summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/bcachefs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-06-17bcachefs: fsck: Fix reattach_inode() for subvol rootsKent Overstreet1-0/+12
bch_subvolume.fs_path_parent needs to be updated as well, it should match inode.bi_parent_subvol. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: fsck: Fix remove_backpointer() for subvol rootsKent Overstreet1-1/+9
The dirent will be in a different snapshot if the inode is a subvolume root. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: fsck: Print path when we find a subvol loopKent Overstreet1-4/+9
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: Fix __bch2_inum_to_path() when crossing subvol boundariesKent Overstreet1-5/+22
The bch2_subvolume_get_snapshot() call needs to happen before the dirent lookup - the dirent is in the parent subvolume. Also, check for loops. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: Call bch2_fs_init_rw() early if we'll be going rwKent Overstreet5-7/+32
kthread creation checks for pending signals, which is _very_ annoying if we have to do a long recovery and don't go rw until we've done significant work. Check if we'll be going rw and pre-allocate kthreads/workqueues. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: fsck: Improve check_key_has_inode()Kent Overstreet2-22/+88
Print out more info when we find a key (extent, dirent, xattr) for a missing inode - was there a good inode in an older snapshot, full(ish) list of keys for that missing inode, so we can make better decisions on how to repair. If it looks like it should've been deleted, autofix it. If we ever hit the non-autofix cases, we'll want to write more repair code (possibly reconstituting the inode). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: don't return fsck_fix for unfixable node errors in __btree_errBharadwaj Raju1-1/+3
After cd3cdb1ef706 ("Single err message for btree node reads"), all errors caused __btree_err to return -BCH_ERR_fsck_fix no matter what the actual error type was if the recovery pass was scanning for btree nodes. This lead to the code continuing despite things like bad node formats when they earlier would have caused a jump to fsck_err, because btree_err only jumps when the return from __btree_err does not match fsck_fix. Ultimately this lead to undefined behavior by attempting to unpack a key based on an invalid format. Make only errors of type -BCH_ERR_btree_node_read_err_fixable cause __btree_err to return -BCH_ERR_fsck_fix when scanning for btree nodes. Reported-by: syzbot+cfd994b9cdf00446fd54@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: cd3cdb1ef706 ("bcachefs: Single err message for btree node reads") Signed-off-by: Bharadwaj Raju <bharadwaj.raju777@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: Fix pool->alloc NULL pointer dereferenceAlan Huang2-8/+24
btree_interior_update_pool has not been initialized before the filesystem becomes read-write, thus mempool_alloc in bch2_btree_update_start will trigger pool->alloc NULL pointer dereference in mempool_alloc_noprof Reported-by: syzbot+2f3859bd28f20fa682e6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: Move bset size check before csum checkAlan Huang1-20/+22
In syzbot's crash, the bset's u64s is larger than the btree node. Reported-by: syzbot+bfaeaa8e26281970158d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: mark more errors autofixKent Overstreet1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: Kill unused tracepointsKent Overstreet4-104/+9
Dead code cleanup. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/20250612224059.39fddd07@batman.local.home/ Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-17bcachefs: opts.journal_rewindKent Overstreet5-27/+69
Add a mount option for rewinding the journal, bringing the entire filesystem to where it was at a previous point in time. This is for extreme disaster recovery scenarios - it's not intended as an undelete operation. The option takes a journal sequence number; the desired sequence number can be determined with 'bcachefs list_journal' Caveats: - The 'journal_transaction_names' option must have been enabled (it's on by default). The option controls emitting of extra debug info in the journal, so we can see what individual transactions were doing; It also enables journalling of keys being overwritten, which is what we rely on here. - A full fsck run will be automatically triggered since alloc info will be inconsistent. Only leaf node updates to non-alloc btrees are rewound, since rewinding interior btree updates isn't possible or desirable. - We can't do anything about data that was deleted and overwritten. Lots of metadata updates after the point in time we're rewinding to shouldn't cause a problem, since we segragate data and metadata allocations (this is in order to make repair by btree node scan practical on larger filesystems; there's a small 64-bit per device bitmap in the superblock of device ranges with btree nodes, and we try to keep this small). However, having discards enabled will cause problems, since buckets are discarded as soon as they become empty (this is why we don't implement fstrim: we don't need it). Hopefully, this feature will be a one-off thing that's never used again: this was implemented for recovering from the "vfs i_nlink 0 -> subvol deletion" bug, and that bug was unusually disastrous and additional safeguards have since been implemented. But if it does turn out that we need this more in the future, I'll have to implement an option so that empty buckets aren't discarded immediately - lagging by perhaps 1% of device capacity. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: fsck: fix extent past end of inode repairKent Overstreet1-5/+26
