| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit 6abfe107894af7e8ce3a2e120c619d81ee764ad5 ]
Copying the file system while it is mounted as read-only results in
a mount failure:
[~]# mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdc
[~]# mount /dev/sdc -o ro /mnt/test
[~]# dd if=/dev/sdc of=/dev/sda bs=1M
[~]# mount /dev/sda /mnt/test1
[ 1094.849826] JBD2: journal checksum error
[ 1094.850927] EXT4-fs (sda): Could not load journal inode
mount: mount /dev/sda on /mnt/test1 failed: Bad message
The process described above is just an abstracted way I came up with to
reproduce the issue. In the actual scenario, the file system was mounted
read-only and then copied while it was still mounted. It was found that
the mount operation failed. The user intended to verify the data or use
it as a backup, and this action was performed during a version upgrade.
Above issue may happen as follows:
ext4_fill_super
set_journal_csum_feature_set(sb)
if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(sb))
incompat = JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CSUM_V3;
if (test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)
jbd2_journal_set_features(sbi->s_journal, compat, 0, incompat);
lock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
sb->s_feature_incompat |= cpu_to_be32(incompat);
//The data in the journal sb was modified, but the checksum was not
updated, so the data remaining in memory has a mismatch between the
data and the checksum.
unlock_buffer(journal->j_sb_buffer);
In this case, the journal sb copied over is in a state where the checksum
and data are inconsistent, so mounting fails.
To solve the above issue, update the checksum in memory after modifying
the journal sb.
Fixes: 4fd5ea43bc11 ("jbd2: checksum journal superblock")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20251103010123.3753631-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[ Changed jbd2_superblock_csum(sb) to jbd2_superblock_csum(journal, sb) ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 40a71b53d5a6d4ea17e4d54b99b2ac03a7f5e783 upstream.
jbd2 journal handling code doesn't want jbd2_might_wait_for_commit()
to be placed between start_this_handle() and stop_this_handle(). So it
marks the region with rwsem_acquire_read() and rwsem_release().
However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have
to use more than try lock annotation for that.
rwsem_acquire_read() implies:
1. might be a waiter on contention of the lock.
2. enter to the critical section of the lock.
All we need in here is to act 2, not 1. So trylock version of
annotation is sufficient for that purpose. Now that dept partially
relies on lockdep annotaions, dept interpets rwsem_acquire_read() as a
potential wait and might report a deadlock by the wait.
Replace it with trylock version of annotation.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Message-ID: <20251024073940.1063-1-byungchul@sk.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
corrupted
commit 986835bf4d11032bba4ab8414d18fce038c61bb4 upstream.
There's issue when file system corrupted:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next
RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0
RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534
RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010
RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170
ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0
ext4_bread+0x11/0x100
ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0
ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0
ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920
vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740
do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0
__x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120
do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by
storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system
data.
In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block
bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where
a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the
following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course,
it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger
this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such
an image and easily reproduced this issue.
Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may
not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT()
directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is
clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead
of immediately invoking BUG_ON.
Fixes: 470decc613ab ("[PATCH] jbd2: initial copy of files from jbd")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20251025072657.307851-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 3c652c3a71de1d30d72dc82c3bead8deb48eb749 upstream.
When releasing file system metadata blocks in jbd2_journal_forget(), if
this buffer has not yet been checkpointed, it may have already been
written back, currently be in the process of being written back, or has
not yet written back. jbd2_journal_forget() calls
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint() to check the buffer's status and
add it to the current transaction if it has not been written back. This
buffer can only be reallocated after the transaction is committed.
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint() attempts to lock the buffer and
check its dirty status while holding the buffer lock. If the buffer has
already been written back, everything proceeds normally. However, there
are two issues. First, the function returns immediately if the buffer is
locked by the write-back process. It does not wait for the write-back to
complete. Consequently, until the current transaction is committed and
the block is reallocated, there is no guarantee that the I/O will
complete. This means that ongoing I/O could write stale metadata to the
newly allocated block, potentially corrupting data. Second, the function
unlocks the buffer as soon as it detects that the buffer is still dirty.
If a concurrent write-back occurs immediately after this unlocking and
before clear_buffer_dirty() is called in jbd2_journal_forget(), data
corruption can theoretically still occur.
Although these two issues are unlikely to occur in practice since the
undergoing metadata writeback I/O does not take this long to complete,
it's better to explicitly ensure that all ongoing I/O operations are
completed.
Fixes: 597599268e3b ("jbd2: discard dirty data when forgetting an un-journalled buffer")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20250916093337.3161016-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 9d98cf4632258720f18265a058e62fde120c0151 upstream.
