| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Correct spelling typo in printk
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
|
The driver core clears the driver data to NULL after device_release or on
probe failure, since commit 0998d0631001288a5974afc0b2a5f568bcdecb4d
(device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no driver is bound). Thus, it is
not needed to manually clear the device driver data to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
|
|
The devm_kzalloc function allocates memory that is released automatically,
when a driver detaches. Thus, there is no reason to explicitly call kfree
in probe or remove functions.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
|
|
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no
longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Sparse complains:
CHECK drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c
drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c:128:5: warning: symbol 'array_soc' was not declared. Should it be static?
CHECK drivers/power/88pm860x_charger.c
drivers/power/88pm860x_charger.c:640:3: warning: symbol 'pm860x_irq_descs' was not declared. Should it be static?
CHECK drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53: expected struct charger_regulator *charger_regulators
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53: got struct regulator_bulk_data static [toplevel] *
The issues are minor, except for the last one. We seemed to use
'regulator_bulk_data' struct (just as charger manager documentation
wrongly tells us), but in real it should have been
'struct charger_regulator'. The only reason that it worked is
because both 'supply' and 'regulator_name' struct members are the
first in these structs. :-)
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
|
|
There are charger and battery measurement feature for 88pm860x PMIC.
For charger, it can support pre-charge with small current when battery is
nearly exausted and then changed into fast-charge with CC&CV mode.
For battery monitor, it can support battery measurement such as
vbat,vsys,vchg and ibat etc,it can aslo accumulating the Coulomb value
charged or discharged from battery based on Conlomb Counter, we use it
to estimate battery capacity.
Signed-off-by: Jett.Zhou <jtzhou@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
|
