summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-12-02btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereferenceQu Wenruo1-0/+1
commit 6bf9e4bd6a277840d3fe8c5d5d530a1fbd3db592 upstream [BUG] When accessing a file on a crafted image, btrfs can crash in block layer: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 PGD 136501067 P4D 136501067 PUD 124519067 PMD 0 CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8-default #252 RIP: 0010:end_bio_extent_readpage+0x144/0x700 Call Trace: <IRQ> blk_update_request+0x8f/0x350 blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x120 blk_done_softirq+0x99/0xc0 __do_softirq+0xc7/0x467 irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0 call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x1e/0x170 [CAUSE] The crafted image has a tricky corruption, the INODE_ITEM has a different type against its parent dir: item 20 key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 2808 itemsize 160 generation 13 transid 13 size 1048576 nbytes 1048576 block group 0 mode 121644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 9 flags 0x0(none) This mode number 0120000 means it's a symlink. But the dir item think it's still a regular file: item 8 key (264 DIR_INDEX 5) itemoff 3707 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 item 40 key (264 DIR_ITEM 51821248) itemoff 1573 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 For symlink, we don't set BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.ops and leave it empty, as symlink is only designed to have inlined extent, all handled by tree block read. Thus no need to trigger btrfs_submit_bio_hook() for inline file extent. However end_bio_extent_readpage() expects tree->ops populated, as it's reading regular data extent. This causes NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] This patch fixes the problem in two ways: - Verify inode mode against its dir item when looking up inode So in btrfs_lookup_dentry() if we find inode mode mismatch with dir item, we error out so that corrupted inode will not be accessed. - Verify inode mode when getting extent mapping Only regular file should have regular or preallocated extent. If we found regular/preallocated file extent for symlink or the rest, we error out before submitting the read bio. With this fix that crafted image can be rejected gracefully: BTRFS critical (device loop0): inode mode mismatch with dir: inode mode=0121644 btrfs type=7 dir type=1 Reported-by: Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202763 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [sudip: use original btrfs_inode_type()] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-02-28btrfs: Make get_extent_t take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-21/+23
In addition to changing the signature, this patch also switches all the functions which are used as an argument to also take btrfs_inode. Namely those are: btrfs_get_extent and btrfs_get_extent_filemap. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-28btrfs: Make btrfs_drop_extent_cache take btrfs_inodeNikolay Borisov1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-12-06btrfs: pull node/sector/stripe sizes out of root and into fs_infoJeff Mahoney1-8/+8
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit, but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience variable fix it up again. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-09-26btrfs: extend btrfs_set_extent_delalloc and its friends to support in-band ↵Qu Wenruo1-6/+6
dedupe and subpage size patchset Extend btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() and extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() parameters for both in-band dedupe and subpage sector size patchset. This should reduce conflict of both patchset and the effort to rebase them. Cc: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-07-26btrfs: tests, require fs_info for rootJeff Mahoney1-22/+24
This allows the upcoming patchset to push nodesize and sectorsize into fs_info. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-06-02Btrfs: self-tests: Support non-4k page sizeFeifei Xu1-156/+188
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k page sized systems (e.g. ppc64). Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-05-25btrfs: fix string and comment grammatical issues and typosNicholas D Steeves1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-03-11btrfs: move btrfs_compression_type to compression.hAnand Jain1-0/+1
So that its better organized. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-01-22btrfs: tests: switch to GFP_KERNELDavid Sterba1-4/+4
There's no reason to do GFP_NOFS in tests, it's not data-heavy and memory allocation failures would affect only developers or testers. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-01-07Btrfs: use linux/sizes.h to represent constantsByongho Lee1-1/+1
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB' which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'. So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'. Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-03-17Btrfs: add sanity test for outstanding_extents accountingJosef Bacik1-1/+196
I introduced a regression wrt outstanding_extents accounting. These are tricky areas that aren't easily covered by xfstests as we could change MAX_EXTENT_SIZE at any time. So add sanity tests to cover the various conditions that are tricky in order to make sure we don't introduce regressions in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-12-12btrfs: unify extent buffer allocation apiDavid Sterba1-2/+2
Make the extent buffer allocation interface consistent. Cloned eb will set a valid fs_info. For dummy eb, we can drop the length parameter and set it from fs_info. The built-in sanity checks may pass a NULL fs_info that's queried for nodesize, but we know it's 4096. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-06-10Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting codeJosef Bacik1-31/+4
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself, hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: add a sanity test for a vacant extent at the front of a fileJosef Bacik1-5/+128
Btrfs_get_extent was not handling this case properly, add a test to make sure we don't regress. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: add tests for btrfs_get_extentJosef Bacik1-0/+832
I'm going to be removing hole extents in the near future so I wanted to make a sanity test for btrfs_get_extent to make sure I don't break anything in the meantime. This patch just puts btrfs_get_extent through its paces by giving it a completely unreasonable mapping to look at and make sure it is giving us back maps that make sense. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>