summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-10-15Btrfs: do not unnecessarily pass write_lock_level when processing leafLiu Bo1-1/+1
As we're going to return right after the call, it's not necessary to get update the new write_lock_level from unlock_up. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-10-15btrfs: Remove 'objectid' member from struct btrfs_rootMisono Tomohiro1-1/+1
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid. They are both set to the same value in __setup_root(): static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 objectid) { ... root->objectid = objectid; ... root->root_key.objectid = objecitd; ... } and not changed to other value after initialization. grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places: $ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l 133 $ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l 55 (4.17, inc. some noise) It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case. Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove 'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Remove V0 extent supportNikolay Borisov1-5/+1
The v0 compat code was introduced in commit 5d4f98a28c7d ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") 9 years ago, which was merged in 2.6.31. This means that the code is there to support filesystems which are _VERY_ old and if you are using btrfs on such an old kernel, you have much bigger problems. This coupled with the fact that no one is likely testing/maintining this code likely means it has bugs lurking. All things considered I think 43 kernel releases later it's high time this remnant of the past got removed. This patch removes all code wrapped in #ifdefs but leaves the BUG_ONs in case we have a v0 with no support intact as a sort of safety-net. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Deduplicate extent_buffer init codeNikolay Borisov1-28/+1
When a new extent buffer is allocated there are a few mandatory fields which need to be set in order for the buffer to be sane: level, generation, bytenr, backref_rev, owner and FSID/UUID. Currently this is open coded in the callers of btrfs_alloc_tree_block, meaning it's fairly high in the abstraction hierarchy of operations. This patch solves this by simply moving this init code in btrfs_init_new_buffer, since this is the function which initializes a newly allocated extent buffer. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Remove fs_info from fixup_low_keysNikolay Borisov1-10/+8
This argument is unused. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: remove unused check of skip_lockingLiu Bo1-2/+5
The check is superfluous since all callers who set search_for_commit also have skip_locking set. ASSERT() is put in place to ensure skip_locking is set by new callers. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: remove always true check in unlock_upLiu Bo1-1/+1
As unlock_up() is written as for () { if (!path->locks[i]) break; ... if (... && path->locks[i]) { } } Apparently, @path->locks[i] is always true at this 'if'. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: grab write lock directly if write_lock_level is the max levelLiu Bo1-11/+16
Typically, when acquiring root node's lock, btrfs tries its best to get read lock and trade for write lock if @write_lock_level implies to do so. In case of (cow && (p->keep_locks || p->lowest_level)), write_lock_level is set to BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL, which means we need to acquire root node's write lock directly. In this particular case, the dance of acquiring read lock and then trading for write lock can be saved. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: move get root out of btrfs_search_slot to a helperLiu Bo1-45/+65
It's good to have a helper instead of having all get-root details open-coded. The new helper locks (if necessary) and sets root node of the path. Also invert the checks to make the code flow easier to read. There is no functional change in this commit. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: use more straightforward extent_buffer_uptodate checkLiu Bo1-1/+1
If parent_transid "0" is passed to btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), btrfs_buffer_uptodate() is equivalent to extent_buffer_uptodate(), but extent_buffer_uptodate() is preferred since we don't have to look into verify_parent_transid(). Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-30Btrfs: remove superfluous free_extent_buffer in read_block_for_searchLiu Bo1-1/+0
read_block_for_search() can be simplified as: tmp = find_extent_buffer(); if (tmp) return; ... free_extent_buffer(); read_tree_block(); Apparently, @tmp must be NULL at this point, free_extent_buffer() is not needed. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-17btrfs: fix reading stale metadata blocks after degraded raid1 mountsLiu Bo1-3/+3
If a btree block, aka. extent buffer, is not available in the extent buffer cache, it'll be read out from the disk instead, i.e. btrfs_search_slot() read_block_for_search() # hold parent and its lock, go to read child btrfs_release_path() read_tree_block() # read child Unfortunately, the parent lock got released before reading child, so commit 5bdd3536cbbe ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race") had used 0 as parent transid to read the child block. It forces read_tree_block() not to check if parent transid is different with the generation id of the child that it reads out from disk. A simple PoC is included in btrfs/124, 0. A two-disk raid1 btrfs, 1. Right after mkfs.btrfs, block A is allocated to be device tree's root. 2. Mount this filesystem and put it in use, after a while, device tree's root got COW but block A hasn't been allocated/overwritten yet. 3. Umount it and reload the btrfs module to remove both disks from the global @fs_devices list. 4. mount -odegraded dev1 and write some data, so now block A is allocated to be a leaf in checksum tree. Note that only dev1 has the latest metadata of this filesystem. 