Both jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() and jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list()
periodically release j_list_lock after processing a batch of buffers to
avoid long hold times on the j_list_lock. However, since both functions
contend for j_list_lock, the combined time spent waiting and processing
can be significant.
jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list() explicitly calls cond_resched() when
need_resched() is true to avoid softlockups during prolonged operations.
But jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() only exits its loop when need_resched() is
true, relying on potentially sleeping functions like __flush_batch() or
wait_on_buffer() to trigger rescheduling. If those functions do not sleep,
the kernel may hit a softlockup.
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 156s! [kworker/u129:2:373]
CPU: 3 PID: 373 Comm: kworker/u129:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.6.0+ #10
Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.27 06/13/2017
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:2)
pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x358/0x418
lr : jbd2_log_do_checkpoint+0x31c/0x438 [jbd2]
Call trace:
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x358/0x418
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint+0x31c/0x438 [jbd2]
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0xfc/0x2f8 [jbd2]
add_transaction_credits+0x3bc/0x418 [jbd2]
start_this_handle+0xf8/0x560 [jbd2]
jbd2__journal_start+0x118/0x228 [jbd2]
__ext4_journal_start_sb+0x110/0x188 [ext4]
ext4_do_writepages+0x3dc/0x740 [ext4]
ext4_writepages+0xa4/0x190 [ext4]
do_writepages+0x94/0x228
__writeback_single_inode+0x48/0x318
writeback_sb_inodes+0x204/0x590
__writeback_inodes_wb+0x54/0xf8
wb_writeback+0x2cc/0x3d8
wb_do_writeback+0x2e0/0x2f8
wb_workfn+0x80/0x2a8
process_one_work+0x178/0x3e8
worker_thread+0x234/0x3b8
kthread+0xf0/0x108
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
So explicitly call cond_resched() in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() to avoid
softlockup.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250812063752.912130-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit af98b0157adf6504fade79b3e6cb260c4ff68e37 upstream.
Since handle->h_transaction may be a NULL pointer, so we should change it
to call is_handle_aborted(handle) first before dereferencing it.
And the following data-race was reported in my fuzzer:
==================================================================
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata / jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata
write to 0xffff888011024104 of 4 bytes by task 10881 on cpu 1:
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x2a5/0x770 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1556
__ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xe7/0x4b0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:358
ext4_do_update_inode fs/ext4/inode.c:5220 [inline]
ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0x32c/0xd50 fs/ext4/inode.c:5869
__ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0xe1/0x450 fs/ext4/inode.c:6074
ext4_dirty_inode+0x98/0xc0 fs/ext4/inode.c:6103
....
read to 0xffff888011024104 of 4 bytes by task 10880 on cpu 0:
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0xf2/0x770 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1512
__ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xe7/0x4b0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:358
ext4_do_update_inode fs/ext4/inode.c:5220 [inline]
ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0x32c/0xd50 fs/ext4/inode.c:5869
__ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0xe1/0x450 fs/ext4/inode.c:6074
ext4_dirty_inode+0x98/0xc0 fs/ext4/inode.c:6103
....
value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0x00000001
==================================================================
This issue is caused by missing data-race annotation for jh->b_modified.
Therefore, the missing annotation needs to be added.
Reported-by: syzbot+de24c3fe3c4091051710@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=de24c3fe3c4091051710
Fixes: 6e06ae88edae ("jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250514130855.99010-1-aha310510@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit e6eff39dd0fe4190c6146069cc16d160e71d1148 upstream.
Journal emptiness is not determined by sb->s_sequence == 0 but rather by
sb->s_start == 0 (which is set a few lines above). Furthermore 0 is a
valid transaction ID so the check can spuriously trigger. Remove the
invalid WARN_ON.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250206094657.20865-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit a0851ea9cd555c333795b85ddd908898b937c4e1 ]
When committing transaction in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(), the
disk caches for the filesystem device should be flushed before updating
the journal tail sequence. However, this step is missed if the journal
is not located on the filesystem device. As a result, the filesystem may
become inconsistent following a power failure or system crash. Fix it by
ensuring that the filesystem device is flushed appropriately.
Fixes: 3339578f0578 ("jbd2: cleanup journal tail after transaction commit")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203014407.805916-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 6db3c1575a750fd417a70e0178bdf6efa0dd5037 upstream.
When a full journal commit is on-going, any fast commit has to be enqueued
into a different queue: FC_Q_STAGING instead of FC_Q_MAIN. This enqueueing
is done only once, i.e. if an inode is already queued in a previous fast
commit entry it won't be enqueued again. However, if a full commit starts
_after_ the inode is enqueued into FC_Q_MAIN, the next fast commit needs to
be done into FC_Q_STAGING. And this is not being done in function
ext4_fc_track_template().
This patch fixes the issue by re-enqueuing an inode into the STAGING queue
during the fast commit clean-up callback when doing a full commit. However,
to prevent a race with a fast-commit, the clean-up callback has to be called
with the journal locked.