Fix the case where we're deleting in a different snapshot and need to emit a whiteout - that requires a regular BTREE_ITER_filter_snapshots iterator. Also, only delete the part of the extent that extents past i_size. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: fsck: fix add_inode()Kent Overstreet1-1/+1
the inode btree uses the offset field for the inum, not the inode field. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Fix snapshot_key_missing_inode_snapshot repairKent Overstreet1-6/+4
When the inode was a whiteout, we were inserting a new whiteout at the wrong (old) snapshot. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Fix "now allowing incompatible features" messageKent Overstreet1-1/+1
Check against version_incompat_allowed, not version_incompat. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: pass last_seq into fs_journal_start()Kent Overstreet3-15/+9
Prep work for journal rewind, where the seq we're replaying from may be different than the last journal entry's last_seq. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: better __bch2_snapshot_is_ancestor() assertKent Overstreet1-3/+5
Previously, we weren't checking the result of the skiplist walk, just the is_ancestor bitmap. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: btree_iter: fix updates, journal overlayKent Overstreet1-12/+17
We need to start searching from search_key - _not_ path->pos, which will point to the key we found in the btree Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Fix bch2_journal_keys_peek_prev_min()Kent Overstreet1-2/+2
this code is rarely invoked, so - we had a few bugs left from basing it off of bch2_journal_keys_peek_max()... Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Delay calculation of trans->journal_u64sAlan Huang1-4/+7
When there is commit error that need split btree leaf, fsck might change the value of trans->journal_entries.u64s, when retry commit, the value of trans->journal_u64s would be incorrect, which will lead to trans->journal_res.u64s underflow, and then out of bounds write will occur: [ 464.496970][T11969] Call trace: [ 464.496973][T11969] show_stack+0x3c/0x88 (C) [ 464.496995][T11969] dump_stack_lvl+0xf8/0x178 [ 464.497014][T11969] dump_stack+0x20/0x30 [ 464.497031][T11969] __bch2_trans_log_str+0x344/0x350 [ 464.497048][T11969] bch2_trans_log_str+0x3c/0x60 [ 464.497065][T11969] __bch2_fsck_err+0x11bc/0x1390 [ 464.497083][T11969] bch2_check_discard_freespace_key+0xad4/0x10d0 [ 464.497100][T11969] bch2_bucket_alloc_freelist+0x99c/0x1130 [ 464.497117][T11969] bch2_bucket_alloc_trans+0x79c/0xcb8 [ 464.497133][T11969] bch2_bucket_alloc_set_trans+0x378/0xc20 [ 464.497151][T11969] __open_bucket_add_buckets+0x7fc/0x1c00 [ 464.497168][T11969] open_bucket_add_buckets+0x184/0x3a8 [ 464.497185][T11969] bch2_alloc_sectors_start_trans+0xa04/0x1da0 [ 464.497203][T11969] bch2_btree_reserve_get+0x6e0/0xef0 [ 464.497220][T11969] bch2_btree_update_start+0x1618/0x2600 [ 464.497239][T11969] bch2_btree_split_leaf+0xcc/0x730 [ 464.497258][T11969] bch2_trans_commit_error+0x22c/0xc30 [ 464.497276][T11969] __bch2_trans_commit+0x207c/0x4e30 [ 464.497292][T11969] bch2_journal_replay+0x9e0/0x1420 [ 464.497305][T11969] __bch2_run_recovery_passes+0x458/0xf98 [ 464.497318][T11969] bch2_run_recovery_passes+0x280/0x478 [ 464.497331][T11969] bch2_fs_recovery+0x24f0/0x3a28 [ 464.497344][T11969] bch2_fs_start+0xb80/0x1248 [ 464.497358][T11969] bch2_fs_get_tree+0xe94/0x1708 [ 464.497377][T11969] vfs_get_tree+0x84/0x2d0 Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Add missing EBUG_ONAlan Huang1-0/+2
Just like the EBUG_ON in bch2_journal_add_entry(). Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Fix alloc_req use after freeAlan Huang2-14/+35
Now the alloc_req is allocated from the bump allocator, if there is reallocation, the memory of alloc_req would be frees, fix by delaying the reallocation to transaction restart, it has to restart anyway. Reported-by: syzbot+2887a13a5c387e616a68@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: Don't allocate new memory when mempool is exhaustedAlan Huang1-25/+4
Allocating new memory when mempool is exhausted is too complicated, just return ENOMEM is fine. memcpy is not needed, since there might be pointers point to the old memory, that's the bug. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: btree iter tracepointsKent Overstreet2-5/+82
We've been seeing some livelock-ish behavior in the index update part of the main write path, and while we've got low level btree path tracepoints, we've been lacking high level btree iterator tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-16bcachefs: trace_extent_trim_atomicKent Overstreet2-1/+17
Add a tracepoint for when we insert only part of an extent, due to too many overwrites. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Don't trace should_be_locked unless changingKent Overstreet1-2/+4
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Ensure that snapshot creation propagates has_case_insensitiveKent Overstreet1-0/+10
We normally can't create a new directory with the case-insensitive option already set - except when we're creating a snapshot. And if casefolding is enabled filesystem wide, we should still set it even though not strictly required, for consistency. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Print devices we're mounting on multi device filesystemsKent Overstreet1-6/+14
