| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[HICCUP]
After adding extra checks on btrfs_file_extent_item::ram_bytes to
tree-checker, running fsstress leads to tree-checker warning at write time,
as we created file extent items with an invalid ram_bytes.
All those offending file extents have offset 0, and ram_bytes matching
num_bytes, and smaller than disk_num_bytes.
This would also trigger the recently enhanced btrfs-check, which catches
such mismatches and report them as minor errors.
[CAUSE]
When a folio/page is invalidated and it is part of a submitted OE, we
mark the OE truncated just to the beginning of the folio/page.
And for truncated OE, we insert the file extent item with incorrect
value for ram_bytes (using num_bytes instead of the usual value).
This is not a big deal for end users, as we do not utilize the ram_bytes
field for regular non-compressed extents.
This mismatch is just a small violation against on-disk format.
[FIX]
Fix it by removing the override on btrfs_file_extent_item::ram_bytes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Previously validate_extent_map() is only to catch bugs related to
extent_map member cleanups.
But with recent btrfs-check enhancement to catch ram_bytes mismatch with
disk_num_bytes, it would be much better to catch such extent maps
earlier.
So this patch adds extra ram_bytes validation for extent maps.
Please note that, older filesystems with such mismatch won't trigger this error:
- extent_map::ram_bytes is already fixed
Previous patch has already fixed the ram_bytes for affected file
extents.
So this enhanced sanity check should not affect end users.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[HICCUP]
Kernels can create file extent items with incorrect ram_bytes like this:
item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 32768
extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096
extent compression 0 (none)
Thankfully kernel can handle them properly, as in that case ram_bytes is
not utilized at all.
[ENHANCEMENT]
Since the hiccup is not going to cause any data-loss and is only a minor
violation of on-disk format, here we only need to ignore the incorrect
ram_bytes value, and use the correct one from
btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_num_bytes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[HICCUP]
Before commit 85de2be7129c ("btrfs: remove extent_map::block_start
member"), we utilized @bytenr variable inside
btrfs_extent_item_to_extent_map() to calculate block_start.
But that commit removed block_start completely, we have no need to
advance @bytenr at all.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Rename @bytenr as @disk_bytenr
- Only declare @disk_bytenr inside the if branch
- Make @disk_bytenr const and remove the modification on it
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's a typo in an error message when checking the block group tree
feature, it mentions fres-space-tree instead of free-space-tree. Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The direct IO code is over a thousand lines and it's currently spread
between file.c and inode.c, which makes it not easy to locate some parts
of it sometimes. Also inode.c is about 11 thousand lines and file.c about
4 thousand lines, both too big. So move all the direct IO code into a
dedicated file, so that it's easy to locate all its code and reduce the
sizes of inode.c and file.c.
This is a pure move of code without any other changes except export a
a couple functions from inode.c (get_extent_allocation_hint() and
create_io_em()) because they are used in inode.c and the new direct-io.c
file, and a couple functions from file.c (btrfs_buffered_write() and
btrfs_write_check()) because they are used both in file.c and in the new
direct-io.c file.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_set_prop() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_compress_heuristic() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that,
allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_ioctl_send() and _btrfs_ioctl_send()
as it's an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to is_data_inode() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items() as it's
an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items() as it's
an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Remove the encoding field from 'struct btrfs_stripe_extent'. It was
originally intended to encode the RAID type as well as if we're a data
or a parity stripe.
But the RAID type can be inferred form the block-group and the data vs.
parity differentiation can be done easier with adding a new key type
for parity stripes in the RAID stripe tree.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When debugging the recent ram_bytes mismatch bug, I can hit it with
enhanced tree-checker for file extent items at write time.
But the bug is not that easy to trigger (mostly triggered with
btrfs/06*, which uses 20 threads fsstress), and when I hit it, the only
info is the kernel leaf dump, but it doesn't include things like the
file extent type (REGULAR or PREALLOC).