This bug was found using fstest generic/047. This test creates several 32k
bytes files, sync'ing each of them after it's creation, and then shutting
down the filesystem. Some data may be loss in this operation; for example a
file may have it's size truncated to zero.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240717172220.14201-1-luis.henriques@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 7a6443e1dad70281f99f0bd394d7fd342481a632 upstream.
Function jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list() assumes that '0' is not a
valid value for transaction IDs, which is incorrect. Don't assume that and
use two extra boolean variables to control the loop iterations and keep
track of the first and last tid.
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240724161119.13448-4-luis.henriques@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 972090651ee15e51abfb2160e986fa050cfc7a40 upstream.
Function __jbd2_log_wait_for_space() assumes that '0' is not a valid value
for transaction IDs, which is incorrect. Don't assume that and invoke
jbd2_log_wait_commit() if the journal had a committing transaction instead.
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240724161119.13448-3-luis.henriques@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit f0e3c14802515f60a47e6ef347ea59c2733402aa upstream.
Use tid_geq to compare tids to work over sequence number wraps.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240801013815.2393869-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit f5cacdc6f2bb2a9bf214469dd7112b43dd2dd68a upstream.
In __jbd2_log_wait_for_space(), we might call jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail()
to recover some journal space. But if an error occurs while executing
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() (e.g., an EIO), we don't stop waiting for free
space right away, we try other branches, and if j_committing_transaction
is NULL (i.e., the tid is 0), we will get the following complain:
============================================
JBD2: I/O error when updating journal superblock for sdd-8.
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 256 blocks and only had 217 space available
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in sdd-8
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 139804 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:109 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 2 PID: 139804 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1
RIP: 0010:__jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
add_transaction_credits+0x5d1/0x5e0
start_this_handle+0x1ef/0x6a0
jbd2__journal_start+0x18b/0x340
ext4_dirty_inode+0x5d/0xb0
__mark_inode_dirty+0xe4/0x5d0
generic_update_time+0x60/0x70
[...]
============================================
So only if jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() returns 1, i.e., there is nothing to
clean up at the moment, continue to try to reclaim free space in other ways.
Note that this fix relies on commit 6f6a6fda2945 ("jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt
when updating journal superblock fails") to make jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail
return the correct error code.
Fixes: 8c3f25d8950c ("jbd2: don't give up looking for space so easily in __jbd2_log_wait_for_space")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240718115336.2554501-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit cc102aa24638b90e04364d64e4f58a1fa91a1976 ]
The new_bh is from alloc_buffer_head, we should call free_buffer_head to
free it in error case.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240514112438.1269037-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 4aa99c71e42ad60178c1154ec24e3df9c684fb67 upstream.
There's no reason to have jbd2_journal_get_max_txn_bufs() public
function. Currently all users are internal and can use
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers instead. This saves some unnecessary
recomputations of the limit as a bonus which becomes important as this
function gets more complex in the following patch.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240624170127.3253-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 6c02757c936063f0631b4e43fe156f8c8f1f351f ]
There's issue when do io test:
WARN: soft lockup - CPU#45 stuck for 11s! [jbd2/dm-2-8:4170]
CPU: 45 PID: 4170 Comm: jbd2/dm-2-8 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
show_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack+0xb0/0x100
watchdog_timer_fn+0x254/0x3f8
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x11c/0x380
hrtimer_interrupt+0xfc/0x2f8
arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x58
handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
generic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x58
__handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
gic_handle_irq+0x90/0x320
el1_irq+0xcc/0x180
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1d8/0x320
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x10f4/0x1c78 [jbd2]
kjournald2+0xec/0x2f0 [jbd2]
kthread+0x134/0x138
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Analyzed informations from vmcore as follows:
(1) There are about 5k+ jbd2_inode in 'commit_transaction->t_inode_list';
(2) Now is processing the 855th jbd2_inode;
(3) JBD2 task has TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag;
(4) There's no pags in address_space around the 855th jbd2_inode;
(5) There are some process is doing drop caches;
(6) Mounted with 'nodioread_nolock' option;
(7) 128 CPUs;
According to informations from vmcore we know 'journal->j_list_lock' spin lock
competition is fierce. So journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() maybe process
slowly. Theoretically, there is scheduling point in the filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors().
However, if inode's address_space has no pages which taged with PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK,
will not call cond_resched(). So may lead to soft lockup.
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers
filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors
__filemap_fdatawait_range
while (index <= end)
nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_range_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index, end, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
if (!nr_pages)
break; --> If 'nr_pages' is equal zero will break, then will not call cond_resched()
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
cond_resched();
To solve above issue, add scheduling point in the journal_finish_inode_data_buffers();
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211112544.3879780-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 85559227211020b270728104c3b89918f7af27ac ]
The write_flags print in the trace of jbd2_write_superblock() is not
real, so move the modification before the trace.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129114740.2686201-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
fs bdev
commit 61187fce8600e8ef90e601be84f9d0f3222c1206 upstream.
