summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ubifs/shrinker.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-08-15ubifs: tnc: use monotonic znode timestampArnd Bergmann1-1/+1
The tnc uses get_seconds() based timestamps to check the age of a znode, which has two problems: on 32-bit architectures this may overflow in 2038 or 2106, and it gives incorrect information when the system time is updated using settimeofday(). Using montonic timestamps with ktime_get_seconds() solves both thes problems. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2014-06-02UBIFS: Remove incorrect assertion in shrink_tnc()hujianyang1-1/+0
I hit the same assert failed as Dolev Raviv reported in Kernel v3.10 shows like this: [ 9641.164028] UBIFS assert failed in shrink_tnc at 131 (pid 13297) [ 9641.234078] CPU: 1 PID: 13297 Comm: mmap.test Tainted: G O 3.10.40 #1 [ 9641.234116] [<c0011a6c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c000d0b0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [ 9641.234137] [<c000d0b0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c0311134>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x28) [ 9641.234188] [<c0311134>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x28) from [<bf22425c>] (shrink_tnc_trees+0x25c/0x350 [ubifs]) [ 9641.234265] [<bf22425c>] (shrink_tnc_trees+0x25c/0x350 [ubifs]) from [<bf2245ac>] (ubifs_shrinker+0x25c/0x310 [ubifs]) [ 9641.234307] [<bf2245ac>] (ubifs_shrinker+0x25c/0x310 [ubifs]) from [<c00cdad8>] (shrink_slab+0x1d4/0x2f8) [ 9641.234327] [<c00cdad8>] (shrink_slab+0x1d4/0x2f8) from [<c00d03d0>] (do_try_to_free_pages+0x300/0x544) [ 9641.234344] [<c00d03d0>] (do_try_to_free_pages+0x300/0x544) from [<c00d0a44>] (try_to_free_pages+0x2d0/0x398) [ 9641.234363] [<c00d0a44>] (try_to_free_pages+0x2d0/0x398) from [<c00c6a60>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x494/0x7e8) [ 9641.234382] [<c00c6a60>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x494/0x7e8) from [<c00f62d8>] (new_slab+0x78/0x238) [ 9641.234400] [<c00f62d8>] (new_slab+0x78/0x238) from [<c031081c>] (__slab_alloc.constprop.42+0x1a4/0x50c) [ 9641.234419] [<c031081c>] (__slab_alloc.constprop.42+0x1a4/0x50c) from [<c00f80e8>] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x54/0x188) [ 9641.234459] [<c00f80e8>] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x54/0x188) from [<bf227908>] (do_readpage+0x168/0x468 [ubifs]) [ 9641.234553] [<bf227908>] (do_readpage+0x168/0x468 [ubifs]) from [<bf2296a0>] (ubifs_readpage+0x424/0x464 [ubifs]) [ 9641.234606] [<bf2296a0>] (ubifs_readpage+0x424/0x464 [ubifs]) from [<c00c17c0>] (filemap_fault+0x304/0x418) [ 9641.234638] [<c00c17c0>] (filemap_fault+0x304/0x418) from [<c00de694>] (__do_fault+0xd4/0x530) [ 9641.234665] [<c00de694>] (__do_fault+0xd4/0x530) from [<c00e10c0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x480/0xf54) [ 9641.234690] [<c00e10c0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x480/0xf54) from [<c00e2bf8>] (handle_mm_fault+0x140/0x184) [ 9641.234716] [<c00e2bf8>] (handle_mm_fault+0x140/0x184) from [<c0316688>] (do_page_fault+0x150/0x3ac) [ 9641.234737] [<c0316688>] (do_page_fault+0x150/0x3ac) from [<c000842c>] (do_DataAbort+0x3c/0xa0) [ 9641.234759] [<c000842c>] (do_DataAbort+0x3c/0xa0) from [<c0314e38>] (__dabt_usr+0x38/0x40) After analyzing the code, I found a condition that may cause this failed in correct operations. Thus, I think this assertion is wrong and should be removed. Suppose there are two clean znodes and one dirty znode in TNC. So the per-filesystem atomic_t @clean_zn_cnt is (2). If commit start, dirty_znode is set to COW_ZNODE in get_znodes_to_commit() in case of potentially ops on this znode. We clear COW bit and DIRTY bit in write_index() without @tnc_mutex locked. We don't increase @clean_zn_cnt in this place. As the comments in write_index() shows, if another process hold @tnc_mutex and dirty this znode after we clean it, @clean_zn_cnt would be decreased to (1). We will increase @clean_zn_cnt to (2) with @tnc_mutex locked in free_obsolete_znodes() to keep it right. If shrink_tnc() performs between decrease and increase, it will release other 2 clean znodes it holds and found @clean_zn_cnt is less than zero (1 - 2 = -1), then hit the assertion. Because free_obsolete_znodes() will soon correct @clean_zn_cnt and no harm to fs in this case, I think this assertion could be removed. 2 clean zondes and 1 dirty znode, @clean_zn_cnt == 2 Thread A (commit) Thread B (write or others) Thread C (shrinker) ->write_index ->clear_bit(DIRTY_NODE) ->clear_bit(COW_ZNODE) @clean_zn_cnt == 2 ->mutex_locked(&tnc_mutex) ->dirty_cow_znode ->!ubifs_zn_cow(znode) ->!test_and_set_bit(DIRTY_NODE) ->atomic_dec(&clean_zn_cnt) ->mutex_unlocked(&tnc_mutex) @clean_zn_cnt == 1 ->mutex_locked(&tnc_mutex) ->shrink_tnc ->destroy_tnc_subtree ->atomic_sub(&clean_zn_cnt, 2) ->ubifs_assert <- hit ->mutex_unlocked(&tnc_mutex) @clean_zn_cnt == -1 ->mutex_lock(&tnc_mutex) ->free_obsolete_znodes ->atomic_inc(&clean_zn_cnt) ->mutux_unlock(&tnc_mutex) @clean_zn_cnt == 0 (correct after shrink) Signed-off-by: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
2013-09-11fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count APIDave Chinner1-11/+18
