
This should enlarge the queue depth.
This would greatly improve the merge rate (thus read block size) and
queue depth:
Before (with regression, and cached extent/csum path):
Device r/s rkB/s rrqm/s %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz %util
nvme0n1p3 20666.00 1318240.00 10.00 0.05 0.08 63.79 1.63 100.00
After (with all patches applied):
nvme0n1p3 5165.00 2278304.00 30557.00 85.54 0.55 441.10 2.81 100.00
i.e. 1287 to 2224 MB/s.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
One of the bottleneck of the new scrub code is the extra csum tree
search.
The old code would only do the csum tree search for each scrub bio,
which can be as large as 512KiB, thus they can afford to allocate a new
path each time.
But the new scrub code is doing csum tree search for each stripe, which
is only 64KiB, this means we'd better re-use the same csum path during
each search.
This patch would introduce a per-sctx path for csum tree search, as we
don't need to re-allocate the path every time we need to do a csum tree
search.
With this change we can further improve the queue depth and improve the
scrub read performance:
Before (with regression and cached extent tree path):
Device r/s rkB/s rrqm/s %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz %util
nvme0n1p3 15875.00 1013328.00 12.00 0.08 0.08 63.83 1.35 100.00
After (with both cached extent/csum tree path):
nvme0n1p3 17759.00 1133280.00 10.00 0.06 0.08 63.81 1.50 100.00
Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since commit e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror()
to scrub_stripe infrastructure"), scrub no longer re-use the same path
for extent tree search.
This can lead to unnecessary extent tree search, especially for the new
stripe based scrub, as we have way more stripes to prepare.
This patch would re-introduce a shared path for extent tree search, and
properly release it when the block group is scrubbed.
This change alone can improve scrub performance slightly by reducing the
time spend preparing the stripe thus improving the queue depth.
Before (with regression):
Device r/s rkB/s rrqm/s %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz %util
nvme0n1p3 15578.00 993616.00 5.00 0.03 0.09 63.78 1.32 100.00
After (with this patch):
nvme0n1p3 15875.00 1013328.00 12.00 0.08 0.08 63.83 1.35 100.00
Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs supports creating nested subvolumes however snapshots are not
recursive. When a snapshot is taken of a volume which contains a
subvolume the subvolume is replaced with a stub subvolume which has the
same name and uses inode number 2[1]. The stub subvolume kept the
directory name but did not set the time or permissions of the stub
subvolume. This resulted in all time information being the current time
and ownership defaulting to root. When subvolumes and snapshots are
created using unshare this results in a snapshot directory the user
created but has no permissions for.
Test case:
[vmuser@archvm ~]# sudo -i
[root@archvm ~]# mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/test
[root@archvm ~]# chown vmuser:users /mnt/btrfs/test/
[root@archvm ~]# exit
logout
[vmuser@archvm ~]$ cd /mnt/btrfs/test
[vmuser@archvm test]$ unshare --user --keep-caps --map-auto --map-root-user
[root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume create subvolume
Create subvolume './subvolume'
[root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume create subvolume/subsubvolume
Create subvolume 'subvolume/subsubvolume'
[root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume snapshot subvolume snapshot
Create a snapshot of 'subvolume' in './snapshot'
[root@archvm test]# exit
logout
[vmuser@archvm test]$ tree -ug
[vmuser users ] .
├── [vmuser users ] snapshot
│ └── [vmuser users ] subsubvolume <-- Without patch perm is root:root
└── [vmuser users ] subvolume
└── [vmuser users ] subsubvolume
5 directories, 0 files
[1] https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-subvolume.html#nested-subvolumes
Signed-off-by: Lee Trager <lee@trager.us>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_readdir_delayed_dir_index(), called when reading a directory, we
have this check for an empty list to return immediately, but it's not
needed since list_for_each_entry_safe(), called immediately after, is
prepared to deal with an empty list, it simply does nothing. So remove
the empty list check.
Besides shorter source code, it also slightly reduces the binary text
size:
Before this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1609408 167269 16864 1793541 1b5e05 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1609392 167269 16864 1793525 1b5df5 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
fs_devices::metadata_uuid value is already updated based on the
super_block::METADATA_UUID flag for either fsid or metadata_uuid as
appropriate. So, fs_devices::metadata_uuid can be used directly.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the metadata_uuid in
the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to
do that.
Such as in the following stacks:
write_all_supers()
sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
scrub_one_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
And
check_dev_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::metadata_uuid
instead. Fix this using the correct metadata_uuid in the superblock
argument.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided
superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that.