JBD2 makes sure journal data is fallen on fs device by sync_blockdev(),
however, other process could intercept the EIO information from bdev's
mapping, which leads journal recovering successful even EIO occurs during
data written back to fs device.
We found this problem in our product, iscsi + multipath is chosen for block
device of ext4. Unstable network may trigger kpartx to rescan partitions in
device mapper layer. Detailed process is shown as following:
mount kpartx irq
jbd2_journal_recover
do_one_pass
memcpy(nbh->b_data, obh->b_data) // copy data to fs dev from journal
mark_buffer_dirty // mark bh dirty
vfs_read
generic_file_read_iter // dio
filemap_write_and_wait_range
__filemap_fdatawrite_range
do_writepages
block_write_full_folio
submit_bh_wbc
>> EIO occurs in disk <<
end_buffer_async_write
mark_buffer_write_io_error
mapping_set_error
set_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // set!
filemap_check_errors
test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // clear!
err2 = sync_blockdev
filemap_write_and_wait
filemap_check_errors
test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // false
err2 = 0
Filesystem is mounted successfully even data from journal is failed written
into disk, and ext4/ocfs2 could become corrupted.
Fix it by comparing the wb_err state in fs block device before recovering
and after recovering.
A reproducer can be found in the kernel bugzilla referenced below.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217888
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919012525.1783108-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 2dfba3bb40ad8536b9fa802364f2d40da31aa88e ]
We got a filesystem inconsistency issue below while running generic/475
I/O failure pressure test with fast_commit feature enabled.
Symlink /p3/d3/d1c/d6c/dd6/dce/l101 (inode #132605) is invalid.
If fast_commit feature is enabled, a special fast_commit journal area is
appended to the end of the normal journal area. The journal->j_last
point to the first unused block behind the normal journal area instead
of the whole log area, and the journal->j_fc_last point to the first
unused block behind the fast_commit journal area. While doing journal
recovery, do_one_pass(PASS_SCAN) should first scan the normal journal
area and turn around to the first block once it meet journal->j_last,
but the wrap() macro misuse the journal->j_fc_last, so the recovering
could not read the next magic block (commit block perhaps) and would end
early mistakenly and missing tN and every transaction after it in the
following example. Finally, it could lead to filesystem inconsistency.
| normal journal area | fast commit area |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
| tN(rere) | tN+1 |~| tN-x |...| tN-1 | tN(front) | .... |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
/ / /
start journal->j_last journal->j_fc_last
This patch fix it by use the correct ending journal->j_last.
Fixes: 5b849b5f96b4 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20230613043120.GB1584772@mit.edu/
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230626073322.3956567-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit cb3b3bf22cf33707d684e74207908ba0ef3b6467 ]
The name of jbd_debug() is confusing as all functions inside jbd2 have
jbd2_ prefix. Rename jbd_debug() to jbd2_debug(). No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608112355.4397-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit f7f497cb702462e8505ff3d8d4e7722ad95626a1 ]
This patch kills t_handle_lock transaction spinlock completely from
jbd2.
To explain the reasoning, currently there were three sites at which
this spinlock was used.
1. jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
a. Based on careful code review it can be seen that, we don't need this
lock here. This is since we wait for any currently ongoing updates
based on a atomic variable t_updates. And we anyway don't take any
t_handle_lock while in stop_this_handle().
i.e.
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock()
jbd2_journal_wait_updates() stop_this_handle()
while (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) { |
DEFINE_WAIT(wait); |
prepare_to_wait(); |
if (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) if (atomic_dec_and_test(txn->t_updates))
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
schedule(); wake_up()
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
finish_wait();
}
txn->t_state = T_COMMIT
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
b. Also note that between atomic_inc(&txn->t_updates) in
start_this_handle() and jbd2_journal_wait_updates(), the
synchronization happens via read_lock(journal->j_state_lock) in
start_this_handle();
2. jbd2_journal_extend()
a. jbd2_journal_extend() is called with the handle of each process from
task_struct. So no lock required in updating member fields of handle_t
b. For member fields of h_transaction, all updates happens only via
atomic APIs (which is also within read_lock()).
So, no need of this transaction spinlock.
3. update_t_max_wait()
Based on Jan suggestion, this can be carefully removed using atomic
cmpxchg API.
Note that there can be several processes which are waiting for a new
transaction to be allocated and started. For doing this only one
process will succeed in taking write_lock() and allocating a new txn.
After that all of the process will be updating the t_max_wait (max
transaction wait time). This can be done via below method w/o taking
any locks using atomic cmpxchg.