Add the dump for generation and type (although only numeric output) to
make debugging a little easier.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Periodic reclaim attempts to avoid block_groups seeing active use with a
sweep mark that gets cleared on allocation and set on a sweep. In urgent
conditions where we have very little unallocated space (less than one
chunk used by the threshold calculation for the unallocated target), we
want to be able to override this mechanism.
Introduce a second pass that only happens if we fail to find a reclaim
candidate and reclaim is urgent. In that case, do a second pass where
all block groups are eligible.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Periodic reclaim runs the risk of getting stuck in a state where it
keeps reclaiming the same block group over and over. This can happen if
1. reclaiming that block_group fails
2. reclaiming that block_group fails to move any extents into existing
block_groups and just allocates a fresh chunk and moves everything.
Currently, 1. is a very tight loop inside the reclaim worker. That is
critical for edge triggered reclaim or else we risk forgetting about a
reclaimable group. On the other hand, with level triggered reclaim we
can break out of that loop and get it later.
With that fixed, 2. applies to both failures and "successes" with no
progress. If we have done a periodic reclaim on a space_info and nothing
has changed in that space_info, there is not much point to trying again,
so don't, until enough space gets free, which we capture with a
heuristic of needing to net free 1 chunk.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We currently employ a edge-triggered block group reclaim strategy which
marks block groups for reclaim as they free down past a threshold.
With a dynamic threshold, this is worse than doing it in a
level-triggered fashion periodically. That is because the reclaim
itself happens periodically, so the threshold at that point in time is
what really matters, not the threshold at freeing time. If we mark the
reclaim in a big pass, then sort by usage and do reclaim, we also
benefit from a negative feedback loop preventing unnecessary reclaims as
we crunch through the "best" candidates.
Since this is quite a different model, it requires some additional
support. The edge triggered reclaim has a good heuristic for not
reclaiming fresh block groups, so we need to replace that with a typical
GC sweep mark which skips block groups that have seen an allocation
since the last sweep.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We can currently recover allocated block_groups by:
- explicitly starting balance operations
- "auto reclaim" via bg_reclaim_threshold
The latter works by checking against a fixed threshold on frees. If we
pass from above the threshold to below, relocation triggers and the
block group will get reclaimed by the cleaner thread (assuming it is
still eligible)
Picking a threshold is challenging. Too high, and you end up trying to
reclaim very full block_groups which is quite costly, and you don't do
reclaim on block_groups that don't get quite THAT full, but could still
be quite fragmented and stranding a lot of space. Too low, and you
similarly miss out on reclaim even if you badly need it to avoid running
out of unallocated space, if you have heavily fragmented block groups
living above the threshold.
No matter the threshold, it suffers from a workload that happens to
bounce around that threshold, which can introduce arbitrary amounts of
reclaim waste.
To improve this situation, introduce a dynamic threshold. The basic idea
behind this threshold is that it should be very lax when there is plenty
of unallocated space, and increasingly aggressive as we approach zero
unallocated space. To that end, it sets a target for unallocated space
(10 chunks) and then linearly increases the threshold as the amount of
space short of the target we are increases. The formula is:
(target - unalloc) / target
I tested this by running it on three interesting workloads:
1. bounce allocations around X% full.
2. fill up all the way and introduce full fragmentation.
3. write in a fragmented way until the filesystem is just about full.
1. and 2. attack the weaknesses of a fixed threshold; fixed either works
perfectly or fully falls apart, depending on the threshold. Dynamic
always handles these cases well.
3. attacks dynamic by checking whether it is too zealous to reclaim in
conditions with low unallocated and low unused. It tends to claw back
1GiB of unallocated fairly aggressively, but not much more. Early
versions of dynamic threshold struggled on this test.
Additional work could be done to intelligently ratchet up the urgency of
reclaim in very low unallocated conditions. Existing mechanisms are
already useless in that case anyway.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is handy when computing space_info dynamic reclaim thresholds where
we do not have access to a block group. We could add it to the various
functions as a parameter, but it seems reasonable for space_info to have
an fs_info pointer.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When evaluating various reclaim strategies/thresholds against each
other, it is useful to collect data about the amount of reclaim
happening. Expose a count, error count, and byte count via sysfs
per space_info.
