Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Constify 'struct spi_nor_fixups' in order to respect flash_info
structure declaration.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211106102915.153552-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com
|
|
Clarify for what the flash_info flags are used for. Split them in
four categories and a bool:
1/ FLAGS: flags that indicate support that is not defined by the JESD216
standard in its SFDP tables.
2/ NO_SFDP_FLAGS: these flags are used when the flash does not define the
SFDP tables. These flags indicate support that can be discovered via
SFDP. Used together with SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP flag.
3/ FIXUP_FLAGS: flags that indicate support that can be discovered
via SFDP ideally, but can not be discovered for this particular flash
because the SFDP table that indicates this support is not defined by
the flash. In case the table for this support is defined but has wrong
values, one should instead use a post_sfdp() hook to set the SNOR_F
equivalent flag.
4/ MFR_FLAGS: manufacturer private flags. Used in the manufacturer
fixup hooks to differentiate support between flashes of the same
manufacturer.
5/ PARSE_SFDP: sets info->parse_sfdp to true. All flash_info entries
that support SFDP should be converted to set info->parse_sfdp to true.
SPI NOR flashes that statically declare one of the
SPI_NOR_{DUAL, QUAD, OCTAL, OCTAL_DTR}_READ flags and do not support
the RDSFDP command are gratuiously receiving the RDSFDP command
in the attempt of parsing the SFDP tables. It is not desirable to issue
commands that are not supported, so introduce PARSE_SFDP to help on this
situation.
New flash additions/updates should be declared/updated to use either
PARSE_SFDP or SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP. Once all the flash_info entries are
converted to use SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP or PARSE_SFDP, we can get rid of the
SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP flag and use just the bool nor->info->parse_sfdp to
determine whether to parse SFDP or not. SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP flag is kept
just as a way to differentiate whether a flash is converted to the new
flags logic or not.
Support that can be discovered when parsing SFDP should not be duplicated
by explicit flags at flash declaration. All the flash parameters will be
discovered when parsing SFDP. Sometimes manufacturers wrongly define some
fields in the SFDP tables. If that's the case, SFDP data can be amended
with the fixups() hooks. It is not common, but if the SFDP tables are
entirely wrong, and it does not worth the hassle to tweak the SFDP
parameters by using the fixups hooks, or if the flash does not define the
SFDP tables at all, then statically init the flash with the
SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP flag and specify the rest of flash capabilities with
the flash info flags.
With time, we want to convert all flashes to use PARSE_SFDP and
stop triggering the SFDP parsing with the
SPI_NOR_{DUAL, QUAD, OCTAL*}_READ flags. Getting rid of the
SPI_NOR_{OCTAL, OCTAL_DTR}_READ trigger is easily achievable,
the rest are a long term goal.
Manufacturer specific flags like USE_CLSR, USE_FSR, SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY,
will be removed in a future series.
No functional changes intended in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207140254.87681-7-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com
|
|
Macronix MX25L12805D supports locking with 4 block
protection bits in its status register. Add the corresponding
flag in order to clear these bits when unloking the flash.
Otherwise, the flash might not be writable depending on the state
left by the bootloader.
Tested-on: Ubiquiti UniFi AC Lite (ath79)
Signed-off-by: David Bauer <mail@david-bauer.net>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
|
|
According to macronix website, there is no mx66l51235l part number.
The chip detected as such is actually mx66l51235f. Rename the flash.
Do not update the mx66l51235l name from the spi_nor_dev_ids[], since
there are dt that are using this compatible.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 04b8edad262eec0d153005973dfbdd83423c0dcb.
mx25l51245g and mx66l51235l have the same flash ID. The flash
detection returns the first entry in the flash_info array that
matches the flash ID that was read, thus for the 0xc2201a ID,
mx25l51245g was always hit, introducing a regression for
mx66l51235l.
If one wants to differentiate the flash names, a better fix would be
to differentiate between the two at run-time, depending on SFDP,
and choose the correct name from a list of flash names, depending on
the SFDP differentiator.
Fixes: 04b8edad262e ("mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add support for mx25l51245g")
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210402082031.19055-2-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com
|
|
spi_nor_parse_sfdp(nor, nor->params);
passes for the second argument a member within the first argument.
Drop the second argument and obtain it directly from the first,
and do it across all the children functions. This is a follow up for
'commit 69a8eed58cc0 ("mtd: spi-nor: Don't copy self-pointing struct around")'
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210306095002.22983-4-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com
|
|
According to the mx25l12805d datasheet it supports using 4K or 64K sectors.
So lets add the SECT_4K to enable 4K sector usage.
Datasheet: https://www.mxic.com.tw/Lists/Datasheet/Attachments/7321/MX25L12805D,%203V,%20128Mb,%20v1.2.pdf
Cc: Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915100623.708736-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr
|
|
The Macronix mx66u2g45g is a 1.8V, 2Gbit (256MB) device that
supports x1, x2, or x4 operation.
Tested on Pensando SoC hardware with a cadence quadspi controller
via drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c, in x2 mode at 50MHz.
- random data write, erase, read - verified erase operations
- random data write, read/compare - verified write/read operations
Signed-off-by: David Clear <dac2@pensando.io>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200720163656.38006-2-dac2@pensando.io
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
|
The MX25R1635F is the smaller sibling of the MX25R3235F that is
already supported. It's only half the size (16Mb).
It was tested on the Kontron Electronics i.MX8MM SoM (N8010)
using raw read and write from and to the mtd device and
the 'flash_erase' command.
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
[tudor.ambarus@microchip.com: update subject]
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702140523.6811-1-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de
|
|
mx25u51245g is a mass production for new design and
replace mx66u51235f(phase out).
Validated by read, erase, read back, write and read back
on Xilinx Zynq PicoZed FPGA board which included
Macronix SPI Host (driver/spi/spi-mxic.c).
Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
|
mx25l51245g is a mass production for new design and
replace mx66l51235l(phase out).
Validated by read, erase, read back, write and read back
on Xilinx Zynq PicoZed FPGA board which included
Macronix SPI Host (driver/spi/spi-mxic.c).
Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
|
|
The SPI NOR controllers drivers must not be able to use structures that
are meant just for the SPI NOR core.
struct spi_nor_flash_parameter is filled at run-time with info gathered
from flash_info, manufacturer and sfdp data. struct spi_nor_flash_parameter
should be opaque to the SPI NOR controller drivers, make sure it is.
spi_nor_option_flags, spi_nor_read_command, spi_nor_pp_command,
spi_nor_read_command_index and spi_nor_pp_command_index are defined for the
core use, make sure they are opaque to the SPI NOR controller drivers.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
|
|
Create a SPI NOR manufacturer driver for Macronix chips, and move the
Macronix definitions outside of core.c.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
|