For more details refer [1]
new = get_new_val();
old = READ_ONCE(ptr->max_val);
while (old < new)
old = cmpxchg(&ptr->max_val, old, new);
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/849237/
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d89e599658b4a1f3893a48c6feded200073037fc.1644992076.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit cc16eecae687912238ee6efbff71ad31e2bc414e ]
jbd2_journal_wait_updates() is called with j_state_lock held. But if
there is a commit in progress, then this transaction might get committed
and freed via jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ->
jbd2_journal_free_transaction(), when we release j_state_lock.
So check for journal->j_running_transaction everytime we release and
acquire j_state_lock to avoid use-after-free issue.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/948c2fed518ae739db6a8f7f83f1d58b504f87d0.1644497105.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Fixes: 4f98186848707f53 ("jbd2: refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+afa2ca5171d93e44b348@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 4f98186848707f530669238d90e0562d92a78aab ]
No functionality change as such in this patch. This only refactors the
common piece of code which waits for t_updates to finish into a common
function named as jbd2_journal_wait_updates(journal_t *)
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c564f70f4b2591171677a2a74fccb22a7b6c3a4.1642416995.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 590a809ff743e7bd890ba5fb36bc38e20a36de53 upstream.
Following process will corrupt ext4 image:
Step 1:
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
__jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction)
// Put jh into trans1->t_checkpoint_list
journal->j_checkpoint_transactions = commit_transaction
// Put trans1 into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
Step 2:
do_get_write_access
test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty，set jbd dirty
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction) // jh belongs to trans2
Step 3:
drop_cache
journal_shrink_one_cp_list
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint
if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) // lock bh, true
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) // buffer is not dirty
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
// remove jh from trans1->t_checkpoint_list
Step 4:
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
trans1 = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
// jh is not in trans1->t_checkpoint_list
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal) // trans1 is done
Step 5: Power cut, trans2 is not committed, jh is lost in next mounting.
Fix it by checking 'jh->b_transaction' before remove it from checkpoint.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 373ac521799d9e97061515aca6ec6621789036bb upstream.
journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the
committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it
meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan
and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests
below.
Test cmd:
./fs_mark -d scratch -s 1024 -n 10000 -t 1 -D 100 -N 100
Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8304.9 49033
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 7649.0 50012
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 2107.1 50871
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in
journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~
100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it
through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add
a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy
buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+.
After this fix:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8558.4 49109
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: b98dba273a0e ("jbd2: remove journal_clean_one_cp_list()")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 46f881b5b1758dc4a35fba4a643c10717d0cf427 ]
Before removing checkpoint buffer from the t_checkpoint_list, we have to
check both BH_Dirty and BH_Lock bits together to distinguish buffers
have not been or were being written back. But __cp_buffer_busy() checks
them separately, it first check lock state and then check dirty, the
window between these two checks could be raced by writing back
procedure, which locks buffer and clears buffer dirty before I/O
completes. So it cannot guarantee checkpointing buffers been written
back to disk if some error happens later. Finally, it may clean
checkpoint transactions and lead to inconsistent filesystem.
jbd2_journal_forget() and __journal_try_to_free_buffer() also have the
same problem (journal_unmap_buffer() escape from this issue since it's
running under the buffer lock), so fix them through introducing a new
helper to try holding the buffer lock and remove really clean buffer.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217490
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-6-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit b98dba273a0e47dbfade89c9af73c5b012a4eabb ]
journal_clean_one_cp_list() and journal_shrink_one_cp_list() are almost
the same, so merge them into journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), remove the
nr_to_scan parameter, always scan and try to free the whole checkpoint
list.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit be22255360f80d3af789daad00025171a65424a5 ]
Since t_checkpoint_io_list was stop using in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
now, it's time to remove the whole t_checkpoint_io_list logic.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e34c8dd238d0c9368b746480f313055f5bab5040 ]
Following process,
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
// there are several dirty buffer heads in transaction->t_checkpoint_list
P1 wb_workfn
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
if (buffer_locked(bh)) // false
__block_write_full_page
trylock_buffer(bh)
test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)
if (!buffer_dirty(bh))
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) // false
>> bh IO error occurs <<
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail
__jbd2_update_log_tail
jbd2_write_superblock
// The bh won't be replayed in next mount.
, which could corrupt the ext4 image, fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Since writeback process clears buffer dirty after locking buffer head,
we can fix it by try locking buffer and check dirtiness while buffer is
locked, the buffer head can be removed if it is neither dirty nor locked.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217490
Fixes: 470decc613ab ("[PATCH] jbd2: initial copy of files from jbd")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit c2d6fd9d6f35079f1669f0100f05b46708c74b7f upstream.
