summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/bonding
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-09-30bonding: trivial: remove forgotten bond_next_vlan()Veaceslav Falico1-1/+0
It's a forgotten function declaration, which was removed some time ago already. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: remove bond_next_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-31/+0
There are no users left, so it's safe to remove. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: don't use bond_next_slave() in bond_info_seq_next()Veaceslav Falico1-4/+12
We don't need the circular loop there and it's the only current user of bond_next_slave() - so just use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: remove unused __get_next_agg()Veaceslav Falico1-22/+0
It has no users, so it's safe to remove it completely. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: make bond_3ad_unbind_slave() use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-4/+9
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: make ad_agg_selection_logic() use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-12/+10
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). Also, remove the useless checks before calling bond_3ad_set_carrier() - if we have something NULL - it would fire long ago, in __get_first/next_port(), per example. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: make __get_active_agg() use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-8/+7
Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic. Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: make ad_port_selection_logic() use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-2/+7
Currently, ad_port_selection_logic() uses for (aggregator = __get_first_agg(port); aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { construct, however it's suboptimal, difficult to read and understand. Change it to a standard bond_for_each_slave(), so that we won't need __get_first/next_agg() and have it more readable. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: remove __get_first_port()Veaceslav Falico1-14/+4
Currently we have only one user of it, so it's kind of useless and just obfusicates things. Remove it and move the logic to the only user - bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: remove __get_next_port()Veaceslav Falico1-25/+9
Currently this function is only used in constructs like for (port = __get_first_port(bond); port; port = __get_next_port(port)) which is basicly the same as bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port); but a more time consuming. Remove the function and convert the users to bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: verify if we still have slaves in bond_3ad_unbind_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-1/+3
After commit 1f718f0f4f97145f4072d2d72dcf85069ca7226d ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the unlinking of the slave to the earliest position possible - so that nobody will see an half-uninited slave. However, bond_3ad_unbind_slave() relied that, even while removing the last slave, it is still accessible - via __get_first_agg() (and, eventually, bond_first_slave()). Fix that by verifying if the aggregator return is an actual aggregator, but not NULL. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-29bonding: correctly verify for the first slave in bond_enslaveVeaceslav Falico1-1/+1
After commit 1f718f0f4f97145f4072d2d72dcf85069ca7226d ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the actual 'linking' in the end of the function - so that, once linked, the slave is ready to be used, and is not still in the process of enslaving. However, 802.3ad verified if it's the first slave by looking at the if (bond_first_slave(bond) == new_slave) which, because we've moved the linking to the end, became broken - on the first slave bond_first_slave(bond) returns NULL. Fix this by verifying if the prev_slave, that equals bond_last_slave(), is actually populated - if it is - then it's not the first slave, and vice versa. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devicesVeaceslav Falico3-33/+1
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour. The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device bridge0. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bondVeaceslav Falico1-17/+3
Currently, we can have only one master upper neighbour, so it would be useful to create a symlink to it in the sysfs device directory, the way that bonding now does it, for every device. Lower devices from bridge/team/etc will automagically get it, so we could rely on it. Also, remove the same functionality from bonding. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: remove slave listsVeaceslav Falico2-6/+0
And all the initialization. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-5/+1
Use the new function __bond_next_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: add __bond_next_slave() which uses neighboursVeaceslav Falico1-0/+28
Add a new function, __bond_next_slave(), which uses neighbours to find the next slave after the slave provided. It will be further used to gradually go start using neighbour netdev_adjacent infrastructure instead of bonding's own lists. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: remove bond_prev_slave()Veaceslav Falico2-10/+3
We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighboursVeaceslav Falico1-6/+11
For that, use netdev_adjacent_get_private(list_head) on bond's lower neighbour list members. Also, add a small macro - bond_slave_list(bond), which returns the bond list via neighbour list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour listVeaceslav Falico1-1/+1
The same way as it was used for its own slave_list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use itVeaceslav Falico5-23/+25
Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable and easier to change in the future. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from()Veaceslav Falico1-13/+0
It has no users, so we can remove it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() to use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-14/+24
Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the next suitable slave. Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in *before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before, and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave. Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico1-31/+12
bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if it's suitable. After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up slave or the slave whose link came back earliest. We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it won't go away. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave()Veaceslav Falico2-23/+22
Currently, we're using bond_for_each_slave_from(), which is really hard to implement under RCU and/or neighbour list. Remove it and use bond_for_each_slave() instead, taking care of the last used slave. Also, rename next_rx_slave to rx_slave and store the current (last) rx_slave. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() onlyVeaceslav Falico1-24/+22
Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any suitable slave to send the packet through. Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found. Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit for readability. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit()Veaceslav Falico1-2/+3
We're safe agains removal there, cause we use neighbours primitives. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's privateVeaceslav Falico6-54/+96
It needs a list_head *iter, so add it wherever needed. Use both non-rcu and rcu variants. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse()Veaceslav Falico3-28/+30
We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart bond_for_each_dev() instead. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighboursVeaceslav Falico1-7/+1
It should be used under rtnl/bonding lock, so use the non-RCU version. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslaveVeaceslav Falico1-14/+16
Use the new provided function when attaching the lower slave to populate its ->private with struct slave *new_slave. Also, move it to the end to be able to 'find' it only after it was completely initialized, and deinitialize in the first place on release. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-27net: add adj_list to save only neighboursVeaceslav Falico2-5/+7
Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices. This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path. To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure - adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list), i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible, currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't change the main linked logic at all. Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following rules: netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_* If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to get better stack traces. CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-16bonding: Make alb learning packet interval configurableNeil Horman5-5/+47
running bonding in ALB mode requires that learning packets be sent periodically, so that the switch knows where to send responding traffic. However, depending on switch configuration, there may not be any need to send traffic at the default rate of 3 packets per second, which represents little more than wasted data. Allow the ALB learning packet interval to be made configurable via sysfs Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: Acked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-11bonding: fix bond_arp_rcv setting and arp validate desync statenikolay@redhat.com3-5/+19
We make bond_arp_rcv global so it can be used in bond_sysfs if the bond interface is up and arp_interval is being changed to a positive value and cleared otherwise as per Jay's suggestion. This also fixes a problem where bond_arp_rcv was set even though arp_validate was disabled while the bond was up by unsetting recv_probe in bond_store_arp_validate and respectively setting it if enabled. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> Acked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-11bonding: fix store_arp_validate race with mode changenikolay@redhat.com1-4/+10
We need to protect store_arp_validate via rtnl because it can race with mode changing and we can end up having arp_validate set in a mode different from active-backup. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: drop read_lock in bond_compute_featuresnikolay@redhat.com1-7/+3
bond_compute_features is always called with RTNL held, so we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: drop read_lock in bond_fix_featuresnikolay@redhat.com1-7/+3
We're protected by RTNL so nothing can happen and we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: simplify bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate and use RTNL for syncnikolay@redhat.com2-8/+7
We can drop the use of bond->lock for mutual exclusion in bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate and use RTNL in the sysfs store function instead. This way we'll prevent races with mode change and interface up/down as well as simplify update_lacp_rate by removing the check for port->slave because it'll always be initialized (done while enslaving with RTNL). This change will also help in the future removal of reader bond->lock from bond_enslave. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: trivial: remove outdated comment and bracesnikolay@redhat.com1-5/+1
We don't have to release all slaves when closing the bond dev, so remove the outdated comment and the braces around the left single statement. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: simplify and fix peer notificationnikolay@redhat.com1-15/+7
This patch aims to remove a use of the bond->lock for mutual exclusion which will later allow easier migration to RCU of the users of this functionality. We use RTNL as a synchronizing mechanism since it's always held when send_peer_notif is set, and when it is decremented from the notifier function. We can also drop some locking, and fix the leakage of the send_peer_notif counter. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: use rlb_client_info->vlan_id instead of ->tagVeaceslav Falico2-5/+4
Store VID in ->vlan_id (if any), and remove the useless ->tag. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04bonding: remove bond_vlan_used()Veaceslav Falico2-22/+2
We're using it currently to verify if we have vlans before getting the tag from the skb we're about to send. It's useless because the vlan_get_tag() verifies if the skb has the tag (and returns an error if not), and we can receive tagged skbs only if we *already* have vlans. Plus, the current RCUed implementation is kind of useless anyway - the we can remove the last vlan in the moment we return from the function. So remove the only usage of it and the whole function. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: pr_debug instead of pr_warn in bond_arp_send_allVeaceslav Falico1-8/+6
They're simply annoying and will spam dmesg constantly if we hit them, so convert to pr_debug so that we still can access them in case of debugging. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: remove vlan_list/current_alb_vlanVeaceslav Falico4-143/+2
Currently there are no real users of vlan_list/current_alb_vlan, only the helpers which maintain them, so remove them. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: make alb_send_learning_packets() use upper dev listVeaceslav Falico2-19/+11
Currently, if there are vlans on top of bond, alb_send_learning_packets() will never send LPs from the bond itself (i.e. untagged), which might leave untagged clients unupdated. Also, the 'circular vlan' logic (i.e. update only MAX_LP_BURST vlans at a time, and save the last vlan for the next update) is really suboptimal - in case of lots of vlans it will take a lot of time to update every vlan. It is also never called in any hot path and sends only a few small packets - thus the optimization by itself is useless. So remove the whole current_alb_vlan/MAX_LP_BURST logic from alb_send_learning_packets(). Instead, we'll first send a packet untagged and then traverse the upper dev list, sending a tagged packet for each vlan found. Also, remove the MAX_LP_BURST define - we already don't need it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: split alb_send_learning_packets()Veaceslav Falico1-24/+35
Create alb_send_lp_vid(), which will handle the skb/lp creation, vlan tagging and sending, and use it in alb_send_learning_packets(). This way all the logic remains in alb_send_learning_packets(), which becomes a lot more cleaner and easier to understand. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: use vlan_uses_dev() in __bond_release_one()Veaceslav Falico1-1/+1
We always hold the rtnl_lock() in __bond_release_one(), so use vlan_uses_dev() instead of bond_vlan_used(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: convert bond_has_this_ip() to use upper devicesVeaceslav Falico1-12/+13
Currently, bond_has_this_ip() is aware only of vlan upper devices, and thus will return false if the address is associated with the upper bridge or any other device, and thus will break the arp logic. Fix this by using the upper device list. For every upper device we verify if the address associated with it is our address, and if yes - return true. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: make bond_arp_send_all use upper device listVeaceslav Falico1-51/+51
Currently, bond_arp_send_all() is aware only of vlans, which breaks configurations like bond <- bridge (or any other 'upper' device) with IP (which is quite a common scenario for virt setups). To fix this we convert the bond_arp_send_all() to first verify if the rt device is the bond itself, and if not - to go through its list of upper vlans and their respectiv upper devices (if the vlan's upper device matches - tag the packet), if still not found - go through all of our upper list devices to see if any of them match the route device for the target. If the match is a vlan device - we also save its vlan_id and tag it in bond_arp_send(). Also, clean the function a bit to be more readable. CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-08-30bonding: use netdev_upper list in bond_vlan_usedVeaceslav Falico1-1/+14
Convert bond_vlan_used() to traverse the upper device list to see if we have any vlans above us. It's protected by rcu, and in case we are holding rtnl_lock we should call vlan_uses_dev() instead - it's faster. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>