Previously, we only ever logged the filesystem UUID. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Don't trust sb->nr_devices in members_to_text()Kent Overstreet1-4/+30
We have to be able to print superblock sections even if they fail to validate (for debugging), so we have to calculate the number of entries from the field size. Reported-by: syzbot+5138f00559ffb3cb3610@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Fix version checks in validate_bset()Kent Overstreet1-5/+11
It seems btree node scan picked up a partially overwritten btree node, and corrected the "bset version older than sb version_min" error - resulting in an invalid superblock with a bad version_min field. Don't run this check at all when we're in btree node scan, and when we do run it, do something saner if the bset version is totally crazy. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: ioctl: avoid stack overflow warningArnd Bergmann1-2/+2
Multiple ioctl handlers individually use a lot of stack space, and clang chooses to inline them into the bch2_fs_ioctl() function, blowing through the warning limit: fs/bcachefs/chardev.c:655:6: error: stack frame size (1032) exceeds limit (1024) in 'bch2_fs_ioctl' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 655 | long bch2_fs_ioctl(struct bch_fs *c, unsigned cmd, void __user *arg) By marking the largest two of them as noinline_for_stack, no indidual code path ends up using this much, which avoids the warning and reduces the possible total stack usage in the ioctl handler. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Don't pass trans to fsck_err() in gc_accounting_doneKent Overstreet1-1/+3
fsck_err() can return a transaction restart if passed a transaction object - this has always been true when it has to drop locks to prompt for user input, but we're seeing this more now that we're logging the error being corrected in the journal. gc_accounting_done() doesn't call fsck_err() from an actual commit loop, and it doesn't need to be holding btree locks when it calls fsck_err(), so the easy fix here for the unhandled transaction restart is to just not pass it the transaction object. We'll miss out on the fancy new logging, but that's ok. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Fix leak in bch2_fs_recovery() error pathKent Overstreet1-4/+4
Fix a small leak of the superblock 'clean' section. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Fix rcu_pending for PREEMPT_RTKent Overstreet1-11/+11
PREEMPT_RT redefines how standard spinlocks work, so local_irq_save() + spin_lock() is no longer equivalent to spin_lock_irqsave(). Fortunately, we don't strictly need to do it that way. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Fix downgrade_table_extra()Kent Overstreet1-1/+4
Fix a UAF: we were calling darray_make_room() and retaining a pointer to the old buffer. And fix an UBSAN warning: struct bch_sb_field_downgrade_entry uses __counted_by, so set dst->nr_errors before assigning to the array entry. Reported-by: syzbot+14c52d86ddbd89bea13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Don't put rhashtable on stackKent Overstreet1-9/+13
Object debugging generally needs special provisions for putting said objects on the stack, which rhashtable does not have. Reported-by: syzbot+bcc38a9556d0324c2ec2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Make sure opts.read_only gets propagated back to VFSKent Overstreet2-1/+11
If we think we're read-only but the VFS doesn't, fun will ensue. And now that we know we have to be able to do this safely, just make nochanges imply ro. Reported-by: syzbot+a7d6ceaba099cc21dee4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Fix possible console lock involved deadlockAlan Huang6-20/+8
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6822ab02.050a0220.f2294.00cb.GAE@google.com/T/ Reported-by: syzbot+2c3ef91c9523c3d1a25c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: mark more errors autofixKent Overstreet1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Don't persistently run scan_for_btree_nodesKent Overstreet2-3/+13
bch2_btree_lost_data() gets called on btree node read error, but the error might be transient. btree_node_scan is expensive, and there's no need to run it persistently (marking it in the superblock as required to run) - check_topology will run it if required, via bch2_get_scanned_nodes(). Running it non-persistently is fine, to avoid check_topology having to rewind recovery to run it. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Read error message now prints if self healingKent Overstreet2-2/+10
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Only run 'increase_depth' for keys from btree node csanKent Overstreet1-1/+12
bch2_btree_increase_depth() was originally for disaster recovery, to get some data back from the journal when a btree root was bad. We don't need it for that purpose anymore; on bad btree root we'll launch btree node scan and reconstruct all the interior nodes. If there's a key in the journal for a depth that doesn't exists, and it's not from check_topology/btree node scan, we should just ignore it. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Mark need_discard_freespace_key_bad autofixKent Overstreet1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Update /dev/disk/by-uuid on device addKent Overstreet1-0/+16