Such as in the following stack:
write_all_supers()
sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
scrub_one_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
And
check_dev_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead,
which is not correct. Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock
argument.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is a helper which provides either metadata_uuid or fsid as per
METADATA_UUID flag. So use it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In some cases, we need to read the FSID from the superblock when the
metadata_uuid is not set, and otherwise, read the metadata_uuid. So,
add a helper.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have
any report from the community either.
So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error handling, and just
treat them as regular extent tree corruption.
This patch would remove the btrfs_print_v0_err() helper, and enhance the
involved error handling to treat them just as any extent tree
corruption. No reports regarding v0 extents have been seen since the
graceful handling was added in 2018.
This involves:
- btrfs_backref_add_tree_node()
This change is a little tricky, the new code is changed to only handle
BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY.
But this is safe, as we have rejected any unknown inline refs through
btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type().
For keyed backrefs, we're safe to skip anything we don't know (that's
if it can pass tree-checker in the first place).
- btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
- lookup_inline_extent_backref()
- run_delayed_extent_op()
- __btrfs_free_extent()
- add_tree_block()
Regular error handling of unexpected extent tree item, and abort
transaction (if we have a trans handle).
- remove_extent_data_ref()
It's pretty much the same as the regular rejection of unknown backref
key.
But for this particular case, we can also remove a BUG_ON().
- extent_data_ref_count()
We can remove the BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY BUG_ON(), as it would be
rejected by the only caller.
- btrfs_print_leaf()
Remove the handling for BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
Syzbot reported several warning triggered inside
lookup_inline_extent_backref().
[CAUSE]
As usual, the reproducer doesn't reliably trigger locally here, but at
least we know the WARN_ON() is triggered when an inline backref can not
be found, and it can only be triggered when @insert is true. (I.e.
inserting a new inline backref, which means the backref should already
exist)
[ENHANCEMENT]
After the WARN_ON(), dump all the parameters and the extent tree
leaf to help debug.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d6f9ff86c1d804ba2bc6
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Having the assert in the actual helper documents the pre-conditions
much better than having it in the caller, so move it.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Share the calls to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc for btrfs_path allocation
failure handling and the normal exit path.
This relies on btrfs_free_path ignoring a NULL pointer, and the
initialization of cur_offset to start at the beginning of the function.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Use the block group pointer used to track the outstanding NOCOW writes as
a boolean to remove the duplicate nocow variable, and keep it contained
in the main loop to simplify the logic.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When run_delalloc_nocow has cow_start set to a value other than (u64)-1,
it has delayed COW writeback pending behind cur_offset. When an error
occurs in such a window, the range going back to cow_start and not just
cur_offset needs to be unlocked, but only two error cases handle this
correctly Move the code to handle unlock the COW range to the common
error handling label and document the logic.
To make things even more complicated, cow_file_range as called by
fallback_to_cow will unlock the range it is operating on when it fails as
well, so we need to reset cow_start right after caling fallback_to_cow
instead of only when it succeeded.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When multiple writes happen at once, we may need to sacrifice a currently
active block group to be zone finished for a new allocation. We choose a
block group with the least free space left, and zone finish it.
To do the finishing, we need to send IOs for already allocated region
and wait for them and on-going IOs. Otherwise, these IOs fail because the
zone is already finished at the time the IO reach a device.
However, if a block group dedicated to the data relocation is zone
finished, there is a chance that finishing it before an ongoing write IO
reaches the device. That is because there is timing gap between an
allocation is done (block_group->reservations == 0, as pre-allocation is
done) and an ordered extent is created when the relocation IO starts.
Thus, if we finish the zone between them, we can fail the IOs.
We cannot simply use "fs_info->data_reloc_bg == block_group->start" to
avoid the zone finishing. Because, the data_reloc_bg may already switch to
a new block group, while there are still ongoing write IOs to the old
data_reloc_bg.
So, this patch reworks the BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONED_DATA_RELOC bit to
indicate there is a data relocation allocation and/or ongoing write to the
block group. The bit is set on allocation and cleared in end_io function of
the last IO for the currently allocated region.
To change the timing of the bit setting also solves the issue that the bit
being left even after there is no IO going on. With the current code, if
the data_reloc_bg switches after the last IO to the current data_reloc_bg,
the bit is set at this timing and there is no one clearing that bit. As a
result, that block group is kept unallocatable for anything.
Fixes: 343d8a30851c ("btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG")
Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