Convert the filesystem shrinkers to use the new API, and standardise some of the behaviours of the shrinkers at the same time. For example, nr_to_scan means the number of objects to scan, not the number of objects to free. I refactored the CIFS idmap shrinker a little - it really needs to be broken up into a shrinker per tree and keep an item count with the tree root so that we don't need to walk the tree every time the shrinker needs to count the number of objects in the tree (i.e. all the time under memory pressure). [glommer@openvz.org: fixes for ext4, ubifs, nfs, cifs and glock. Fixes are needed mainly due to new code merged in the tree] [assorted fixes folded in] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-06-03UBIFS: fix shrinker object count reportsArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+5
Sometimes VM asks the shrinker to return amount of objects it can shrink, and we return the ubifs_clean_zn_cnt in that case. However, it is possible that this counter is negative for a short period of time, due to the way UBIFS TNC code updates it. And I can observe the following warnings sometimes: shrink_slab: ubifs_shrinker+0x0/0x2b7 [ubifs] negative objects to delete nr=-8541616642706119788 This patch makes sure UBIFS never returns negative count of objects. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2011-05-29cifs/ubifs: Fix shrinker API change falloutAl Viro1-1/+2
Commit 1495f230fa77 ("vmscan: change shrinker API by passing shrink_control struct") changed the API of ->shrink(), but missed ubifs and cifs instances. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-09-19UBIFS: introduce new flags for RO mountsArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+1
Commit 2fde99cb55fb9d9b88180512a5e8a5d939d27fec "UBIFS: mark VFS SB RO too" introduced regression. This commit made UBIFS set the 'MS_RDONLY' flag in the VFS superblock when it switches to R/O mode due to an error. This was done to make VFS show the R/O UBIFS flag in /proc/mounts. However, several places in UBIFS relied on the 'MS_RDONLY' flag and assume this flag can only change when we re-mount. For example, 'ubifs_put_super()'. This patch introduces new UBIFS flag - 'c->ro_mount' which changes only when we re-mount, and preserves the way UBIFS was originally mounted (R/W or R/O). This allows us to de-initialize UBIFS cleanly in 'ubifs_put_super()'. This patch also changes all 'ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media)' assertions to 'ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media && !c->ro_mount)', because we never should write anything if the FS was mounter R/O. All the places where we test for 'MS_RDONLY' flag in the VFS SB were changed and now we test the 'c->ro_mount' flag instead, because it preserves the original UBIFS mount type, unlike the 'MS_RDONLY' flag. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2010-09-17UBIFS: introduce new flag for RO due to errorsArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+1
The R/O state may have various reasons: 1. The UBI volume is R/O 2. The FS is mounted R/O 3. The FS switched to R/O mode because of an error However, in UBIFS we have only one variable which represents cases 1 and 3 - 'c->ro_media'. Indeed, we set this to 1 if we switch to R/O mode due to an error, and then we test it in many places to make sure that we stop writing as soon as the error happens. But this is very unclean. One consequence of this, for example, is that in 'ubifs_remount_fs()' we use 'c->ro_media' to check whether we are in R/O mode because on an error, and we print a message in this case. However, if we are in R/O mode because the media is R/O, our message is bogus. This patch introduces new flag - 'c->ro_error' which is set when we switch to R/O mode because of an error. It also changes all "if (c->ro_media)" checks to "if (c->ro_error)" checks, because this is what the checks actually mean. We do not need to check for 'c->ro_media' because if the UBI volume is in R/O mode, we do not allow R/W mounting, and now writes can happen. This is guaranteed by VFS. But it is good to double-check this, so this patch also adds many "ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media)" checks. In the 'ubifs_remount_fs()' function this patch makes a bit more changes - it fixes the error messages as well. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2010-07-19mm: add context argument to shrinker callbackDave Chinner1-1/+1
The current shrinker implementation requires the registered callback to have global state to work from. This makes it difficult to shrink caches that are not global (e.g. per-filesystem caches). Pass the shrinker structure to the callback so that users can embed the shrinker structure in the context the shrinker needs to operate on and get back to it in the callback via container_of(). Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2009-02-17UBIFS: list usage cleanupEric Sesterhenn1-4/+2
Trivial cleanup, list_del(); list_add{,_tail}() is equivalent to list_move{,_tail}(). Semantic patch for coccinelle can be found at www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/list_move_tail.spatch Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2009-01-06trivial: fix then -> than typos in comments and documentationFrederik Schwarzer1-1/+1
- (better, more, bigger ...) then -> (...) than Signed-off-by: Frederik Schwarzer <schwarzerf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2008-07-15UBIFS: add new flash file systemArtem Bityutskiy1-0/+322
This is a new flash file system. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>