5. Umount it and mount it again normally (with both disks), since raid1 can pick up one disk by the writer task's pid, if btrfs_search_slot() needs to read block A, dev2 which does NOT have the latest metadata might be read for block A, then we got a stale block A. 6. As parent transid is not checked, block A is marked as uptodate and put into the extent buffer cache, so the future search won't bother to read disk again, which means it'll make changes on this stale one and make it dirty and flush it onto disk. To avoid the problem, parent transid needs to be passed to read_tree_block(). In order to get a valid parent transid, we need to hold the parent's lock until finishing reading child. This patch needs to be slightly adapted for stable kernels, the &first_key parameter added to read_tree_block() is from 4.16+ (581c1760415c4). The fix is to replace 0 by 'gen'. Fixes: 5bdd3536cbbe ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-14Btrfs: send, fix invalid access to commit roots due to concurrent snapshottingRobbie Ko1-2/+14
[BUG] btrfs incremental send BUG happens when creating a snapshot of snapshot that is being used by send. [REASON] The problem can happen if while we are doing a send one of the snapshots used (parent or send) is snapshotted, because snapshoting implies COWing the root of the source subvolume/snapshot. 1. When doing an incremental send, the send process will get the commit roots from the parent and send snapshots, and add references to them through extent_buffer_get(). 2. When a snapshot/subvolume is snapshotted, its root node is COWed (transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot()). 3. COWing releases the space used by the node immediately, through: __btrfs_cow_block() --btrfs_free_tree_block() ----btrfs_add_free_space(bytenr of node) 4. Because send doesn't hold a transaction open, it's possible that the transaction used to create the snapshot commits, switches the commit root and the old space used by the previous root node gets assigned to some other node allocation. Allocation of a new node will use the existing extent buffer found in memory, which we previously got a reference through extent_buffer_get(), and allow the extent buffer's content (pages) to be modified: btrfs_alloc_tree_block --btrfs_reserve_extent ----find_free_extent (get bytenr of old node) --btrfs_init_new_buffer (use bytenr of old node) ----btrfs_find_create_tree_block ------alloc_extent_buffer --------find_extent_buffer (get old node) 5. So send can access invalid memory content and have unpredictable behaviour. [FIX] So we fix the problem by copying the commit roots of the send and parent snapshots and use those copies. CallTrace looks like this: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1861! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 6 PID: 24235 Comm: btrfs Tainted: P O 3.10.105 #23721 ffff88046652d680 ti: ffff88041b720000 task.ti: ffff88041b720000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa08dd0e8>] read_node_slot+0x108/0x110 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffff88041b723b68 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff88043ca6b000 RBX: ffff88041b723c50 RCX: ffff880000000000 RDX: 000000000000004c RSI: ffff880314b133f8 RDI: ffff880458b24000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88041b723c66 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8803f3e48890 R13: ffff8803f3e48880 R14: ffff880466351800 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f8c321dc8c0(0000) GS:ffff88047fcc0000(0000) CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 R2: 00007efd1006d000 CR3: 0000000213a24000 CR4: 00000000003407e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Stack: ffff88041b723c50 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff8803f3e48890 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff880466351800 0000000000000001 ffffffffa08dd9d7 ffff88041b723c50 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff88041b723c66 ffffffffa08dde85 a9ff88042d2c4400 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa08dd9d7>] ? tree_move_down.isra.33+0x27/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa08dde85>] ? tree_advance+0xb5/0xc0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa08e83d4>] ? btrfs_compare_trees+0x2d4/0x760 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0982050>] ? finish_inode_if_needed+0x870/0x870 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa09841ea>] ? btrfs_ioctl_send+0xeda/0x1050 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa094bd3d>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1e3d/0x33f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81111133>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x373/0x990 [<ffffffff8153a096>] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81063256>] ? set_task_cpu+0xb6/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811122c3>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x143/0x2a0 [<ffffffff81539cc0>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1d0/0x500 [<ffffffff81062f07>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x57/0x90 [<ffffffff8115075a>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x4aa/0x990 [<ffffffff81034f83>] ? do_fork+0x113/0x3b0 [<ffffffff812dd7d7>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x6c [<ffffffff81150cc8>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x88/0xa0 [<ffffffff8153e422>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ---[ end trace 29576629ee80b2e1 ]--- Fixes: 7069830a9e38 ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.6+ Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-12btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sourcesDavid Sterba1-14/+1
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: update barrier in should_cow_blockDavid Sterba1-2/+2
Once there was a simple int force_cow that was used with the plain barriers, and then converted to a bit, so we should use the appropriate barrier helper. Other variables in the complex if condition do not depend on a barrier, so we should be fine in case the atomic barrier becomes a no-op. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first keyQu Wenruo1-6/+22