There is a long-standing metadata corruption issue that happens from
time to time, but it's very difficult to reproduce and analyse, benefit
from the JBD2_CYCLE_RECORD option, we found out that the problem is the
checkpointing process miss to write out some buffers which are raced by
another do_get_write_access(). Looks below for detail.
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() //transaction X
//buffer A is dirty and not belones to any transaction
__buffer_relink_io() //move it to the IO list
__flush_batch()
write_dirty_buffer()
do_get_write_access()
clear_buffer_dirty
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
//add buffer A to a new transaction Y
lock_buffer(bh)
//doesn't write out
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
//finish checkpoint except buffer A
//filesystem corrupt if the new transaction Y isn't fully write out.
Due to the t_checkpoint_list walking loop in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
have already handles waiting for buffers under IO and re-added new
transaction to complete commit, and it also removing cleaned buffers,
this makes sure the list will eventually get empty. So it's fine to
leave buffers on the t_checkpoint_list while flushing out and completely
stop using the t_checkpoint_io_list.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit bd159398a2d2234de07d310132865706964aaaa7 ]
When invalidating buffers under the partial tail page,
jbd2_journal_invalidate_folio() returns -EBUSY if the buffer is part of
the committing transaction as we cannot safely modify buffer state.
However if the buffer is already invalidated (due to previous
invalidation attempts from ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit()), there's
nothing to do and there's no point in returning -EBUSY. This fixes
occasional warnings from ext4_journalled_invalidate_folio() triggered by
generic/051 fstest when blocksize < pagesize.
Fixes: 53e872681fed ("ext4: fix deadlock in journal_unmap_buffer()")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329154950.19720-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 2729cfdcfa1cc49bef5a90d046fa4a187fdfcc69 upstream.
This patch drops all calls to ext4_fc_start_update() and
ext4_fc_stop_update(). To ensure that there are no ongoing journal
updates during fast commit, we also make jbd2_fc_begin_commit() lock
journal for updates. This way we don't have to maintain two different
transaction start stop APIs for fast commit and full commit. This
patch doesn't remove the functions altogether since in future we want
to have inode level locking for fast commits.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223202140.2061101-2-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit e6b9bd7290d334451ce054e98e752abc055e0034 upstream.
Following process will make data lost and could lead to a filesystem
corrupted problem:
1. jh(bh) is inserted into T1->t_checkpoint_list, bh is dirty, and
jh->b_transaction = NULL
2. T1 is added into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions.
3. Get bh prepare to write while doing checkpoing:
PA PB
do_get_write_access jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock)
if (buffer_dirty(bh))
clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty
set_buffer_jbddirty(bh)
transaction =
journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_list
if (!buffer_dirty(bh))
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
// bh won't be flushed
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved)
4. Aborting journal/Power-cut before writing latest bh on journal area.
In this way we get a corrupted filesystem with bh's data lost.
Fix it by moving the clearing of buffer_dirty bit just before the call
to __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(), both bit clearing and jh->b_transaction
assignment are under journal->j_list_lock locked, so that
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() will wait until jh's new transaction fininshed
even bh is currently not dirty. And journal_shrink_one_cp_list() won't
remove jh from checkpoint list if the buffer head is reused in
do_get_write_access().
Fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216898
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110015327.1181863-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit dfff66f30f66b9524b661f311bbed8ff3d2ca49f upstream.
In fc_do_one_pass() miss release buffer head after use which will lead
to reference count leak.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220917093805.1782845-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 243d1a5d505d0b0460c9af0ad56ed4a56ef0bebd upstream.
In 'jbd2_fc_wait_bufs' use 'bh' after put buffer head reference count
which may lead to use-after-free.
So judge buffer if uptodate before put buffer head reference count.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220914100812.1414768-3-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit e0d5fc7a6d80ac2406c7dfc6bb625201d0250a8a upstream.
As in 'jbd2_fc_wait_bufs' if buffer isn't uptodate, will return -EIO without
update 'journal->j_fc_off'. But 'jbd2_fc_release_bufs' will release buffer head
from ‘j_fc_off - 1’ if 'bh' is NULL will terminal release which will lead to
buffer head buffer head reference count leak.
To solve above issue, update 'journal->j_fc_off' before return -EIO.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220914100812.1414768-2-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 34fc8768ec6089565d6d73bad26724083cecf7bd upstream.
LIFO wakeup order is unfair and sometimes leads to a journal
user not being able to get a journal handle for hundreds of
transactions in a row.