Note that this is only for automatic reclaim, not manually invoked
balances or other codepaths that use "relocate_block_group"
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() after btrfs_run_qgroups() fails to
update the qgroup status is probably not necessary, this would turn the
filesystem to read-only. For the same reason aborting the transaction is
also not a good option.
The state is left inconsistent and can be fixed by rescan, printing a
warning should be sufficient. Return code reflects the status of
adding/deleting the relation and if the transaction was ended properly.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's a transaction joined in the qgroup relation add/remove ioctl and
any error will lead to abort/error. We could lift the allocation from
btrfs_add_qgroup_relation() and move it outside of the transaction
context. The relation deletion does not need that.
The ownership of the structure is moved to the add relation handler.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The errors during removing a chunk item are fatal, we expect to have a
matching item in the chunk map from which the chunk_offset is taken.
Handle that by transaction abort.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The extent item used to have a v0 that was removed in 6.6. There's a
check for minimum expected size that could lead to
btrfs_handle_fs_error() that would make the filesystem read-only. As we
don't have v0 anymore (and haven't seen any reports in the deprecation
period), handle this in a less intrusive way.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When an extended ref is deleted we do a sanity check right before
removing the item, if we can't find it then handle the error. This is
done by btrfs_handle_fs_error() but this is from the time before we had
the transaction abort infrastructure, so switch to that. The end result
is the same, the error is reported and switched to read-only. We newly
return the -ENOENT error code as this better represents what happened.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We always allocate a delayed extent op structure when allocating a tree
block (except for log trees), but most of the time we don't need it as
we only need to set the BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF if we're dealing
with a relocation tree and we only need to set the key of a tree block
in a btrfs_tree_block_info structure if we are not using skinny metadata
(feature enabled by default since btrfs-progs 3.18 and available as of
kernel 3.10).
In these cases, where we don't need neither to update flags nor to set
the key, we only use the delayed extent op structure to set the tree
block's level. This is a waste of memory and besides that, the memory
allocation can fail and can add additional latency.
Instead of using a delayed extent op structure to store the level of
the tree block, use the delayed ref head to store it. This doesn't
change the size of neither structure and helps us avoid allocating
delayed extent ops structures when using the skinny metadata feature
and there's no relocation going on. This also gets rid of a BUG_ON().
For example, for a fs_mark run, with 5 iterations, 8 threads and 100K
files per iteration, before this patch there were 118109 allocations
of delayed extent op structures and after it there were none.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When qgroups are enabled, during data reservation, we allocate the
ulist_nodes that track the exact reserved extents with GFP_ATOMIC
unconditionally. This is unnecessary, and we can follow the model
already employed by the struct extent_state we preallocate in the non
qgroups case, which should reduce the risk of allocation failures with
GFP_ATOMIC.
Add a prealloc node to struct ulist which ulist_add will grab when it is
present, and try to allocate it before taking the tree lock while we can
still take advantage of a less strict gfp mask. The lifetime of that
node belongs to the new prealloc field, until it is used, at which point
it belongs to the ulist linked list.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of doing a BUG_ON() handle the error by returning -EUCLEAN,
aborting the transaction and logging an error message.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of using an if-else statement when processing the extent item at
btrfs_lookup_extent_info(), use a single if statement for the error case
since it does a goto at the end and leave the success (expected) case
following the if statement, reducing indentation and making the logic a
bit easier to follow. Also make the if statement's condition as unlikely
since it's not expected to ever happen, as it signals some corruption,
making it clear and hint the compiler to generate more efficient code.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we didn't found an extent item with the initial btrfs_search_slot()
call, it's pointless to test if the "metadata" variable is "true", because
right after we check if the key type is BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY and that
is the case only when "metadata" is set to "true". So remove the redundant
check.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of a BUG_ON() just return an error, log an error message and
abort the transaction in case we find an extent buffer belonging to the
relocation tree that doesn't have the full backref flag set. This is
unexpected and should never happen (save for bugs or a potential bad
memory).
