summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-07-27btrfs: stop incremening log_batch for the log root tree when syncing logFilipe Manana2-1/+1
We are incrementing the log_batch atomic counter of the root log tree but we never use that counter, it's used only for the log trees of subvolume roots. We started doing it when we moved the log_batch and log_write counters from the global, per fs, btrfs_fs_info structure, into the btrfs_root structure in commit 7237f1833601dc ("Btrfs: fix tree logs parallel sync"). So just stop doing it for the log root tree and add a comment over the field declaration so inform it's used only for log trees of subvolume roots. This patch is part of a series that has the following patches: 1/4 btrfs: only commit the delayed inode when doing a full fsync 2/4 btrfs: only commit delayed items at fsync if we are logging a directory 3/4 btrfs: stop incremening log_batch for the log root tree when syncing log 4/4 btrfs: remove no longer needed use of log_writers for the log root tree After the entire patchset applied I saw about 12% decrease on max latency reported by dbench. The test was done on a qemu vm, with 8 cores, 16Gb of ram, using kvm and using a raw NVMe device directly (no intermediary fs on the host). The test was invoked like the following: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdk mount -o ssd -o nospace_cache /dev/sdk /mnt/sdk dbench -D /mnt/sdk -t 300 8 umount /mnt/dsk CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: only commit delayed items at fsync if we are logging a directoryFilipe Manana1-4/+5
When logging an inode we are committing its delayed items if either the inode is a directory or if it is a new inode, created in the current transaction. We need to do it for directories, since new directory indexes are stored as delayed items of the inode and when logging a directory we need to be able to access all indexes from the fs/subvolume tree in order to figure out which index ranges need to be logged. However for new inodes that are not directories, we do not need to do it because the only type of delayed item they can have is the inode item, and we are guaranteed to always log an up to date version of the inode item: *) for a full fsync we do it by committing the delayed inode and then copying the item from the fs/subvolume tree with copy_inode_items_to_log(); *) for a fast fsync we always log the inode item based on the contents of the in-memory struct btrfs_inode. We guarantee this is always done since commit e4545de5b035c7 ("Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after append write"). So stop running delayed items for a new inodes that are not directories, since that forces committing the delayed inode into the fs/subvolume tree, wasting time and adding contention to the tree when a full fsync is not required. We will only do it in case a fast fsync is needed. This patch is part of a series that has the following patches: 1/4 btrfs: only commit the delayed inode when doing a full fsync 2/4 btrfs: only commit delayed items at fsync if we are logging a directory 3/4 btrfs: stop incremening log_batch for the log root tree when syncing log 4/4 btrfs: remove no longer needed use of log_writers for the log root tree After the entire patchset applied I saw about 12% decrease on max latency reported by dbench. The test was done on a qemu vm, with 8 cores, 16Gb of ram, using kvm and using a raw NVMe device directly (no intermediary fs on the host). The test was invoked like the following: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdk mount -o ssd -o nospace_cache /dev/sdk /mnt/sdk dbench -D /mnt/sdk -t 300 8 umount /mnt/dsk CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: only commit the delayed inode when doing a full fsyncFilipe Manana1-5/+7
Commit 2c2c452b0cafdc ("Btrfs: fix fsync when extend references are added to an inode") forced a commit of the delayed inode when logging an inode in order to ensure we would end up logging the inode item during a full fsync. By committing the delayed inode, we updated the inode item in the fs/subvolume tree and then later when copying items from leafs modified in the current transaction into the log tree (with copy_inode_items_to_log()) we ended up copying the inode item from the fs/subvolume tree into the log tree. Logging an up to date version of the inode item is required to make sure at log replay time we get the link count fixup triggered among other things (replay xattr deletes, etc). The test case generic/040 from fstests exercises the bug which that commit fixed. However for a fast fsync we don't need to commit the delayed inode because we always log an up to date version of the inode item based on the struct btrfs_inode we have in-memory. We started doing this for fast fsyncs since commit e4545de5b035c7 ("Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after append write"). So just stop committing the delayed inode if we are doing a fast fsync, we are only wasting time and adding contention on fs/subvolume tree. This patch is part of a series that has the following patches: 1/4 btrfs: only commit the delayed inode when doing a full fsync 2/4 btrfs: only commit delayed items at fsync if we are logging a directory 3/4 btrfs: stop incremening log_batch for the log root tree when syncing log 4/4 btrfs: remove no longer needed use of log_writers for the log root tree After the entire patchset applied I saw about 12% decrease on max latency reported by dbench. The test was done on a qemu vm, with 8 cores, 16Gb of ram, using kvm and using a raw NVMe device directly (no intermediary fs on the host). The test was invoked like the following: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdk mount -o ssd -o nospace_cache /dev/sdk /mnt/sdk dbench -D /mnt/sdk -t 300 8 umount /mnt/dsk CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creationQu Wenruo5-9/+89