FIFO wakeup can make things more fair.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907165959.1137482-1-alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 4a734f0869f970b8a9b65062ea40b09a5da9dba8 ]
Following process will fail assertion 'jh->b_frozen_data == NULL' in
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata():
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
unlink(dir/a)
jh->b_transaction = trans1
jh->b_jlist = BJ_Metadata
journal->j_running_transaction = NULL
trans1->t_state = T_COMMIT
unlink(dir/b)
handle->h_trans = trans2
do_get_write_access
jh->b_modified = 0
jh->b_frozen_data = frozen_buffer
jh->b_next_transaction = trans2
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata
is_handle_aborted
is_journal_aborted // return false
--> jbd2 abort <--
while (commit_transaction->t_buffers)
if (is_journal_aborted)
jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
WRITE_ONCE(jh->b_transaction,
jh->b_next_transaction)
WRITE_ONCE(jh->b_next_transaction, NULL)
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, BJ_Reserved)
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_frozen_data == NULL) // assertion failure !
The reproducer (See detail in [Link]) reports:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1629!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 584 Comm: unlink Tainted: G W
5.19.0-rc6-00115-g4a57a8400075-dirty #697
RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x3c5/0x470
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000be7ce0 EFLAGS: 00010202
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xa0/0x290
ext4_handle_dirty_dirblock+0x10c/0x1d0
ext4_delete_entry+0x104/0x200
__ext4_unlink+0x22b/0x360
ext4_unlink+0x275/0x390
vfs_unlink+0x20b/0x4c0
do_unlinkat+0x42f/0x4c0
__x64_sys_unlink+0x37/0x50
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
After journal aborting, __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() is executed with
holding @jh->b_state_lock, we can fix it by moving 'is_handle_aborted()'
into the area protected by @jh->b_state_lock.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216251
Fixes: 470decc613ab20 ("[PATCH] jbd2: initial copy of files from jbd")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715125152.4022726-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit a89573ce4ad32f19f43ec669771726817e185be0 ]
We catch an assert problem in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() when
doing fsstress and request falut injection tests. The problem is
happened in a race condition between jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
and ext4_end_io_end(). Firstly, ext4_writepages() writeback dirty pages
and start reserved handle, and then the journal was aborted due to some
previous metadata IO error, jbd2_journal_abort() start to commit current
running transaction, the committing procedure could be raced by
ext4_end_io_end() and lead to subtract j_reserved_credits twice from
commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits, finally the
t_outstanding_credits is mistakenly smaller than t_nr_buffers and
trigger assert.
kjournald2 kworker
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
atomic_sub(j_reserved_credits, t_outstanding_credits); //sub once
jbd2_journal_start_reserved()
start_this_handle() //detect aborted journal
jbd2_journal_free_reserved() //get running transaction
read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock)
__jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle()
atomic_sub(j_reserved_credits, t_outstanding_credits);
//sub again
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
journal->j_running_transaction = NULL;
J_ASSERT(t_nr_buffers <= t_outstanding_credits) //bomb!!!
Fix this issue by using journal->j_state_lock to protect the subtraction
in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction().
Fixes: 96f1e0974575 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock while committing a transaction")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220611130426.2013258-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 23e3d7f7061f8682c751c46512718f47580ad8f0 upstream.
we got issue as follows:
[ 72.796117] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm fallocate: Detected aborted journal
[ 72.826847] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
fallocate: fallocate failed: Read-only file system
[ 74.791830] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: jh=0xffff9cfefe725d90 bh=0x0000000000000000 end delay
[ 74.793597] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 74.794203] kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2063!
[ 74.794886] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 74.795533] CPU: 4 PID: 2260 Comm: jbd2/sda-8 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-next-20220315-dirty #150
[ 74.798327] RIP: 0010:__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer+0x3e/0x60
[ 74.801971] RSP: 0018:ffffa828c24a3cb8 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 74.802694] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 74.803601] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff9cfefe725d90 RDI: ffff9cfefe725d90
[ 74.804554] RBP: ffff9cfefe725d90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa828c24a3b20
[ 74.805471] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9cfefe725d90
[ 74.806385] R13: ffff9cfefe725d98 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9cfe833a4d00
[ 74.807301] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d01afb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 74.808338] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 74.809084] CR2: 00007f2b81bf4000 CR3: 0000000100056000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 74.810047] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 74.810981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 74.811897] Call Trace:
[ 74.812241] <TASK>
[ 74.812566] __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0x12f/0x180
[ 74.813246] jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0x4c/0xa0
[ 74.813869] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction.cold+0xa1/0x148
[ 74.817550] kjournald2+0xf8/0x3e0
[ 74.819056] kthread+0x153/0x1c0
[ 74.819963] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Above issue may happen as follows:
write truncate kjournald2
generic_perform_write
ext4_write_begin
ext4_walk_page_buffers
do_journal_get_write_access ->add BJ_Reserved list
ext4_journalled_write_end
ext4_walk_page_buffers
write_end_fn
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata
***************JBD2 ABORT**************
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata
-> return -EROFS, jh in reserved_list
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
while (commit_transaction->t_reserved_list)
jh = commit_transaction->t_reserved_list;
truncate_pagecache_range
do_invalidatepage
ext4_journalled_invalidatepage
jbd2_journal_invalidatepage
journal_unmap_buffer
__dispose_buffer
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head ->put last ref_count
__journal_remove_journal_head
bh->b_private = NULL;
jh->b_bh = NULL;
jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(journal, jh);
bh = jh2bh(jh);
->bh is NULL, later will trigger null-ptr-deref
journal_free_journal_head(jh);
After commit 96f1e0974575, we no longer hold the j_state_lock while
iterating over the list of reserved handles in
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(). This potentially allows the
journal_head to be freed by journal_unmap_buffer while the commit
codepath is also trying to free the BJ_Reserved buffers. Keeping
j_state_lock held while trying extends hold time of the lock
minimally, and solves this issue.
