| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Make sure that work is cancelled after removing the i8042 filter, and
unregister the platform device rather than deleting it.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
|
|
The following build bug (x86, allyesconfig):
arch/x86/oprofile/built-in.o:(.data+0x250): multiple definition of `buffer_mutex'
Was triggered in -tip testing, caused by this upstream commit:
116ee77: dell-laptop: Use buffer with 32-bit physical address
There's multiple buffer_mutex's in the kernel. Make this new one
static.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
The Latitude C640 has another variation of dell in its DMI vendor entry.
Add it to the whitelist in order to enjoy the sweet fruits of software
backlight toggling.
Signed-off-by: Erik Andren <erik.andren@gmail.com>
|
|
Right now, we assume that the hardware rfkill switch on Dells toggles all
radio devices. In fact, this can be configured in the BIOS and so right
now we may mark a device as hardware killed even when it isn't. Add code
to query the devices controlled by the switch, and use this when
determining the hardware kill state of a radio.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
|
|
Calls to communicate with system firmware via a SMI (using dcdbas)
need to use a buffer that has a physical address of 4GB or less.
Currently the dell-laptop driver does not guarantee this, and when the
buffer address is higher than 4GB, the address is truncated to 32 bits
and the SMI handler writes to the wrong memory address.
Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart_hayes@dell.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
|
|
The Mini family doesn't support smbios 17,11 although it reports it does.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <superm1@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
|
|
The "hardware" switch is tied directly to a BIOS interface that will
connect and disconnect the hardware from the bus.
If you use the software interface to request the BIOS to make these
changes, the HW switch will be in an inconsistent state and LEDs may not
reflect the state of the HW.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
|
|
da_tokens was not being freed by dell-laptop on unload. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
|
|
dell-laptop currently fails to clean up its platform device correctly.
Make sure that it's unregistered.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
|
|
The rfkill interface on Dells only sends a notification that the switch
has been changed via the keyboard controller. Add a filter so we can
pick these notifications up and update the rfkill state appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
dell-laptop may not need to export any sysfs files, but it should still
create a platform device as a parent for the rfkill and backlight
devices. Otherwise sysfs will display these as "virtual" devices,
with no connection to either physical hardware or the dell-laptop
module.
Apparently this is useful for hardware detection.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
dell_setup_rfkill() already cleans up the rfkill devices on failure.
So if it returns an error, we should not try to unregister the rfkill
devices.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
The current code in dell-laptop is confused about the hardware rfkill
state. Fix it up such that it's always reported correctly.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
A polarity error snuck into the rfkill rewrite's dell-laptop
conversion, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
|
This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address
the following deficiencies:
* all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary
rather than having one central implementation
* updating the rfkill state cannot be done from arbitrary
contexts, forcing drivers to use schedule_work and requiring
lots of code
* rfkill drivers need to keep track of soft/hard blocked
internally -- the core should do this
* the rfkill API has many unexpected quirks, for example being
asymmetric wrt. alloc/free and register/unregister
* rfkill can call back into a driver from within a function the
driver called -- this is prone to deadlocks and generally
should be avoided
* rfkill-input pointlessly is a separate module
* drivers need to #ifdef rfkill functions (unless they want to
depend on or select RFKILL) -- rfkill should provide inlines
that do nothing if it isn't compiled in
* the rfkill structure is not opaque -- drivers need to initialise
it correctly (lots of sanity checking code required) -- instead
force drivers to pass the right variables to rfkill_alloc()
* the documentation is hard to read because it always assumes the
reader is completely clueless and contains way TOO MANY CAPS
* the rfkill code needlessly uses a lot of locks and atomic
operations in locked sections
* fix LED trigger to actually change the LED when the radio state
changes -- this wasn't done before
Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> [thinkpad]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
|
At the moment, dmi_walk() lacks flexibility, users can't pass data to
the callback function. Add a pointer for private data to make this
function more flexible.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