[BUG] When the anonymous block device pool is exhausted, subvolume/snapshot creation fails with EMFILE (Too many files open). This has been reported by a user. The allocation happens in the second phase during transaction commit where it's only way out is to abort the transaction BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -24) WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 17041 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1576 create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] Call Trace: create_pending_snapshots+0x82/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x275/0x8c0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x4b9/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x11a4/0x2da0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x640 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ---[ end trace 33f2f83f3d5250e9 ]--- BTRFS: error (device sda1) in create_pending_snapshot:1576: errno=-24 unknown BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1831: errno=-24 unknown [CAUSE] When the global anonymous block device pool is exhausted, the following call chain will fail, and lead to transaction abort: btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2() |- btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid() |- btrfs_mksubvol() |- btrfs_commit_transaction() |- create_pending_snapshot() |- btrfs_get_fs_root() |- btrfs_init_fs_root() |- get_anon_bdev() [FIX] Although we can't enlarge the anonymous block device pool, at least we can preallocate anon_dev for subvolume/snapshot in the first phase, outside of transaction context and exactly at the moment the user calls the creation ioctl. Reported-by: Greed Rong <greedrong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+UqX+NTrZ6boGnWHhSeZmEY5J76CTqmYjO2S+=tHJX7nb9DPw@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: free anon block device right after subvolume deletionQu Wenruo1-0/+2
[BUG] When a lot of subvolumes are created, there is a user report about transaction aborted caused by slow anonymous block device reclaim: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -24) WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 17041 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1576 create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] Call Trace: create_pending_snapshots+0x82/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x275/0x8c0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x4b9/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x11a4/0x2da0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x640 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ---[ end trace 33f2f83f3d5250e9 ]--- BTRFS: error (device sda1) in create_pending_snapshot:1576: errno=-24 unknown BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1831: errno=-24 unknown [CAUSE] The anonymous device pool is shared and its size is 1M. It's possible to hit that limit if the subvolume deletion is not fast enough and the subvolumes to be cleaned keep the ids allocated. [WORKAROUND] We can't avoid the anon device pool exhaustion but we can shorten the time the id is attached to the subvolume root once the subvolume becomes invisible to the user. Reported-by: Greed Rong <greedrong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+UqX+NTrZ6boGnWHhSeZmEY5J76CTqmYjO2S+=tHJX7nb9DPw@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: don't allocate anonymous block device for user invisible rootsQu Wenruo1-3/+10
[BUG] When a lot of subvolumes are created, there is a user report about transaction aborted: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -24) WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 17041 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1576 create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs] Call Trace: create_pending_snapshots+0x82/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x275/0x8c0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x4b9/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x11a4/0x2da0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x640 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ---[ end trace 33f2f83f3d5250e9 ]--- BTRFS: error (device sda1) in create_pending_snapshot:1576: errno=-24 unknown BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1831: errno=-24 unknown [CAUSE] The error is EMFILE (Too many files open) and comes from the anonymous block device allocation. The ids are in a shared pool of size 1<<20. The ids are assigned to live subvolumes, ie. the root structure exists in memory (eg. after creation or after the root appears in some path). The pool could be exhausted if the numbers are not reclaimed fast enough, after subvolume deletion or if other system component uses the anon block devices. [WORKAROUND] Since it's not possible to completely solve the problem, we can only minimize the time the id is allocated to a subvolume root. Firstly, we can reduce the use of anon_dev by trees that are not subvolume roots, like data reloc tree. This patch will do extra check on root objectid, to skip roots that don't need anon_dev. Currently it's only data reloc tree and orphan roots. Reported-by: Greed Rong <greedrong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+UqX+NTrZ6boGnWHhSeZmEY5J76CTqmYjO2S+=tHJX7nb9DPw@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: qgroup: export qgroups in sysfsQu Wenruo5-9/+202
This patch will add the following sysfs interface: /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/referenced /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/exclusive /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/max_referenced /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/max_exclusive /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/limit_flags Which is also available in output of "btrfs qgroup show". /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_data /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_meta_pertrans /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_meta_prealloc The last 3 rsv related members are not visible to users, but can be very useful to debug qgroup limit related bugs. Also, to avoid '/' used in <qgroup_id>, the separator between qgroup level and qgroup id is changed to '_'. The interface is not hidden behind 'debug' as we want this interface to be included into production build and to provide another way to read the qgroup information besides the ioctls. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: use __u16 for the return value of btrfs_qgroup_level()Qu Wenruo1-1/+1