Invalidate pagecache after we write the new superblock and send a uevent. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Add more flags to btree nodes for rewrite reasonKent Overstreet4-6/+48
It seems excessive forced btree node rewrites can cause interior btree updates to become wedged during recovery, before we're using the write buffer for backpointer updates. Add more flags so we can determine where these are coming from. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Add range being updated to btree_update_to_text()Kent Overstreet2-2/+31
We had a deadlock during recovery where interior btree updates became wedged and all open_buckets were consumed; start adding more introspection. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Log fsck errors in the journalKent Overstreet1-0/+3
Log the specific error being corrected in the journal when we're repairing, this helps greatly with 'bcachefs list_journal' analysis. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-12bcachefs: Add missing restart handling to check_topology()Kent Overstreet1-35/+60
The next patch will add logging of the specific error being corrected in repair paths to the journal; this means __bch2_fsck_err() can return transaction restarts in places that previously weren't expecting them. check_topology() is old code that doesn't use btree iterators for btree node locking - it'll have to be rewritten in the future to work online. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-06-05Merge tag 'bcachefs-2025-06-04' of git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefsLinus Torvalds98-1757/+2323
Pull more bcachefs updates from Kent Overstreet: "More bcachefs updates: - More stack usage improvements (~600 bytes) - Define CLASS()es for some commonly used types, and convert most rcu_read_lock() uses to the new lock guards - New introspection: - Superblock error counters are now available in sysfs: previously, they were only visible with 'show-super', which doesn't provide a live view - New tracepoint, error_throw(), which is called any time we return an error and start to unwind - Repair - check_fix_ptrs() can now repair btree node roots - We can now repair when we've somehow ended up with the journal using a superblock bucket - Revert some leftovers from the aborted directory i_size feature, and add repair code: some userspace programs (e.g. sshfs) were getting confused It seems in 6.15 there's a bug where i_nlink on the vfs inode has been getting incorrectly set to 0, with some unfortunate results; list_journal analysis showed bch2_inode_rm() being called (by bch2_evict_inode()) when it clearly should not have been. - bch2_inode_rm() now runs "should we be deleting this inode?" checks that were previously only run when deleting unlinked inodes in recovery - check_subvol() was treating a dangling subvol (pointing to a missing root inode) like a dangling dirent, and deleting it. This was the really unfortunate one: check_subvol() will now recreate the root inode if necessary This took longer to debug than it should have, and we lost several filesystems unnecessarily, because users have been ignoring the release notes and blindly running 'fsck -y'. Debugging required reconstructing what happened through analyzing the journal, when ideally someone would have noticed 'hey, fsck is asking me if I want to repair this: it usually doesn't, maybe I should run this in dry run mode and check what's going on?' As a reminder, fsck errors are being marked as autofix once we've verified, in real world usage, that they're working correctly; blindly running 'fsck -y' on an experimental filesystem is playing with fire Up to this incident we've had an excellent track record of not losing data, so let's try to learn from this one This is a community effort, I wouldn't be able to get this done without the help of all the people QAing and providing excellent bug reports and feedback based on real world usage. But please don't ignore advice and expect me to pick up the pieces If an error isn't marked as autofix, and it /is/ happening in the wild, that's also something I need to know about so we can check it out and add it to the autofix list if repair looks good. I haven't been getting those reports, and I should be; since we don't have any sort of telemetry yet I am absolutely dependent on user reports Now I'll be spending the weekend working on new repair code to see if I can get a filesystem back for a user who didn't have backups" * tag 'bcachefs-2025-06-04' of git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs: (69 commits) bcachefs: add cond_resched() to handle_overwrites() bcachefs: Make journal read log message a bit quieter bcachefs: Fix subvol to missing root repair bcachefs: Run may_delete_deleted_inode() checks in bch2_inode_rm() bcachefs: delete dead code from may_delete_deleted_inode() bcachefs: Add flags to subvolume_to_text() bcachefs: Fix oops in btree_node_seq_matches() bcachefs: Fix dirent_casefold_mismatch repair bcachefs: Fix bch2_fsck_rename_dirent() for casefold bcachefs: Redo bch2_dirent_init_name() bcachefs: Fix -Wc23-extensions in bch2_check_dirents() bcachefs: Run check_dirents second time if required bcachefs: Run snapshot deletion out of system_long_wq bcachefs: Make check_key_has_snapshot safer bcachefs: BCH_RECOVERY_PASS_NO_RATELIMIT bcachefs: bch2_require_recovery_pass() bcachefs: bch_err_throw() bcachefs: Repair code for directory i_size bcachefs: Kill un-reverted directory i_size code bcachefs: Delete redundant fsck_err() ...