Fixes: 96f1e0974575("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock while committing a transaction")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220317142137.1821590-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit e85c81ba8859a4c839bcd69c5d83b32954133a5b ]
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit 4cd1103d8c66b2cdb7e64385c274edb0ac5e8887 upstream.
Patch series "ocfs2: fix a deadlock case".
This fixes a deadlock case in ocfs2. We firstly export jbd2 symbols
jbd2_journal_[grab|put]_journal_head as preparation and later use them
in ocfs2 insread of jbd_[lock|unlock]_bh_journal_head to fix the
deadlock.
This patch (of 2):
This exports symbols jbd2_journal_[grab|put]_journal_head, which will be
used outside modules, e.g. ocfs2.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220121071205.100648-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Gautham Ananthakrishna <gautham.ananthakrishna@oracle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@oracle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
JBD2 layer support triggers which are called when journaling layer moves
buffer to a certain state. We can use the frozen trigger, which gets
called when buffer data is frozen and about to be written out to the
journal, to compute block checksums for some buffer types (similarly as
does ocfs2). This avoids unnecessary repeated recomputation of the
checksum (at the cost of larger window where memory corruption won't be
caught by checksumming) and is even necessary when there are
unsynchronized updaters of the checksummed data.
So add superblock and journal trigger type arguments to
ext4_journal_get_write_access() and ext4_journal_get_create_access() so
that frozen triggers can be set accordingly. Also add inode argument to
ext4_walk_page_buffers() and all the callbacks used with that function
for the same purpose. This patch is mostly only a change of prototype of
the above mentioned functions and a few small helpers. Real checksumming
will come later.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816095713.16537-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Fix a signed vs unsigned and a void * pointer arithmetic warning.
This cleanup is also in e2fsprogs commit aec460db9a93 ("e2fsck: clean
up two gcc -Wall warnings in recovery.c").
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Remove unused variable store which was never used.
This fix is also in e2fsprogs commit 99a2294f85f0 ("e2fsck: value
stored to err is never read").
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
This commit applies the e2fsck/recovery.c portions of commit
1e0c8ca7c08a ("e2fsck: fix portability problems caused by unaligned
accesses) from the e2fsprogs git tree.
The on-disk format for the ext4 journal can have unaigned 32-bit
integers. This can happen when replaying a journal using a obsolete
checksum format (which was never popularly used, since the v3 format
replaced v2 while the metadata checksum feature was being stablized).
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
The function jbd2_journal_unregister_shrinker() was getting called
twice when the file system was getting unmounted. On Power and ARM
platforms this was causing kernel crash when unmounting the file
system, when a percpu_counter was destroyed twice.
Fix this by removing jbd2_journal_[un]register_shrinker() functions,
and inlining the shrinker setup and teardown into
journal_init_common() and jbd2_journal_destroy(). This means that
ext4 and ocfs2 now no longer need to know about registering and
unregistering jbd2's shrinker.
Also, while we're at it, rename the percpu counter from
j_jh_shrink_count to j_checkpoint_jh_count, since this makes it
clearer what this counter is intended to track.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210705145025.3363130-1-tytso@mit.edu
Fixes: 4ba3fcdde7e3 ("jbd2,ext4: add a shrinker to release checkpointed buffers")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Export jbd2_journal_[un]register_shrinker() to fix this error when
ext4 is built as a module:
ERROR: modpost: "jbd2_journal_unregister_shrinker" undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "jbd2_journal_register_shrinker" undefined!
Fixes: 4ba3fcdde7e3 ("jbd2,ext4: add a shrinker to release checkpointed buffers")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630083638.140218-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Now that __try_to_free_cp_buf() remove checkpointed buffer or transaction
when the buffer is not 'busy', which is only called by
journal_clean_one_cp_list(). This patch simplify this function by remove
__try_to_free_cp_buf() and invoke __cp_buffer_busy() directly.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-7-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