The qgroup level is limited to u16, so no need to use u64 for it. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_qgroup_check_reserved_leak take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-9/+9
vfs_inode is used only for the inode number everything else requires btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ use btrfs_ino ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_set_inode_last_trans take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov2-9/+9
Instead of making multiple calls to BTRFS_I simply take btrfs_inode as an input paramter. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make prealloc_file_extent_cluster take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-12/+12
The vfs inode is only used for a pair of inode_lock/unlock calls all other uses call for btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: remove BTRFS_I calls in btrfs_writepage_fixup_workerNikolay Borisov1-21/+17
All of its children functions use btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov6-15/+15
All of its children take btrfs_inode so bubble up this requirement to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space's interface and stop calling BTRFS_I internally. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_check_data_free_space take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov5-10/+12
Instead of calling BTRFS_I on the passed vfs_inode take btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_delalloc_release_space take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov6-22/+25
It needs btrfs_inode so take it as a parameter directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_free_reserved_data_space take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov4-19/+20
It only uses btrfs_inode internally so take it as a parameter. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota take btrfs_fs_infoNikolay Borisov4-10/+7
No point in taking an inode only to get btrfs_fs_info from it, instead take btrfs_fs_info directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov4-10/+11
There's only a single use of vfs_inode in a tracepoint so let's take btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_dirty_pages take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-15/+16
There is a single use of the generic vfs_inode so let's take btrfs_inode as a parameter and remove couple of redundant BTRFS_I() calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_set_extent_delalloc take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov6-18/+19
Preparation to make btrfs_dirty_pages take btrfs_inode as parameter. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make writepage_delalloc take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-4/+5
Only find_lock_delalloc_range uses vfs_inode so let's take the btrfs_inode as a parameter. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make __extent_writepage_io take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-8/+7
It has only a single use for a generic vfs inode vs 3 for btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_new_extent_direct take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-8/+8
This function really needs a btrfs_inode and not a generic vfs one. Take it as a parameter and get rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_create_dio_extent take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-10/+8
Take btrfs_inode directly and stop using superfulous BTRFS_I calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_add_ordered_extent_dio take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-4/+4
Simply forwards its argument so let's get rid of one extra BTRFS_I by taking btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_run_delalloc_range take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-16/+15
All children now take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking it as a parameter as well. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make need_force_cow take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-7/+6
Gets rid of superfulous BTRFS_I() calls and prepare for converting btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make inode_need_compress take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-11/+12
Simply gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make inode_can_compress take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-5/+5
Gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-5/+4
Preparation to converting btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode without BTRFS_I() calls. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make __endio_write_update_ordered take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-8/+10
It really wants btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-9/+8
It doesn't really need vfs_inode but btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make cow_file_range_async take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-9/+9
It only uses vfs inode for assigning it to the async_chunk function. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make run_delalloc_nocow take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-20/+18
It only really uses btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make fallback_to_cow take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-11/+11
It really wants btrfs_inode and is prepration to converting run_delalloc_nocow to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make insert_reserved_file_extent take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-13/+10