We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with valid generation and checksum. Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like: leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592 Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly. At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(), where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the child tree block. The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already modified to extract expected level from its call chain. While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such check: 1) Root node/leaf As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check. 2) Direct backref Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key all by ourselves, skip @first_key check. Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which is limited to node/leaf boundary. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: kill tree_mod_log_set_root_pointer helperDavid Sterba1-13/+7
A useless wrapper around tree_mod_log_insert_root that hides missing error handling. Move it to the callers. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: kill tree_mod_log_set_node_key helperDavid Sterba1-15/+17
A trivial wrapper that can be simply opencoded and makes the GFP allocation request more visible. The error handling is now moved to the callers. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: kill trivial wrapper tree_mod_log_eb_moveDavid Sterba1-15/+12
The wrapper is effectively an alias for tree_mod_log_insert_move but also hides the missing error handling. To make that more visible, lift the BUG_ON to the callers. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: remove trivial locking wrappers of tree mod logDavid Sterba1-39/+19
The wrappers are trivial and do not bring any extra value on top of the plain locking primitives. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from __tree_mod_log_oldest_rootDavid Sterba1-6/+5
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: embed tree_mod_move structure to tree_mod_elemDavid Sterba1-6/+4
The tree_mod_move is not used anywhere and can be embedded as anonymous structure. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop unused fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_eb_moveDavid Sterba1-7/+6
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_free_ebDavid Sterba1-7/+4
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_free_ebDavid Sterba1-9/+6
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_keyDavid Sterba1-15/+12
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_moveDavid Sterba1-13/+10
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_set_node_keyDavid Sterba1-11/+8
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-26btrfs: Remove redundant comment from btrfs_search_forwardNikolay Borisov1-3/+0
This function always sets keep_locks to 1 and saves the old value of keep_locks which is restored at the end. So there is no way it can be called without keep_locks being set. Remove comment imposing redundant requirement on callers. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-01-22btrfs: Improve btrfs_search_slot descriptionNikolay Borisov1-9/+21
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-01-22btrfs: Rename bin_search -> btrfs_bin_searchNikolay Borisov1-10/+4
Currently there are 2 function doing binary search on btrfs nodes: bin_search and btrfs_bin_search. The latter being a simple wrapper for the former. So eliminate the wrapper and just rename bin_search to btrfs_bin_search. No functional changes Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-01-22btrfs: Fix out of bounds access in btrfs_search_slotNikolay Borisov1-3/+9
When modifying a tree where the root is at BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 then the level variable is going to be 7 (this is the max height of the tree). On the other hand btrfs_cow_block is always called with "level + 1" as an index into the nodes and slots arrays. This leads to an out of bounds access. Admittdely this will be benign since an OOB access of the nodes array will likely read the 0th element from the slots array, which in this case is going to be 0 (since we start CoW at the top of the tree). The OOB access into the slots array in turn will read the 0th and 1st values of the locks array, which would both be 0 at the time. However, this benign behavior relies on the fact that the path being passed hasn't been initialised, if it has already been used to query a btree then it could potentially have populated the nodes/slots arrays. Fix it by explicitly checking if we are at level 7 (the maximum allowed index in nodes/slots arrays) and explicitly call the CoW routine with NULL for parent's node/slot. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Fixes-coverity-id: 711515 Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-07btrfs: handle errors while updating refcounts in update_ref_for_cowJeff Mahoney1-6/+12
Since commit fb235dc06fa (btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup accounting time out of commit trans) the assumption that btrfs_add_delayed_{data,tree}_ref can only return 0 or -ENOMEM has been false. The qgroup operations call into btrfs_search_slot and friends and can now return the full spectrum of error codes. Fortunately, the fix here is easy since update_ref_for_cow failing is already handled so we just need to bail early with the error code. Fixes: fb235dc06fa (btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup accounting ...) Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.11+ Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Edmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-10-30btrfs: pass root to various extent ref mod functionsJosef Bacik1-1/+1
We need the actual root for the ref verifier tool to work, so change these functions to pass the root around instead. This will be used in a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-10-30btrfs: Remove unused arguments from btrfs_changed_cb_tNikolay Borisov1-10/+5