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We keep a "new_flags" variable only to keep track if we need to update the
metadata extent's flags, and when we set BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF in
the variable, we do it in an inner scope. Then check in an outer scope
if the variable is not 0 and if so call btrfs_set_disk_extent_flags().
The variable isn't used for anything else. This is somewhat confusing, so
to make it more straightforward update the extent's flags where we are
currently updating "new_flags" and remove the variable.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are no callers of btrfs_lookup_extent_info() that pass a NULL value
for the transaction handle argument, so there's no point in having special
logic to deal with the NULL. The last caller that passed a NULL value was
removed in commit 19b546d7a1b2 ("btrfs: relocation:
Use btrfs_find_all_leafs to locate data extent parent tree leaves").
So remove the NULL handling from btrfs_lookup_extent_info().
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_force_cow_block() we have several error paths that need to
unlock the "cow" extent buffer, drop the reference on it and then return
an error. This is a bit verbose so add a label where we perform these
tasks and make the error paths jump to that label.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When freeing a tree block, at btrfs_free_tree_block(), if we fail to
create a delayed reference we don't deal with the error and just do a
BUG_ON(). The error most likely to happen is -ENOMEM, and we have a
comment mentioning that only -ENOMEM can happen, but that is not true,
because in case qgroups are enabled any error returned from
btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() (can be -EUCLEAN or anything returned
from btrfs_search_slot() for example) can be propagated back to
btrfs_free_tree_block().
So stop doing a BUG_ON() and return the error to the callers and make
them abort the transaction to prevent leaking space. Syzbot was
triggering this, likely due to memory allocation failure injection.
Reported-by: syzbot+a306f914b4d01b3958fe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000fcba1e05e998263c@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's pointless to pass a super block argument to btrfs_iget_locked()
because we always pass a root and from it we can get the super block
through:
root->fs_info->sb
So remove the super block argument.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's pointless to pass a super block argument to btrfs_iget_path() because
we always pass a root and from it we can get the super block through:
root->fs_info->sb
So remove the super block argument.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's pointless to pass a super block argument to btrfs_iget() because we
always pass a root and from it we can get the super block through:
root->fs_info->sb
So remove the super block argument.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since commit 2b2553f12355 ("btrfs: stop setting PageError in the data I/O
path") btrfs no longer utilizes subpage error bitmaps anymore, but the
commit forgot to remove the error bitmap in btrfs_subpage_dump_bitmap(),
resulting in possible meaningless result for the error bitmap.
Fix it by just removing the error bitmap dumping.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Snapshot delete has some complicated looking code that is weirdly subtle
at times. I've cleaned it up the best I can without re-writing it, but
there are still a lot of details that are non-obvious. Add a bunch of
comments to the main parts of the code to help future developers better
understand the mechanics of snapshot deletion.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In walk_up_proc() we BUG_ON(ret) from btrfs_dec_ref(). This is
incorrect, we have proper error handling here, return the error.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In walk_up_proc() we have several sanity checks that should only trip if
the programmer made a mistake. Convert these to ASSERT()'s instead of
BUG_ON()'s.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return
-EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have a couple of areas where we check to make sure the tree block is
locked before looking up or messing with references. This is old code
so it has this as BUG_ON(). Convert this to ASSERT() for developers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have blanket BUG_ON(ret) after every one of these reference mod
attempts, which is just incorrect. If we encounter any errors during
walk_down_tree() we will abort, so abort on any one of these failures.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
walk_down_proc()
We handle errors here properly, ENOMEM isn't fatal, return the error.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is a big chunk of code in do_walk_down() that will conditionally
remove the reference for the child block we're currently evaluating.
Extract it out into it's own helper and call that from do_walk_down()
instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