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>c Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_qgroup_release_data take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov4-6/+5
It just forwards its argument to __btrfs_qgroup_release_data. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make submit_compressed_extents take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-19/+15
All but 3 uses require vfs_inode so convert the logic to have btrfs_inode be the main inode struct. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_submit_compressed_write take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-10/+11
Majority of its uses are for btrfs_inode so take it as an argument directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_add_ordered_extent_compress take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-4/+4
It simpy forwards its inode argument to __btrfs_add_ordered_extent which already takes btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make cow_file_range take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-28/+24
All its children functions take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_add_ordered_extent take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov3-7/+8
Preparation to converting its callers to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-15/+16
It has only 2 uses for the vfs_inode - insert_inline_extent and i_size_read. On the flipside it will allow converting its callers to btrfs_inode, so convert it to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make btrfs_qgroup_free_data take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov5-11/+11
It passes btrfs_inode to its callee so change the interface. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make __btrfs_qgroup_release_data take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-12/+10
It uses vfs_inode only for a tracepoint so convert its interface to take btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: make qgroup_free_reserved_data take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-5/+6
It only uses btrfs_inode so can just as easily take it as an argument. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: allow use of global block reserve for balance item deletionDavid Sterba1-1/+1
On a filesystem with exhausted metadata, but still enough to start balance, it's possible to hit this error: [324402.053842] BTRFS info (device loop0): 1 enospc errors during balance [324402.060769] BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -28 [324402.172295] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in reset_balance_state:3321: errno=-28 No space left It fails inside reset_balance_state and turns the filesystem to read-only, which is unnecessary and should be fixed too, but the problem is caused by lack for space when the balance item is deleted. This is a one-time operation and from the same rank as unlink that is allowed to use the global block reserve. So do the same for the balance item. Status of the filesystem (100GiB) just after the balance fails: $ btrfs fi df mnt Data, single: total=80.01GiB, used=38.58GiB System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=16.00KiB Metadata, single: total=19.99GiB, used=19.48GiB GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=50.11MiB CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: refactor btrfs_check_can_nocow() into two variantsQu Wenruo3-42/+54
The function btrfs_check_can_nocow() now has two completely different call patterns. For nowait variant, callers don't need to do any cleanup. While for wait variant, callers need to release the lock if they can do nocow write. This is somehow confusing, and is already a problem for the exported btrfs_check_can_nocow(). So this patch will separate the different patterns into different functions. For nowait variant, the function will be called check_nocow_nolock(). For wait variant, the function pair will be btrfs_check_nocow_lock() btrfs_check_nocow_unlock(). Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: add comments for btrfs_check_can_nocow() and can_nocow_extent()Qu Wenruo2-2/+40
These two functions have extra conditions that their callers need to meet, and some not-that-common parameters used for return value. So adding some comments may save reviewers some time. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-27btrfs: allow btrfs_truncate_block() to fallback to nocow for data space ↵Qu Wenruo3-13/+45
reservation [BUG] When the data space is exhausted, even if the inode has NOCOW attribute, we will still refuse to truncate unaligned range due to ENOSPC. The following script can reproduce it pretty easily: #!/bin/bash dev=/dev/test/test mnt=/mnt/btrfs umount $dev &> /dev/null umount $mnt &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $dev -b 1G mount -o nospace_cache $dev $mnt touch $mnt/foobar chattr +C $mnt/foobar xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 4k" $mnt/foobar > /dev/null xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 1G" $mnt/padding &> /dev/null sync xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 2k" $mnt/foobar umount $mnt Currently this will fail at the fpunch part. [CAUSE] Because btrfs_truncate_block() always reserves space without checking the NOCOW attribute. Since the writeback path follows NOCOW bit, we only need to bother the space reservation code in btrfs_truncate_block(). [FIX] Make btrfs_truncate_block() follow btrfs_buffered_write() to try to reserve data space first, and fall back to NOCOW check only when we don't have enough space. Such always-try-reserve is an optimization introduced in btrfs_buffered_write(), to avoid expensive btrfs_check_can_nocow() call. This patch will export check_can_nocow() as btrfs_check_can_nocow(), and use it in btrfs_truncate_block() to fix the problem. Reported-by: Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2025-09-30 04:19:45 +0300