btrfs_changed_cb_t represents the signature of the callback being passed to btrfs_compare_trees. Currently there is only one such callback, namely changed_cb in send.c. This function doesn't really uses the first 2 parameters, i.e. the roots. Since there are not other functions implementing the btrfs_changed_cb_t let's remove the unused parameters from the prototype and implementation. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-08-16btrfs: get fs_info from eb in btrfs_print_leaf, remove argumentDavid Sterba1-7/+7
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-19btrfs: adjust includes after vmalloc removalDavid Sterba1-1/+1
As we don't use vmalloc/vzalloc/vfree directly in ctree.c, we can now use the proper header that defines kvmalloc. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-19btrfs: rename btrfs_leaf_data to BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_OFFSETNikolay Borisov1-20/+20
Commit 5f39d397dfbe ("Btrfs: Create extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") refactored btrfs_leaf_data function to take extent_buffer rather than struct btrfs_leaf. However, as it turns out the parameter being passed is never used. Furthermore this function no longer returns the leaf data but rather the offset to it. So rename the function to BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_OFFSET to make it consistent with other BTRFS_LEAF_* helpers and turn it into a macro. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> [ removed () from the macro ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-05-10Merge branch 'for-linus-4.12' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-10/+10
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason: "This has fixes and cleanups Dave Sterba collected for the merge window. The biggest functional fixes are between btrfs raid5/6 and scrub, and raid5/6 and device replacement. Some of our pending qgroup fixes are included as well while I bash on the rest in testing. We also have the usual set of cleanups, including one that makes __btrfs_map_block() much more maintainable, and conversions from atomic_t to refcount_t" * 'for-linus-4.12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (71 commits) btrfs: fix the gfp_mask for the reada_zones radix tree Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks Btrfs: send, fix file hole not being preserved due to inline extent Btrfs: fix extent map leak during fallocate error path Btrfs: fix incorrect space accounting after failure to insert inline extent Btrfs: fix invalid attempt to free reserved space on failure to cow range btrfs: Handle delalloc error correctly to avoid ordered extent hang btrfs: Fix metadata underflow caused by btrfs_reloc_clone_csum error btrfs: check if the device is flush capable btrfs: delete unused member nobarriers btrfs: scrub: Fix RAID56 recovery race condition btrfs: scrub: Introduce full stripe lock for RAID56 btrfs: Use ktime_get_real_ts for root ctime Btrfs: handle only applicable errors returned by btrfs_get_extent btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup corruption caused by inode_cache mount option btrfs: use q which is already obtained from bdev_get_queue Btrfs: switch to div64_u64 if with a u64 divisor Btrfs: update scrub_parity to use u64 stripe_len Btrfs: enable repair during read for raid56 profile btrfs: use clear_page where appropriate ...
2017-05-09treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variantsMichal Hocko1-6/+3
There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-04-18btrfs: sink GFP flags parameter to tree_mod_log_insert_rootDavid Sterba1-5/+5
All (1) callers pass the same value. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-04-18btrfs: sink GFP flags parameter to tree_mod_log_insert_moveDavid Sterba1-5/+5
All (1) callers pass the same value. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-03-01Merge branch 'for-chris-4.11-part2' of ↵Chris Mason1-2/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.11
2017-02-28btrfs: remove BUG_ON from __tree_mod_log_insertDavid Sterba1-2/+0
All callers dereference the 'tm' parameter before it gets to this function, the NULL check does not make much sense here. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-24Btrfs: try harder to migrate items to left sibling before splitting a leafFilipe Manana1-0/+7
Before attempting to split a leaf we try to migrate items from the leaf to its right and left siblings. We start by trying to move items into the rigth sibling and, if the new item is meant to be inserted at the end of our leaf, we try to free from our leaf an amount of bytes equal to the number of bytes used by the new item, by setting the variable space_needed to the byte size of that new item. However if we fail to move enough items to the right sibling due to lack of space in that sibling, we then try to move items into the left sibling, and in that case we try to free an amount equal to the size of the new item from our leaf, when we need only to free an amount corresponding to the size of the new item minus the current free space of our leaf. So make sure that before we try to move items to the left sibling we do set the variable space_needed with a value corresponding to the new item's size minus the leaf's current free space. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2017-02-17btrfs: remove unused parameter from tree_move_next_or_upnextDavid Sterba1-4/+2
Not needed. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-17btrfs: remove unused parameter from tree_move_downDavid Sterba1-2/+2
Never needed. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-17btrfs: remove unused parameter from __push_leaf_leftDavid Sterba1-3/+2
Unused since long ago. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-17btrfs: remove unused parameter from __push_leaf_rightDavid Sterba1-3/+2
Unused since long ago. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-02-17btrfs: remove unused parameter from split_itemDavid Sterba1-3/+2
Never used. Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>